In defence of inclusive fitness theory (original) (raw)

Nature volume 471, pages E8–E9 (2011)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Arising from M. A. Nowak, C. E. Tarnita & E. O. Wilson Nature 466, 1057–1062 (2010)10.1038/nature09205; Nowak et al. reply

Arguably the defining characteristic of the scientific process is its capacity for self-criticism and correction1. Nowak et al.2 challenge proposed connections between relatedness and the evolution of eusociality3, suggest instead that defensible nests and “spring-loaded” traits are key, and present alternative modelling approaches. They then dismiss the utility of Hamilton’s insight that relatedness has a profound evolutionary effect3, formalized in his widely accepted inclusive fitness theory as Hamilton’s rule (“Rise and fall of inclusive fitness theory”). However, we believe that Nowak et al.2 fail to make their case for logical, theoretical and empirical reasons.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 51 print issues and online access

$199.00 per year

only $3.90 per issue

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mayr, E. The Growth of Biological Thought (Harvard Univ. Press, 1982)
    Google Scholar
  2. Nowak, M. A., Tarnita, C. E. & Wilson, E. O. The evolution of eusociality. Nature 466, 1057–1062 (2010)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  3. Hamilton, W. D. Narrow Roads of Gene Land. Vol. I. Evolution of Social Behaviour (Oxford Univ. Press, 1998)
    Google Scholar
  4. Hughes, W. O. H., Oldroyd, B. P., Beekman, M. & Ratnieks, F. L. W. Ancestral monogamy shows kin selection is key to the evolution of eusociality. Science 320, 1213–1216 (2008)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  5. Cornwallis, C. K., West, S. A., Davis, K. E. & Griffin, A. S. Promiscuity and the evolution to complex societies. Nature 466, 969–972 (2010)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  6. Boomsma, J. J. Lifetime monogamy and the evolution of eusociality. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 364, 3191–3207 (2009)
    Article Google Scholar
  7. Costa, J. T. The Other Insect Societies (Harvard Univ. Press, 2006)
    Google Scholar
  8. Michener, C. D. The Social Behavior of the Bees (Harvard Univ. Press, 1974)
    Google Scholar
  9. Michener, C. D. From solitary to eusocial: Need there be a series of intervening species? Fortschr. Zool. 31, 293–306 (1985)
    Google Scholar
  10. Jeanson, R., Kukuk, P. F. & Fewell, J. H. Emergence of division of labour in halictine bees: Contributions of social interactions and behavioural variance. Anim. Behav. 70, 1183–1193 (2005)
    Article Google Scholar
  11. Wcislo, W. T. Social interactions and behavioral context in a largely solitary bee, Lasioglossum (Dialictus) figueresi (Hymenoptera, Halictidae). Insectes Soc. 44, 199–208 (1997)
    Article Google Scholar
  12. Cronin, A. L. A molecular phylogeny and social behaviour of Japenese Ceratina (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Xylocopinae). Insect Syst. Evol. 35, 137–146 (2004)
    Article Google Scholar
  13. Gardner, A., West, S. A. & Barton, N. H. The relation between multilocus population genetics and social evolution theory. Am. Nat. 169, 207–226 (2007)
    Article Google Scholar
  14. Ratnieks, F. L. W. & Vissher, P. K. Worker policing in honeybees. Nature 342, 796–797 (1989)
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  15. Mueller, U. G. Haplodiploidy and the evolution of facultative sex ratios in a primitively eusocial bee. Science 254, 442–444 (1991)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Apartado 0843-03092, Balboa, Republic of Panama,
    Edward Allen Herre & William T. Wcislo
  2. Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, MRC 0580-06, unit 9100 Box 0948, DPO AA, 34002-9998, USA
    Edward Allen Herre & William T. Wcislo

Authors

  1. Edward Allen Herre
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  2. William T. Wcislo
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Both authors contributed extensively to all aspects of this work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence toEdward Allen Herre.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Competing financial interests: declared none.

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Herre, E., Wcislo, W. In defence of inclusive fitness theory.Nature 471, E8–E9 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09835

Download citation

Associated content