Visual but not trigeminal mediation of magnetic compass information in a migratory bird (original) (raw)

Nature volume 461, pages 1274–1277 (2009)Cite this article

Abstract

Magnetic compass information has a key role in bird orientation1,2,3, but the physiological mechanisms enabling birds to sense the Earth’s magnetic field remain one of the unresolved mysteries in biology2,4. Two biophysical mechanisms have become established as the most promising magnetodetection candidates. The iron-mineral-based hypothesis suggests that magnetic information is detected by magnetoreceptors in the upper beak and transmitted through the ophthalmic branch of the trigeminal nerve to the brain5,6,7,8,9,10. The light-dependent hypothesis suggests that magnetic field direction is sensed by radical pair-forming photopigments in the eyes11,12,13,14,15 and that this visual signal is processed in cluster N, a specialized, night-time active, light-processing forebrain region16,17,18,19. Here we report that European robins with bilateral lesions of cluster N are unable to show oriented magnetic-compass-guided behaviour but are able to perform sun compass and star compass orientation behaviour. In contrast, bilateral section of the ophthalmic branch of the trigeminal nerve in European robins did not influence the birds’ ability to use their magnetic compass for orientation. These data show that cluster N is required for magnetic compass orientation in this species and indicate that it may be specifically involved in processing of magnetic compass information. Furthermore, the data strongly suggest that a vision-mediated mechanism underlies the magnetic compass in this migratory songbird, and that the putative iron-mineral-based receptors in the upper beak connected to the brain by the trigeminal nerve6,7,8 are neither necessary nor sufficient for magnetic compass orientation in European robins.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 51 print issues and online access

$199.00 per year

only $3.90 per issue

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wiltschko, W. & Wiltschko, R. Magnetic compass of European robins. Science 176, 62–64 (1972)
    Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
  2. Wiltschko, W. & Wiltschko, R. Magnetic compass orientation in birds and its physiological basis. Naturwissenschaften 89, 445–452 (2002)
    Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
  3. Cochran, W. W., Mouritsen, H. & Wikelski, M. Free-flying migrating songbirds recalibrate their magnetic compass daily from sunset cues. Science 304, 405–408 (2004)
    Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
  4. Mouritsen, H. & Ritz, T. Magnetoreception and it use in bird navigation. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 15, 406–414 (2005)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  5. Kirschvink, J. L. & Gould, J. L. Biogenic magnetite as a basis for magnetic field sensitivity in animals. Biosystems 13, 181–201 (1981)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  6. Walker, M. M. et al. Structure and function of the vertebrate magnetic sense. Nature 390, 371–376 (1997)
    Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
  7. Williams, N. M. & Wild, J. M. Trigeminally innervated iron-containing structures in the beak of homing pigeons, and other birds. Brain Res. 889, 243–246 (2001)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  8. Fleissner, G. et al. Ultrastructural analysis of a putative magnetoreceptor in the beak of homing pigeons. J. Comp. Neurol. 458, 350–360 (2003)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  9. Fleissner, G., Stahl, B., Thalau, P., Falkenberg, G. & Fleissner, G. A novel concept of Fe-mineral-based magnetoreception: histological and physicochemical data from the upper beak of homing pigeons. Naturwissenschaften 94, 631–642 (2007)
    Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
  10. Mora, C. V., Davison, M., Wild, J. M. & Walker, M. M. Magnetoreception and its trigeminal mediation in the homing pigeon. Nature 432, 508–511 (2004)
    Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
  11. Ritz, T., Adem, S. & Schulten, K. A model for photoreceptor-based magnetoreception in birds. Biophys. J. 78, 707–718 (2000)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  12. Ritz, T., Thalau, P., Phillips, J. B., Wiltschko, R. & Wiltschko, W. Resonance effects indicate radical pair mechanism for avian magnetic compass. Nature 429, 177–180 (2004)
    Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
  13. Mouritsen, H. et al. Cryptochromes and activity markers co-localize in bird retina during magnetic orientation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 14294–14299 (2004)
    Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
  14. Liedvogel, M. et al. Chemical magnetoreception: bird cryptochrome 1a is excited by blue light and forms long-lived radical-pairs. PLoS ONE 2, e1106 (2007)
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  15. Ritz, T. et al. Magnetic compass of birds is based on a molecule with optimal directional sensitivity. Biophys. J. 96, 3451–3457 (2009)
    Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
  16. Mouritsen, H., Feenders, G., Liedvogel, M., Wada, K. & Jarvis, E. D. A night vision brain area in migratory songbirds. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 8339–8344 (2005)
    Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
  17. Liedvogel, M. et al. Lateralised activation of cluster N in the brains of migratory songbirds. Eur. J. Neurosci. 25, 1166–1173 (2007)
    Article Google Scholar
  18. Heyers, D., Manns, M., Luksch, H., Güntürkün, O. & Mouritsen, H. A visual pathway links brain structures active during magnetic compass orientation in migratory birds. PLoS ONE 2, e937 (2007)
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  19. Feenders, G. et al. Molecular mapping of movement-associated areas in the avian brain: a motor theory for vocal learning origin. PLoS ONE 3, e1768 (2008)
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  20. Emlen, S. T. & Emlen, J. T. A technique for recording migratory orientation of captive birds. Auk 83, 361–367 (1966)
    Article Google Scholar
  21. Mouritsen, H., Feenders, G., Hegemann, A. & Liedvogel, M. Thermal paper can replace typewriter correction paper in Emlen funnels. J. Ornithol. 150, 713–715 (2009)
    Article Google Scholar
  22. Barami, K., Iversen, K., Furneaux, H. & Goldman, S. A. Hu protein as an early marker of neuronal phenotypic differentiation by subependymal zone cells of the adult songbird forebrain. J. Neurobiol. 28, 82–101 (1995)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  23. Pasternak, T. & Hodos, W. Intensity difference thresholds after lesions of the visual Wulst in pigeons. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 91, 485–497 (1977)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  24. Åkesson, S. & Sandberg, R. Migratory orientation of passerines at dusk, night and dawn. Ethology 98, 177–191 (1994)
    Article Google Scholar
  25. Beason, R. & Semm, P. Does the avian ophthalmic nerve carry magnetic navigational information? J. Exp. Biol. 199, 1241–1244 (1996)
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  26. Presti, D. & Pettigrew, J. D. Ferromagnetic coupling to muscle receptors as a basis for geomagnetic field sensitivity in animals. Nature 285, 99–101 (1980)
    Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
  27. Dennis, T. E., Raynor, M. J. & Walker, M. M. Evidence that pigeons orient to geomagnetic intensity during homing. Proc. R. Soc. B 274, 1153–1158 (2007)
    Article Google Scholar
  28. Gagliardo, A., Ioale, P., Savini, M. & Wild, J. M. Having the nerve to home: olfactory versus magnetoreceptor mediation of homing in pigeons. J. Exp. Biol. 209, 2888–2892 (2006)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  29. Gagliardo, A., Ioalè, P., Savini, M. & Wild, J. M. Navigational abilities of homing pigeons deprived of olfactory or trigeminally mediated magnetic information when young. J. Exp. Biol. 211, 2046–2051 (2008)
    Article Google Scholar
  30. Kirschvink, J. L. Uniform magnetic fields and double-wrapped coil systems: improved techniques for the design of bioelectromagnetic experiments. Bioelectromagnetics 13, 401–411 (1992)
    Article CAS Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank M. Bourdonnais, D. Hugo, A. Kittel, C. Mora and several volunteer students for assistance, E. Jarvis for scientific discussions, Blumberg GmbH, Rattingen, Germany for providing the thermal paper, the workshops of the University of Oldenburg for building huts, magnetic coil systems and electronic controls and J. Rahn for assistance in the planetarium of the Fachhochschule Oldenburg/Elsfleth. Financial support was provided by the Volkswagenstiftung (to H.M. and D.H.) and by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (to H.M.).

Author Contributions H.M. designed and supervised the study. M.Z., C.M.H., S.E. and J.H. performed and M.Z. and C.M.H. supervised the majority of the orientation experiments. M.Z., C.M.H., S.E., J.H. and H.M. analysed the orientation results. J.M.W. and D.H. performed the surgeries. D.H. did the post-mortem histological analyses. D.D. performed the lesion analyses using AMIRA. S.W. and D.K. performed and analysed the operant conditioning. N.-L.S. suggested and made crucial improvements to the experimental set-up. H.M., M.Z., J.M.W. and D.H. wrote most of the paper. All authors read and commented on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. AG Neurosensorik/Animal Navigation, IBU, University of Oldenburg, D-26111 Oldenburg, Germany
    Manuela Zapka, Dominik Heyers, Christine M. Hein, Svenja Engels, Nils-Lasse Schneider, Jörg Hans, Simon Weiler, David Dreyer, Dmitry Kishkinev & Henrik Mouritsen
  2. Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand,
    J. Martin Wild

Authors

  1. Manuela Zapka
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  2. Dominik Heyers
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  3. Christine M. Hein
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  4. Svenja Engels
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  5. Nils-Lasse Schneider
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  6. Jörg Hans
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  7. Simon Weiler
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  8. David Dreyer
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  9. Dmitry Kishkinev
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  10. J. Martin Wild
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  11. Henrik Mouritsen
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence toHenrik Mouritsen.

Supplementary information

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zapka, M., Heyers, D., Hein, C. et al. Visual but not trigeminal mediation of magnetic compass information in a migratory bird .Nature 461, 1274–1277 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08528

Download citation

This article is cited by

Editorial Summary

Bird navigation: flying by eye

How do birds find their way home? All agree that animals tap into Earth's magnetic field to create an internal 'compass' sense. But there agreement ends; some researchers promote the idea that magnetism is detected by magnetic bodies in the beak wired to the trigeminal nerve, others that magnetism is transduced through the eye via a complex light-sensitive mechanism. Support for the latter view, a role for the eye, comes from a neurosurgical and behavioural study of European robins. Birds with lesions in a brain centre called 'cluster N' are found deficient in magnetic orientation. And in this migratory species, at least, the putative magnetoreceptor in the beak plays no part in magnetic compass orientation.