Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity (original) (raw)

References

1. Jones, C. G., Lawton, J. H. & Shachak, M. Organisms as ecosystem engineers. Oikos 69, 373–386 (1994)
   Google Scholar
2. Sterner, R. W. & Elser, J. J. Ecological Stoichiometry: The Biology of Elements from Molecules to the Biosphere (Princeton Univ. Press, 2002)
   Google Scholar
3. Power, M. E. et al. Challenges in the quest for keystones. Bioscience 46, 609–620 (1996)
   Google Scholar
4. Schulze, E. D. & Mooney, H. A. Biodiversity and Ecosystem Function (Springer, 1993)This influential book established many of the original hypotheses and ideas that laid the foundation for two decades of empirical work in BEF.
   Google Scholar
5. Heywood, V. H., ed. Global Biodiversity Assessment (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1995)
6. Loreau, M. et al. DIVERSITAS Report No. 1: DIVERSITAS Science Plan. (2002)
7. Tilman, D. & Downing, J. A. Biodiversity and stability in grasslands. Nature 367, 363–365 (1994)This study, along with ref. 8, started a generation of research that examined how biodiversity influences the functioning of ecosystems.
   ADS Google Scholar
8. Naeem, S., Thompson, L. J., Lawler, S. P., Lawton, J. H. & Woodfin, R. M. Declining biodiversity can alter the performance of ecosystems. Nature 368, 734–737 (1994)
   ADS Google Scholar
9. Tilman, D., Wedin, D. & Knops, J. Productivity and sustainability influenced by biodiversity in grassland ecosystems. Nature 379, 718–720 (1996)
   ADS CAS Google Scholar
10. Hector, A. et al. Plant diversity and productivity experiments in European grasslands. Science 286, 1123–1127 (1999)
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
11. Loreau, M., Naeem, S. & Inchausti, P. Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning: Synthesis and Perspectives (Oxford Univ. Press, 2002)This book, which followed a 2000 conference in Paris, summarized the first decade of BEF research.
    Google Scholar
12. Cardinale, B. J. et al. The functional role of producer diversity in ecosystems. Am. J. Bot. 98, 572–592 (2011)
    PubMed Google Scholar
13. Daily, G. C. Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems (Island Press, 1997)This book cemented the notion that natural habitats provide essential goods services to society, and it helped to make ecosystem services a mainstream term.
    Google Scholar
14. Perrings, C., Folke, C. & Maler, K. G. The ecology and economics of biodiversity loss—The research agenda. Ambio 21, 201–211 (1992)
    Google Scholar
15. Mace, G. M., Norris, K. & Fitter, A. H. Biodiversity and ecosystem services: a multilayered relationship. Trends Ecol. Evol. 27, 19–26 (2012)
    PubMed Google Scholar
16. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis (World Resources Institute, 2005)
17. Kinzig, A. P., Pacala, S. W. & Tilman, D. The Functional Consequences of Biodiversity: Empirical Progress and Theoretical Extensions (Princeton Univ. Press, 2002)
    Google Scholar
18. Loreau, M. From Populations to Ecosystems: Theoretical Foundations for a New Ecological Synthesis (Princeton Univ. Press, 2010)
    Google Scholar
19. Tilman, D., Lehman, D. & Thompson, K. Plant diversity and ecosystem productivity: Theoretical considerations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 1857–1861 (1997)
    ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
20. Paquette, A. & Messier, C. The effect of biodiversity on tree productivity: from temperate to boreal forests. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 20, 170–180 (2011)This paper, along with ref. 21, exemplifies how to quantify biodiversity effects on ecosystem functions at large scales in real ecosystems.
    Google Scholar
21. Maestre, F. T. et al. Plant species richness and ecosystem multifunctionality in global drylands. Science 335, 214–218 (2012)
    ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
22. Mora, C. et al. Global human footprint on the linkage between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in reef fishes. PLoS Biol. 9, e1000606 (2011)
    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
23. Hooper, D. U. et al. Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: A consensus of current knowledge. Ecol. Monogr. 75, 3–35 (2005)This paper was the last published scientific consensus statement on how biodiversity influences ecosystem functions and services.
    Google Scholar
24. Balvanera, P. et al. Quantifying the evidence for biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning and services. Ecol. Lett. 9, 1146–1156 (2006)This paper, along with ref. 25, was the first to synthesize BEF research via statistical meta-analyses.
    PubMed Google Scholar
25. Cardinale, B. J. et al. Effects of biodiversity on the functioning of trophic groups and ecosystems. Nature 443, 989–992 (2006)
    ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
26. Worm, B. et al. Impacts of biodiversity loss on ocean ecosystem services. Science 314, 787–790 (2006)
    ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
27. Cardinale, B. J. et al. Impacts of plant diversity on biomass production increase through time due to complementary resource use: A meta-analysis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 18123–18128 (2007)
    ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
28. Stachowicz, J., Bruno, J. F. & Duffy, J. E. Understanding the effects of marine biodiversity on communities and ecosystems. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 38, 739–766 (2007)
    Google Scholar
29. Bruno, J. F. & Cardinale, B. J. Cascading effects of predator richness. Front. Ecol. Environ 6, 539–546 (2008)
    Google Scholar
30. Cardinale, B. J. et al. in Biodiversity and Human Impacts (eds Naeem, S. . et al.) 105–120 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2009)
31. Schmid, B. et al. in Biodiversity and Human Impacts (eds Naeem, S. . et al.) 14–29 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2009)
32. Srivastava, D. S. et al. Diversity has stronger top-down than bottom-up effects on decomposition. Ecology 90, 1073–1083 (2009)
    PubMed Google Scholar
33. Quijas, S., Schmid, B. & Balvanera, P. Plant diversity enhances provision of ecosystem services: A new synthesis. Basic Appl. Ecol. 11, 582–593 (2010)
    Google Scholar
34. Cadotte, M. W., Cardinale, B. J. & Oakley, T. H. Evolutionary history and the effect of biodiversity on plant productivity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 17012–17017 (2008)
    ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
35. Flynn, D. F. B., Mirotchnick, N., Jain, M., Palmer, M. I. & Naeem, S. Functional and phylogenetic diversity as predictors of biodiversity-ecosystem-function relationships. Ecology 92, 1573–1581 (2011)
    PubMed Google Scholar
36. Wardle, D. A., Bonner, K. I. & Nicholson, K. S. Biodiversity and plant litter: Experimental evidence which does not support the view that enhanced species richness improves ecosystem function. Oikos 79, 247–258 (1997)
    Google Scholar
37. Ives, A. R. & Carpenter, S. R. Stability and diversity of ecosystems. Science 317, 58–62 (2008)
    ADS Google Scholar
38. Cottingham, K. L., Brown, B. L. & Lennon, J. T. Biodiversity may regulate the temporal variability of ecological systems. Ecol. Lett. 4, 72–85 (2001)
    Google Scholar
39. Jiang, L. & Pu, Z. C. Different effects of species diversity on temporal stability in single-trophic and multitrophic communities. Am. Nat. 174, 651–659 (2009)
    PubMed Google Scholar
40. Hector, A. et al. General stabilizing effects of plant diversity on grassland productivity through population asynchrony and overyielding. Ecology 91, 2213–2220 (2010)
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
41. Campbell, V., Murphy, G. & Romanuk, T. N. Experimental design and the outcome and interpretation of diversity-stability relations. Oikos 120, 399–408 (2011)
    Google Scholar
42. Griffin, J. N. et al. in Biodiversity and Human Impacts (eds Naeem, S. et al.) 78–93 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2009)
43. Doak, D. F. et al. The statistical inevitability of stability-diversity relationships in community ecology. Am. Nat. 151, 264–276 (1998)
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
44. Gonzalez, A. & Loreau, M. The causes and consequences of compensatory dynamics in ecological communities. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 40, 393–414 (2009)
    Google Scholar
45. Duffy, J. E. Why biodiversity is important to the functioning of real-world ecosystems. Front. Ecol. Environ 7, 437–444 (2009)
    Google Scholar
46. Tilman, D. et al. Diversity and productivity in a long-term grassland experiment. Science 294, 843–845 (2001)This experiment continues to be one of the largest and longest running biodiversity studies ever conducted.
    ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
47. Huston, M. A. Hidden treatments in ecological experiments: Re-evaluating the ecosystem function of biodiversity. Oecologia 110, 449–460 (1997)This paper raised several criticisms against early BEF research, which forced the reconsideration of conclusions with better experiments and more rigorous data analyses.
    ADS PubMed Google Scholar
48. Loreau, M. & Hector, A. Partitioning selection and complementarity in biodiversity experiments. Nature 412, 72–76 (2001)
    ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
49. Carroll, I. T., Cardinale, B. J. & Nisbet, R. M. Niche and fitness differences relate the maintenance of diversity to ecosystem function. Ecology 92, 1157–1165 (2011)
    PubMed Google Scholar
50. Shurin, J. B. et al. A cross-ecosystem comparison of the strength of trophic cascades. Ecol. Lett. 5, 785–791 (2002)
    Google Scholar
51. Estes, J. A. et al. Trophic downgrading of planet earth. Science 333, 301–306 (2011)This paper summarizes how the extinction of large carnivores has an impact on ecosystem processes, emphasizing the urgent need to integrate trophic interactions into BEF and BES research.
    ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
52. Duffy, J. E. et al. The functional role of biodiversity in ecosystems: Incorporating trophic complexity. Ecol. Lett. 10, 522–538 (2007)
    PubMed Google Scholar
53. Diaz, S. et al. Incorporating plant functional diversity effects in ecosystem service assessments. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 20684–20689 (2007)This paper outlined a framework for linking species functional traits to ecosystem services, which moves the field of BES research towards more predictive models.
    ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
54. Schmid, B., Hector, A., Saha, P. & Loreau, M. Biodiversity effects and transgressive overyielding. J. Plant Ecol. 1, 95–102 (2008)
    Google Scholar
55. Suding, K. N. et al. Scaling environmental change through the community-level: a trait-based response-and-effect framework for plants. Glob. Change Biol. 14, 1125–1140 (2008)
    ADS Google Scholar
56. Tilman, D., Reich, P. & Isbell, F. Biodiversity impacts ecosystem productivity as much as resources, disturbance or herbivory. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA (in the press)
57. Hooper, D. U. et al. A global synthesis reveals biodiversity loss as a major driver of ecosystem change. Naturehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature11118 (2 May 2012)
58. Houghton, J. T., Jenkins, G. J., Ephraums, J. J., eds. Climate Change: The IPCC Scientific Assessment (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007)
59. Stachowicz, J. J., Graham, M., Bracken, M. E. S. & Szoboszlai, A. I. Diversity enhances cover and stability of seaweed assemblages: The role of heterogeneity and time. Ecology 89, 3008–3019 (2008)
    PubMed Google Scholar
60. Dimitrakopoulos, P. G. & Schmid, B. Biodiversity effects increase linearly with biotope space. Ecol. Lett. 7, 574–583 (2004)
    Google Scholar
61. Venail, P. A., Maclean, R. C., Meynard, C. N. & Mouquet, N. Dispersal scales up the biodiversity-productivity relationship in an experimental source-sink metacommunity. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 277, 2339–2345 (2010)
    Google Scholar
62. Tylianakis, J. M. et al. Resource heterogeneity moderates the biodiversity-function relationship in real world ecosystems. PLoS Biol. 6, e122 (2008)
    PubMed Central Google Scholar
63. Cardinale, B. J. Biodiversity improves water quality through niche partitioning. Nature 472, 86–89 (2011)
    ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
64. Finke, D. L. & Snyder, W. E. Niche partitioning increases resource exploitation by diverse communities. Science 321, 1488–1490 (2008)
    ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
65. Hector, A. & Bagchi, R. Biodiversity and ecosystem multifunctionality. Nature 448, 188–190 (2007)
    ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
66. Zavaleta, E. S., Pasari, J. R., Hulvey, K. B. & Tilman, G. D. Sustaining multiple ecosystem functions in grassland communities requires higher biodiversity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 1443–1446 (2010)
    ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
67. Isbell, F. et al. High plant diversity is needed to maintain ecosystem services. Nature 477, 199–202 (2011)
    ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
68. Mace, G. M., Gittleman, J. L. & Purvis, A. Preserving the tree of life. Science 300, 1707–1709 (2003)
    ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
69. Díaz, S., Fargione, J., Chapin, F. S. & Tilman, D. Biodiversity loss threatens human well-being. PLoS Biol. 4, 1300–1305 (2006)
    Google Scholar
70. Letourneau, D. K. et al. Does plant diversity benefit agroecosystems? A synthetic review. Ecol. Appl. 21, 9–21 (2011)
    PubMed Google Scholar
71. Keesing, F. et al. Impacts of biodiversity on the emergence and transmission of infectious diseases. Nature 468, 647–652 (2010)
    ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
72. Zhang, W., Ricketts, T. H., Kremen, C., Carney, K. & Swinton, S. M. Ecosystem services and dis-services to agriculture. Ecol. Econ. 64, 253–260 (2007)
    Google Scholar
73. Latta, L. C. et al. Species and genotype diversity drive community and ecosystem properties in experimental microcosms. Evol. Ecol. 25, 1107–1125 (2011)
    Google Scholar
74. Denoth, M., Frid, L. & Myers, J. H. Multiple agents in biological control: improving the odds? Biol. Control 24, 20–30 (2002)
    Google Scholar
75. Letourneau, D. K., Jedlicka, J. A., Bothwell, S. G. & Moreno, C. R. Effects of natural enemy biodiversity on the suppression of arthropod herbivores in terrestrial ecosystems. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 40, 573–592 (2009)
    Google Scholar
76. Vance-Chalcraft, H. D., Rosenheim, J. A., Vonesh, J. R., Osenberg, C. W. & Sih, A. The influence of intraguild predation on prey suppression and prey release: A meta-analysis. Ecology 88, 2689–2696 (2007)
    PubMed Google Scholar
77. Taylor, L. H., Latham, S. M. & Woolhouse, M. E. J. Risk factors for human disease emergence. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 356, 983–989 (2001)
    CAS Google Scholar
78. Wardle, D. A., Bardgett, R. D., Callaway, R. M. & Van der Putten, W. H. Terrestrial ecosystem responses to species gains and losses. Science 332, 1273–1277 (2011)
    ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
79. Solan, M. et al. Extinction and ecosystem function in the marine benthos. Science 306, 1177–1180 (2004)
    ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
80. Bunker, D. E. et al. Species loss and aboveground carbon storage in a tropical forest. Science 310, 1029–1031 (2005)
    ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
81. Ives, A. R. & Cardinale, B. J. Food-web interactions govern the resistance of communities after non-random extinctions. Nature 429, 174–177 (2004)
    ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
82. Sax, D. F. & Gaines, S. D. Species diversity: from global decreases to local increases. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18, 561–566 (2003)
    Google Scholar
83. Bardgett, R. D. & Wardle, D. A. Aboveground-belowground Linkages: Biotic Interactions, Ecosystem Processes, and Global Change (Oxford Univ. Press, 2010)
    Google Scholar
84. Vilà, M. et al. Ecological impacts of invasive alien plants: a meta-analysis of their effects on species, communities and ecosystems. Ecol. Lett. 14, 702–708 (2011)
    PubMed Google Scholar
85. Fox, J. W. & Kerr, B. Analyzing the effects of species gain and loss on ecosystem function using the extended Price equation partition. Oikos 121, 290–298 (2012)
    Google Scholar
86. Loeuille, N. & Loreau, M. Evolutionary emergence of size-structured food webs. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 5761–5766 (2005)
    ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
87. Berlow, E. L. et al. Simple prediction of interaction strengths in complex food webs. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 187–191 (2009)
    ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
88. O’Gorman, E. J., Jacob, U., Jonsson, T. & Emmerson, M. C. Interaction strength, food web topology and the relative importance of species in food webs. J. Anim. Ecol. 79, 682–692 (2010)
    PubMed Google Scholar
89. Wood, S. A., Lilley, S. A., Schiel, D. R. & Shurin, J. B. Organismal traits are more important than environment for species interactions in the intertidal zone. Ecol. Lett. 13, 1160–1171 (2010)
    PubMed Google Scholar
90. Kinzig, A. P. et al. Paying for ecosystem services-promise and peril. Science 334, 603–604 (2011)
    ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
91. Goldman-Benner, R. et al. Water funds and PES: Practice learns from theory and theory can learn from practice. Oryx 46, 55–63 (2012)
    Google Scholar
92. Kattge, J. et al. TRY—a global database of plant traits. Glob. Change Biol. 17, 2905–2935 (2011)
    ADS Google Scholar
93. Kareiva, P., Tallis, H., Ricketts, T., Daily, G. & Polasky, S. Natural Capital: Theory & Practice of Mapping Ecosystem Services (Oxford Univ. Press, 2011)This book summarizes the state-of-the-art in modelling ecosystem services.
    Google Scholar
94. Heal, G. M. et al. Valuing Ecosystem Services: Toward Better Environmental Decision Making (The National Academies Press, 2005)
95. Jackson, R. B. et al. Trading water for carbon with biological carbon sequestration. Science 310, 1944–1947 (2005)
    ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
96. Perrings, C. et al. Ecosystem services, targets, and indicators for the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity. Front. Ecol. Environ 9, 512–520 (2011)
    Google Scholar
97. Kinzig, A. P. et al. Ecosystem services: Free lunch no more response. Science 335, 656–657 (2012)
    ADS CAS Google Scholar
98. Butchart, S. H. M. et al. Global biodiversity: Indicators of recent declines. Science 328, 1164–1168 (2010)
    ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
99. Perrings, C., Duraiappah, A., Larigauderie, A. & Mooney, H. The biodiversity and ecosystem services science-policy interface. Science 331, 1139–1140 (2011)
    ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
100. Larigauderie, A. et al. Biodiversity and ecosystem services science for a sustainable planet: The DIVERSITAS vision for 2012–20. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sust. 4, 101–105 (2012)
     Google Scholar

Download references