A systems approach to evaluating the air quality co-benefits of US carbon policies (original) (raw)

References

  1. Bell, M. L., Dominici, F. & Samet, J. M. A meta-analysis of time-series studies of ozone and mortality with comparison to the national morbidity, mortality, and air pollution study. Epidemiology 16, 436–445 (2005).
    Article Google Scholar
  2. Pope, C. A., Ezzati, M. & Dockery, D. W. Fine-particulate air pollution and life expectancy in the United States. N. Engl. J. Med. 360, 376–386 (2009).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  3. US EPA Area Designations for 2008 Ground-Level Ozone Standards (Office of Air and Radiation, 2012); www.epa.gov/airquality/ozonepollution/designations/2008standards/index.htm
  4. US EPA Fine Particle (PM 2.5 ) Designations (Office of Air and Radiation, 2012). www.epa.gov/pmdesignations/
  5. IPCC, Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis (eds Solomon, S. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007).
  6. IPCC, Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).
  7. Nemet, G. F., Holloway, T. & Meier, P. Implications of incorporating air-quality co-benefits into climate change policymaking. Environ. Res. Lett. 5, 014007 (2010).
    Article Google Scholar
  8. Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Carbon (IWGSCC), Technical Update of the Social Cost of Carbon for Regulatory Impact Analysis Under Executive Order No. 12866 (United States Government, 2013); www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/assets/inforeg/technical-update-social-cost-of-carbon-for-regulator-impact-analysis.pdf
  9. Greenstone, M., Kopits, E. & Wolverton, A. Developing a social cost of carbon for US regulatory analysis: A methodology and interpretation. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 7, 23–46 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  10. Griffiths, C. et al. in Fiscal Policy to Mitigate Climate Change: A Guide for Policymakers (EPub) (ed Ruud de Mooij, I. et al.) Ch. 4 (International Monetary Fund, 2012).
    Google Scholar
  11. Jack, D. W. & Kinney, P. L. Health co-benefits of climate mitigation in urban areas. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2, 172–177 (2010).
    Article Google Scholar
  12. Shindell, D. et al. Simultaneously mitigating near-term climate change and improving human health and food security. Science 335, 183–189 (2012).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  13. Shindell, D. et al. Climate, health, agricultural and economic impacts of tighter vehicle-emission standards. Nature Clim. Change 1, 59–66 (2011).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  14. Burtraw, D. et al. Ancillary benefits of reduced air pollution in the US from moderate greenhouse gas mitigation policies in the electricity sector. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 45, 650–673 (2003).
    Article Google Scholar
  15. Groosman, B., Muller, N. Z. & O’Neill-Toy, E. The ancillary benefits from climate policy in the United States. Environ. Res. Econ. 50, 585–603 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
  16. Fann, N., Fulcher, C. M. & Hubbell, B. J. The influence of location, source, and emission type in estimates of the human health benefits of reducing a ton of air pollution. Air Qual. Atmos. Health 2, 169–176 (2009).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  17. Muller, N. Z., Mendelsohn, R. & Nordhaus, W. Environmental accounting for pollution in the United States Economy. Am. Econ. Rev. 101, 1649–1675 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
  18. Levy, J. I., Baxter, L. K. & Schwartz, J. Uncertainty and variability in health-related damages from coal-fired power plants in the United States. Risk Analysis 29, 1000–1014 (2009).
    Article Google Scholar
  19. Webster, M. et al. Analysis of climate policy targets under uncertainty. Climatic Change 112, 569–583 (2012).
    Article Google Scholar
  20. Rausch, S., Metcalf, G. E. & Reilly, J. M. Distributional impacts of carbon pricing: A general equilibrium approach with micro-data for households. Energy Econ. 33, (Suppl. 1) S20–S33 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
  21. ENVIRON User’s Guide: Comprehensive Air Quality Model with Extensions, Version 5.3 (ENVIRON International Corporation, 2010).
  22. Abt Associates Inc. BenMAP, Environmental Benefits Mapping and Analysis Program. User’s Manual, version 4.0 (US EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, 2012). Available at: www.epa.gov/airquality/benmap/docs.html (2013)
  23. Paltsev, S. & Capros, P. Cost concepts for climate change mitigation. Clim. Change Econ. 04, 1340003 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  24. US EPA Regulatory Impact Analysis for the Federal Implementation Plans to Reduce Interstate Transport of Fine Particulate Matter and Ozone in 27 States (Office of Air and Radiation, 2011); www.epa.gov/airtransport/pdfs/FinalRIA.pdf
  25. Weyant, J. P., C-Chesnaye, F. & Blanford, G. J. Overview of EMF-21: Multigas mitigation and climate policy. Energy J. (special issue 3) 1–32 (2006).
  26. Montgomery, D. W. Markets in licenses and efficient pollution control programs. J. Econ. Theory 5, 395–418 (1972).
    Article Google Scholar
  27. US EPA Regulatory Impact Analysis for the Final Mercury and Air Toxics Standards (Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, 2011); www.epa.gov/ttn/ecas/regdata/RIAs/matsriafinal.pdf
  28. Stern, N. The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007).
    Book Google Scholar
  29. Waugh, C. J. An Integrated Assessment of Air Pollutant Abatement Opportunities in a Computable General Equilibrium Framework Master of Science Thesis, MIT Technology and Policy Program (2012); http://globalchange.mit.edu/research/publications/2295
  30. US EPA Industrial Economics, Inc. Uncertainty Analyses to Support the Second Section 812 Benefit-Cost Analysis of the Clean Air Act (Office of Air and Radiation, 2010); www.epa.gov/oar/sect812/may10/IEc_Uncertainty.pdf
  31. Matus, K. et al. Health damages from air pollution in China. Glob. Environ. Change 22, 55–66 (2012).
    Article Google Scholar
  32. Nam, K-M., Selin, N. E., Reilly, J. M. & Paltsev, S. Measuring welfare loss caused by air pollution in Europe: A CGE analysis. Energy Policy 38, 5059–5071 (2010).
    Article Google Scholar
  33. Matus, K., Yang, T., Paltsev, S., Reilly, J. & Nam, K-M. Toward integrated assessment of environmental change: Air pollution health effects in the USA. Climatic Change 88, 59–92 (2008).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  34. Chang, H. H., Zhou, J. & Fuentes, M. Impact of climate change on ambient ozone level and mortality in Southeastern United States. Int. J. Environ. Res. Publ. Health 7, 2866–2880 (2010).
    Article Google Scholar
  35. Tagaris, E. et al. Impacts of global climate change and emissions on regional ozone and fine particulate matter concentrations over the United States. J. Geophys. Res. 112, D14312 (2007).
    Article Google Scholar
  36. Thompson, T. M., Saari, R. K. & Selin, N. E. Air quality resolution for health impact assessment: Influence of regional characteristics. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 14, 969–978 (2014).
    Article Google Scholar
  37. Fann, N. et al. Estimating the national public health burden associated with exposure to ambient PM2.5 and ozone. Risk Anal. 32, 81–95 (2012).
    Article Google Scholar
  38. Jacob, D. J. & Winner, D. A. Effect of climate change on air quality. Atmos. Environ. 43, 51–63 (2009).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  39. IPCC, Climate Change 2007: Mitigation (ed Metz, B. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007).
  40. Rausch, S., Metcalf, G. E., Reilly, J. M. & Paltsev, S. Distributional implications of alternative US greenhouse gas control measures. B.E. J. Econ. Anal. Policy 10 http://10.2202/1935-1682.2537 (2010)
  41. Caron, J. & Rausch, S. A Global General Equilibrium Model with US State-Level Detail for Trade and Environmental Policy Analysis (MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, 2013); http://globalchange.mit.edu/research/publications/2405
  42. Rausch, S., Metcalf, G. E., Reilly, J. M. & Paltsev, S. Distributional Impacts of a US Greenhouse Gas Policy: A General Equilibrium Analysis of Carbon Pricing, US Energy Tax Policy (ed Metcalf, G. E.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2011).
    Google Scholar
  43. CMAS SMOKE v2.7 User’s Manual (Institute for the Environment, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2010); https://www.cmascenter.org/smoke/documentation/2.7/html/
  44. US EPA Guidance on the Use of Models and Other Analyses for Demonstrating Attainment of Air Quality Goals for Ozone, PM 2.5 , and Regional Haze (Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, 2007); www.epa.gov/scram001/guidance/guide/final-03-pm-rh-guidance.pdf
  45. US EPA Air Quality Modeling Final Rule Technical Support Document (Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, 2011); www.epa.gov/airtransport/pdfs/AQModeling.pdf
  46. Thompson, T. M. & Selin, N. E. Influence of air quality model resolution on uncertainty associated with health impacts. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 12, 9753–9762 (2012).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  47. CDC Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (Center for Disease Control and Prevention, 2006); http://wonder.cdc.gov/mmwr/mmwr_reps.asp

Download references