Peak growing season gross uptake of carbon in North America is largest in the Midwest USA (original) (raw)

• Ciais, P. et al. in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) 465–570 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).
  Google Scholar
• Arneth, A. et al. Terrestrial biogeochemical feedbacks in the climate system. Nat. Geosci. 3, 525–532 (2010).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Guanter, L. et al. Global and time-resolved monitoring of crop photosynthesis with chlorophyll fluorescence. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, E1327–E1333 (2014).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Friedlingstein, P. et al. Climate-carbon cycle feedback analysis: results from the C4 MIP model intercomparison. J. Clim. 19, 3337–3353 (2006).
  Article Google Scholar
• Friedlingstein, P. et al. Uncertainties in CMIP5 climate projections due to carbon cycle feedbacks. J. Clim. 27, 511–526 (2014).
  Article Google Scholar
• Huntzinger, D. et al. North American Carbon Program (NACP) regional interim synthesis: terrestrial biospheric model intercomparison. Ecol. Model. 232, 144–157 (2012).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Hilton, T. W., Davis, K. J. & Keller, K. Evaluating terrestrial CO2 flux diagnoses and uncertainties from a simple land surface model and its residuals. Biogeosciences 11, 217–235 (2014).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Schaefer, K. et al. A model-data comparison of gross primary productivity. J. Geophys. Res. 117, G03010 (2012).
  Article Google Scholar
• Jung, M. et al. Global patterns of land-atmosphere fluxes of carbon dioxide, latent heat, and sensible heat derived from eddy covariance, satellite, and meteorological observations. J. Geophys. Res. 116, G00J07 (2011).
  Article Google Scholar
• Miles, N. L. et al. Large amplitude spatial and temporal gradients in atmospheric boundary layer CO2 mole fractions detected with a tower-based network in the US Upper Midwest. J. Geophys. Res. 117, G01019 (2012).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Schuh, A. E. et al. Evaluating atmospheric CO2 inversions at multiple scales over a highly inventoried agricultural landscape. Glob. Change Biol. 19, 1424–1439 (2013).
  Article Google Scholar
• Montzka, S. A. et al. On the global distribution, seasonality, and budget of atmospheric carbonyl sulfide (COS) and some similarities to CO2 . J. Geophys. Res. 112, D09302 (2007).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. E. et al. Photosynthetic control of atmospheric carbonyl sulfide during the growing season. Science 322, 1085–1088 (2008).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Suntharalingam, P., Kettle, A. J., Montzka, S. M. & Jacob, D. J. Global 3-D model analysis of the seasonal cycle of atmospheric carbonyl sulfide: implications for terrestrial vegetation uptake. Geophys. Res. Lett. 35, L19801 (2008).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Stimler, K., Montzka, S. A., Berry, J. A., Rudich, Y. & Yakir, D. Relationships between carbonyl sulfide (COS) and CO2 during leaf gas exchange. New Phytol. 186, 869–878 (2010).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Maseyk, K. et al. Sources and sinks of carbonyl sulfide in an agricultural field in the Southern Great Plains. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 9064–9069 (2014).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Commane, R. et al. Seasonal fluxes of carbonyl sulfide in a midlatitude forest. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 14162–14167 (2015).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Berry, J. et al. A coupled model of the global cycles of carbonyl sulfide and CO2: a possible new window on the carbon cycle. J. Geophys. Res. 118, 842–852 (2013).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Huete, A. et al. Overview of the radiometric and biophysical performance of the MODIS vegetation indices. Remote Sens. Environ. 83, 195–213 (2002).
  Article Google Scholar
• Guanter, L. et al. Retrieval and global assessment of terrestrial chlorophyll fluorescence from {GOSAT} space measurements. Remote Sens. Environ. 121, 236–251 (2012).
  Article Google Scholar
• Huete, A., Justice, C. & van Leeuwen, W. MODIS Vegetation Index (MOD 13) Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document, Version 3 (1999); http://modis.gsfc.nasa.gov/data/atbd/atbd_mod13.pdf
• Launois, T., Peylin, P., Belviso, S. & Poulter, B. A new model of the global biogeochemical cycle of carbonyl sulfide—Part 2: use of carbonyl sulfide to constrain gross primary productivity in current vegetation models. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 15, 9285–9312 (2015).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Stimler, K., Berry, J. A., Montzka, S. A. & Yakir, D. Association between carbonyl sulfide uptake and 18Δ during gas exchange in C3 and C4 leaves. Plant Physiol. 157, 509–517 (2011).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Hilton, T. W. et al. Large variability in ecosystem models explains uncertainty in a critical parameter for quantifying GPP with carbonyl sulphide. Tellus B 67, 26329 (2015).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Kettle, A. J., Kuhn, U., von Hobe, M., Kesselmeier, J. & Andreae, M. O. Global budget of atmospheric carbonyl sulfide: temporal and spatial variations of the dominant sources and sinks. J. Geophys. Res. 107, ACH 25-1–ACH 25-16 (2002).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Asaf, D. et al. Ecosystem photosynthesis inferred from measurements of carbonyl sulphide flux. Nat. Geosci. 6, 186–190 (2013).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Whelan, M. E. et al. Carbonyl sulfide exchange in soils for better estimates of ecosystem carbon uptake. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 16, 3711–3726 (2016).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. E. et al. Atmospheric carbonyl sulfide sources from anthropogenic activity: implications for carbon cycle constraints. Geophys. Res. Lett. 42, 3004–3010 (2015).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Zumkehr, A., Hilton, T. W., Whelan, M., Smith, S. & Campbell, J. E. Gridded anthropogenic emissions inventory and atmospheric transport of carbonyl sulfide in the US. J. Geophys. Res. 122, 2169–2178 (2017).
  CAS Google Scholar
• Kulkarni, S. et al. Source sector and region contributions to BC and PM2.5 in Central Asia. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 15, 1683–1705 (2015).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. E. et al. Analysis of anthropogenic CO2 signal in ICARTT using a regional chemical transport model and observed tracers. Tellus B 59, 199–210 (2007).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• van der Werf, G. R. et al. Global fire emissions and the contribution of deforestation, savanna, forest, agricultural, and peat fires (1997–2009). Atmos. Chem. Phys. 10, 11707–11735 (2010).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Sellers, P. J. et al. A revised land surface parameterization (SiB2) for atmospheric GCMS. Part I: model formulation. J. Clim. 9, 676–705 (1996).
  Article Google Scholar
• Sellers, P. J. et al. A revised land surface parameterization (SiB2) for atmospheric GCMS. Part II: the generation of global fields of terrestrial biophysical parameters from satellite data. J. Clim. 9, 706–737 (1996).
  Article Google Scholar
• Baker, I. T., Denning, A. S. & Stöckli, R. North American gross primary productivity: regional characterization and interannual variability. Tellus B 62, 533–549 (2010).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Baker, I. T. et al. Seasonal drought stress in the Amazon: reconciling models and observations. J. Geophys. Res. 113, G00B01 (2008).
  Article Google Scholar
• Liu, J., Price, D. T. & Chen, J. M. Nitrogen controls on ecosystem carbon sequestration: a model implementation and application to Saskatchewan, Canada. Ecol. Model. 186, 178–195 (2005).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Efron, B. & Tibshirani, R. Statistical data analysis in the computer age. Science 253, 390–395 (1991).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Lokupitiya, E. et al. Incorporation of crop phenology in Simple Biosphere Model (SiBcrop) to improve land-atmosphere carbon exchanges from croplands. Biogeosciences 6, 969–986 (2009).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Corbin, K. D. et al. Assessing the impact of crops on regional CO2 fluxes and atmospheric concentrations. Tellus B 62, 521–532 (2010).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Still, C. J., Berry, J. A., Collatz, G. J. & DeFries, R. S. in ISLSCP Initiative II Collection (eds Hall, F. G. et al.) (Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 2009); http://daac.ornl.gov from Oak Ridge National Laboratory Distributed Active Archive Center.
  Google Scholar
• Stimler, K., Berry, J. A. & Yakir, D. Effects of carbonyl sulfide and carbonic anhydrase on stomatal conductance. Plant Physiol. 158, 524–530 (2012).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Kesselmeier, J., Teusch, N. & Kuhn, U. Controlling variables for the uptake of atmospheric carbonyl sulfide by soil. J. Geophys. Res. 104, 11577–11584 (1999).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Sun, W., Maseyk, K., Lett, C. & Seibt, U. A soil diffusion-reaction model for surface COS flux: COSSM v1. Geosci. Model Dev. 8, 3055–3070 (2015).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Ogée, J. et al. A new mechanistic framework to predict OCS fluxes from soils. Biogeosciences 13, 2221–2240 (2016).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Ramankutty, N., Evan, A. T., Monfreda, C. & Foley, J. A. Farming the planet: 1. Geographic distribution of global agricultural lands in the year 2000. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 22, GB1003 (2008).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Watts, S. F. The mass budgets of carbonyl sulfide, dimethyl sulfide, carbon disulfide and hydrogen sulfide. Atmos. Environ. 34, 761–779 (2000).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Blake, N. J. et al. Carbonyl sulfide and carbon disulfide: large-scale distributions over the western Pacific and emissions from Asia during TRACE-P. J. Geophys. Res. 109, D15S05 (2004).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• D’Allura, A. et al. Meteorological and air quality forecasting using the WRF–STEM model during the 2008 ARCTAS field campaign. Atmos. Environ. 45, 6901–6910 (2011).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Canty, A. & Ripley, B. D. boot: Bootstrap R (S-Plus) Functions. R package version 1.3-18 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2016).
• Davison, A. C. & Hinkley, D. V. Bootstrap Methods and their Applications (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1997).
  Book Google Scholar
• R Core Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2015); https://www.R-project.org
• Hilborn, R. & Mangel, M. The Ecological Detective: Confronting Models with Data (Princeton Univ. Press, 1997).
  Google Scholar
• Jones, E. et al. SciPy: Open Source Scientific Tools for Python (SciPy Developers, 2001); http://www.scipy.org
  Google Scholar
• Hunter, J. D. Matplotlib: a 2D graphics environment. Comput. Sci. Eng. 9, 90–95 (2007).
  Article Google Scholar
• McKinney, W. in Proceedings of the 9th Python in Science Conference (eds van der Walt, S. & Millman, J.) 51–56 (2010).
  Google Scholar