Lure of lie detectors spooks ethicists (original) (raw)

US companies are planning to profit from lie-detection technology that uses brain scans, but the move to commercialize a little-tested method is ringing ethical and scientific alarm bells. Helen Pearson reports.

Access through your institution

Buy or subscribe

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Access through your institution

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 52 print issues and online access

$199.00 per year

only $3.83 per issue

Learn more

Buy this article

• Purchase on SpringerLink
• Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

• Log in
• Learn about institutional subscriptions
• Read our FAQs
• Contact customer support

Related links

Related links

Related links in Nature Research

Ethicists urge caution over emotive power of brain scans

Brain-scan ethics come under the spotlight

Brain imaging could spot liars

The truth about lying

Outspoken nuclear scientist 'forced out' over polygraph row

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lure of lie detectors spooks ethicists.Nature 441, 918–919 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/441918a

Download citation

• Published: 21 June 2006
• Issue date: 22 June 2006
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/441918a

This article is cited by

• The Inheritance, Power and Predicaments of the “Brain-Reading” Metaphor

  • Frederic Gilbert
  • Lawrence Burns
  • Timothy Krahn
    Medicine Studies (2011)

• The Lie of fMRI: An Examination of the Ethics of a Market in Lie Detection Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

  • Amy E. White
    HEC Forum (2010)

• Actions speak louder than images

  • Apoorva Mandavilli
    Nature (2006)

• What's on your mind?

Nature Neuroscience (2006)