Solar wind dynamic pressure and electric field as the main factors controlling Saturn's aurorae (original) (raw)

Nature volume 433, pages 720–722 (2005)Cite this article

Abstract

The interaction of the solar wind with Earth's magnetosphere gives rise to the bright polar aurorae and to geomagnetic storms1, but the relation between the solar wind and the dynamics of the outer planets' magnetospheres is poorly understood. Jupiter's magnetospheric dynamics and aurorae are dominated by processes internal to the jovian system2, whereas Saturn's magnetosphere has generally been considered to have both internal and solar-wind-driven processes. This hypothesis, however, is tentative because of limited simultaneous solar wind and magnetospheric measurements. Here we report solar wind measurements, immediately upstream of Saturn, over a one-month period. When combined with simultaneous ultraviolet imaging3 we find that, unlike Jupiter, Saturn's aurorae respond strongly to solar wind conditions. But in contrast to Earth, the main controlling factor appears to be solar wind dynamic pressure and electric field, with the orientation of the interplanetary magnetic field playing a much more limited role. Saturn's magnetosphere is, therefore, strongly driven by the solar wind, but the solar wind conditions that drive it differ from those that drive the Earth's magnetosphere.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 51 print issues and online access

$199.00 per year

only $3.90 per issue

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dungey, J. W. Interplanetary magnetic field and the auroral zone. Phys. Rev. Lett. 6, 47–48 (1961)
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  2. Hill, T. W., Dessler, A. J. & Goertz, C. K. in Physics of the Jovian Magnetosphere (ed. Dessler, A. J.) 353–394 (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1983)
    Book Google Scholar
  3. Clarke, J. T. et al. Morphological differences of Saturn's ultraviolet aurorae and those of Earth and Jupiter. Nature doi:10.1038/nature03331 (this issue)
  4. Meurant, M., Gerard, J.-C., Blockx, C., Hubert, B. & Coumans, V. Propagation of electron and proton shock-induced aurora and the role of the interplanetary magnetic field and solar wind. J. Geophys. Res. 109, A10210, doi:10.1029/2004JA010453 (2004)
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  5. Cowley, S. W. H. & Bunce, E. J. Origin of the main auroral oval in Jupiter's coupled magnetosphere-ionosphere system. Planet. Space Sci. 49, 1067–1088 (2001)
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  6. Zarka, P. & Genova, F. Low frequency jovian emissions and solar wind magnetic sector structure. Nature 306, 767–768 (1983)
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  7. Desch, M. D. & Barrow, C. H. Direct evidence for solar wind control of Jupiter's hectometric wavelength radio emission. J. Geophys. Res. 89, 6819–6823 (1984)
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  8. Gurnett, D. A. et al. Control of Jupiter's radio emissions and aurorae by the solar wind. Nature 415, 985–987 (2002)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  9. Kivelson, M. G. & Southwood, D. J. First evidence of IMF control of Jovian magnetospheric boundary locations: Cassini and Galileo magnetic field measurements compared. Planet. Space Sci. 51, 891–898 (2003)
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  10. Southwood, D. J. & Kivelson, M. G. A new perspective concerning the influence of the solar wind on the Jovian magnetosphere. J. Geophys. Res. 106, 6123–6130 (2001)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  11. Cowley, S. W. H. & Bunce, E. J. Modulation of Jupiter's main auroral oval emissions by solar wind induced expansions and compressions of the magnetosphere. Planet. Space Sci. 51, 57–79 (2003)
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  12. Desch, M. D. Evidence for solar wind control of Saturn radio emission. J. Geophys. Res. 87, 4549–4554 (1982)
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  13. Young, D. T. et al. Cassini plasma spectrometer investigation. Space Sci. Rev. (in the press)
  14. Kurth, W. S. et al. An Earth-like correspondence between Saturn's auroral features and radio emission. Nature doi:10.1038/nature03334 (this issue)
  15. Hanlon, P. G. et al. On the evolution of the solar wind between 1 and 5AU at the time of the Cassini-Jupiter flyby: multi spacecraft observations of ICMEs including the formation of a merged interaction region. J. Geophys. Res. 109, A09S03, doi:10.1029/2003JA010112 (2004)
    Google Scholar
  16. Tóth, G. General code for modeling MHD flows on parallel computers: Versatile advection code. Astrophys. Lett. Commun. 34, 245–250 (1996)
    ADS Google Scholar
  17. Akasofu, S.-I. The solar wind-magnetosphere energy coupling and magnetospheric disturbances. Planet. Space Sci. 28, 495–509 (1980)
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  18. Russell, C. T. & McPherron, R. L. Semiannual variation of geomagnetic activity. J. Geophys. Res. 78, 92–108 (1973)
    Article ADS Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

F.J.C., B.L.B., J.T.S. and D.T.Y. were supported by NASA through a Jet Propulsion Laboratory contract with SWRI; D.G.M., K.C.H. and W.S.K. were supported through other NASA/JPL contracts; P.G.H. was supported by a PPARC-UK quota studentship; and J.C.G. and D.G. were supported by the Belgian Foundation for Scientific Research (FNRS) and the PRODEX program of the ESA. This work is based on observations with the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope, obtained at the Space Telescope Science Institute, which is operated by the AURA, Inc., for NASA.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Southwest Research Institute, Culebra Road, San Antonio, Texas, 78288, USA
    F. J. Crary & D. T. Young
  2. Boston University, 725 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts, 02215, USA
    J. T. Clarke
  3. Blackett Laboratory, Imperial College of Science and Technology, London, SW7 2BZ, UK
    M. K. Dougherty & P. G. Hanlon
  4. The University of Michigan, Space Research Building, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, USA
    K. C. Hansen
  5. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, 87545, USA
    J. T. Steinberg & B. L. Barraclough
  6. University College London, Mullard Space Science Laboratory, Surrey, RH5 6NT, UK
    A. J. Coates & A. M. Rymer
  7. Université de Liège, 17 avenue du 6 aout, B4000, Liège, Belgium
    J.-C. Gérard & D. Grodent
  8. Department of Physics and Astronomy, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, 52242, USA
    W. S. Kurth
  9. Applied Physics Laboratory, Johns Hopkins University, 11100 Johns Hopkins Road, Laurel, Maryland, 20723, USA
    D. G. Mitchell

Authors

  1. F. J. Crary
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  2. J. T. Clarke
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  3. M. K. Dougherty
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  4. P. G. Hanlon
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  5. K. C. Hansen
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  6. J. T. Steinberg
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  7. B. L. Barraclough
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  8. A. J. Coates
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  9. J.-C. Gérard
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  10. D. Grodent
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  11. W. S. Kurth
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  12. D. G. Mitchell
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  13. A. M. Rymer
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  14. D. T. Young
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence toF. J. Crary.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Crary, F., Clarke, J., Dougherty, M. et al. Solar wind dynamic pressure and electric field as the main factors controlling Saturn's aurorae.Nature 433, 720–722 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03333

Download citation

This article is cited by

Editorial Summary

Saturn's aurora

The cover shows Hubble Space Telescope (HST) images of Saturn and its polar auroral emissions on 24, 26 and 28 January 2004. Visible wavelength images are combined with ultraviolet images of the south polar region. The strong brightening of the aurora on 28 January corresponded with a large disturbance in the solar wind. These images were obtained during a campaign by the Cassini spacecraft to measure the solar wind approaching Saturn and the Saturn kilometric emissions, and the combined results are presented in three letters in this issue. Saturn's aurorae differ in shape and form from those seen on Earth and on Jupiter, and they also differ in their response to the solar wind. Saturn's strongest radio emissions appear to be closely tied to the polar aurora.