Lineage-negative progenitors mobilize to regenerate lung epithelium after major injury (original) (raw)

Accession codes

Primary accessions

Gene Expression Omnibus

Data deposits

The FPKM files from single-cell RNA-seq experiments have been deposited in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) under accession GSE61300.

References

  1. Clevers, H. The intestinal crypt, a prototype stem cell compartment. Cell 154, 274–284 (2013)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  2. Gurtner, G. C., Werner, S., Barrandon, Y. & Longaker, M. T. Wound repair and regeneration. Nature 453, 314–321 (2008)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  3. Tanimizu, N. & Mitaka, T. Re-evaluation of liver stem/progenitor cells. Organogenesis 10, 208–215 (2014)
    Article Google Scholar
  4. King, R. S. & Newmark, P. A. The cell biology of regeneration. J. Cell Biol. 196, 553–562 (2012)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  5. Desai, T. J., Brownfield, D. G. & Krasnow, M. A. Alveolar progenitor and stem cells in lung development, renewal and cancer. Nature 507, 190–194 (2014)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  6. Barkauskas, C. E. et al. Type 2 alveolar cells are stem cells in adult lung. J. Clin. Invest. 123, 3025–3036 (2013)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  7. Giangreco, A. et al. Stem cells are dispensable for lung homeostasis but restore airways after injury. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 9286–9291 (2009)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  8. Kumar, P. A. et al. Distal airway stem cells yield alveoli in vitro and during lung regeneration following H1N1 influenza infection. Cell 147, 525–538 (2011)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  9. Schrepfer, S. et al. Experimental orthotopic tracheal transplantation: the Stanford technique. Microsurgery 27, 187–189 (2007)
    Article Google Scholar
  10. Treutlein, B. et al. Reconstructing lineage hierarchies of the distal lung epithelium using single-cell RNA-seq. Nature 509, 371–375 (2014)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  11. Rawlins, E. L., Ostrowski, L. E., Randell, S. H. & Hogan, B. L. M. Lung development and repair: Contribution of the ciliated lineage. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 410–417 (2007)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  12. Rawlins, E. L. & Hogan, B. L. Ciliated epithelial cell lifespan in the mouse trachea and lung. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 295, L231–L234 (2008)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  13. Chapman, H. A. et al. Integrin α6β4 identifies an adult distal lung epithelial population with regenerative potential in mice. J. Clin. Invest. 121, 2855–2862 (2011)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  14. Guseh, J. S. et al. Notch signaling promotes airway mucous metaplasia and inhibits alveolar development. Development 136, 1751–1759 (2009)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  15. Chakrabarti, R. et al. Elf5 regulates mammary gland stem/progenitor cell fate by influencing notch signaling. Stem Cells 30, 1496–1508 (2012)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  16. Wang, J. et al. Differentiated human alveolar epithelial cells and reversibility of their phenotype in vitro. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 36, 661–668 (2007)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  17. Seibold, M. A. et al. The idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis honeycomb cyst contains a mucocilary pseudostratified epithelium. PLoS ONE 8, e58658 (2013)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  18. Van Keymeulen, A. et al. Distinct stem cells contribute to mammary gland development and maintenance. Nature 479, 189–193 (2011)
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
  19. Rawlins, E. L. et al. The role of Scgb1a1+ Clara cells in the long-term maintenance and repair of lung airway, but not alveolar, epithelium. Cell Stem Cell 4, 525–534 (2009)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  20. Duncan, A. W. et al. Integration of Notch and Wnt signaling in hematopoietic stem cell maintenance. Nature Immunol. 6, 314–322 (2005)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  21. Muzumdar, M. D., Tasic, B., Miyamichi, K., Li, L. & Luo, L. A global double-fluorescent Cre reporter mouse. Genesis 45, 593–605 (2007)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  22. Madisen, L. et al. A robust and high-throughput Cre reporting and characterization system for the whole mouse brain. Nature Neurosci. 13, 133–140 (2010)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  23. Schaefer, B. C., Schaefer, M. L., Kappler, J. W., Marrack, P. & Kedl, R. M. Observation of antigen-dependent CD8+ T-cell/ dendritic cell interactions in vivo. Cell. Immunol. 214, 110–122 (2001)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  24. Krupnick, A. S. et al. Orthotopic mouse lung transplantation as experimental methodology to study transplant and tumor biology. Nature Protocols 4, 86–93 (2009)
    Article CAS Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants RO1 HL44712 and UO1 HL111054 and a sponsored research agreement with Daiichi Pharmaceuticals. A.E.V. is supported by F32 HL117600-01. The authors thank T. Kim for assistance with animal work and K. Corbin for assistance with Imaris software. Mouse line art was created by A. van de Wiel. We also thank P. Wolters at the UCSF Interstitial Lung Disease Blood and Tissue Repository for procuring diseased lung tissues. We thank the Nina Ireland Program for Lung Health that supported the tracheal/lung transplant experiments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medicine, Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, California 94143, USA,
    Andrew E. Vaughan, Alexis N. Brumwell, Ying Xi, Jeffrey E. Gotts, Kevin Tan, Victor Tan, Feng Chun Liu, Mark R. Looney, Michael A. Matthay & Harold A. Chapman
  2. Department of Biochemistry, Stanford University School of Medicine and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford, 94305, California, USA
    Doug G. Brownfield
  3. Department of Evolutionary Genetics, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Deutscher Platz 6, 04103 Leipzig, Germany,
    Barbara Treutlein
  4. Department of Anatomy, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, California 94143, USA,
    Jason R. Rock

Authors

  1. Andrew E. Vaughan
  2. Alexis N. Brumwell
  3. Ying Xi
  4. Jeffrey E. Gotts
  5. Doug G. Brownfield
  6. Barbara Treutlein
  7. Kevin Tan
  8. Victor Tan
  9. Feng Chun Liu
  10. Mark R. Looney
  11. Michael A. Matthay
  12. Jason R. Rock
  13. Harold A. Chapman

Contributions

A.E.V. and H.A.C. designed the study, analysed the data, and wrote the manuscript. A.E.V. performed lineage tracing, flow cytometry purification, and characterization of lung cells; J.E.G. titred PR8 virus and initiated all infections; A.N.B. isolated lung cell suspensions, assisted with flow cytometry, and designed and performed most of the immunostaining; Y.X. assisted with biochemistry, RNA analysis, and immunostaining; K.T. and V.T. managed the mouse genotyping and performed in vivo mouse experiments; V.T. isolated lung cells and designed quantification methods; F.C.L. and M.R.L. performed lung transplantations; M.M. procured and screened human lungs; D.G.B. and B.T. synthesized libraries and provided initial data analysis for RNA-seq experiments J.R.R. provided key reagents and assisted with study design.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence toAndrew E. Vaughan or Harold A. Chapman.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Figure 1 Characterization of influenza-induced Krt5+ cells.

a–c, Alveolar (a, b) and airway (c) Krt5+ cells strongly express β4 after influenza injury. d, FACS plot of epithelial (EpCAM+) cells from tamoxifen-treated Krt5-CreERT2/tdTomato mice at day 15 after influenza, demonstrating β4 expression in nearly all traced (tdTomato+) cells. e, f, Most Krt5+ cells co-express ΔNp63 (e) and Krt14 (f). g, h, Expanded Krt5+ cells are invariably associated with abundant CD45+ inflammatory cells (g) and few if any remaining normal E-cadherin+ epithelial cells other than the Krt5+ cells themselves (h). i, Krt5+ cells are unlabelled in SPC-CreERT2/mTmG mice. Inset in i demonstrates appropriate labelling of type II cells in an uninjured region of the same lung. j, k, Krt5+ cells are not fluorescent after trachea transplantation from tdTomato donor. Basal cells in transplanted section of trachea retained fluorescence (j, inset in k). Scale bars, 100 μm (a) and 20 μm (b, c, e–k).

Extended Data Figure 2 Influenza-induced Krt5+ cells arise in both airways and alveoli and migrate across, around and through airway and parenchymal tissue.

a, b, Krt5+ cells are detected in alveoli as early as day 5 and are found in larger clusters over time. c, d, Krt5+ cells similarly arise in airways in greater abundance with time. e, Distinct alveolar and airway expansion is apparent 11 days after infection. f, Freeze-frames of live imaging from a Krt5-CreERT2/tdTomato mouse 11 days after influenza, in which tdTomato+ cells migrate from their original location (white box) outward. See Supplementary Video 1. g, Freeze-frames from a small airway in the same mouse; arrow denotes a single cell crossing the basement membrane. See Supplementary Video 2. Scale bars, 20 μm (a, b, g) and 100 μm (c, d, f).

Extended Data Figure 3 Characterization of bleomycin-induced Krt5+ cells.

a–c, β4+ Krt5+ cells also arise after bleomycin injury and express ΔNp63 (b, c). d, Western blotting demonstrating more pronounced and reproducible Krt5 induction after influenza injury at day 11 than after bleomycin injury at day 17. Each lane was loaded with whole-lung lysate from a single mouse; average percentage lung area corresponding to a band in influenza-injured mice is 3.6 ± 0.5% (n = 13 mice quantified, see Fig. 3g as an example). e, Lineage tracing of bleomycin-injured Krt5-CreERT2 mice reveal traced (tdTomato+) type II cells expressing SPC and cells morphologically resembling type I cells. In total, 31% of Krt5-CreERT2 traced cells express SPC by day 50 after bleomycin (n = 3 mice, 264 Krt5-CreERT2-labelled cells counted). Scale bars, 100 μm (a) and 20 μm (b, c, e). Full western blot scan in d is available as Supplementary Fig. 1.

Extended Data Figure 4 Krt5+ cells do not arise from CC10-expressing progenitors but rather upregulate CC10 during expansion.

a, Krt5+ cells express detectable levels of CC10 (top) compared to isotype control (bottom) in alveolar clusters (a). b, Representative image of CC10-CreERT2 lineage trace in which waiting only 7 days after tamoxifen administration before influenza injury results in significant labelling of Krt5+ cells (quantified in Fig. 1d). c, Strong CC10 expression in Krt5-CreERT2-traced (tdTomato+) cells by day 22 after influenza. For comparison, see single channel images (c, right and bottom) of the same region. Scale bars, 20 μm.

Extended Data Figure 5 Heterogeneity of the LNEP-containing CC10− β4+ population.

a, Rare Krt5-CreERT2-traced (tdTomato+) cells were observed in uninjured distal lung airways that lacked Krt5 staining compared to trachea basal cells (inset) in the same section. All distal tdTomato+ cells express ΔNp63 but most ΔNp63+ cells are untraced (see Fig. 2c). b, Cytospins of sorted CC10− β4+ cells reveal the presence of abundant multiciliated cells (green, acetylated tubulin+) and a small fraction of ΔNp63+ cells (red). c, Quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (qRT–PCR) analysis of mature lineage genes and genes of interest in all populations. n = 3 biological replicates; data are mean ± s.d. d, Principal component analysis plot of cells sequenced in Fig. 2b, demonstrating that p63+ cells in the CC10− β4+ population (outlined, asterisk) cluster with multi-ciliated cells. e, CD200 is not expressed by FoxJ1-CreERT2-labelled multi-ciliated cells, highlighting its use in excluding such cells. f, Cytospin of Foxj1-CreERT2-labelled β4+ cells demonstrating reliable selection for multi-ciliated cells (198 cells quantified). g, Gating on CD14 expression within the EpCAM+ β4+ CD200+ population excludes CC10-expressing club cells. Scale bars, 20 μm.

Extended Data Figure 6 Orthotopic transplantation of LNEPs reveals their multipotency and differentiation appropriate to the local microenvironment.

a, Several distinct areas of LNEP engraftment (red) reflect differentiation in response to location. Left dashed box demonstrates SPC expression in engrafted cells with nearby endogenous SPC-expressing cells (white); far right dashed box demonstrates Krt5 expression in engrafted cells and nearby endogenous Krt5-expressing cells (green). b, c, Cells in regions of SPC+ differentiation (b) lack Hes1 expression (right), whereas those in areas of Krt5+ differentiation (c) strongly express Hes1 (right). d, Distinct areas of LNEP engraftment demonstrate an inverse relationship between SPC expression (left) and Hes1 expression (right) in probable single clones. e, Examination of transplanted cells 5 days after engraftment demonstrate abundant Edu incorporation (see Methods) indicative of proliferation. At this time point cells can be identified co-expressing β4 and SPC (right, circled). f, g, Krt5+ cells and CC10+ cells were often found clustered in single regions of engraftment. h, Many engrafted cells in Fig. 2e are also SPC positive. i, β4− type II cells engraft in small clusters and only express SPC. j, k, CC10+ cells engraft but do not express SPC, CC10 or Krt5. l, Multi-ciliated cells engraft but only persist as isolated single cells, losing acetylated tubulin expression. Scale bars, 100 μm (a) and 20 μm (b–l).

Extended Data Figure 7 Transplantation of β4+ CD14+ CD200+ and Krt5-CreERT2-traced cells recapitulates multipotency of the heterogenous CC10− β4+ population.

a, Single channels images from Fig. 2h demonstrate Krt5 expression in transplanted β4+ CD14+ CD200+ cells. b, c, Transplanted β4+ CD14+ CD200+ can also differentiate towards type II cells (b) and club cells (c). d, e, Transplantation of rare Krt5-CreERT2-traced cells from uninjured mice resulting in donor-derived Krt5+ cell expansion indistinguishable from endogenous expansion. Images in d and e are representative images from four attempted transplants, two of which exhibited engraftment in two or four individual lobes. Scale bars, 20 μm.

Extended Data Figure 8 Notch activity in normal and injured lung.

a, Uninjured Notch reporter mice (Cp-eGFP) show dim GFP in small airways and no detectable GFP in alveoli. b, Krt5+ cells arising in distal airways express GFP in Notch reporter mice 7 days after influenza infection. c, d, Some Krt5+ cells persist within Krt5-CreERT2-labelled (tdTomato+) cysts (d) long-term (day 88) after influenza injury, and many traced cells express CC10 (c). e, Cysts rarely contain SPC+ type II cells (arrows). f, g, Hes1 expression is maintained in Krt5-CreERT2-traced (GFP+) cyst cells 98 days after influenza (f) but is absent in normal alveolar parenchyma from the same mice (g). h, Representative images of Krt5+ cell expansion in vehicle- (left) or DAPT- (right) treated mice at day 11 after influenza, quantified in Fig. 3g. Scale bars, 20 μm (a–g) and 100 μm (h).

Extended Data Figure 9 IPF and scleroderma lungs both contain HES1+ honeycomb cysts, but scleroderma lungs also possess SPC and KRT5 co-expressing cells.

Normal human lungs contain putative LNEPs and lack HES1 in alveoli. a–d, Honeycomb cysts in several IPF lungs; many KRT5+ cells as well as surrounding cystic epithelium demonstrate strong nuclear HES1 signal. e, Region of scleroderma honeycombing similar to IPF lung. f, Scleroderma subpleural alveolar region with type II cell hyperplasia demonstrating cells co-expressing SPC and KRT5. g, h, Cystic epithelium in scleroderma lungs expresses HES1 as in IPF. i, KRT5− ΔNp63+ cells (white outlines) distinct from KRT5+ ΔNp63+ basal cells (red outlines) are present in distal airways. j, k, HES1 staining is apparent in small airways of normal lung (j) but very low in alveolar parenchyma (k). All images are from patient samples in addition to those shown in Fig. 4. Scale bars, 20 μm (a–d, g–k) and 100 μm (e, f).

Extended Data Figure 10 Hierarchical cellular responses to injury severity and Notch-regulated LNEP dynamics.

a, Distinct epithelial cell types contribute to regeneration depending on the severity of parenchymal injury. Examples of each are referenced. b, Notch signalling regulates the activation, expansion and differentiation of LNEPs. Notch is required for activation and maintenance of LNEPs. Alveolar differentiation requires subsequent loss of Notch activity, whereas persistent Notch results in either airway differentiation or abnormal cystic honeycombing.

Supplementary information

PowerPoint slides

Source data

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vaughan, A., Brumwell, A., Xi, Y. et al. Lineage-negative progenitors mobilize to regenerate lung epithelium after major injury.Nature 517, 621–625 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14112

Download citation