C. elegans ORFeome version 1.1: experimental verification of the genome annotation and resource for proteome-scale protein expression (original) (raw)

Nature Genetics volume 34, pages 35–41 (2003)Cite this article

Abstract

To verify the genome annotation and to create a resource to functionally characterize the proteome, we attempted to Gateway-clone all predicted protein-encoding open reading frames (ORFs), or the 'ORFeome,' of Caenorhabditis elegans. We successfully cloned approximately 12,000 ORFs (ORFeome 1.1), of which roughly 4,000 correspond to genes that are untouched by any cDNA or expressed-sequence tag (EST). More than 50% of predicted genes needed corrections in their intron-exon structures. Notably, approximately 11,000 C. elegans proteins can now be expressed under many conditions and characterized using various high-throughput strategies, including large-scale interactome mapping. We suggest that similar ORFeome projects will be valuable for other organisms, including humans.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 12 print issues and online access

$209.00 per year

only $17.42 per issue

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mardis, E., McPherson, J., Martienssen, R., Wilson, R.K. & McCombie, W.R. What is finished, and why does it matter. Genome Res. 12, 669–671 (2002).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  2. Vidal, M. A biological atlas of functional maps. Cell 104, 333–339 (2001).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  3. Ideker, T., Galitski, T. & Hood, L. A new approach to decoding life: systems biology. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 2, 343–372 (2001).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  4. Kapranov, P. et al. Large-scale transcriptional activity in human chromosomes 21 and 22. Science 296, 916–919 (2002).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  5. The International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 409, 860–921 (2001).
  6. Reboul, J. et al. Open-reading-frame sequence tags (OSTs) support the existence of at least 17,300 genes in C. elegans. Nat. Genet. 27, 332–336 (2001).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  7. Blandin, G. et al. Genomic exploration of the hemiascomycetous yeasts: 4. The genome of Saccharomyces cerevisiae revisited. FEBS Lett. 487, 31–36 (2000).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  8. Oshiro, G. et al. Parallel identification of new genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genome Res. 12, 1210–1220 (2002).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  9. Zhu, H. et al. Global analysis of protein activities using proteome chips. Science 293, 2101–2105 (2001).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  10. MacBeath, G. & Schreiber, S.L. Printing proteins as microarrays for high-throughput function determination. Science 289, 1760–1763 (2000).
    CAS Google Scholar
  11. Ziauddin, J. & Sabatini, D.M. Microarrays of cells expressing defined cDNAs. Nature 411, 107–110 (2001).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  12. Gera, J.F., Hazbun, T.R. & Fields, S. Array-based methods for identifying protein–protein and protein–nucleic acid interactions. Methods Enzymol. 350, 499–512 (2002).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  13. Mammalian Gene Collection (MGC) Program Team. Generation and initial analysis of more than 15,000 full-length human and mouse cDNA sequences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 16899–16903 (2002).
  14. The FANTOM Consortium and the RIKEN Genome Exploration Research Group Phase I & II Team. Analysis of the mouse transcriptome based on functional annotation of 60,770 full-length cDNAs. Nature 420, 563–573 (2002).
  15. Seki, M. et al. Functional annotation of a full-length Arabidopsis cDNA collection. Science 296, 141–145 (2002).
    Article Google Scholar
  16. Stein, L., Sternberg, P., Durbin, R., Thierry-Mieg, J. & Spieth, J. WormBase: network access to the genome and biology of Caenorhabditis elegans. Nucleic Acids Res. 29, 82–86 (2001).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  17. Walhout, A.J. et al. Gateway recombinational cloning: application to the cloning of large numbers of open reading frames or ORFeomes. Methods Enzymol. 328, 575–592 (2000).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  18. Walhout, A.J. et al. Protein interaction mapping in C. elegans using proteins involved in vulval development. Science 287, 116–122 (2000).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  19. Hartley, J.L., Temple, G.F. & Brasch, M.A. DNA cloning using in vitro site-specific recombination. Genome Res. 10, 1788–1795 (2000).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  20. The C. elegans Sequencing Consortium. Genome sequence of the nematode C. elegans: a platform for investigating biology. Science 282, 2012–2018 (1998).
  21. Morin, X., Daneman, R., Zavortink, M. & Chia, W. A protein trap strategy to detect GFP-tagged proteins expressed from their endogenous loci in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 15050–15055 (2001).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  22. Harrison, P.M., Echols, N. & Gerstein, M.B. Digging for dead genes: an analysis of the characteristics of the pseudogene population in the Caenorhabditis elegans genome. Nucleic Acids Res. 29, 818–830 (2001).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  23. Vaglio, P. et al. WorfDB: the C. elegans ORFeome Database. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 237–240 (2003).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  24. Hazbun, T.R. & Fields, S. Networking proteins in yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 4277–4278 (2001).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  25. Davy, A. et al. A protein–protein interaction map of the Caenorhabditis elegans 26S proteasome. EMBO Rep. 2, 821–828 (2001).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  26. Boulton, S.J. et al. Combined functional genomic maps of the C. elegans DNA damage response. Science 295, 127–131 (2002).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  27. Kinoshita, N., Minshull, J. & Kirschner, M.W. The identification of two novel ligands of the FGF receptor by a yeast screening method and their activity in Xenopus development. Cell 83, 621–630 (1995).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  28. Braun, P. et al. Proteome-scale purification of human proteins from bacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 2654–2659 (2002).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  29. Hammarstrom, M., Hellgren, N., van Den Berg, S., Berglund, H. & Hard, T. Rapid screening for improved solubility of small human proteins produced as fusion proteins in Escherichia coli. Protein Sci. 11, 313–321 (2002).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  30. Hillier, L. & Green, P. OSP: a computer program for choosing PCR and DNA sequencing primers. PCR Methods Appl. 1, 124–128 (1991).
    Article CAS Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the C. elegans Sequencing Consortium for the genome sequence; the participants of the annual ORFeome meeting for their input and numerous suggestions; the members of M.V.'s laboratory for their input and help; C. McCowan for administrative assistance; B. Sobhian, A.-S. Nicot, N. Tzellas and the GenomeVision Service sequencing staff at Genome Therapeutics for technical assistance; and P. Braun for the protein expression plasmids. This work was supported by grants from the National Cancer Institute, the National Human Genome Research Institute, the National Institute of General Medical Sciences and the Merck Genome Research Institute awarded to M.V.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Jérôme Reboul
    Present address: INSERM Unité 119, Institut Paoli Calmette, 13009, Marseille, France
  2. Troy Moore
    Present address: Open Biosystems, Huntsville, Alabama, 35806, USA
  3. James R. Hudson Jr.
    Present address: Cityscapes, Huntsville, Alabama, 35801, USA
  4. James L. Hartley
    Present address: SAIC/National Cancer Institute, Frederick, Maryland, 21702, USA
  5. Michael A. Brasch
    Present address: Atto Bioscience, Rockville, Maryland, 20850, USA
  6. Simon Boulton
    Present address: Cancer Research UK, Clare Hall, Herts, EN6 3LD, UK
  7. Lynn Doucette-Stamm
    Present address: Agencourt Biosciences Corporation, Beverly, Massachusetts, 01915, USA
  8. Jérôme Reboul, Philippe Vaglio, Jean-François Rual and Philippe Lamesch: These authors contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, 02115, Massachusetts, USA
    Jérôme Reboul, Philippe Vaglio, Jean-François Rual, Philippe Lamesch, Monica Martinez, Christopher M. Armstrong, Siming Li, Laurent Jacotot, Nicolas Bertin, Rekin's Janky, Simon Boulton, David E. Hill & Marc Vidal
  2. Unité de Recherche en Biologie Moléculaire, Facultés Universitaires Notre-Dame de la Paix, Namur, 5000, Belgium
    Jean-François Rual, Philippe Lamesch & Jean Vandenhaute
  3. Research Genetics /Invitrogen, Huntsville, Alabama, USA
    Troy Moore & James R. Hudson Jr.
  4. Life Technologies /Invitrogen, Rockville, Maryland, USA
    James L. Hartley & Michael A. Brasch
  5. Protedyne Corporation, Windsor, 06095, Connecticut, USA
    Gregory A. Endress
  6. Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
    Sarah Jenna & Eric Chevet
  7. Center for Applied Genomics, Public Health Research Institute, Newark, 07103, New Jersey, USA
    Vasilis Papasotiropoulos & Peter P. Tolias
  8. Yale University, New Haven, 06520, Connecticut, USA
    Jason Ptacek & Mike Snyder
  9. Center for Synchrotron Biosciences and Department of Physiology & Biophysics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, 10461, New York, USA
    Raymond Huang & Mark R. Chance
  10. Genome Therapeutics, Waltham, 02453, Massachusetts, USA
    Hongmei Lee & Lynn Doucette-Stamm

Authors

  1. Jérôme Reboul
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  2. Philippe Vaglio
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  3. Jean-François Rual
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  4. Philippe Lamesch
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  5. Monica Martinez
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  6. Christopher M. Armstrong
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  7. Siming Li
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  8. Laurent Jacotot
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  9. Nicolas Bertin
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  10. Rekin's Janky
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  11. Troy Moore
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  12. James R. Hudson Jr.
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  13. James L. Hartley
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  14. Michael A. Brasch
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  15. Jean Vandenhaute
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  16. Simon Boulton
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  17. Gregory A. Endress
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  18. Sarah Jenna
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  19. Eric Chevet
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  20. Vasilis Papasotiropoulos
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  21. Peter P. Tolias
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  22. Jason Ptacek
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  23. Mike Snyder
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  24. Raymond Huang
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  25. Mark R. Chance
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  26. Hongmei Lee
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  27. Lynn Doucette-Stamm
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  28. David E. Hill
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  29. Marc Vidal
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence toMarc Vidal.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

T.M. has financial interests in Open Biosystems, one of the companies responsible for the distribution of the C. elegans ORFeome version 1.1.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reboul, J., Vaglio, P., Rual, JF. et al. C. elegans ORFeome version 1.1: experimental verification of the genome annotation and resource for proteome-scale protein expression.Nat Genet 34, 35–41 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1140

Download citation

Associated content