A typology of loss and damage perspectives (original) (raw)

References

1. Calliari, E. Loss and damage: a critical discourse analysis of Parties’ positions in climate change negotiations. J. Risk Res. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2016.1240706 (2016).
2. Mace, M. J. & Verheyen, R. Loss, damage and responsibility after COP21: all options open for the Paris agreement. Rev. Eur. Comp. Int. Environ. Law 25, 197–214 (2016).
   Article Google Scholar
3. Mace, M. J. & Schaeffer, M. Loss and damage in the UNFCCC: what relationship to the Hyogo Framework? Clim. Anal. http://www.lossanddamage.net/4941 (2013).
4. UNFCCC Decision 2/CP.19: Warsaw International Mechanism for Loss and Damage Associated with Climate Change Impacts (2013).
5. UNFCCC Adoption of the Paris Agreement FCCC/CP/2015/10/Add.1. 1–32 (2015).
6. Vanhala, L. & Hestbaek, C. Framing climate change loss and damage in the UNFCCC negotiations. Glob. Environ. Polit. 16, 111–129 (2016).
   Article Google Scholar
7. James, R. et al. Characterizing loss and damage from climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 938–939 (2014).
   Article Google Scholar
8. UNFCCC Report of the Executive Committee of the Warsaw International Mechanism for Loss and Damage Associated with Climate Change Impacts FCCC/SB/2016/3 (2016).
9. UNEP Loss and Damage: The Role of Ecosystem Services (2016).
10. WFP Regional Bureau for Asia Loss & Damage: Repairing Shattered Lives. Paper No. 1. Black and White Paper Series (2014).
11. CARE Germanwatch, ActionAid, WWF. Loss and Damage: Into Unknown Territory (2012).
12. UNFCCC Submissions on Possible Activities under Strategic Workstreams of the Five-Year Rolling Workplan: Organizations (2017); http://unfccc.int/adaptation/groups_committees/loss_and_damage_executive_committee/items/10064.php
13. Huq, S., Roberts, E. & Fenton, A. Loss and damage. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 947–949 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
14. Parker, H. R. et al. Stakeholder perceptions of event attribution in the loss and damage debate. Clim. Policy 3062, 1–18 (2016).
    Google Scholar
15. Roberts, E. & Pelling, M. Climate change-related loss and damage: translating the global policy agenda for national policy processes. Clim. Dev. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2016.1184608 (2016).
16. Huggel, C., Stone, D., Eicken, H. & Hansen, G. Potential and limitations of the attribution of climate change impacts for informing loss and damage discussions and policies. Climatic Change 133, 453–467 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
17. Surminski, S. & Lopez, A. Concept of loss and damage of climate change a new challenge for climate decision-making? A climate science perspective. Clim. Dev. 7, 1–11 (2014).
    Google Scholar
18. Warner, K. & Geest, K. V. Loss and damage from climate change: local level evidence from nine vulnerable countries. Int. J. Glob. Warming 5, 367–386 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
19. Verheyen, R. Tackling Loss & Damage—A New Role for the Climate Regime? (2012); http://loss-and-damage.net/download/6877.pdf
20. Mechler, R. & Schinko, T. Identifying the policy space for climate loss and damage. Science 354, 290–292 (2016).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
21. Schinko, T. & Mechler, R. Applying recent insights from climate risk management to operationalize the loss and damage mechanism. Ecol. Econ. 136, 296–298 (2017).
    Article Google Scholar
22. UNFCCC A Literature Review on the Topics in the Context of Thematic Area 2 of the Work Programme on Loss and Damage: A Range of Approaches to Address Loss and Damage Associated with the Adverse Effects of Climate Change. UNFCCC Subsidiary Body for Implementation (SBI) FCCC/SBI/2012/INF.14. 2014 (2012).
23. Mechler, R. & Bouwer, L. M. Understanding trends and projections of disaster losses and climate change: is vulnerability the missing link? Climatic Change 133, 23–35 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
24. Roberts, E., Andrei, S., Huq, S. & Flint, L. Resilience synergies in the post-2015 development agenda. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 1024–1025 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
25. Hirsh, T. et al. Climate-Related Loss and Damage: Finding a Just Solution to the Political Challenges (Act Alliance, Germanwatch, and Bread for the World, 2015); https://germanwatch.org/en/download/13036.pdf
26. Mechler, R. & Bouwer, L. M. Managing unnatural disaster risk from climate extremes. Nat. Clim. 4, 235–237 (2014).
    Article Google Scholar
27. Dow, K., Berkhout, F. & Preston, B. L. Limits to adaptation. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 305–307 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
28. Klein, R. J. T. et al. in Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability (eds Field, C. B. et al.) 899–943 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).
    Google Scholar
29. UNFCCC Decision 1/CP.16 The Cancun Agreements: Outcome of the work of the Ad Hoc Working Group on Long-term Cooperative Action under the Convention (2011).
30. Thompson, A. & Otto, F. E. L. Ethical and normative implications of weather event attribution for policy discussions concerning loss and damage. Climatic Change 133, 439–451 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
31. Wallimann-Helmer, I. Justice for climate loss and damage. Climatic Change 133, 469–480 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
32. Surminski, S., Bouwer, L. M. & Linnerooth-Bayer, J. How insurance can support climate resilience? Nat. Clim. Change 6, 333–334 (2016).
    Article Google Scholar
33. Otto, F. E. L. et al. Attribution of extreme weather events in Africa: a preliminary exploration of the science and policy implications. Climatic Change 132, 531–543 (2015).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
34. Parker, H. R. et al. Implications of event attribution for loss and damage policy. Weather 70, 268–272 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
35. Barnett, J., Tschakert, P., Head, L. & Adger, W. N. A science of loss. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 976–978 (2016).
    Article Google Scholar
36. Tschakert, P. et al. Climate change and loss, as if people mattered: values, places, and experiences. Wiley Interdisciplinary Rev. Clim. Change 8, e476 (2017).
    Article Google Scholar
37. Hoffmaister, J. P., Talakai, M., Damptey, P. & Barbosa, A. S. Warsaw International Mechanism for Loss and Damage: Moving from Polarizing Discussions Towards Addressing the Emerging Challenges Faced by Developing Countries (2014); http://loss-and-damage.net/4950
38. UNFCCC Summary Information on the SCF Forum 2016 (2016); http://unfccc.int/files/cooperation_and_support/financial_mechanism/standing_committee/application/pdf/scf_forum_2016_information_summary_final2.pdf
39. UNFCCC Report of the Executive Committee of the Warsaw International Mechanism for Loss and Damage associated with Climate Change Impacts FCCC/SB/2014/4. (2014); http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2014/sb/eng/04.pdf
40. Boyd, E. & Juhola, S. Stepping up to the climate change: opportunities in re-conceptualising development futures. J. Int. Dev. 21, 792–804 (2009).
    Article Google Scholar
41. Ormston, R., Spencer, L., Barnard, M. & Snape, D. in Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers (eds Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., Nicholls, C. M. & Ormston, R.) 1–26 (SAGE, 2014).
    Google Scholar
42. Atkinson, R. & Flint, R. in The SAGE Encyclopedia of Social Science Research Methods (eds Lewis-Beck, M. S., Bryman, A. & Liao, T. F.) 1043–1044 (SAGE, 2004).
    Google Scholar
43. Eisenhardt, K. M. & Graebner, M. E. Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges. Acad. Manag. J. 50, 25–32 (2007).
    Article Google Scholar
44. Collier, D., LaPorte, J. & Seawright, J. Putting typologies to work: concept formation, measurement, and analytic rigor. Polit. Res. Q. 65, 217–232 (2012).
    Article Google Scholar
45. Boyd, E., James, R. & Jones, R. Policy Brief: Typologies of Loss and Damage and Associated Actions (Environmental Change Institute, 2016); http://www.eci.ox.ac.uk/publications/policy-brief-pdf/160608_Typologies_ExCom3Update_Final.pdf
46. Boyd, E., James, R. & Jones, R. Policy Brief: A Spectrum of Views on Loss and Damage (Environmental Change Institute, 2016); http://www.eci.ox.ac.uk/publications/161101.pdf

Download references