Dual personality of memory T cells (original) (raw)

Immunology

Nature volume 401, pages 659–660 (1999)Cite this article

Often, when a pathogen first infects the body, nothing happens — at least, not for several days. But when the same pathogen is encountered a second time, the response is rapid and vigorous. This phenomenon, known as immunological memory, is the basis for vaccination, yet very little is understood about how it protects the entire body so effectively. On page 708 of this issue, Sallusto et al.1 report that a newly identified cell-surface marker — the chemokine receptor CCR7 — can distinguish two subsets of T cells that carry immunological memory. These two subsets apparently circulate around the body by different pathways, and mediate the memory response in different ways. The results provide a new insight into the memory response, one that is relevant to basic immunology, as well as to vaccination strategies and the development of immunosuppressive therapies.

The immune system responds slowly to newly encountered pathogens owing to the relative lack of antigen-specific cells. New pathogens must first be transported to nearby lymphoid tissue, where the primary immune response develops and where naive lymphocytes and antigen-presenting cells interact. Two clonally expanded populations emanate from this primary response: ‘effector’ cells, which combat spread of the pathogen; and ‘memory’ cells, which guard against subsequent infections. Effector and memory cells are thought to be distributed to all tissues in the body, particularly epithelial surfaces (such as the skin and gut) where pathogens are likely to be re-encountered, so lymphocyte migration facilitates systemic immunological memory.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 51 print issues and online access

$199.00 per year

only $3.90 per issue

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Figure 1: Two types of memory T cell with different migration preferences.

References

  1. Sallusto, F., Lenig, D., Forster, R., Lipp, M. & Lanzavecchia, A. Nature 401, 708–712 (1999).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  2. Mackay, C. R. Adv. Immunol. 53, 217–265 (1993).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  3. Gunn, M. D. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 258–263 (1998).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  4. Gunn, M. D. et al. J. Exp. Med. 189, 451–460 (1999).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  5. Förster, R. et al. Cell 99, 23–33 (1999).
    Article Google Scholar
  6. Williams, M. B. & Butcher, E. C. J. Immunol. 159, 1746–1752 (1997).
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  7. Sallusto, F., Lanzavecchia, A. & Mackay, C. R. Immunol. Today 19, 568–574 (1998).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  8. Campbell, J. et al. Nature 400, 776–780 (1999).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  9. Jacob, J. & Baltimore, D. Nature 399, 593–597 (1999).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. the Garvan Institute of Medical Research, 384 Victoria Street, Darlinghurst, 2010, New South Wales, Australia
    Charles R. Mackay

Authors

  1. Charles R. Mackay
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence toCharles R. Mackay.

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mackay, C. Dual personality of memory T cells.Nature 401, 659–660 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1038/44309

Download citation