Good governance for geoengineering (original) (raw)
- Comment
- Published: 16 November 2011
Environmental science
Nature volume 479, page 293 (2011) Cite this article
- 5517 Accesses
- 109 Citations
- 73 Altmetric
- Metrics details
Subjects
Phil Macnaghten and Richard Owen describe the first attempt to govern a climate-engineering research project.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
Thermosteric and dynamic sea level under solar geoengineering
- Chao Yue
- , Svetlana Jevrejeva
- … John C. Moore
npj Climate and Atmospheric Science Open Access 07 September 2023
Experimental reaction rates constrain estimates of ozone response to calcium carbonate geoengineering
- Zhen Dai
- , Debra K. Weisenstein
- … David W. Keith
Communications Earth & Environment Open Access 15 December 2020
Responsible Innovation and Climate Engineering. A Step Back to Technology Assessment
- Harald Stelzer
Philosophy of Management Open Access 19 February 2020
- Harald Stelzer
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 52 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.83 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to the full article PDF.
USD 39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Additional access options:
References
- Royal Society working group Geoengineering the Climate: Science, Governance and Uncertainty (Royal Society, 2009) available at http://go.nature.com/zxpwun
- Rayner, S., Redgwell, C., Savulescu, J., Pidgeon, N. & Kruger, T. Memorandum on Draft Principles for the Conduct of Geoengineering Research (House of Commons Science and Technology Committee Enquiry into The Regulation of Geoengineering; 2009).
Google Scholar - http://www.handsoffmotherearth.org/hose-experiment/spice-opposition-letter/
- Nurse, P. Letter to The Guardian 8 September 2011 available at http://go.nature.com/efnybg
Google Scholar
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
- Phil Macnaghten is professor of geography at Durham University, UK.,
Phil Macnaghten - Richard Owen is chair in responsible innovation at the University of Exeter Business School, UK.,
Richard Owen
Authors
- Phil Macnaghten
- Richard Owen
Corresponding authors
Correspondence toPhil Macnaghten or Richard Owen.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Macnaghten, P., Owen, R. Good governance for geoengineering.Nature 479, 293 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/479293a
- Published: 16 November 2011
- Issue date: 17 November 2011
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/479293a
This article is cited by
Comments
Commenting on this article is now closed.
- Chris Exley 24 November 2011, 12:46
Last week I sent an email to the corresponding author of this article asking about the nature of the particles which are planned to be used in these geoengineering projects. I have not received any reply. Several months ago I asked a contact I got via the EPSRC website, someone called Pidgeon at Cardiff, the same question. They eventually told me that they were not able to answer my simple question!
Does anybody out there know the answer to this?
Chris Exley - Phil Macnaghten 5 December 2011, 12:22
Dear Chris
I am afraid your email did not make it onto my server. To answer your question I propose you contact the PI on the SPICE project, Dr Matt Watson. You can contact him on Matt.Watson@bristol.ac.uk. Please note that the SPICE project is proposing to use water for the field test and that the nature of the particles themselves was not part of the Stagegate review process. I hope this helps.
Phil Macnaghten