Limited impact on decadal-scale climate change from increased use of natural gas (original) (raw)

References

  1. Sovacool, B. K. Cornucopia or curse? Reviewing the costs and benefits of shale gas hydraulic fracturing (fracking). Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 37, 249–264 (2014)
    Article Google Scholar
  2. International Energy Agency. Are We Entering a Golden Age of Gas? (IEA Report, 2011)
  3. Hultman, N., Rebois, D., Scholten, M. & Ramig, C. The greenhouse impact of unconventional gas for electricity generation. Environ. Res. Lett. 6, 044008 (2011)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  4. Moniz, E. J. et al. The Future of Natural Gas: An Interdisciplinary MIT Study (MIT, 2011); http://mitei.mit.edu/system/files/NaturalGas_Report.pdf
  5. Brown, S., Krupnick, A. & Walls, M. Natural Gas: a Bridge to a Low-Carbon Future (Resource for the Future, 2009); http://www.rff.org/RFF/Documents/RFF-IB-09-11.pdf
  6. Levi, M. Climate consequences of natural gas as a bridge fuel. Clim. Change 118, 609–623 (2013)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  7. Howarth, R. W., Santoro, R. & Ingraffea, A. Methane and the greenhouse-gas footprint of natural gas from shale formations. Clim. Change 106, 679–690 (2011)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  8. Howarth, R. W., Ingraffea, A. & Engelder, T. Natural gas: should fracking stop? Nature 477, 271–275 (2011)
    Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  9. Newell, R. G. & Raimi, D. Implications of shale gas development for climate change. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48, 8360–8368 (2014)
    Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  10. Energy Modeling Forum. Changing the game? Emissions and Market Implications of New Natural Gas Supplies EMF Report 26 (EMF, 2013); https://web.stanford.edu/group/emf-research/docs/emf26/Summary26.pdf
  11. Edmonds, J. A. et al. in Climate Change Modeling Methodology 169–209 (Springer, 2012)
  12. Rogner, H. et al. in Global Energy Assessment 423–512 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2012)
  13. Mi, R. & Fisher, B. S. BAEGEM Model Documentation (BAEconomics, 2014); http://www.baeconomics.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/BAEGEM-documentation-21Feb14.pdf
  14. Calvin, K. et al. GCAM Wiki Documentation (Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, 2011); http://wiki.umd.edu/gcam/
  15. Riahi, K., Grübler, A. & Nakicenovic, N. Scenarios of long-term socio-economic and environmental development under climate stabilization. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 74, 887–935 (2007)
    Article Google Scholar
  16. Bauer, N. et al. Global fossil energy markets and climate change mitigation—an analysis with REMIND. Clim. Change (in the press)
  17. Bosetti, V., Carraro, C., Galeotti, M., Massetti, E. & Tavoni, M. A world induced technical change hybrid model. Energy J. 27, 13–37 (2006)
    Google Scholar
  18. Van Vuuren, D. P. et al. The representative concentration pathways: an overview. Clim. Change 109, 5–31 (2011)
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  19. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013)
  20. Bauer, N. et al. CO2 emission mitigation and fossil fuel markets: dynamic and international aspects of climate policies. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change (in the press)
  21. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IPCC report, 2006); http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/
  22. Meinshausen, M., Raper, S. C. B. & Wigley, T. M. L. Emulating coupled atmosphere-ocean and carbon cycle models with a simpler model, MAGICC6: Part I—model description and calibration. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 11, 1417–1456 (2011)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  23. Environmental Protection Agency Inventory of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks 1990–2009 (EPA Publication 430-R-11–005, 2011); http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/Downloads/ghgemissions/US-GHG-Inventory-2011-Complete_Report.pdf
  24. Venkatesh, A., Jaramillo, P., Griffin, W. M. & Matthews, H. S. Uncertainty in life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from United States natural gas end-uses and its effects on policy. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45, 8182–8189 (2011)
    Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  25. Burnham, A. et al. Life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions of shale gas, natural gas, coal, and petroleum. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 619–627 (2012)
    Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  26. Laurenzi, I. J. & Jersey, G. R. Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions and freshwater consumption of Marcellus shale gas. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 4896–4903 (2013)
    Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  27. Miller, S. M. et al. Anthropogenic emissions of methane in the United States. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 20018–20022 (2013)
    Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  28. Brandt, A. et al. Methane leaks from North American natural gas systems. Science 343, 733–735 (2014)
    Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  29. Kriegler, E. et al. The role of technology for achieving climate policy objectives: overview of the EMF 27 study on global technology and climate policy strategies. Clim. Change 123, 353–367 (2014)
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  30. Calvin, K. et al. The role of Asia in mitigating climate change: results from the Asia modeling exercise. Energy Econ. 34, S251–S260 (2012)
    Article Google Scholar
  31. Riahi, K. et al. Locked into Copenhagen pledges—implications of short-term emission targets for the cost and feasibility of long-term climate goals. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change (in the press)
  32. Nordhaus, W. D. & Boyer, J. G. Requiem for Kyoto: an economic analysis of the Kyoto Protocol. Energy J. 20, 93–130 (1999)
    Article Google Scholar
  33. Skone, T. J. Life Cycle Analysis: Natural Gas Combined Cycle (NGCC) Power Plant (National Energy Technology Laboratory, 2010); http://www.netl.doe.gov/File%20Library/Research/Energy%20Analysis/Life%20Cycle%20Analysis/NGCC-LCA-Final-Report---Report---9-30-10---Final---Rev-2.pdf
  34. McCollum, D., Bauer, N., Calvin, K., Kitous, A. & Riahi, K. Fossil resource and energy security dynamics in conventional and carbon-constrained worlds. Clim. Change 123, 413–426 (2014)
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  35. Messner, S. & Strubegger, M. User’s Guide for MESSAGE III (International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, 1995)
    Google Scholar
  36. Luderer, G., Leimbach, M., Bauer, N. & Kriegler, E. Description of the ReMIND-R model. (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, 2011); http://www.pik-potsdam.de/research/sustainable-solutions/models/remind/REMIND_Description.pdf
  37. Integrated Assessment Modeling Consortium IPCC AR5 Scenario Database (IAMC, 2014); https://secure.iiasa.ac.at/web-apps/ene/AR5DB/
  38. Reilly, J. M., Edmonds, J. A., Gardner, R. H. & Brenkert, A. L. Uncertainty analysis of the IEA/ORAU CO2 emissions model. Energy J. 8, 1–29 (1987)
    Article Google Scholar
  39. Scott, M. J., Sands, R. D., Edmonds, J., Liebetrau, A. M. & Engel, D. W. Uncertainty in integrated assessment models: modeling with MiniCAM 1.0. Energy Policy 27, 855–879 (1999)
    Article Google Scholar
  40. Meehl, G., Covey, C., McAvaney, B., Latif, M. & Stouffer, R. Overview of the coupled model intercomparison project (CMIP). Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 86, 89–93 (2005)
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  41. Hertel, T. W. & Hertel, T. W. Global Trade Analysis: Modeling and Applications (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1999)
    MATH Google Scholar
  42. Hanoch, G. CRESH production functions. Econometrica 39, 695–712 (1971)
    Article MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
  43. Harrison, J., Horridge, J., Jerie, M. & Pearson, K. GEMPACK Manual (2012); http://www.copsmodels.com/gpmanual.htm
  44. Aguiar, A., McDougall, R. & Narayanan, B. Global Trade, Assistance and Production: The GTAP 8 Data Base (Center for Global Trade Analysis, Purdue Univ., 2012)
    Google Scholar
  45. International Energy Agency. CO 2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion 2012 (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, 2012)
  46. International Energy Agency. Emissions of CO 2 , CH 4 , N 2 O, HFCs, PFCs and SF 6 (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, 2012)
  47. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. 2012 Annex I Party GHG Inventory Submissions (UNFCCC, 2012)
  48. Environmental Protection Agency. Global Anthropogenic Non-CO 2 Greenhouse Gas Emissions: 1990-2030 (US Environmental Protection Agency, 2012)
  49. Wigley, T. M. MAGICC/SCENGEN 5.3: User Manual Version 2 (NCAR, 2008)
    Google Scholar
  50. International Energy Agency. CO 2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion 1971–2001 (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, 2012)
  51. Weyant, J. P., de la Chesnaye, F. C. & Blanford, G. J. Overview of EMF-21: multigas mitigation and climate policy. Energy J. 27, 1–32 (2006)
    Google Scholar
  52. Edmonds, J. & Reilly, J. Global energy production and use to the year 2050. Energy 8, 419–432 (1983)
    Article Google Scholar
  53. Edmonds, J. & Reilly, J. Global energy and CO2 to the year 2050. Energy J. 4, 21–47 (1983)
    Article Google Scholar
  54. Edmonds, J. & Reilly, J. A long-term global energy-economic model of carbon dioxide release from fossil fuel use. Energy Econ. 5, 74–88 (1983)
    Article Google Scholar
  55. Wise, M. et al. Implications of limiting CO2 concentrations for land use and energy. Science 324, 1183–1186 (2009)
    Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  56. Thomson, A. M. et al. RCP4.5: a pathway for stabilization of radiative forcing by 2100. Clim. Change 109, 77–94 (2011)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  57. Clarke, J. F. & Edmonds, J. A. Modelling energy technologies in a competitive market. Energy Econ. 15, 123–129 (1993)
    Article Google Scholar
  58. Boden, T. A., Marland, G. & Andres, R. J. Global, Regional, and National Fossil-Fuel CO2 Emissions (Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, US Department of Energy, 2009)
    Book Google Scholar
  59. International Energy Agency. Energy Balances of OECD Countries (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, 2013)
  60. International Energy Agency. Energy Balances of Non-OECD Countries (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, 2013)
  61. Lamarque, J.-F. et al. Historical (1850–2000) gridded anthropogenic and biomass burning emissions of reactive gases and aerosols: methodology and application. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 10, 7017–7039 (2010)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  62. Messner, S. & Schrattenholzer, L. MESSAGE–MACRO: linking an energy supply model with a macroeconomic module and solving it iteratively. Energy 25, 267–282 (2000)
    Article Google Scholar
  63. Rao, S. & Riahi, K. The role of non-CO2 greenhouse gases in climate change mitigation: long-term scenarios for the 21st century. Energy J. 27, 177–200 (2006)
    Google Scholar
  64. Manne, A., Mendelsohn, R. & Richels, R. MERGE: a model for evaluating regional and global effects of GHG reduction policies. Energy Policy 23, 17–34 (1995)
    Article Google Scholar
  65. Wigley, T. & Raper, S. Implications for climate and sea level of revised IPCC emissions scenarios. Nature 357, 293–300 (1992)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  66. Arthur, W. B. Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. Econ. J. 99, 116–131 (1989)
    Article Google Scholar
  67. O’Neill, B. C., Riahi, K. & Keppo, I. Mitigation implications of midcentury targets that preserve long-term climate policy options. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 1011–1016 (2010)
    Article ADS PubMed CAS Google Scholar
  68. Riahi, K. et al. Energy pathways for sustainable development. In Global Energy Assessment 1203–1306 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2012)
  69. International Energy Agency. World Energy Outlook 2008 (International Energy Agency, 2008)
  70. Riahi, K., Rubin, E. S. & Schrattenholzer, L. Prospects for carbon capture and sequestration technologies assuming their technological learning. Energy 29, 1309–1318 (2004)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  71. Ramage, M. & Katzer, J. Liquid Transportation Fuels from Coal and Biomass: Technological Status, Costs, and Environmental Impacts (National Academies Press, 2009)
    Google Scholar
  72. Liu, G., Larson, E. D., Williams, R. H., Kreutz, T. G. & Guo, X. Making Fischer−Tropsch fuels and electricity from coal and biomass: performance and cost analysis. Energy Fuels 25, 415–437 (2011)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  73. Liu, G., Williams, R. H., Larson, E. D. & Kreutz, T. G. Design/economics of low-carbon power generation from natural gas and biomass with synthetic fuels co-production. Energy Procedia 4, 1989–1996 (2011)
    Article Google Scholar
  74. Global Energy Assessment GEA Scenario Database (2012); http://www.iiasa.ac.at/web-apps/ene/geadb/
  75. Rogner, H.-H. An assessment of world hydrocarbon resources. Annu. Rev. Energy Environ. 22, 217–262 (1997)
    Article Google Scholar
  76. Patwardhan, A. P., Gomez-Echeverri, L., Johansson, T. B. & Nakićenović, N. Global Energy Assessment: Toward a Sustainable Future (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2012)
    Google Scholar
  77. Weber, C. L. & Clavin, C. Life cycle carbon footprint of shale gas: review of evidence and implications. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 5688–5695 (2012)
    Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  78. Rao, S. & Riahi, K. The role of non-CO2 greenhouse gases in climate change mitigation: long-term scenarios for the 21st century. Energy J. 27, 177–200 (2006)
    Google Scholar
  79. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Guidance and Uncertainty Management in National Greenhouse Gas Inventories 2000 (IPCC Report, 2000)
  80. Nordhaus, W. D. & Yang, Z. A regional dynamic general-equilibrium model of alternative climate-change strategies. Am. Econ. Rev. 86, 741–765 (1996)
    Google Scholar
  81. Leimbach, M., Bauer, N., Baumstark, L., Luken, M. & Edenhofer, O. Technological change and international trade-insights from REMIND-R. Energy J. 31, 109–136 (2010)
    Article Google Scholar
  82. Bauer, N., Brecha, R. J. & Luderer, G. Economics of nuclear power and climate change mitigation policies. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 16805–16810 (2012)
    Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  83. Luderer, G. et al. The economics of decarbonizing the energy system—results and insights from the RECIPE model intercomparison. Clim. Change 114, 9–37 (2012)
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  84. Edenhofer, O. et al. The economics of low stabilization: model comparison of mitigation strategies and costs. Energy J. 31, 11–48 (2010)
    Google Scholar
  85. Kriegler, E. et al. The role of technology for achieving climate policy objectives: overview of the EMF 27 study on global technology and climate policy strategies. Clim. Change 123, 353–367 (2014)
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  86. Bauer, N., Edenhofer, O. & Kypreos, S. Linking energy system and macroeconomic growth models. Comput. Manage. Sci. 5, 95–117 (2008)
    Article MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
  87. Schwanitz, V. J., Piontek, F., Bertram, C. & Luderer, G. Long-term climate policy implications of phasing out fossil fuel subsidies. Energy Policy 67, 882–894 (2014)
    Article Google Scholar
  88. Klein, D. et al. The value of bioenergy in low stabilization scenarios: an assessment using REMIND-MAgPIE. Clim. Change 123, 705–718 (2013)
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  89. Strefler, J., Luderer, G., Aboumahboub, T. & Kriegler, E. Economic impacts of alternative greenhouse gas emission metrics: a model-based assessment. Clim. Change (in the press)
  90. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis Global Biosphere Management Model (IIASA, 2014); http://www.iiasa.ac.at/web/home/research/modelsData/GLOBIOM/GLOBIOM.en.html
  91. Bosetti, V., Carraro, C., Massetti, E. & Tavoni, M. International energy R&D spillovers and the economics of greenhouse gas atmospheric stabilization. Energy Econ. 30, 2912–2929 (2008)
    Article Google Scholar
  92. Bosetti, V., Carraro, C., Duval, R. & Tavoni, M. What should we expect from innovation? A model-based assessment of the environmental and mitigation cost implications of climate-related R&D. Energy Econ. 33, 1313–1320 (2011)
    Article Google Scholar
  93. Wigley, T. M. & Raper, S. Thermal expansion of sea water associated with global warming. Nature 330, 127–131 (1987)
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  94. Friedlingstein, P. et al. Climate-carbon cycle feedback analysis: results from the C4MIP model intercomparison. J. Clim. 19, 3337–3353 (2006)
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  95. Moss, R. H. et al. The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment. Nature 463, 747–756 (2010)
    Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  96. Meinshausen, M. et al. The RCP greenhouse gas concentrations and their extensions from 1765 to 2300. Clim. Change 109, 213–241 (2011)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  97. Joos, F. et al. Global warming feedbacks on terrestrial carbon uptake under the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) emission scenarios. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 15, 891–907 (2001)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  98. Wigley, T., Smith, S. J. & Prather, M. Radiative forcing due to reactive gas emissions. J. Clim. 15, 2690–2696 (2002)
    Article ADS Google Scholar

Download references