Genetic evidence for female host-specific races of the common cuckoo (original) (raw)

References

  1. Newton, A. A Dictionary of Birds. (Black, London, 1893).
    Book Google Scholar
  2. Baker, E. C. S. Cuckoo Problems. (Witherby, London, 1942).
    Google Scholar
  3. Brooke, M. de L. & Davies, N. B. Egg mimicry by cuckoos, Cuculus canorus, in relation to discrimination by hosts. Nature 335, 630–632 (1988).
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  4. Moksnes, A. & Røskaft, E. Egg-morphs and host preference in the common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus): an analysis of cuckoo and host eggs from European museum collections. J. Zool. 236 , 625–648 (1995).
    Article Google Scholar
  5. Marchetti, K., Nakamura, H. & Gibbs, H. L. Host race formation in the Common Cuckoo. Science 282, 471–472 ( 1998).
    Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  6. Punnett, R. C. Inheritance of egg-colour in the parasitic cuckoos. Nature 132, 892 (1933).
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  7. Davies, N. B. & Brooke, M. de L. An experimental study of co-evolution between the cuckoo, Cuculus canorus, and its hosts. II. Host egg markings, chick discrimination, and general discussion. J. Anim. Ecol. 58, 225–236 (1989).
    Article Google Scholar
  8. Davies, N. B. Cuckoos, Cowbirds and Other Cheats (Poyser, London, 2000).
    Google Scholar
  9. Gibbs, H. L., Brooke, M. de L., & Davies, N. B. Analysis of genetic differentiation of host races of the common cuckoo Cuculus canorus using mitochondrial and microsatellite DNA variation. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 263, 89–96 (1996).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  10. Nakamura, H. & Miyazawa, Y. Movements, space use and social organization of radio-tracked cuckoos during the breeding season in Japan. Jap. J. Ornithol. 46, 23– 53 (1997).
    Article Google Scholar
  11. Nakamura, H., Kubota, S. & Suzuki, R. in Parasitic Birds and Their Hosts (eds Rothstein, S. I. & Robinson, S. K.) 94–112 (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1998).
    Google Scholar
  12. Steel, M. A., Cooper, A. C. & Penny, D. Confidence intervals for the divergence time of two clades. System. Biol. 45, 127– 134 (1996).
    Article Google Scholar
  13. Avise, J. C. & Walker, D. Pleistocene phylogeographic effects on avian populations and the speciation process. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265, 457–463 ( 1998).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  14. Teuschl. Y., Taborsky, B. & Taborsky, M. How do cuckoos find their hosts? The role of habitat imprinting. Anim. Behav. 56, 1425– 1433 (1998).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  15. Brooke, M. de L. & Davies, N. B. A failure to demonstrate host imprinting in the common cuckoo Cuculus canorus and alternative hypotheses for the maintenance of egg mimicry. Ethology 89, 154–166 ( 1991).
    Article Google Scholar
  16. Collias, E. C. Inheritance of egg-colour polymorphism in the village weaver (Ploceus cucullatus ). Auk 110, 683–693 (1993).
  17. Schoffner, R. N. et al. The effect of a protoporphyrin mutant on some economic traits of the chicken. Poultry Sci. 61, 817– 820 (1982).
    Article Google Scholar
  18. Roldan, E. R. S. & Gomendio, M. The Y chromosome as a battleground for sexual selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14, 58–62 (1999).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  19. Kilner, R. M., Noble, D. G. & Davies, N. B. Signals of need in parent-offspring communication and their exploitation by the common cuckoo. Nature 397, 667–672 (1999).
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  20. Dawkins, R. Unweaving the Rainbow. (Allen Lane, London, 1998).
    Google Scholar
  21. Gibbs, H. L., De Sousa, L., Marchetti, K. & Nakamura, H. Isolation and characterization of microsatellite DNA loci for an obligate brood parasitic bird, the common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus). Mol. Ecol. 7, 1437–1439 (1998).
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  22. Swofford, D. PAUP, Ver. 4.0 (Sinauer Associates, 1999).
  23. Schneider, S., Kueffer, J. M., Roessli, D. & Excoffier, L. Arlequin ver. 1. 1: A Software for Population Genetic Data Analysis. (Genetics and Biometry Laboratory, Univ. Geneva, Switzerland, 1997).
    Google Scholar
  24. Raymond, M. & Rousset, F. An exact test for population differentiation. Evolution 49, 1280–1283 (1995).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  25. Hudson, R., Slatkin, M. & Maddison, W. Estimation of levels of gene flow from DNA sequence data. Genetics 132, 583– 589 (1992).
    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  26. Slatkin, M. A measure of population subdivision based on microsatellite allele frequencies. Genetics 139, 457–462 (1995).
    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  27. Excoffier, L., Smouse, P. E. & Quattro, J. M. Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA. Genetics 131, 479–491 ( 1992).
    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  28. Goodnight, K., Queller, D. C. & Poznansky, T. Kinship Ver. 1.2 (1997). Available on http://www.bioc.rice.edu/∼kfg/GSoft.html.
  29. Queller, D. C. & Goodnight, K. F. Estimating relatedness using genetic markers. Evolution 42, 258–275 (1989).
    Article Google Scholar
  30. Maddison, W. P. & Maddison, D. R. MacClade: Analysis of Phylogeny and Character Evolution. Ver. 3.0. (Sinauer Associates, 1992).
    Google Scholar

Download references