Phase transitions in the assembly of multivalent signalling proteins (original) (raw)

Nature volume 483, pages 336–340 (2012)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Cells are organized on length scales ranging from ångström to micrometres. However, the mechanisms by which ångström-scale molecular properties are translated to micrometre-scale macroscopic properties are not well understood. Here we show that interactions between diverse synthetic, multivalent macromolecules (including multi-domain proteins and RNA) produce sharp liquid–liquid-demixing phase separations, generating micrometre-sized liquid droplets in aqueous solution. This macroscopic transition corresponds to a molecular transition between small complexes and large, dynamic supramolecular polymers. The concentrations needed for phase transition are directly related to the valency of the interacting species. In the case of the actin-regulatory protein called neural Wiskott–Aldrich syndrome protein (N-WASP) interacting with its established biological partners NCK and phosphorylated nephrin1, the phase transition corresponds to a sharp increase in activity towards an actin nucleation factor, the Arp2/3 complex. The transition is governed by the degree of phosphorylation of nephrin, explaining how this property of the system can be controlled to regulatory effect by kinases. The widespread occurrence of multivalent systems suggests that phase transitions may be used to spatially organize and biochemically regulate information throughout biology.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 51 print issues and online access

$199.00 per year

only $3.90 per issue

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jones, N. et al. Nck adaptor proteins link nephrin to the actin cytoskeleton of kidney podocytes. Nature 440, 818–823 (2006)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  2. Flory, P. J. Principles of Polymer Chemistry (Cornell Univ. Press, 1953)
    Google Scholar
  3. Cohen, R. J. & Benedek, G. B. Equilibrium and kinetic theory of polymerization and the sol-gel transition. J. Phys. Chem. 86, 3696–3714 (1982)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  4. Lehn, J.-M. Supramolecular polymer chemistry—scope and perspectives. Polym. Int. 51, 825–839 (2002)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  5. Tanaka, F. Polymer Physics: Applications to Molecular Association and Thermoreversible Gelation (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2011)
    Book Google Scholar
  6. Semenov, A. N. & Rubinstein, M. Thermoreversible gelation in solutions of associative polymers. 1. Statics. Macromolecules 31, 1373–1385 (1998)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  7. Brewer, C. F., Miceli, M. C. & Baum, L. G. Clusters, bundles, arrays and lattices: novel mechanisms for lectin–saccharide-mediated cellular interactions. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 12, 616–623 (2002)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  8. Pawson, T. & Nash, P. Assembly of cell regulatory systems through protein interaction domains. Science 300, 445–452 (2003)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  9. Lunde, B. M., Moore, C. & Varani, G. RNA-binding proteins: modular design for efficient function. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8, 479–490 (2007)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  10. Ruthenburg, A. J., Li, H., Patel, D. J. & Allis, C. D. Multivalent engagement of chromatin modifications by linked binding modules. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8, 983–994 (2007)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  11. Goldberg, R. A theory of antibody–antigen reactions. I. Theory for reactions of multivalent antigen with bivalent and univalent antibody. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 74, 5715–5725 (1952)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  12. Dam, T. K. et al. Thermodynamic, kinetic, and electron microscopy studies of concanavalin A and Dioclea grandiflora lectin cross-linked with synthetic divalent carbohydrates. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 8640–8646 (2005)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  13. Sisu, C. et al. The influence of ligand valency on aggregation mechanisms for inhibiting bacterial toxins. Chembiochem 10, 329–337 (2009)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  14. Jin, J. et al. Eukaryotic protein domains as functional units of cellular evolution. Sci. Signal. 2, ra76 (2009)
    Article Google Scholar
  15. Asherie, N. et al. Oligomerization and phase separation in globular protein solutions. Biophys. Chem. 75, 213–227 (1998)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  16. Stockmayer, W. H. Molecular distribution in condensation polymers. J. Polym. Sci. 9, 69–71 (1952)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  17. Li, J., Ngai, T. & Wu, C. The slow relaxation mode: from solutions to gel networks. Polym. J. 42, 609–625 (2010)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  18. Semenov, A., Charlot, A., Auzely-Velty, R. & Rinaudo, M. Rheological properties of binary associating polymers. Rheol. Acta 46, 541–568 (2007)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  19. Blasutig, I. M. et al. Phosphorylated YDXV motifs and Nck SH2/SH3 adaptors act cooperatively to induce actin reorganization. Mol. Cell. Biol. 28, 2035–2046 (2008)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  20. Rohatgi, R., Nollau, P., Ho, H. Y., Kirschner, M. W. & Mayer, B. J. Nck and phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate synergistically activate actin polymerization through the N-WASP–Arp2/3 pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 26448–26452 (2001)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  21. Padrick, S. B. et al. Hierarchical regulation of WASP/WAVE proteins. Mol. Cell 32, 426–438 (2008)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  22. Padrick, S. B. & Rosen, M. K. Physical mechanisms of signal integration by WASP family proteins. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 79, 707–735 (2010)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  23. Lettau, M., Pieper, J. & Janssen, O. Nck adaptor proteins: functional versatility in T cells. Cell Commun. Signal. 7, 1 (2009)
    Article Google Scholar
  24. Obenauer, J. C., Cantley, L. C. & Yaffe, M. B. Scansite 2.0: proteome-wide prediction of cell signaling interactions using short sequence motifs. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 3635–3641 (2003)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  25. Matera, A. G., Izaguire-Sierra, M., Praveen, K. & Rajendra, T. K. Nuclear bodies: random aggregates of sticky proteins or crucibles of macromolecular assembly? Dev. Cell 17, 639–647 (2009)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  26. Buchan, J. R. & Parker, R. Eukaryotic stress granules: the ins and outs of translation. Mol. Cell 36, 932–941 (2009)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  27. Parker, R. & Sheth, U. P bodies and the control of mRNA translation and degradation. Mol. Cell 25, 635–646 (2007)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  28. Matera, A. G. & Shpargel, K. B. Pumping RNA: nuclear bodybuilding along the RNP pipeline. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 18, 317–324 (2006)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  29. Bernardi, R. & Pandolfi, P. P. Structure, dynamics and functions of promyelocytic leukaemia nuclear bodies. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8, 1006–1016 (2007)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  30. Brangwynne, C. P. et al. Germline P granules are liquid droplets that localize by controlled dissolution/condensation. Science 324, 1729–1732 (2009)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  31. Chen, B. et al. ATP ground- and transition states of bacterial enhancer binding AAA+ ATPases support complex formation with their target protein, σ54. Structure 15, 429–440 (2007)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  32. Svergun, D. I. Determination of the regularization parameter in indirect-transform methods using perceptual criteria. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 25, 495–503 (1992)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  33. Fischer, H., Neto, M. O., Napolitano, H. B., Polikarpov, I. & Craievich, A. F. Determination of the molecular weight of proteins in solution from a single small-angle X-ray scattering measurement on a relative scale. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 43, 101–109 (2010)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  34. Provencher, S. W. CONTIN: a general purpose constrained regularization program for inverting noisy linear algebraic and integral equations. Comput. Phys. Commun. 27, 229–242 (1982)
    Article ADS Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank J. Onuchic and S. Padrick for discussion of the theoretical aspects of this study, L. Rice for sharing his fluorescence microscope, M. Socolich for a gift of purified eGFP, K. Luby-Phelps and A. Bugde for advice on FRAP experiments, S. Padrick and L. Doolittle for help in purifying actin and the Arp2/3 complex and for sharing reagents, N. Grishin and S. Shi for help with database searches, K. Lynch for providing the PTB expression construct, D. Billadeau and T. Gomez for providing antibodies, A. Ramesh, W. Winkler and P.-L. Tsai for advice on RNA experiments, K. Roybal and C. Wülfing for sharing unpublished data, and J. Liu for help with cryo-electron tomography. This work was supported by the following: the Howard Hughes Medical Institute and grants from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) (R01-GM56322) and Welch Foundation (I–1544) to M.K.R., a Chilton Foundation Fellowship to H.-C.C., an NIH EUREKA award (R01-GM088745) to Q.-X.J., an NIH Cancer Biology T32 Training Grant to M.L., a National Science Foundation award (DMR-1005707) to P.S.R. and a Gates Millennium Fund award to J.V.H. Use of the Advanced Photon Source was supported by the US Department of Energy, Basic Energy Sciences, Office of Science, under contract number W-31-109-ENG-38. BioCAT is NIH-supported Research Center RR-08630.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Pilong Li, Sudeep Banjade and Hui-Chun Cheng: These authors contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biochemistry and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, 75390-8812, Texas, USA
    Pilong Li, Sudeep Banjade, Hui-Chun Cheng, Soyeon Kim, Baoyu Chen, Salman F. Banani & Michael K. Rosen
  2. BioCAT of IIT at the Advanced Photon Source, Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 South Cass Avenue, Argonne, 60439, Illinois, USA
    Liang Guo
  3. Department of Cell Biology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, 75390-9148, Texas, USA
    Marc Llaguno & Qiu-Xing Jiang
  4. Department of Chemistry and Macromolecular Studies Group, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, 70803, Louisiana, USA
    Javoris V. Hollingsworth & Paul S. Russo
  5. Howard Hughes Medical Institute Mass Spectrometry Laboratory and Department of Molecular & Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, 94720, California, USA
    David S. King
  6. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, 16802, USA
    B. Tracy Nixon

Authors

  1. Pilong Li
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  2. Sudeep Banjade
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  3. Hui-Chun Cheng
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  4. Soyeon Kim
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  5. Baoyu Chen
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  6. Liang Guo
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  7. Marc Llaguno
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  8. Javoris V. Hollingsworth
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  9. David S. King
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  10. Salman F. Banani
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  11. Paul S. Russo
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  12. Qiu-Xing Jiang
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  13. B. Tracy Nixon
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  14. Michael K. Rosen
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

M.K.R. oversaw the project, helped analyse all of the data and wrote the paper with assistance from all of the authors. P.L., H.-.C.C. and M.K.R. conceived of the project. P.L. developed and interpreted the theoretical and computational models, which promoted much of the experimentation. S.B. performed and analysed experiments on the nephrin–NCK–N-WASP system and performed monovalent competition studies. H.-.C.C. mapped and analysed the phase diagrams, and collected FRAP data, on the engineered model systems. S.K. performed and analysed the cellular experiments. S.B., B.C., L.G. and B.T.N. collected and/or analysed the SAXS data. S.B., M.L. and Q.-.X. J. collected and/or analysed the electron microscopy data. S.B., J.V.H. and P.S.R. collected and/or analysed the multi-angle DLS data. H.-.C.C. and S.B. collected and analysed the single-angle DLS data. D.S.K. synthesized the octameric PRM dendrimer. S.F.B. analysed the cyclization in the sol–gel transition.

Corresponding author

Correspondence toMichael K. Rosen.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

This file contains Supplementary Text and Data, Supplementary Table 1, full legend for Supplementary Movie 1, Supplementary References and Supplementary Figures 1-23. (PDF 24828 kb)

Supplementary Movie 1

This zipped file contains a movie showing large polymer formation – see Supplementary Information file page 23 for full legend. (ZIP 218 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, P., Banjade, S., Cheng, HC. et al. Phase transitions in the assembly of multivalent signalling proteins.Nature 483, 336–340 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10879

Download citation

This article is cited by

Editorial Summary

Cell organization scales up

The translation of molecular-scale structures into the macroscopic world of organelles and tissues is a little-understood aspect of cellular organization. Here, Michael Rosen and colleagues show that when multivalent proteins interact with each other, they undergo a switch-like phase transition from small complexes to huge polymeric assemblies as concentration increases. At the same time, they undergo a macroscopic liquid–liquid phase separation. This produces micrometre-sized suspended liquid droplets that resemble cellular structures such as P bodies, P granules and Cajal bodies. Such switch-like phase separations and transitions from small complexes to large assemblies may be a general feature of interactions between multivalent molecules.