Myc and Max proteins possess distinct transcriptional activities (original) (raw)
- Letter
- Published: 01 October 1992
Nature volume 359, pages 426–429 (1992)Cite this article
- 893 Accesses
- 461 Citations
- 3 Altmetric
- Metrics details
Abstract
THE Myc family proteins are thought to be involved in transcription1,2 because they have both a carboxy-terminal basic–helix–loop–helix–zipper (bHLH-Z) domain, common to a large class of transcription factors3, and an amino-terminal fragment which, for c-Myc, has transactivating function when assayed in chimaeric constructs4. In addition, c-, N- and L-Myc proteins heterodimerize, in vitro and in vivo, with the bHLH-Z protein Max5–8. In vitro, Max homodimerizes but preferentially associates with Myc, which homodimerizes poorly5,6. Furthermore Myc-Max heterodimers specifically bind the nucleotide sequence CACGTG9 with higher affinity than either homodimer alone5. The identification of Max and the specific DNA-binding activities of Myc and Max provides an opportunity for directly testing the transcriptional activities of these proteins in mammalian cells. We report here that Myc overexpression activates, whereas Max overexpression represses, transcription of a reporter gene. Max-induced repression is relieved by overexpression of c-Myc. Repression requires the DNA-binding domain of Max, whereas relief of repression requires the dimerization and transcriptional activation activities of Myc. Both effects require Myc–Max-binding sites in the reporter gene.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Additional access options:
Similar content being viewed by others
References
- Kingston, R. E., Baldwin, A. S. & Sharp, P. A. Cell 41, 3–5 (1985).
Article CAS Google Scholar - Kaddurah-Daouk, R., Greene, J. M., Baldwin, A. S. & Kingston, R. E. Genes Dev. 1, 347–357 (1987).
Article CAS Google Scholar - Jones, N. Cell 61, 9–11 (1990).
Article CAS Google Scholar - Kato, G. J., Barrett, J., Villa-Garcia, M. & Dang, C. V. Molec. cell Biol. 10, 5914–5920 (1990).
Article CAS Google Scholar - Blackwood, E. M. & Eisenman, R. N. Science 251, 1211–1217 (1991).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar - Prendergast, G. C., Lawe, D. & Ziff, E. B. Cell 85, 395–407 (1991).
Article Google Scholar - Blackwood, E. M., Lüscher, B. & Eisenman, R. N. Genes Dev. 6, 71–80 (1992).
Article CAS Google Scholar - Wenzel, A., Cziepluch, C., Hamann, U., Schümann, J. & Schwab, M. EMBO J. 10, 3703–3712 (1991).
Article CAS Google Scholar - Blackwell, T. K., Kretzner, L., Blackwood, E. M., Eisenman, R. N. & Weintraub, H. Science 250, 1149–1151 (1990).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar - Hann, S. R., Thompson, C. B. & Eisenman, R. N. Nature 314, 366–369 (1985).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar - Gregor, P. D., Sawadogo, M. & Roeder, R. G. Genes Dev. 4, 1730–1740 (1990).
Article CAS Google Scholar - Beckman, H., Su, L.-K. & Kadesch, T. Genes Dev. 4, 167–179 (1990).
Article Google Scholar - Chiu, R. et al. Cell 54, 541–552 (1988).
Article CAS Google Scholar - Boyle, W. J. et al. Cell 64, 573–584 (1991).
Article CAS Google Scholar - Kato, G. J., Lee, W. M. F., Chen, L. & Dang, C. V. Genes Dev. 6, 81–92 (1992).
Article CAS Google Scholar - Hann, S. R. & Eisenman, R. N. Molec. cell. Biol. 4, 2486–2497 (1984).
Article CAS Google Scholar - Waters, C.M., Littlewood, T. D., Hancock, D. C., Moore, J. P. & Evan, G. I. Oncogene 6, 797–805 (1991).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar - Kelly, K., Cochran, B. H., Stiles, C. D. & Leder, P. Cell 35, 603–610 (1983).
Article CAS Google Scholar - Dean, M. et al. J. biol. Chem. 261, 9161–9166 (1986).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar - Ptashne, M. Nature 335, 683–689 (1988).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar - Rustgi, A. K., Dyson, N. & Bernards, R. Nature 352, 541–544 (1991).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar - Harland, R. & Weintraub, H. J. cell. Biol. 101, 1094–1099 (1985).
Article CAS Google Scholar - Gorman, C. M., Moffat, L. F. & Howard, B. H. Molec. cell. Biol. 2, 1044–1051 (1982).
Article CAS Google Scholar - Halazonetis, T. D. & Kandil, A. N. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 88, 6162–6166 (1991).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar - Nyborg, J. K. et al. J. biol. Chem. 265, 8237–8242 (1990).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar - Geballe, A. P. & Mocarski, E. S. J. Virol. 62, 3334–3340 (1988).
CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar - Berberich, S. J. & Cole, M. D. Genes Dev. 6, 166–176 (1992).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
- Division of Basic Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1124 Columbia Street, Seattle, Washington, 98104, USA
Leo Kretzner & Robert N. Eisenman - Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, 98195, USA
Elizabeth M. Blackwood
Authors
- Leo Kretzner
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar - Elizabeth M. Blackwood
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar - Robert N. Eisenman
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kretzner, L., Blackwood, E. & Eisenman, R. Myc and Max proteins possess distinct transcriptional activities.Nature 359, 426–429 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1038/359426a0
- Received: 23 April 1992
- Accepted: 14 August 1992
- Issue Date: 01 October 1992
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/359426a0