The relationship between personal experience and belief in the reality of global warming (original) (raw)

References

1. Akerlof, K., Maibach, W. W., Fitzgerald, D., Cedeno, A. Y. & Neuman, A. Do people ‘personally experience’ global warming, and if so how, and does it matter? Glob. Env. Change http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.07.006 (in the press).
2. Bullock, H. E., Harlow, L. L. & Mulaik, S. A. Causation issues in structural equation modeling research. Struct. Equ. Modeling 13, 253–267.
3. Maibach, E., Leiserowitz, A., Roser-Renouf, C. & Mertz, C. K. Identifying like-minded audiences for global warming public engagement campaigns: An audience segmentation analysis and tool development. PLoS ONE 6, e17571 (2011).
   Article CAS Google Scholar
4. Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C. & Hmielowski, J. Global Warming’s Six Americas, March 2012 & Nov. 2011 (Yale Project on Climate Change Communication, 2012).
5. Karl, T. R., Melillo, J. M. & Peterson, T. C. (eds) Global Climate Change Impacts in the United States (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2009).
6. Leiserowitz, A. American risk perceptions: Is climate change dangerous? Risk Anal. 25, 1433–1442 (2005).
   Article Google Scholar
7. Anderegg, W. R. L., Prall, J. W., Harold, J. & Schneider, S. H. Expert credibility in climate change. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 12107–12109 (2010).
   Article CAS Google Scholar
8. Roser-Renouf, C., Maibach, E., Leiserowitz, A. & Zhao, X. The Genesis of Climate Change Activism: From Key Beliefs to Political Advocacy Int. Commun. Assoc. Annual Conference (2011).
9. Weber, E. U. & Stern, P. C. Public understanding of climate change in the United States. Am. Psychologist 66, 315–328 (2011).
   Article Google Scholar
10. Fiske, S. T. & Taylor, S. E. Social Cognition 2nd edn (McGraw-Hill, 1991).
    Google Scholar
11. Miller, J. D. Public understanding of, and attitudes toward, scientific research: What we know and what we need to know. Public Underst. Sci. 13, 273–294 (2004).
    Article Google Scholar
12. Marx, S.M. et al. Communication and mental processes: Experiential and analytic processing of uncertain climate information. Glob. Environ. Change 17, 47–58 (2007).
    Article Google Scholar
13. Lejarraga, T. When experience is better than description: Time delays and complexity. J. Behav. Decis. Making 23, 100–116 (2010).
    Article Google Scholar
14. Leiserowitz, A. Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: The role of affect, imagery, and values. Climatic Change 77, 45–72 (2006).
    Article Google Scholar
15. Weber, E. U. What shapes perceptions of climate change? WIREs Clim. Change 1, 332–342 (2010).
    Article Google Scholar
16. Brody, S. D., Zahran, S., Vedlitz, A. & Grover, H. Examining the relationship between physical vulnerability and public perceptions of global climate change in the United States. Env. Behav. 40, 72–95 (2008).
    Article Google Scholar
17. Spence, A., Poortinga, W., Butler, C. & Pidgeon, N. S. Perceptions of climate change and willingness to save energy related to flood experience. Nature Clim. Change 1, 46–49 (2011).
    Google Scholar
18. Leiserowitz, A. & Broad, K. Florida: Public Opinion on Climate Change (Yale Project on Climate Change, 2008).
19. Kahan, D. M. et al. The Tragedy of the Risk-Perception Commons: Culture Conflict, Rationality Conflict, and Climate Change Temple University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2011-26 (2011); available at http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1871503 (2011).
20. El-Gamal, M. A. & Grether, D. M. Are people Bayesian? Uncovering behavioral strategies. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 90, 1137–1145 (1995).
    Article Google Scholar
21. Kunda, Z. The case for motivated reasoning. Psychol. Bull. 3, 480–498 (1990).
    Article Google Scholar
22. Dawson, E., Gilovich, T. & Regan, D. T. Motivated reasoning and performance on the Wason selection task. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 28, 1379–1387 (2002).
    Article Google Scholar
23. Hart, P. S. & Nisbet, E. C. Boomerang effects in science communication: How motivated reasoning and identity cues amplify opinion polarization about climate mitigation policies. Commun. Res. 39, 701–723 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
24. Taber, C. S. & Lodge, M. Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 50, 755–769 (2006).
    Article Google Scholar
25. Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C., Smith, N. & Dawson, E. Climategate, public opinion, and the loss of trust. (in the press); accessed July 23, 2012 from http://www.climatechangecommunication.org/images/files/Climategate_PublicOpinion_andLossofTrust(1).pdf.
26. Weber, E. U. & Sonka, S. in Farmers’ Decision Making: A Descriptive Approach (eds Jacobsen, B. H., Pedersen, D. E., Christensen, J. & Rasmussen, S.) 201–218 (SJFI, 1994).
    Google Scholar
27. Ruddell, D., Harlan, S. L., Grossman-Clarke, S. & Chowell, G. Scales of perception: Public awareness of regional and neighborhood climates. Climatic Change 3, 1–27 (2011).
    Google Scholar
28. Kline, R. B. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling 3rd edn (The Guilford Press, 2010).
    Google Scholar
29. Maibach, E. W., Nisbet, M., Baldwin, P. & Diao, G. Reframing climate change as a public health issue: An exploratory study of public reactions. BMC Public Health 10, 1–11 (2010).
    Article Google Scholar
30. Myers, T.A., Nisbet, M.C., Maibach, E. W. & Leiserowitz, A. A public health frame arouses hopeful emotions about climate change: A letter. Climatic Change 113, 1105–1112 (2012).
    Article Google Scholar
31. Callegaro, M. & DiSogra, C. Computing response metrics for online panels. Public Opin. Quart. 72, 1008–1032 (2008).
    Article Google Scholar
32. Lorenzoni, I., Nicholson-Cole, S. & Whitmarsh, L. Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications. Glob. Env. Change 17, 445–459 (2007).
    Article Google Scholar

Download references