Origin of avian genome size and structure in non-avian dinosaurs (original) (raw)

Nature volume 446, pages 180–184 (2007)Cite this article

Abstract

Avian genomes are small and streamlined compared with those of other amniotes by virtue of having fewer repetitive elements and less non-coding DNA1,2. This condition has been suggested to represent a key adaptation for flight in birds, by reducing the metabolic costs associated with having large genome and cell sizes3,4. However, the evolution of genome architecture in birds, or any other lineage, is difficult to study because genomic information is often absent for long-extinct relatives. Here we use a novel bayesian comparative method to show that bone-cell size correlates well with genome size in extant vertebrates, and hence use this relationship to estimate the genome sizes of 31 species of extinct dinosaur, including several species of extinct birds. Our results indicate that the small genomes typically associated with avian flight evolved in the saurischian dinosaur lineage between 230 and 250 million years ago, long before this lineage gave rise to the first birds. By comparison, ornithischian dinosaurs are inferred to have had much larger genomes, which were probably typical for ancestral Dinosauria. Using comparative genomic data, we estimate that genome-wide interspersed mobile elements, a class of repetitive DNA, comprised 5–12% of the total genome size in the saurischian dinosaur lineage, but was 7–19% of total genome size in ornithischian dinosaurs, suggesting that repetitive elements became less active in the saurischian lineage. These genomic characteristics should be added to the list of attributes previously considered avian but now thought to have arisen in non-avian dinosaurs, such as feathers5, pulmonary innovations6, and parental care and nesting7.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 51 print issues and online access

$199.00 per year

only $3.90 per issue

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hillier, L. W. et al. Sequence and comparative analysis of the chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution. Nature 432, 695–716 (2004)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  2. Ellengren, H. The avian genome uncovered. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20, 180–186 (2005)
    Article Google Scholar
  3. Hughes, A. L. Adaptive Evolution of Genes and Genomes. (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1999)
    Google Scholar
  4. Hughes, A. L. & Hughes, M. K. Small genomes for better flyers. Nature 377, 391 (1995)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  5. Xu, X., Zhou, Z. & Prum, R. O. Branched integumental structures in Sinornithosaurus and the origin of feathers. Nature 410, 200–204 (2001)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  6. O'Connor, P. M. & Claessens, P. A. M. Basic avian pulmonary design and flow-through ventilation in non-avian theropod dinosaurs. Nature 436, 253–256 (2005)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  7. Horner, J. R. & Makela, R. Nest of juveniles provides evidence of family structure among dinosaurs. Nature 282, 296–298 (1979)
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  8. Gregory, T. R. Animal Genome Size Database 〈http://www.genomesize.com/〉 (2005)
    Google Scholar
  9. Van den Bussche, R. A. How bats achieve a small C-value: frequency of repetitive DNA in Macrotus. Mamm. Genome 6, 521–525 (1995)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  10. Waltari, E. & Edwards, S. V. Evolutionary dynamics of intron size, genome size, and physiological correlates in archosaurs. Am. Nat. 160, 539–552 (2002)
    Article Google Scholar
  11. Tiersch, T. R. & Wachtel, S. S. On the evolution of genome size of birds. J. Hered. 82, 363–368 (1991)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  12. Raup, D. M. Extinction: Bad Genes or Bad Luck? 3–21 (W. W. Norton & Company, New York, 1992)
    Google Scholar
  13. Conway Morris, S. & Harper, E. Genome size in conodonts (Chordata): inferred variations during 270 million years. Science 241, 1230–1232 (1988)
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  14. Masterson, J. Stomatal size in fossil plants: Evidence for polyploidy in majority of angiosperms. Science 264, 421–423 (1994)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  15. Thomson, K. S. & Muraszko, K. Estimation of cell size and DNA content in fossil fishes and amphibians. J. Exp. Zool. 205, 315–320 (1978)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  16. Gregory, T. R. The bigger the C-value, the larger the cell: Genome size and red blood cell size in vertebrates. Blood Cells Mol. Dis. 27, 830–843 (2001)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  17. Pagel, M. D. Inferring evolutionary processes from phylogenies. Zool. Scr. 26, 331–348 (1997)
    Article Google Scholar
  18. Pagel, M. D. Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution. Nature 401, 877–884 (1999)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  19. Gregory, T. R. & Hebert, P. D. N. The modulation of DNA content: proximate causes and ultimate consequences. Genome Res. 9, 317–324 (1999)
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  20. Langer, M. C. in The Dinosauria (eds Weishampel, D. B., Dodson, P. & Osmólska, H.) 25–46 (Univ. California Press, Berkeley, 2004)
    Book Google Scholar
  21. Kazazian, H. H. Mobile elements: Drivers of genome evolution. Science 303, 1626–1632 (2004)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  22. Shedlock, A. M. et al. Phylogenomics of non-avian reptiles and the structure of the ancestral amniote genome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 2767–2772 (2007)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  23. Shedlock, A. M. Phylogenomic investigation of CR1 LINE diversity in reptiles. Syst. Biol. 55, 902–911 (2006)
    Article Google Scholar
  24. Petrov, D. A. Evolution of genome size: new approaches to an old problem. Trends Genet. 17, 23–28 (2001)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  25. Kozlowski, J., Konarzewski, M. & Gawelczyk, A. T. Cell size as a link between noncoding DNA and metabolic rate scaling. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 14080–14085 (2003)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  26. Cavalier-Smith, T. in The Evolution of Genome Size (ed. Cavalier-Smith, T.) 104–184 (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 1985)
    Google Scholar
  27. Szarski, H. Cell size and the concept of wasteful and frugal evolutionary strategies. J. Theor. Biol. 105, 201–209 (1983)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  28. Erickson, G. M., Curry-Rogers, K. & Yerby, S. A. Dinosaurian growth patterns and rapid avian growth rates. Nature 412, 429–433 (2001)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  29. Padian, K., Horner, J. R. & de Ricqlès, A. J. Growth in small dinosaurs and pterosaurs: the evolution of archosaurian growth strategies. J. Vert. Paleontol. 24, 555–571 (2004)
    Article Google Scholar
  30. Gilks, W. R., Richardson, S. & Spiegelhalter, D. J. in Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice (eds Gilks, W. R., Richardson, S. & Spiegelhalter, D. J.) 1–19 (Chapman and Hall, London, 1996)
    MATH Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard University and the Gabriel Laboratory for Cellular and Molecular Paleontology at the Museum of the Rockies for access to histology sections. We also thank D. Smith at the Imaging Center in the Department of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Harvard University for facilitating microscopy, A. Crompton and J. Horner for offering materials, laboratory space, and discussions on palaeohistology, and D. Jablonski and T. Garland for discussions. We are grateful for comments from B. Jennings, N. Hobbs and M. Laurin, which have improved this manuscript. This research was supported by an NIH Postdoctoral Fellowship granted to C.L.O., an NSF grant to S.V.E. and a NERC grant to M.P.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, 26 Oxford Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA,
    Chris L. Organ, Andrew M. Shedlock & Scott V. Edwards
  2. School of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, RG6 6AJ, UK,
    Andrew Meade & Mark Pagel

Authors

  1. Chris L. Organ
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  2. Andrew M. Shedlock
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  3. Andrew Meade
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  4. Mark Pagel
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  5. Scott V. Edwards
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence toChris L. Organ.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Reprints and permissions information is available at www.nature.com/reprints. The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary Notes, Supplementary Data, Supplementary Figure 1, Supplementary Tables 1-8 and additional references. (PDF 398 kb)

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Organ, C., Shedlock, A., Meade, A. et al. Origin of avian genome size and structure in non-avian dinosaurs.Nature 446, 180–184 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05621

Download citation

This article is cited by

Editorial Summary

Chicken and genome question

One of the less well known factors associated with flight in vertebrates is a reduction of the size of the genome. Birds have remarkably small genomes compared with other vertebrates, and bats tend to have smaller genomes than do non-flying mammals. But does flight cause genome loss, or does genome loss predispose animals to take flight? The latter seems to be the case, to judge from an extensive analysis of bone cell volume and genome size in dinosaurs. Genome reduction can be traced deep into the lineage of saurischian dinosaurs — the dinosaur group of which the birds are the only surviving members — but not in ornithischian dinosaurs.