Should scientists study race and IQ? NO: Science and society do not benefit (original) (raw)
- Commentary
- Published: 01 February 2009
Darwin 200
Nature volume 457, pages 786–788 (2009)Cite this article
- 5154 Accesses
- 60 Altmetric
- Metrics details
In the first of two opposing commentaries, Steven Rose argues that studies investigating possible links between race, gender and intelligence do no good. In the second, Stephen Ceci and Wendy M. Williams argue that such research is both morally defensible and important for the pursuit of truth.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Additional access options:
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
- Steven Rose is a neuroscientist and emeritus professor at the Open University, UK. S.P.R.Rose@open.ac.uk ,
Steven Rose
Authors
- Steven Rose
You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
Additional information
See Editorial, page 763 , and online at http://www.nature.com/darwin . Discuss this commentary package on Nature Networks .
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rose, S. Should scientists study race and IQ? NO: Science and society do not benefit.Nature 457, 786–788 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/457786a
- Published: 01 February 2009
- Issue Date: 12 February 2009
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/457786a