lncRNA-dependent mechanisms of androgen-receptor-regulated gene activation programs (original) (raw)

Nature volume 500, pages 598–602 (2013)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Although recent studies have indicated roles of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) in physiological aspects of cell-type determination and tissue homeostasis1, their potential involvement in regulated gene transcription programs remains rather poorly understood. The androgen receptor regulates a large repertoire of genes central to the identity and behaviour of prostate cancer cells2, and functions in a ligand-independent fashion in many prostate cancers when they become hormone refractory after initial androgen deprivation therapy3. Here we report that two lncRNAs highly overexpressed in aggressive prostate cancer, PRNCR1 (also known as PCAT8) and PCGEM1, bind successively to the androgen receptor and strongly enhance both ligand-dependent and ligand-independent androgen-receptor-mediated gene activation programs and proliferation in prostate cancer cells. Binding of PRNCR1 to the carboxy-terminally acetylated androgen receptor on enhancers and its association with DOT1L appear to be required for recruitment of the second lncRNA, PCGEM1, to the androgen receptor amino terminus that is methylated by DOT1L. Unexpectedly, recognition of specific protein marks by PCGEM1-recruited pygopus 2 PHD domain enhances selective looping of androgen-receptor-bound enhancers to target gene promoters in these cells. In ‘resistant’ prostate cancer cells, these overexpressed lncRNAs can interact with, and are required for, the robust activation of both truncated and full-length androgen receptor, causing ligand-independent activation of the androgen receptor transcriptional program and cell proliferation. Conditionally expressed short hairpin RNA targeting these lncRNAs in castration-resistant prostate cancer cell lines strongly suppressed tumour xenograft growth in vivo. Together, these results indicate that these overexpressed lncRNAs can potentially serve as a required component of castration-resistance in prostatic tumours.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 51 print issues and online access

$199.00 per year

only $3.90 per issue

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Similar content being viewed by others

Accession codes

Accessions

Gene Expression Omnibus

Data deposits

The high-throughput sequencing data sets are deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus database under accession GSE47807.

References

  1. Gupta, R. A. et al. Long non-coding RNA HOTAIR reprograms chromatin state to promote cancer metastasis. Nature 464, 1071–1076 (2010)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  2. Heinlein, C. A. & Chang, C. Androgen receptor in prostate cancer. Endocr. Rev. 25, 276–308 (2004)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  3. Scher, H. I. & Sawyers, C. L. Biology of progressive, castration-resistant prostate cancer: directed therapies targeting the androgen-receptor signaling axis. J. Clin. Oncol. 23, 8253–8261 (2005)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  4. Petrovics, G. et al. Elevated expression of PCGEM1, a prostate-specific gene with cell growth-promoting function, is associated with high-risk prostate cancer patients. Oncogene 23, 605–611 (2004)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  5. Chung, S. et al. Association of a novel long non-coding RNA in 8q24 with prostate cancer susceptibility. Cancer Sci. 102, 245–252 (2011)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  6. Chu, C., Qu, K., Zhong, F. L., Artandi, S. E. & Chang, H. Y. Genomic maps of long noncoding RNA occupancy reveal principles of RNA-chromatin interactions. Mol. Cell 44, 667–678 (2011)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  7. Kypta, R. M. & Waxman, J. Wnt/β-catenin signalling in prostate cancer. Nature Rev. Urology 9, 418–428 (2012)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  8. Fu, M. et al. Acetylation of androgen receptor enhances coactivator binding and promotes prostate cancer cell growth. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23, 8563–8575 (2003)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  9. Yang, L. et al. ncRNA- and Pc2 methylation-dependent gene relocation between nuclear structures mediates gene activation programs. Cell 147, 773–788 (2011)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  10. Zippo, A. et al. Histone crosstalk between H3S10ph and H4K16ac generates a histone code that mediates transcription elongation. Cell 138, 1122–1136 (2009)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  11. heintzman, N. D. et al. Histone modifications at human enhancers reflect global cell-type-specific gene expression. Nature 459, 108–112 (2009)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  12. Hu, R. et al. Ligand-independent androgen receptor variants derived from splicing of cryptic exons signify hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 69, 16–22 (2009)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  13. Sun, A. et al. Adeno-associated virus-delivered short hairpin-structured RNA for androgen receptor gene silencing induces tumor eradication of prostate cancer xenografts in nude mice: a preclinical study. Int. J. Cancer 126, 764–774 (2010)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  14. Taberlay, P. C. et al. Polycomb-repressed genes have permissive enhancers that initiate reprogramming. Cell 147, 1283–1294 (2011)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  15. Wang, Q., Carroll, J. S. & Brown, M. Spatial and temporal recruitment of androgen receptor and its coactivators involves chromosomal looping and polymerase tracking. Mol. Cell 19, 631–642 (2005)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  16. Gu, B. et al. Pygo2 expands mammary progenitor cells by facilitating histone H3 K4 methylation. J. Cell Biol. 185, 811–826 (2009)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  17. Wang, D. et al. Reprogramming transcription by distinct classes of enhancers functionally defined by eRNA. Nature 474, 390–394 (2011)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  18. Gu, B., Watanabe, K. & Dai, X. Pygo2 regulates histone gene expression and H3 K56 acetylation in human mammary epithelial cells. Cell Cycle 11, 79–87 (2012)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  19. Lam, M. T. Y. et al. Rev-Erbs repress macrophage gene expression by inhibiting enhancer-directed transcription. Nature 498, 511–515 (2013)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  20. Li, W. et al. Functional roles of enhancer RNAs for oestrogen-dependent transcriptional activation. Nature 498, 516–520 (2013)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  21. Zhao, J. et al. Genome-wide identification of polycomb-associated RNAs by RIP-seq. Mol. Cell 40, 939–953 (2010)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  22. Langmead, B., Trapnell, C., Pop, M. & Salzberg, S. L. Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol. 10, R25 (2009)
    Article Google Scholar
  23. Heinz, S. et al. Simple combinations of lineage-determining transcription factors prime cis-regulatory elements required for macrophage and B cell identities. Mol. Cell 38, 576–589 (2010)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  24. Quinlan, A. R. & Hall, I. M. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics 26, 841–842 (2010)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  25. Saeed, A. I. et al. TM4 microarray software suite. Methods Enzymol. 411, 134–193 (2006)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  26. Zang, C. et al. A clustering approach for identification of enriched domains from histone modification ChIP-Seq data. Bioinformatics 25, 1952–1958 (2009)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  27. Robinson, M. D., McCarthy, D. J. & Smyth, G. K. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26, 139–140 (2010)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  28. Liu, W. et al. PHF8 mediates histone H4 lysine 20 demethylation events involved in cell cycle progression. Nature 466, 508–512 (2010)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  29. Tsai, M. C. et al. Long noncoding RNA as modular scaffold of histone modification complexes. Science 329, 689–693 (2010)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  30. Liao, D. F., Monia, B., Dean, N. & Berk, B. C. Protein kinase C-ζ mediates angiotensin II activation of ERK1/2 in vascular smooth muscle cells. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 6146–6150 (1997)
    Article CAS Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to X. Dai for providing the PYGO2 shRNA and cDNA constructs and J. Hightower for assistance with figure presentation. This work was supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants DK039949, DK18477, NS034934 and CA173903, Department of Defense grant and initially by a grant from Prostate Cancer Foundation to M.G.R.; by Department of Defense grant PC111467 and SV2C-AACR-DT0812 to C.D.E; by grants from the NIH Pathway to Independence Award (1K99DK094981–01) to C.-R.L.; by US Army Medical Research and Material Command Era of Hope Postdoctoral award (W81XWH-08–1-0554), NIH Pathway to Independence Award (4R00CA166527–02) and Cancer Prevention Research Institute of Texas First-time Faculty Recruitment Award (R1218) to L.-Q.Y.; C.-Y.J. is the recipient of a Cancer Research Institute Postdoctoral Fellowship. M.G.R. is an Investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Liuqing Yang and Chunru Lin: These authors contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medicine, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, 92093, California, USA
    Liuqing Yang, Chunru Lin, Chunyu Jin, Bogdan Tanasa, Wenbo Li, Daria Merkurjev, Kenneth A. Ohgi, Jie Zhang & Michael G. Rosenfeld
  2. Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, 77030, Texas, USA
    Liuqing Yang & Chunru Lin
  3. Department of Urology, School of Medicine, University of California Davis, Sacramento, 95817, California, USA
    Joy C. Yang & Christopher P. Evans
  4. Graduate Program, Kellogg School of Science and Technology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, 92037, California, USA
    Bogdan Tanasa
  5. Department of Bioengineering, Bioinformatics and System Biology Program, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, 92093, California, USA
    Daria Merkurjev
  6. Department of Biological Sciences, Neurosciences Graduate Program, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, 92093, California, USA
    Da Meng

Authors

  1. Liuqing Yang
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  2. Chunru Lin
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  3. Chunyu Jin
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  4. Joy C. Yang
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  5. Bogdan Tanasa
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  6. Wenbo Li
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  7. Daria Merkurjev
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  8. Kenneth A. Ohgi
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  9. Da Meng
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  10. Jie Zhang
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  11. Christopher P. Evans
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  12. Michael G. Rosenfeld
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

L.-Q.Y., C.-R.L. and M.G.R. designed the research, and L.-Q.Y. and C.-R.L. performed most of the experiments, with participation from C.-Y.J.; J.C.Y., under supervision of C.P.E., performed in vivo tumour xenograft experiments. B.T. and D.Mer. performed bioinformatics analyses on GRO-Seq, ChIP-Seq and ChIRP-Seq data. W.-B.L., J.Z. and K.A.O. conducted high-throughput sequencing, and D.Men. helped with ChIRP assays, L.-Q.Y., C.-R.L. and M.G.R. wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence toLiuqing Yang, Chunru Lin or Michael G. Rosenfeld.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Figures

This file contains Supplementary Figures 1-19. (PDF 5197 kb)

Supplementary Table 1

This table represents protein identification results for biotinylated lncRNA pulldown. (XLS 42 kb)

Supplementary Table 2

This table shows protein peptides recovered by biotinylated PCGEM1 lncRNA pull down experiments in LNCaP cells. (XLS 105 kb)

Supplementary Table 3

This table shows protein peptides recovered by biotinylated PRNCR1 lncRNA pull down experiments in LNCaP cells. (XLS 144 kb)

PowerPoint slides

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yang, L., Lin, C., Jin, C. et al. lncRNA-dependent mechanisms of androgen-receptor-regulated gene activation programs.Nature 500, 598–602 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12451

Download citation

Editorial Summary

Cancer growth influenced by long non-coding RNAs

Several long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are known to be overexpressed in prostate cancer. Michael Rosenfeld and colleagues have investigated the mechanistic and biological roles of two of these, known as PRNCR1 and PCGEM1. Both are found to interact with the androgen receptor (AR) dependent on specific post-translational modifications, and to enhance the looping of AR-bound enhancers to target gene promoters, leading to enhanced gene expression. They also enhance AR-mediated proliferation in prostate cancer cells and are required for tumour growth in a prostate cancer xenograft mouse model. PRNCR1 and PCGEM1 are upregulated in castration-resistant prostate cancer cell lines. The regulatory roles of lncRNAs in prostate cancer uncovered in this manuscript may open the way to new therapeutic approaches.

Associated content