Male-specific fruitless specifies the neural substrates of Drosophila courtship behaviour (original) (raw)

Nature volume 436, pages 395–400 (2005)Cite this article

Abstract

Robust innate behaviours are attractive systems for genetically dissecting how environmental cues are perceived and integrated to generate complex behaviours. During courtship, Drosophila males engage in a series of innate, stereotyped behaviours that are coordinated by specific sensory cues. However, little is known about the specific neural substrates mediating this complex behavioural programme1. Genetic, developmental and behavioural studies have shown that the fruitless (fru) gene encodes a set of male-specific transcription factors (FruM) that act to establish the potential for courtship in Drosophila2. FruM proteins are expressed in ∼2% of central nervous system neurons, at least one subset of which coordinates the component behaviours of courtship3,4. Here we have inserted the yeast GAL4 gene into the fru locus by homologous recombination and show that (1) FruM is expressed in subsets of all peripheral sensory systems previously implicated in courtship, (2) inhibition of FruM function in olfactory system components reduces olfactory-dependent changes in courtship behaviour, (3) transient inactivation of all FruM-expressing neurons abolishes courtship behaviour, with no other gross changes in general behaviour, and (4) ‘masculinization’ of FruM-expressing neurons in females is largely sufficient to confer male courtship behaviour. Together, these data demonstrate that FruM proteins specify the neural substrates of male courtship.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 51 print issues and online access

$199.00 per year

only $3.90 per issue

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Greenspan, R. J. & Ferveur, J. F. Courtship in Drosophila. Annu. Rev. Genet. 34, 205–232 (2000)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  2. Baker, B. S., Taylor, B. J. & Hall, J. C. Are complex behaviors specified by dedicated regulatory genes? Reasoning from Drosophila. Cell 105, 13–24 (2001)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  3. Lee, G. et al. Spatial, temporal, and sexually dimorphic expression patterns of the fruitless gene in the Drosophila central nervous system. J. Neurobiol. 43, 404–426 (2000)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  4. Manoli, D. S. & Baker, B. S. Median bundle neurons coordinate behaviours during Drosophila male courtship. Nature 430, 564–569 (2004)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  5. Ryner, L. C. et al. Control of male sexual behavior and sexual orientation in Drosophila by the fruitless gene. Cell 87, 1079–1089 (1996)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  6. Gong, W. J. & Golic, K. G. Ends-out, or replacement, gene targeting in Drosophila. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 2556–2561 (2003)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  7. Keil, T. A. Fine structure of the pheromone-sensitive sensilla on the antenna of the hawkmoth, Manduca sexta. Tissue Cell 21, 139–151 (1989)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  8. Boekhoff-Falk, G. Hearing in Drosophila: development of Johnston's organ and emerging parallels to vertebrate ear development. Dev. Dyn. 232, 550–558 (2005)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  9. Ewing, A. W. The neuromuscular basis of courtship song in Drosophila: The role of direct and axillary wing muscles. J. Comp. Physiol. 130, 87–93 (1979)
    Article Google Scholar
  10. Smith, S. A. & Shepherd, D. Central afferent projections of proprioceptive sensory neurons in Drosophila revealed with the enhancer-trap technique. J. Comp. Neurol. 364, 311–323 (1996)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  11. Scott, K. C., Taubman, A. D. & Geyer, P. K. Enhancer blocking by the Drosophila gypsy insulator depends upon insulator anatomy and enhancer strength. Genetics 153, 787–798 (1999)
    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  12. Spieth, H. T. Courtship behavior in Drosophila. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 19, 385–405 (1974)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  13. Acebes, A., Cobb, M. & Ferveur, J. F. Species-specific effects of single sensillum ablation on mating position in Drosophila. J. Exp. Biol. 206, 3095–3100 (2003)
    Article Google Scholar
  14. Wolfner, M. F. The gifts that keep on giving: physiological functions and evolutionary dynamics of male seminal proteins in Drosophila. Heredity 88, 85–93 (2002)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  15. Billeter, J. C. & Goodwin, S. F. Characterization of Drosophila fruitless-gal4 transgenes reveals expression in male-specific fruitless neurons and innervation of male reproductive structures. J. Comp. Neurol. 475, 270–287 (2004)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  16. Kondoh, Y., Kaneshiro, K. Y., Kimura, K. & Yamamoto, D. Evolution of sexual dimorphism in the olfactory brain of Hawaiian Drosophila. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 270, 1005–1013 (2003)
    Article Google Scholar
  17. Vaias, L. J., Napolitano, L. M. & Tompkins, L. Identification of stimuli that mediate experience-dependent modification of homosexual courtship in Drosophila melanogaster. Behav. Genet. 23, 91–97 (1993)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  18. Larsson, M. C. et al. Or83b encodes a broadly expressed odorant receptor essential for Drosophila olfaction. Neuron 43, 703–714 (2004)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  19. Shyamala, B. V. & Chopra, A. Drosophila melanogaster chemosensory and muscle development: identification and properties of a novel allele of scalloped and of a new locus, SG18.1, in a Gal4 enhancer trap screen. J. Genet. 78, 87–97 (1999)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  20. McBride, S. M. et al. Mushroom body ablation impairs short-term memory and long-term memory of courtship conditioning in Drosophila melanogaster. Neuron 24, 967–977 (1999)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  21. Strauss, R. The central complex and the genetic dissection of locomotor behaviour. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 12, 633–638 (2002)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  22. Acebes, A., Grosjean, Y., Everaerts, C. & Ferveur, J. F. Cholinergic control of synchronized seminal emissions in Drosophila. Curr. Biol. 14, 704–710 (2004)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  23. Lee, G. & Hall, J. C. Abnormalities of male-specific FRU protein and serotonin expression in the CNS of fruitless mutants in Drosophila. J. Neurosci. 21, 513–526 (2001)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  24. Anand, A. et al. Molecular genetic dissection of the sex-specific and vital functions of the Drosophila melanogaster sex determination gene fruitless. Genetics 158, 1569–1595 (2001)
    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  25. Eberl, D. F., Duyk, G. M. & Perrimon, N. A genetic screen for mutations that disrupt an auditory response in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 14837–14842 (1997)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  26. Liu, K. S. & Sternberg, P. W. Sensory regulation of male mating behavior in Caenorhabditis elegans. Neuron 14, 79–89 (1995)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  27. Shah, N. M. et al. Visualizing sexual dimorphism in the brain. Neuron 43, 313–319 (2004)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  28. Song, H. J. et al. The fruitless gene is required for the proper formation of axonal tracts in the embryonic central nervous system of Drosophila. Genetics 162, 1703–1724 (2002)
    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  29. Kitamoto, T. Conditional disruption of synaptic transmission induces male–male courtship behavior in Drosophila. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 13232–13237 (2002)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  30. Goodwin, S. F. et al. Aberrant splicing and altered spatial expression patterns in fruitless mutants of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 154, 725–745 (2000)
    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank T. Clandinin and members of the Baker laboratory for discussions and comments on this manuscript, J. Sekelsky for the gift of the pWhiteOut2 vector, A. O'Reilly and M. Simon for technical advice, Y.-S. Liu for help with dissections, M. Siegal for help with statistics, and G. Bohm for preparation of culture materials and fly food. This work was supported by an NINDS grant to B.J.T., J.C.H. and B.S.B.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Neurosciences Program,
    Devanand S. Manoli
  2. Department of Biological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California, 94305, USA
    Devanand S. Manoli & Bruce S. Baker
  3. Department of Zoology, Oregon State University, Oregon, 97331-2914, Corvallis, USA
    Margit Foss & Barbara J. Taylor
  4. Department of Biology, Brandeis University, Massachusetts, 02254, Waltham, USA
    Adriana Villella & Jeffrey C. Hall

Authors

  1. Devanand S. Manoli
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  2. Margit Foss
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  3. Adriana Villella
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  4. Barbara J. Taylor
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  5. Jeffrey C. Hall
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  6. Bruce S. Baker
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence toBruce S. Baker.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Reprints and permissions information is available at npg.nature.com/reprintsandpermissions. The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Figure S1

This figure shows courtship index values (CI) for males with and without FruM function. (PDF 707 kb)

Supplementary Figure S2

This figure shows FruM expression in pharate males (a), where low levels of protein can be detected in regions previously not seen, as well as decreased numbers of cells in central brain clusters. (PDF 2912 kb)

Supplementary Figure S3

This figure shows fruP1-gal4, FruM, and fruP1-derived RNA in periperal structures. (PDF 4863 kb)

Supplementary Figure S4

This figure shows fruP1-gal4 expression in CNS components of the visual olfactory, and auditory systems. (PDF 4232 kb)

Supplementary Figure S5

This figure shows a female masculinized in fruP1-gal4 neurons displaying wing extension and vibration when a wild-type male in the chamber produces wing song. (PDF 658 kb)

Supplementary Video S1

This movie shows the behaviour of groups of control and fruP1-GAL4, UAS-shi TS males at restrictive temperatures (31C), illustrating that inhibition of synaptic transmission in fruP1-gal4 neurons does not appear to affects general behaviour in adult males. (MOV 2158 kb)

Supplementary Figures and Video Legends

Legends to accompany the above Supplementary Figures and Supplementary Video. (DOC 23 kb)

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Manoli, D., Foss, M., Villella, A. et al. Male-specific fruitless specifies the neural substrates of Drosophila courtship behaviour.Nature 436, 395–400 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03859

Download citation

This article is cited by

Editorial Summary

Courtship in the genes

During courtship, male Drosophila fruitflies perform a series of innate stereotyped behaviours in response to specific sensory cues. Now the set of nerve cells that govern this behaviour has been identified. Inactivation of these neurons is sufficient to make male flies lose interest in mating, and altering female brains to produce the same proteins produced by these cells causes the females to display male courtship routines. The neurons produce a set of proteins called FruM, encoded by the fruitless (fru) gene, which has previously been implicated in courtship in male fruitflies. Inactivation of FruM-producing nerve cells inhibited courtship without changing other behaviours. And manipulating females' nerve cells so as to produce FruM was enough to cause them to view other females as potential mates.