Do abnormal responses show utilitarian bias? (original) (raw)
- Brief Communications Arising
- Published: 20 March 2008
Nature volume 452, page E5 (2008) Cite this article
- 2153 Accesses
- 78 Citations
- 5 Altmetric
- Metrics details
Abstract
Arising from: M. Koenigs et al. Nature 446, 908–911 (2007)10.1038/nature05631; Koenigs et al. reply
Neuroscience has recently turned to the study of utilitarian and non-utilitarian moral judgement. Koenigs et al.1 examine the responses of normal subjects and those with ventromedial–prefrontal–cortex (VMPC) damage to moral scenarios drawn from functional magnetic resonance imaging studies by Greene et al.2,3,4, and claim that patients with VMPC damage have an abnormally “utilitarian” pattern of moral judgement. It is crucial to the claims of Koenigs et al. that the scenarios of Greene et al. pose a conflict between utilitarian consequence and duty: however, many of them do not meet this condition. Because of this methodological problem, it is too early to claim that VMPC patients have a utilitarian bias.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
- Koenigs, M. et al. Damage to the prefrontal cortex increases utilitarian moral judgements. Nature 446, 908–911 (2007)
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar - Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M. & Cohen, J. D. An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science 293, 2105–2108 (2001)
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar - Greene, J. D. & Haidt, J. How (and where) does moral judgment work? Trends Cogn. Sci. 6, 517–523 (2002)
Article Google Scholar - Greene, J. D., Nystrom, L. E., Engell, A. D., Darley, J. M. & Cohen, J. D. The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment. Neuron 44, 389–400 (2004)
Article CAS Google Scholar - Singer, P. Ethics and intuitions. J. Ethics 9, 331–352 (2005)
Article Google Scholar - Ciaramelli, E., Muccioli, M., Làdavas, E. & di Pellegrino, G. Selective deficit in personal moral judgment following damage to ventromedial prefrontal cortex. Social Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 2, 84–89 (2007)
Article Google Scholar
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
- Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 1PT, UK
Guy Kahane - Department of Philosophy, ENCAP, University of Cardiff, Cardiff CF10 3EU, UK
Nicholas Shackel - Future of Humanity Institute, Faculty of Philosophy & James Martin 21st Century School, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 1PT, UK
Nicholas Shackel
Authors
- Guy Kahane
- Nicholas Shackel
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kahane, G., Shackel, N. Do abnormal responses show utilitarian bias?.Nature 452, E5 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06785
- Received: 29 August 2007
- Accepted: 17 January 2008
- Issue date: 20 March 2008
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06785