Evolvability of an RNA virus is determined by its mutational neighbourhood (original) (raw)

Nature volume 406, pages 625–628 (2000)Cite this article

Abstract

The ubiquity of mechanisms that generate genetic variation has spurred arguments that evolvability, the ability to generate adaptive variation, has itself evolved in response to natural selection1,2. The high mutation rate of RNA viruses is postulated to be an adaptation for evolvability3,4, but the paradox is that whereas some RNA viruses evolve at high rates4,5, others are highly stable5,6. Here we show that evolvability in the RNA bacteriophage φ6 is also determined by the accessibility of advantageous genotypes within the mutational neighbourhood (the set of mutants one or a few mutational steps away). We found that two φ6 populations that were derived from a single ancestral phage repeatedly evolved at different rates and toward different fitness maxima. Fitness measurements of individual phages showed that the fitness distribution of mutants differed between the two populations. Whereas population A, which evolved toward a higher maximum, had a distribution that contained many advantageous mutants, population B, which evolved toward a lower maximum, had a distribution that contained only deleterious mutants. We interpret these distributions to measure the fitness effects of genotypes that are mutationally available to the two populations. Thus, the /evolvability of φ6 is constrained by the distribution of its mutational neighbours, despite the fact that this phage has the characteristic high mutation rate of RNA viruses.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 51 print issues and online access

$199.00 per year

only $3.90 per issue

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Radman, M., Matic, I. & Taddei, F. Evolution of Evolvability. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 870, 146–155 ( 1999).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  2. Wagner, G. P., Chiu, C. & Hansen, T. F. Is Hsp90 a regulator of evolvability? J. Exp. Zool. 285, 116–118 (1999).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  3. Holland, J. et al. Rapid evolution of RNA genomes. Science 215, 1577–1585 (1982).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  4. Domingo, E. & Holland, J. J. in The Evolutionary Biology of Viruses (ed. Morse, S. S.) 161–184 (Raven, New York, 1994).
    Google Scholar
  5. Fraile, A. et al. A century of tobramovirus evolution in an Australian population of Nicotiana glauca. J. Virol. 71, 8316–8320 (1997).
    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  6. Chao, L. Evolution of sex and the molecular clock in RNA viruses. Gene 205, 301–308 (1997).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  7. Burch, C. L. & Chao, L. Evolution by small steps and rugged landscapes in the RNA virus φ6. Genetics 151, 921–927 (1999).
    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  8. Fenster, C. B., Galloway, L. F. & Chao, L. Epistasis and its consequences for the evolution of natural populations. Trends Ecol. Evol. 12, 282–286 (1997).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  9. Wright, S. The roles of mutation, inbreeding, crossbreeding and selection in evolution. Proc. Sixth Int. Congress Genetics 1, 356 –366 (1932).
    Google Scholar
  10. Eigen, M. New concepts for dealing with the evolution of nucleic acids. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 52, 307– 320 (1987).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  11. Kauffman, S. A. The Origins of Order. (Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 1993).
    Google Scholar
  12. Nijhuis, M. et al. Increased fitness of drug resistant HIV-1 protease as a result of acquisition of compensatory mutations during suboptimal therapy. AIDS 13, 2349–2359 ( 1999).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  13. Eigen, M. On the nature of viral quasispecies. Trends. Microbiol. 4, 212–214 (1996).
    Article Google Scholar
  14. Schuster, P. & Swetina, J. Stationary mutant distributions and evolutionary optimization. Bull. Math. Biol. 50 , 636–660 (1988).
    Article MathSciNet Google Scholar
  15. Vidaver, A. K., Kolski, R. K. & van Etten, J. L. Bacteriophage φ6: a lipid-containing virus of Pseudomonas phaseolicola. J. Virol. 11, 799–805 (1973).
    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  16. Mindich, L., Sinclair, J. F., Levine, D. & Cohen, J. Genetic studies of temperature-sensitive and nonsense mutants of bacteriophage φ6. Virology 75, 218–223 (1976).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  17. Chao, L., Trang, T. T. & Trang, T. T. The advantage of sex in the RNA virus φ6. Evolution 46, 289–299 ( 1997).
    Google Scholar
  18. Chao, L. Fitness of RNA virus decreased by Muller's ratchet. Nature 348, 454–455 (1990).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  19. Sokal, R. R. & Rohlf, F. J. Biometry 3rd edn (Freeman, San Francisco, 1995).
    MATH Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank our laboratory group for feedback, D. Metzgar for comments on manuscript and L. Mindich for discussion and stocks. Support was provided to C.L.B. by a predoctoral fellowship from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute and a Dissertation Improvement Grant from the National Science Foundation. Support was provided to L.C. by the University of California San Diego and the National Institutes of Health (NIGMS).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, 92093-0116, California, USA
    Christina L. Burch & Lin Chao

Authors

  1. Christina L. Burch
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  2. Lin Chao
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence toChristina L. Burch.

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Burch, C., Chao, L. Evolvability of an RNA virus is determined by its mutational neighbourhood .Nature 406, 625–628 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/35020564

Download citation