Sex releases the speed limit on evolution (original) (raw)

Nature volume 420, pages 664–666 (2002)Cite this article

Abstract

Explaining the evolutionary maintenance of sex remains a key problem in evolutionary biology1,2,3. One potential benefit of sex is that it may allow a more rapid adaptive response when environmental conditions change, by increasing the efficiency with which selection can fix beneficial mutations4,5,6,7. Here I show that sex can increase the rate of adaptation in the facultatively sexual single-celled chlorophyte Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, but that the benefits of sex depend crucially on the size of the population that is adapting: sex has a marked effect in large populations but little effect in small populations. Several mechanisms have been proposed to explain the benefits of sex in a novel environment, including stochastic effects in small populations, clonal interference and epistasis between beneficial alleles. These results indicate that clonal interference is important in this system.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 51 print issues and online access

$199.00 per year

only $3.90 per issue

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Maynard Smith, J. The Evolution of Sex (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1978)
    Google Scholar
  2. Bell, G. The Masterpiece of Nature (Croom Helm, London, 1982)
    Google Scholar
  3. West, S. A., Lively, C. M. & Read, A. F. A pluralist approach to sex and recombination. J. Evol. Biol. 12, 1003–1012 (1999)
    Article Google Scholar
  4. Fisher, R. A. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection (Clarendon, Oxford, 1958)
    MATH Google Scholar
  5. Muller, H. J. Some genetic aspects of sex. Am. Nat. 66, 118–138 (1932)
    Article Google Scholar
  6. Otto, S. P. & Barton, N. H. The evolution of recombination: removing the limits to natural selection. Genetics 147, 879–906 (1997)
    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  7. Burt, A. Perspective: Sex, recombination, and the efficacy of selection—was Weismann right? Evolution 54, 337–351 (2000)
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  8. Gerrish, P. J. & Lenski, R. E. The fate of competing mutations in an asexual population. Genetica 102/103, 127–144 (1998)
    Article Google Scholar
  9. de Visser, J. A. G. M., Zeyl, C. W., Gerrish, P. J., Blanchard, J. L. & Lenski, R. E. Diminishing returns from mutation supply rates in asexual populations. Science 283, 404–406 (1999)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  10. Miralles, R., Gerrish, P. J., Moya, A. & Elena, S. F. Clonal interference and the evolution of RNA viruses. Science 285, 1745–1747 (1999)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  11. Otto, S. P. & Barton, N. H. Selection for recombination in small populations. Evolution 55, 1921–1931 (2001)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  12. Colegrave, N., Kaltz, O. & Bell, G. The ecology and genetics of fitness in Chlamydomonas. VIII. The dynamics of adaptation to novel environments after a single episode of sex. Evolution 56, 14–21 (2002)
    Article Google Scholar
  13. Vasi, F., Travisano, M. & Lenski, R. E. Long-term experimental evolution in Escherichia coli. 2. Changes in life-history traits during adaptation to a seasonal environment. Am. Nat. 144, 432–456 (1994)
    Article Google Scholar
  14. Goho, S. & Bell, G. Mild environmental stress elicits mutations affecting fitness in Chlamydomonas. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267, 123–129 (2000)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  15. Lenski, R. E., Rose, M. R., Simpson, S. C. & Tadler, S. C. Long-term experimental evolution in Escherichia coli. I. Adaptation and divergence during 2,000 generations. Am. Nat. 138, 1315–1341 (1991)
    Article Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank N. Barton, G. Bell, T. Johnson and S. Nee for discussion of this experiment and for comments on the manuscript; A. Poon for suggestions for improvement to earlier versions; S. Otto and A. Read for advice at early stages; and D. Haydon, L. Kruuk and M. Spencer for lengthy discussions on curve fitting. This work was supported by a NERC postdoctoral fellowship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Cell, Animal and Population Biology, University of Edinburgh, EH9 3JT, Edinburgh, UK
    Nick Colegrave

Authors

  1. Nick Colegrave
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence toNick Colegrave.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares that he has no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Colegrave, N. Sex releases the speed limit on evolution.Nature 420, 664–666 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01191

Download citation

This article is cited by