Cryptic biodiversity loss linked to global climate change (original) (raw)

References

  1. Thomas, C. D. et al. Extinction risk from climate change. Nature 427, 145–148 (2004).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  2. Hill, J. K., Griffiths, H. M. & Thomas, C. D. Climate change and evolutionary adaptations at species’ range margins. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 56, 143–159 (2011).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  3. Sala, O. E. et al. Biodiversity—Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 287, 1770–1774 (2000).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  4. Habel, J. C., Rodder, D., Schmitt, T. & Neve, G. Global warming will affect the genetic diversity and uniqueness of Lycaena helle populations. Glob. Change Biol. 17, 194–205 (2011).
    Google Scholar
  5. Bickford, D. et al. Cryptic species as a window on diversity and conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22, 148–155 (2007).
    Article Google Scholar
  6. Fraser, D. J. & Bernatchez, L. Adaptive evolutionary conservation: Towards a unified concept for defining conservation units. Mol. Ecol. 10, 2741–2752 (2001).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  7. Schmidt-Kloiber, A. & Hering, D. (eds) The Taxa and Autecology Database for Freshwater Organisms version 4.0 (2011); available at http://www.freshwaterecology.info.
  8. IPCC, Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis (eds Houghton, J. T. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2001).
  9. Pauls, S. U., Lumbsch, H. T. & Haase, P. Phylogeography of the montane caddisfly Drusus discolor: Evidence for multiple refugia and periglacial survival. Mol. Ecol. 15, 2153–2169 (2006).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  10. Schmitt, T. Molecular biogeography of Europe: Pleistocene cycles and postglacial trends. Front. Zool. 4, e11 (2007).
    Article Google Scholar
  11. Engelhardt, C. H. M., Haase, P. & Pauls, S. U. From the Western Alps across Central Europe: Postglacial recolonisation of the tufa stream specialist Rhyacophila pubescens (Insecta, Trichoptera). Front. Zool. 8, e10 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
  12. Taubmann, J. et al. Modelling range shifts and assessing genetic diversity distribution of the montane aquatic mayfly Ameletus inopinatus in Europe under climate change scenarios. Conserv. Genet. 12, 503–515 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
  13. Hampe, A. R. & Petit, J. Conserving biodiversity under climate change: The rear edge matters. Ecol. Lett. 8, 461–467 (2005).
    Article Google Scholar
  14. Scriber, J. M. Impacts of climate warming on hybrid zone movement: Geographically diffuse and biologically porous ‘species borders’. Insect Sci. 18, 121–129 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
  15. Hickerson, M. J. et al. Phylogeography’s past, present, and future: 10 years after Avise, 2000. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 54, 291–301 (2010).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  16. Hebert, P. D. N., Penton, E. H., Burns, J. M., Janzen, D. H. & Hallwachs, W. Ten species in one: DNA barcoding reveals cryptic species in the neotropical skipper butterfly Astraptes fulgerator. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 14812–14817 (2004).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  17. Franklin, J. Moving beyond static species distribution models in support of conservation biogeography. Divers. Distrib. 16, 321–330 (2010).
    Article Google Scholar
  18. Hughes, J. M. Constraints on recovery: Using molecular methods to study connectivity of aquatic biota in rivers and streams. Freshwater Biol. 52, 616–631 (2007).
    Article Google Scholar
  19. Hughes, R. A., Inouye, B. D., Johnson, M. T. J., Underwood, N. & Vellend, M. Ecological consequences of genetic diversity. Ecol. Lett. 11, 609–623 (2008).
    Article Google Scholar
  20. Lewontin, R. C. The Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change (Columbia Univ. Press, 1974).
    Google Scholar
  21. Davis, M. B. & Shaw, R. G. Range shifts and adaptive responses to quaternary climate change. Science 292, 673–679 (2001).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  22. Chown, S. L. et al. Adapting to climate change: A perspective from evolutionary physiology. Clim. Res. 43, 3–15 (2010).
    Article Google Scholar
  23. Lillehammer, A. Norwegian stoneflies. II. Distribution and relationship to the environment. Nor. Entomol. Tidsskr. 21, 195–200 (1974).
    Google Scholar
  24. Vogler, A. P. & Monaghan, M. T. Recent advances in DNA taxonomy. J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res. 45, 1–10 (2007).
    Article Google Scholar
  25. Zhou, X., Adamowicz, S., Jacobus, L., DeWalt, R. E. & Hebert, P. D. N. Towards a comprehensive barcode library for arctic life—Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and Trichoptera of Churchill, Manitoba, Canada. Front. Zool. 6, e30 (2009).
    Article Google Scholar
  26. Monaghan, M. T. et al. Accelerated species inventory on Madagascar using coalescent-based models of species delineation. Syst. Biol. 58, 298–311 (2009).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  27. Drummond, A. J. & Rambaut, A. BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evol. Biol. 7, e214 (2007).
    Article Google Scholar
  28. Ezard, T., Fujisawa, T. & Barraclough, T. Species delimitation by threshold statistics version 1. https://r-forge.r-project.org/projects/splits/ (2009).
  29. http://www.worldclim.org.
  30. Thuiller, W., Lafourcade, B., Engler, R. & Araújo, M. B. BIOMOD—a platform for ensemble forecasting of species distributions. Ecography 32, 369–373 (2009).
    Article Google Scholar
  31. Marmion, M., Parviainen, M., Luoto, M., Heikkinen, R. K. & Thuiller, W. Evaluation of consensus methods in predictive species distribution modelling. Divers. Distrib. 15, 59–69 (2009).
    Article Google Scholar

Download references