Sequencing technology does not eliminate biological variability (original) (raw)

Nature Biotechnology volume 29, pages 572–573 (2011)Cite this article

Subjects

To the Editor:

RNA sequencing technology provides various advantages over DNA microarrays. For example, it is possible to measure alternative transcription1 or measure transcription for noncoding regions2 de novo. Another potential advantage is low technical variation2,3,4. This has led to rapid adoption of the technology and a recent surge of publications5. We would like to caution, however, that the euphoria surrounding the technology has led many of these publications to discount the influence of biological variability, forgetting perhaps that unwanted variability in gene expression measurements is not due only to measurement error. Gene expression is a stochastic process6 and is known to vary between units considered to be of the same population, for example, in samples from a specific healthy tissue across individuals7. In a typical experiment, variation in gene expression measurements [Var(Expr)] can be decomposed8 as the following:

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 12 print issues and online access

$209.00 per year

only $17.42 per issue

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Figure 1: Biological variability measured with sequencing and microarrays.

References

  1. Wang, E.T. et al. Nature 456, 470–476 (2008).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  2. Mortazavi, A., Williams, B.A., McCue, K., Schaeffer, L. & Wold, B. Nat. Methods 5, 621–628 (2008).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  3. Bullard, J.H., Purdom, E., Hansen, K.D. & Dudoit, S. BMC Bioinformatics 11, 94 (2010).
    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  4. Marioni, J.C., Mason, C.E., Mane, S.M., Stephens, M. & Gilad, Y. Genome Res. 18, 1509–1517 (2008).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  5. Wang, Z., Gerstein, M. & Snyder, M. Nat. Rev. Genet. 10, 57–63 (2009).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  6. Elowitz, M.B., Levine, A.J., Siggia, E.D. & Swain, P.S. Science 297, 1183–1186 (2002).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  7. Whitney, A.R. et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 1896–1901 (2003).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  8. Churchill, G.A. Nat. Genet. 32 Suppl, 490–495 (2002).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  9. Golub, T.R. et al. Science 286, 531–537 (1999).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  10. Irizarry, R.A. et al. Nat. Methods 2, 345–350 (2005).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  11. Shi, L. et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 24, 1151–1161 (2006).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  12. Leek, J.T. et al. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11, 733–739 (2010).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  13. Montgomery, S.B. et al. Nature 464, 773–777 (2010).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  14. Pickrell, J.K. et al. Nature 464, 768–772 (2010).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  15. Stranger, B.E. et al. Science 315, 848–853 (2007).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  16. Choy, E. et al. PLoS Genet. 4, e1000287 (2008).
    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
    Kasper D Hansen, Rafael A Irizarry & Jeffrey T Leek
  2. Department of Community Health, Section of Biostatistics, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
    Zhijin Wu

Authors

  1. Kasper D Hansen
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  2. Zhijin Wu
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  3. Rafael A Irizarry
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  4. Jeffrey T Leek
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence toRafael A Irizarry or Jeffrey T Leek.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hansen, K., Wu, Z., Irizarry, R. et al. Sequencing technology does not eliminate biological variability.Nat Biotechnol 29, 572–573 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1910

Download citation

This article is cited by