Fast modulation of visual perception by basal forebrain cholinergic neurons (original) (raw)

References

  1. Crochet, S. & Petersen, C.C.H. Correlating whisker behavior with membrane potential in barrel cortex of awake mice. Nat. Neurosci. 9, 608–610 (2006).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  2. Poulet, J.F.A. & Petersen, C.C.H. Internal brain state regulates membrane potential synchrony in barrel cortex of behaving mice. Nature 454, 881–885 (2008).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  3. Niell, C.M. & Stryker, M.P. Modulation of visual responses by behavioral state in mouse visual cortex. Neuron 65, 472–479 (2010).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  4. Castro-Alamancos, M.A. Absence of rapid sensory adaptation in neocortex during information processing states. Neuron 41, 455–464 (2004).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  5. Wörgötter, F. et al. State-dependent receptive-field restructuring in the visual cortex. Nature 396, 165–168 (1998).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  6. Hasenstaub, A., Sachdev, R.N.S. & McCormick, D.A. State changes rapidly modulate cortical neuronal responsiveness. J. Neurosci. 27, 9607–9622 (2007).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  7. Marguet, S.L. & Harris, K.D. State-dependent representation of amplitude-modulated noise stimuli in rat auditory cortex. J. Neurosci. 31, 6414–6420 (2011).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  8. Xu, S., Jiang, W., Poo, M.-M. & Dan, Y. Activity recall in a visual cortical ensemble. Nat. Neurosci. 15, 449–455 (2012).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  9. Buzsaki, G. et al. Nucleus basalis and thalamic control of neocortical activity in the freely moving rat. J. Neurosci. 8, 4007–4026 (1988).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  10. Zaborszky, L. & Duque, A. Sleep-wake mechanisms and basal forebrain circuitry. Front. Biosci. 8, d1146–d1169 (2003).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  11. Jones, B.E. From waking to sleeping: neuronal and chemical substrates. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 26, 578–586 (2005).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  12. Lee, M.-G., Hassani, O.K., Alonso, A. & Jones, B.E. Cholinergic basal forebrain neurons burst with theta during waking and paradoxical sleep. J. Neurosci. 25, 4365–4369 (2005).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  13. Parikh, V., Kozak, R., Martinez, V. & Sarter, M. Prefrontal acetylcholine release controls cue detection on multiple timescales. Neuron 56, 141–154 (2007).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  14. Metherate, R. & Ashe, J.H. Nucleus basalis stimulation facilitates thalamocortical synaptic transmission in the rat auditory cortex. Synapse 14, 132–143 (1993).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  15. Goard, M. & Dan, Y. Basal forebrain activation enhances cortical coding of natural scenes. Nat. Neurosci. 12, 1444–1449 (2009).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  16. Kuo, M.-C., Rasmusson, D.D. & Dringenberg, H.C. Input-selective potentiation and rebalancing of primary sensory cortex afferents by endogenous acetylcholine. Neuroscience 163, 430–441 (2009).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  17. Zhao, S. et al. Cell type–specific channelrhodopsin-2 transgenic mice for optogenetic dissection of neural circuitry function. Nat. Methods 8, 745–752 (2011).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  18. Bezdudnaya, T. et al. Thalamic burst mode and inattention in the awake LGNd. Neuron 49, 421–432 (2006).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  19. Keller, G.B., Bonhoeffer, T. & Hübener, M. Sensorimotor mismatch signals in primary visual cortex of the behaving mouse. Neuron 74, 809–815 (2012).
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  20. Polack, P.-O., Friedman, J. & Golshani, P. Cellular mechanisms of brain state–dependent gain modulation in visual cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 16, 1331–1339 (2013).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  21. Herrero, J.L. et al. Acetylcholine contributes through muscarinic receptors to attentional modulation in V1. Nature 454, 1110–1114 (2008).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  22. Rokem, A., Landau, A.N., Garg, D., Prinzmetal, W. & Silver, M.A. Cholinergic enhancement increases the effects of voluntary attention but does not affect involuntary attention. Neuropsychopharmacology 35, 2538–2544 (2010).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  23. Bauer, M. et al. Cholinergic enhancement of visual attention and neural oscillations in the human brain. Curr. Biol. 22, 397–402 (2012).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  24. Chiba, A.A., Bushnell, P.J., Oshiro, W.M. & Gallagher, M. Selective removal of cholinergic neurons in the basal forebrain alters cued target detection. Neuroreport 10, 3119–3123 (1999).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  25. Sarter, M., Hasselmo, M.E., Bruno, J.P. & Givens, B. Unraveling the attentional functions of cortical cholinergic inputs: interactions between signal-driven and cognitive modulation of signal detection. Brain Res. Brain Res. Rev. 48, 98–111 (2005).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  26. Sillito, A.M. & Kemp, J.A. Cholinergic modulation of the functional organization of the cat visual cortex. Brain Res. 289, 143–155 (1983).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  27. Laplante, F., Morin, Y., Quirion, R. & Vaucher, E. Acetylcholine release is elicited in the visual cortex, but not in the prefrontal cortex, by patterned visual stimulation: a dual in vivo microdialysis study with functional correlates in the rat brain. Neuroscience 132, 501–510 (2005).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  28. Disney, A.A., Aoki, C. & Hawken, M.J. Gain modulation by nicotine in macaque V1. Neuron 56, 701–713 (2007).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  29. Sato, H., Hata, Y., Masui, H. & Tsumoto, T. A functional role of cholinergic innervation to neurons in the cat visual cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 58, 765–780 (1987).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  30. Guillem, K. et al. Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor-β2 subunits in the medial prefrontal cortex control attention. Science 333, 888–891 (2011).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  31. Kalmbach, A., Hedrick, T. & Waters, J. Selective optogenetic stimulation of cholinergic axons in neocortex. J. Neurophysiol. 107, 2008–2019 (2012).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  32. Tye, K.M. et al. Amygdala circuitry mediating reversible and bidirectional control of anxiety. Nature 471, 358–362 (2011).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  33. Warden, M.R. et al. A prefrontal cortex-brainstem neuronal projection that controls response to behavioural challenge. Nature 492, 428–432 (2012).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  34. Rye, D.B., Wainer, B.H., Mesulam, M.M., Mufson, E.J. & Saper, C.B. Cortical projections arising from the basal forebrain: a study of cholinergic and noncholinergic components employing combined retrograde tracing and immunohistochemical localization of choline acetyltransferase. Neuroscience 13, 627–643 (1984).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  35. Thiele, A., Herrero, J.L., Distler, C. & Hoffmann, K.P. Contribution of cholinergic and GABAergic mechanisms to direction tuning, discriminability, response reliability, and neuronal rate correlations in macaque middle temporal area. J. Neurosci. 32, 16602–16615 (2012).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  36. Parent, A., Pare, D., Smith, Y. & Steriade, M. Basal forebrain cholinergic and noncholinergic projections to the thalamus and brainstem in cats and monkeys. J. Comp. Neurol. 277, 281–301 (1988).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  37. Yu, A.J. & Dayan, P. Uncertainty, neuromodulation, and attention. Neuron 46, 681–692 (2005).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  38. Ma, M. & Luo, M. Optogenetic activation of basal forebrain cholinergic neurons modulates neuronal excitability and sensory responses in the main olfactory bulb. J. Neurosci. 32, 10105–10116 (2012).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  39. Cohen, M.R. & Maunsell, J.H.R. Attention improves performance primarily by reducing interneuronal correlations. Nat. Neurosci. 12, 1594–1600 (2009).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  40. Reynolds, J.H., Pasternak, T. & Desimone, R. Attention increases sensitivity of V4 neurons. Neuron 26, 703–714 (2000).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  41. Williford, T. & Maunsell, J.H.R. Effects of spatial attention on contrast response functions in macaque area V4. J. Neurophysiol. 96, 40–54 (2006).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  42. Boynton, G.M. A framework for describing the effects of attention on visual responses. Vision Res. 49, 1129–1143 (2009).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  43. Mitchell, J.F., Sundberg, K.A. & Reynolds, J.H. Spatial attention decorrelates intrinsic activity fluctuations in macaque area V4. Neuron 63, 879–888 (2009).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  44. Price, J.L. & Stern, R. Individual cells in the nucleus basalis–diagonal band complex have restricted axonal projections to the cerebral cortex in the rat. Brain Res. 269, 352–356 (1983).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  45. Sarter, M., Parikh, V. & Howe, W.M. Phasic acetylcholine release and the volume transmission hypothesis: time to move on. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 10, 383–390 (2009).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  46. Kilgard, M.P. & Merzenich, M.M. Cortical map reorganization enabled by nucleus basalis activity. Science 279, 1714–1718 (1998).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  47. Froemke, R.C. et al. Long-term modification of cortical synapses improves sensory perception. Nat. Neurosci. 16, 79–88 (2013).
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  48. Chubykin, A.A., Roach, E.B., Bear, M.F. & Shuler, M.G.H. A cholinergic mechanism for reward timing within primary visual cortex. Neuron 77, 723–735 (2013).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  49. Hedrick, T. & Waters, J. Physiological properties of cholinergic and non-cholinergic magnocellular neurons in acute slices from adult mouse nucleus basalis. PLoS ONE 5, e11046 (2010).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  50. Paxinos, G. & Franklin, K.B.J. The Mouse Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates (Elsevier, San Diego, 2004).
  51. Dombeck, D.A., Khabbaz, A.N., Collman, F., Adelman, T.L. & Tank, D.W. Imaging large-scale neural activity with cellular resolution in awake, mobile mice. Neuron 56, 43–57 (2007).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  52. van Hateren, J.H. & van der Schaaf, A. Independent component filters of natural images compared with simple cells in primary visual cortex. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265, 359–366 (1998).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  53. Busse, L. et al. The detection of visual contrast in the behaving mouse. J. Neurosci. 31, 11351–11361 (2011).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  54. Hazan, L., Zugaro, M. & Buzsáki, G. Klusters, NeuroScope, NDManager: a free software suite for neurophysiological data processing and visualization. J. Neurosci. Methods 155, 207–216 (2006).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  55. Mitra, P. & Bokil, H. Observed Brain Dynamics (Oxford University Press, New York, 2008).
  56. Britten, K.H., Shadlen, M.N., Newsome, W.T. & Movshon, J.A. The analysis of visual motion: a comparison of neuronal and psychophysical performance. J. Neurosci. 12, 4745–4765 (1992).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank H.J. Alitto for helpful discussions, and E. Rothenberg, J. Cox, G. Pho, S. Zhang, J. Jin, S. Harding-Forrester, C. Oldfield, Y.-C. Kuo, C. Niell, M. Stryker and M. Sur for technical assistance. This work was supported by US National Institutes of Health grant R01 EY018861, National Science Foundation grant 22250400-42533 (Y.D.), National Institute of Mental Health grant RC1-MH088434 (G.F.) and a Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award (F31NS059258) from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (M.J.G.).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Michael J Goard
    Present address: Present address: Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Picower Institute for Learning and Memory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.,
  2. Lucas Pinto and Michael J Goard: These authors contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Neurobiology, Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA
    Lucas Pinto, Michael J Goard, Daniel Estandian, Min Xu, Alex C Kwan, Seung-Hee Lee, Thomas C Harrison & Yang Dan
  2. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
    Guoping Feng

Authors

  1. Lucas Pinto
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  2. Michael J Goard
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  3. Daniel Estandian
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  4. Min Xu
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  5. Alex C Kwan
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  6. Seung-Hee Lee
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  7. Thomas C Harrison
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  8. Guoping Feng
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  9. Yang Dan
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

L.P. and M.J.G. performed the electrophysiology experiments. L.P., M.J.G. and D.E. performed the behavioral experiments. L.P. and D.E. performed histology. M.X. and A.C.K. developed the behavioral setup. S.-H.L., T.C.H. and L.P. performed the tracing experiments. G.F. provided the ChAT-ChR2-EYFP mice. L.P. and M.J.G. analyzed the data. L.P., M.J.G. and Y.D. conceived and designed the experiments and wrote the paper.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence toLucas Pinto or Yang Dan.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Integrated supplementary information

Supplementary Figure 1 Targeting of basal forebrain.

(a) Schematic drawing showing stereotaxic coordinates used for targeting basal forebrain (nucleus basalis). Brain outlines adapted from ref. 50. The black square indicates approximate region shown in (b)–(d). (b) Low-magnification image showing an example of cannula lesion for a ChAT-ChR2-EYFP mouse (dashed circle) in a horizontal slice. Approximate borders of basal forebrain (nucleus basalis) and globus pallidus are outlined in white. (c) Example of a lesion for a ChAT-ARCH-GFP mouse, conventions as in (b). (d) Fiber locations relative to nucleus basalis and globus pallidus borders for 20 basal forebrain activation experiments and 10 inactivation experiments in which histology was performed after behavioral or physiology experiments. In 3 of the behavioral experiments, the fiber location was > 500 μm from the nucleus basalis border (not shown), but they were included in the experimental group in the behavioral analysis. Circles with dashed black outlines correspond to examples in (b) and (c). BF: basal forebrain, NB: nucleus basalis, GP: globus pallidus.

Supplementary Figure 2 V1-projecting cholinergic cells in the basal forebrain.

(a) Schematic coronal slice (adapted from ref. 50) with black square indicating approximate region shown in (b). (b) Low-magnification image of a ChAT-tdTomato mouse injected with the retrograde tracer CTB-488 in V1. We found V1-projecting cholinergic neurons throughout the basal forebrain, including nucleus basalis (NB), substantia innominata (SI), the horizontal limb of the diagonal band of Broca (HDB), and the magnocellular pre-optic nucleus (MCPO). These cells were found from bregma 0 to -0.8 mm in the rostrocaudal axis, 0.8 to 2 mm lateral to bregma, and 4 to 5.5 mm below the cortical surface. (c) Higher magnification images (outlined with white dashed squares in (b) showing co-localization of CTB-filled neurons (green) and ChAT neurons (red) in the NB (top) and HDB/MCPO (bottom) regions. Arrowheads indicate cells with ChAT/CTB-488 overlap. (d) Cholinergic fibers expressing EYFP in V1.

Supplementary Figure 3 Optogenetic activation of basal forebrain cholinergic neurons interacts with ongoing behavioral state.

(a) Example LFP (black) and running speed (gray) traces showing the effect of basal forebrain activation (blue bar) for representative “no run” (black) and “run” (orange) trials. Run trials were defined as the ones in which the mean speed over the 5-s window immediately preceding laser stimulation exceeded 10% of the animal's maximum speed (although the results are not sensitive to variations of this criterion). (b) LFP spectra averaged from 14 experiments with corresponding running speed averages. Blue bar: laser stimulation. Power at each frequency was normalized by baseline and color-coded (scale bar on the right). (c) Population summary of laser-induced LFP power change. Each gray circle represents the median of one experiment, black and orange circles indicate average across experiments. In “no run” trials laser stimulation caused an eight-fold reduction of low-frequency power (t(13) = −4.83, P = 3.3 × 10−4, paired t test, n = 14 mice) and no significant change at high frequencies (t(13)= −0.89, P = 0.39). In the “run” trials, laser also caused a significant reduction of low-frequency power (t(13) = −3.21, P = 0.007), although with a smaller magnitude (1.5-fold) than that in the “no run” trials (t(13) = 2.47, P = 0.03, t test). In the “run” trials laser increased the power in the high-frequency range by a factor of 20 (t(13) = 4.33, P = 9.8 × 10-4, paired t test), which is significantly different from the “no run” trials (t(13) = 4.37, P = 9.2 × 10−4). (d) Basal forebrain cholinergic activation did not change running speed (W(13) = 32, P = 0.62, Wilcoxon signed rank test). Solid line is average and shaded area indicates ± s.e.m. (n = 14 mice). Blue bar indicates laser on period. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, n.s.: not significant, BF: basal forebrain.

Supplementary Figure 4 Behavioral effect of laser stimulation on control mice.

(a) Hit and false alarm rates for wild type animals that did not express ChR2 (n = 8), with and without blue laser stimulation. Neither hit nor false alarm rates were significantly changed (F laser(1,7) = 2.05, P laser = 0.20; and 0.16 and 0.70, respectively, two-way repeated-measures ANOVA). (b) d' was not significantly changed by laser stimulation in control animals (F laser(1,7) = 1.11, P laser = 0.33). Error bars, ± s.e.m. FA: false alarm.

Supplementary Figure 5 Direct optogenetic activation of cholinergic fibers in V1 decreases low-frequency LFP power.

Top: LFP spectra averaged from experiments in 8 different mice, 30 trials/mouse. Blue bar, laser stimulation. Power at each frequency was normalized by the baseline (5-s period preceding laser onset) and color-coded (scale bar on the right). Bottom: Low-frequency power (1 – 5 Hz) is significantly decreased by direct V1 stimulation of cholinergic fibers (W(7) = 92, P = 0.01, Wilcoxon sign rank test). Interruption in axes by dashed lines indicates periods of light-induced artifact on the silicon probes. Shading, ± s.e.m.

Supplementary Figure 6 Dual retrograde tracing shows very low degrees of overlap between basal forebrain cholinergic cells projecting to different cortical areas.

(a) Representative basal forebrain images showing ChAT immunohistochemistry (top, pseudo-colored in blue), cells labeled with V1 retrobead injections (second row), cells labeled with beads injected in another cortical area (third row) and overlay (bottom). Arrow head in bottom left image indicates a cholinergic basal forebrain cell projecting to both V1 and V2 [note that the region labeled as V2 in the mouse brain atlas in fact corresponds to several functionally distinct higher visual areas (Andermann et al., 2011, Neuron 72, 1025–1039; Marshell et al., 2011, Neuron 72, 1040–1054). In these experiments we targeted the area medial and anterior to V1, roughly corresponding to area PM]. (b) Quantification of overlap between cells projecting to V1 and V2 (n = 2 mice, a total of 95 V1-projecting cells, 57 V2-projecting cells, 18 cells projecting to both), V1 and A1 (n = 5 mice, 265 V1-projecting cells, 55 A1-projecting cells, 22 to both), and V1 and medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC, n = 3 mice, 141 V1-projecting cells, 349 PFC-projecting cells, 25 to both). Shown are mean ± s.e.m. of the percentage of double labeled cells across mice. The low degrees of overlap between V1 and these areas is not due to a low efficiency of retrograde labeling, since injection of beads of both colors in V1 revealed a high degree of overlap (dashed line, n = 3 mice, 55 labeled with green beads, 71 with red beads, 55 with both).

Supplementary Figure 7 Optogenetic activation of basal forebrain (BF) cholinergic cells does not significantly affect eye movements.

(a) Distribution of eye positions for a representative mouse during the presentation of natural movie stimuli, for control trials (left) and basal forebrain activation trials (right). Each dot corresponds to a single time point. (b) Basal forebrain activation does not significantly affect eye movements during the presentation of natural movies (t(5) = −0.79, P = 0.46, paired t test, n = 6). Eye movements were quantified as the standard deviation of eye position across the recording for a given experimental condition. Gray circles and lines connect different conditions for individual mice. Bars indicate population mean, error bars: ± s.e.m. (c) Basal forebrain activation does not affect eye movements in the absence of visual stimulation (t(5) = −1.24, P = 0.27, paired t test, n = 6).

Supplementary Figure 8 Acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antagonists in V1 block most effects of basal forebrain cholinergic activation.

(a) Average LFP spectra for basal forebrain activation (blue bar on top) before (n = 8) and after (n = 8) local application of nicotinic and muscarinic AChR antagonists to V1, and after washout of the antagonists (n = 6). (b) Basal forebrain activation-induced LFP desynchronization is significantly decreased by AChR antagonists in a reversible fashion. Gray circles and lines connect different conditions for individual mice, black circles and lines indicate population mean. (c) Δ firing rate (basal forebrain on – control) averaged across contrasts before (x axis) and after (y axis) the application of AChR antagonists. The basal forebrain activation-induced increase in firing rate is significantly reduced by the drugs. Error bars, ± s.e.m. (d) The decrease in low-frequency coherence between neurons induced by basal forebrain cholinergic activation is significantly weakened by AChR antagonists. Conventions as in (c). (e) Basal forebrain activation-induced decrease in Fano factor is not significantly blocked by nicotinic and muscarinic AChR antagonists. Conventions as in (c). BF: basal forebrain, FF: Fano factor.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pinto, L., Goard, M., Estandian, D. et al. Fast modulation of visual perception by basal forebrain cholinergic neurons.Nat Neurosci 16, 1857–1863 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3552

Download citation