eIF5 has GDI activity necessary for translational control by eIF2 phosphorylation (original) (raw)

• Kapp, L. D. & Lorsch, J. R. The molecular mechanics of eukaryotic translation. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 73, 657–704 (2004)
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Sonenberg, N. & Hinnebusch, A. G. Regulation of translation initiation in eukaryotes: mechanisms and biological targets. Cell 136, 731–745 (2009)
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Scheuner, D. et al. Control of mRNA translation preserves endoplasmic reticulum function in beta cells and maintains glucose homeostasis. Nature Med. 11, 757–764 (2005)
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Costa-Mattioli, M. et al. eIF2α phosphorylation bidirectionally regulates the switch from short- to long-term synaptic plasticity and memory. Cell 129, 195–206 (2007)
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Mohr, I. Neutralizing innate host defenses to control viral translation in HSV-1 infected cells. Int. Rev. Immunol. 23, 199–220 (2004)
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Algire, M. A., Maag, D. & Lorsch, J. R. Pi release from eIF2, not GTP hydrolysis, is the step controlled by start-site selection during eukaryotic translation initiation. Mol. Cell 20, 251–262 (2005)
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Das, S., Ghosh, R. & Maitra, U. Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5 functions as a GTPase-activating protein. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 6720–6726 (2001)
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Paulin, F. E. et al. Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5 (eIF5) acts as a classical GTPase-activator protein. Curr. Biol. 11, 55–59 (2001)
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Cheung, Y. N. et al. Dissociation of eIF1 from the 40S ribosomal subunit is a key step in start codon selection in vivo . Genes Dev. 21, 1217–1230 (2007)
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Unbehaun, A., Borukhov, S. I., Hellen, C. U. & Pestova, T. V. Release of initiation factors from 48S complexes during ribosomal subunit joining and the link between establishment of codon-anticodon base-pairing and hydrolysis of eIF2-bound GTP. Genes Dev. 18, 3078–3093 (2004)
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Singh, C. R. et al. An eIF5/eIF2 complex antagonizes guanine nucleotide exchange by eIF2B during translation initiation. EMBO J. 25, 4537–4546 (2006)
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• DerMardirossian, C. & Bokoch, G. M. GDIs: central regulatory molecules in Rho GTPase activation. Trends Cell Biol. 15, 356–363 (2005)
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Pavitt, G. D., Ramaiah, K. V., Kimball, S. R. & Hinnebusch, A. G. eIF2 independently binds two distinct eIF2B subcomplexes that catalyze and regulate guanine-nucleotide exchange. Genes Dev. 12, 514–526 (1998)
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Schmitt, E., Blanquet, S. & Mechulam, Y. The large subunit of initiation factor aIF2 is a close structural homologue of elongation factors. EMBO J. 21, 1821–1832 (2002)
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Asano, K. et al. Conserved bipartite motifs in yeast eIF5 and eIF2Bepsilon, GTPase- activating and GDP–GTP exchange factors in translation initiation, mediate binding to their common substrate eIF2. EMBO J. 18, 1673–1688 (1999)
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Asano, K. et al. Multiple roles for the C-terminal domain of eIF5 in translation initiation complex assembly and GTPase activation. EMBO J. 20, 2326–2337 (2001)
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Conte, M. R. et al. Structure of the eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF) 5 reveals a fold common to several translation factors. Biochemistry 45, 4550–4558 (2006)
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Wei, Z., Xue, Y., Xu, H. & Gong, W. Crystal structure of the C-terminal domain of S. cerevisiae eIF5. J. Mol. Biol. 359, 1–9 (2006)
  Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
• Alone, P. V. & Dever, T. E. Direct binding of translation initiation factor eIF2γ-G domain to its GTPase-activating and GDP-GTP exchange factors eIF5 and eIF2Bε. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 12636–12644 (2006)
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Hinnebusch, A. G. Translational regulation of GCN4 and the general amino acid control of yeast. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 59, 407–450 (2005)
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Singh, C. R. et al. Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 5 is critical for integrity of the scanning preinitiation complex and accurate control of GCN4 translation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 5480–5491 (2005)
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Ramirez, M. et al. Mutations activating the yeast eIF-2α kinase GCN2: isolation of alleles altering the domain related to histidyl-tRNA synthetases. Mol. Cell. Biol. 12, 5801–5815 (1992)
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Pavitt, G. D., Yang, W. & Hinnebusch, A. G. Homologous segments in three subunits of the guanine nucleotide exchange factor eIF2B mediate translational regulation by phosphorylation of eIF2. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 1298–1313 (1997)
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Dever, T. E. et al. Modulation of tRNAi Met, eIF-2 and eIF-2B expression shows that GCN4 translation is inversely coupled to the level of eIF-2.GTP.Met-tRNAi Met ternary complexes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 6351–6363 (1995)
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Krishnamoorthy, T. et al. Tight binding of the phosphorylated alpha subunit of initiation factor 2 (eIF2α) to the regulatory subunits of guanine nucleotide exchange factor eIF2B is required for inhibition of translation initiation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21, 5018–5030 (2001)
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Mohammad-Qureshi, S. S. et al. Critical contacts between the eukaryotic initiation factor 2B (eIF2B) catalytic domain and both eIF2β and -2γ mediate guanine nucleotide exchange. Mol. Cell. Biol. 27, 5225–5234 (2007)
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Adams, A., Gottschling, D. E., Kaiser, C. A. & Stearns, T. Methods in Yeast genetics: A Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Course Manual (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1998)
  Google Scholar
• Gietz, R. D. & Woods, R. A. Transformation of yeast by lithium acetate/single-stranded carrier DNA/polyethylene glycol method. Methods Enzymol. 350, 87–96 (2002)
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Phan, L. et al. Identification of a translation initiation factor 3 (eIF3) core complex, conserved in yeast and mammals, that interacts with eIF5. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 4935–4946 (1998)
  Article CAS Google Scholar