Genotype and SNP calling from next-generation sequencing data (original) (raw)

• Metzker, M. Sequencing technologies — the next generation. Nature Rev. Genet. 11, 31–46 (2010). This article provides an excellent Review of NGS technologies and their applications.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Li, R. et al. The sequence and de novo assembly of the giant panda genome. Nature 463, 311–317 (2010).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Ng, S. B. et al. Exome sequencing identifies the cause of a mendelian disorder. Nature Genet. 42, 30–35 (2010).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Nagalakshmi, U. et al. The transcriptional landscape of the yeast genome defined by RNA sequencing. Science 320, 1344–1349 (2008).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Guttman, M. et al. Ab initio reconstruction of cell type-specific transcriptomes in mouse reveals the conserved multi-exonic structure of lincRNAs. Nature Biotech. 28, 503–510 (2010).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Trapnell, C. et al. Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation. Nature Biotech. 28, 511–515 (2010).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Liti, G. et al. Population genomics of domestic and wild yeasts. Nature 458, 337–341 (2009).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Li, Y. et al. Resequencing of 200 human exomes identifies an excess of low-frequency non-synonymous coding variants. Nature Genet. 42, 969–972 (2010).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Durbin, R. M. et al. A map of human genome variation from population-scale sequencing. Nature 467, 1061–1073 (2010). This 1000Genomes paper provides an application of many of the state-of-the-art methods for analysis of NGS data.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Flicek, P. & Birney, E. Sense from sequence reads: methods for alignment and assembly. Nature Methods 6, S6–S12 (2009).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Kim, S. Y. et al. Design of association studies with pooled or un-pooled next-generation sequencing data. Genet. Epidemiol. 34, 479–491 (2010).
  Article Google Scholar
• Li, H., Ruan, J. & Durbin, R. M. Mapping short DNA sequencing reads and calling variants using mapping quality scores. Genome Res. 18, 1851–1858 (2008). This paper describes MAQ, a forerunner of efficient, hash-based alignment algorithms for short reads. MAQ also produces genotype calls. The concept of read-mapping quality is introduced in this paper.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Li, J. B. et al. Multiplex padlock targeted sequencing reveal human hypermutable CpG variations. Genome Res. 19, 1606–1615 (2009).
  Article Google Scholar
• Li, R. et al. SNP detection for massively parallel whole-genome resequencing. Genome Res. 19, 1124–1132 (2009).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Li, R. et al. SOAP2: an improved ultrafast tool for short read alignment. Bioinformatics 25, 1966–1967 (2009).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Ewing, B. & Green, P. Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. II. Error probabilities. Genome Res. 8, 186–194 (1998).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Quinlan, A. R. et al. Pyrobayes: an improved base caller for SNP discovery in pyrosequences. Nature Methods 5, 179–181 (2008).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Wu, H, Irizarry, R. A. & Bravo, H. C. Intensity normalization improves color calling in SOLiD sequencing. Nature Methods 7, 336–337 (2010).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Kircher, M., Stenzel, U. & Kelso, J. Improved base calling for the Illumina Genome Analyzer using machine learning strategies. Genome Biol. 10, R83 (2009).
  Article Google Scholar
• Kao, W. C., Stevens, K. & Song, Y. S. BayesCall: a model-based basecalling algorithm for high-throughput short-read sequencing. Genome Res. 19, 1884–1895 (2009).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Kao, W. C. & Song, Y. S. naiveBayesCall: an efficient model-based base-calling algorithm for high-throughput sequencing. Lect. Notes Comp. Sci. 6044, 233–247 (2010).
  Article Google Scholar
• Burrows, M. & Wheeler, D. A block-sorting lossless data compression algorithm. Technical Report 124, Digital Equipment Corporation. HP Labs Technical Reports [online], (1994).
• Langmead, B., Trapnell, C., Pop, M. & Salzberg, S. L. Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol. 10, R25 (2009).
  Article Google Scholar
• Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25, 1754–1760 (2009).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Lunter, G. & Goodson, M. Stampy: a statistical algorithm for sensitive and fast mapping of Illumina sequence reads. Genome Res. 27 Oct 2010 (doi:10.1101/gr.111120.110).
  Article Google Scholar
• Sundquist, A., Ronaghi, M., Tang, H., Pevzner, P. & Batzoglou, S. Whole-genome sequencing and assembly with high-throughput, short-read technologies. PLoS ONE 2, e484 (2007).
  Article Google Scholar
• Zerbino, D. R. & Birney, E. Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res. 18, 821–829 (2008).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Butler, J. et al. ALLPATHS: de novo assembly of whole-genome shotgun microreads. Genome Res. 18, 810–820 (2008).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Simpson, J. T. et al. ABySS: a parallel assembler for short read sequence data. Genome Res. 19, 1117–1123 (2009).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Chaisson, M. J. P., Brinza, D. & Pevzner, P. A. De novo fragment assembly with short mate-paired reads: does the read length matter? Genome Res. 19, 336–346 (2009).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Brockman, W. et al. Quality scores and SNP detection in sequencing-by-synthesis systems. Genome Res. 18, 763–770 (2008).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• McKenna, A. et al. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 20, 1297–1303 (2010).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• DePristo, M. A. et al. A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data. Nature Genet. 10 Apr 2011 (doi:10.1038/ng.806).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Harismendy, O. et al. Evaluation of next generation sequencing platforms for population targeted sequencing studies. Genome Biol. 10, R32 (2009).
  Article Google Scholar
• Wang, J. et al. The diploid sequence of an Asian individual. Nature 456, 60–65 (2009).
  Article Google Scholar
• Hedges, D. et al. Exome sequencing of a multigenerational human pedigree. PLoS ONE 4, e8232 (2009).
  Article Google Scholar
• Martin, E. R. et al. SeqEM: an adaptive genotype-calling approach for next- generation sequencing studies. Bioinformatics 26, 2803–2810 (2010).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Sherry, S. T. et al. dbSNP: the NCBI database of genetic variation. Nucleic Acids Res. 29, 308–311 (2001).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Dai, J. Y. et al. Imputation methods to improve inference in SNP association studies. Genet. Epidemiol. 30, 690–702 (2006).
  Article Google Scholar
• Minichiello, M. J. & Durbin, R. Mapping trait loci by use of inferred ancestral recombination graphs. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 79, 910–922 (2006).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Scheet, P. & Stephens, M. A fast and flexible statistical model for large-scale population genotype data: applications to inferring missing genotypes and haplotypic phase. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 78, 629–644 (2006).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Browning, S. R. & Browning, B. L. Rapid and accurate haplotype phasing and missing-data inference for whole-genome association studies by use of localized haplotype clustering. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 81, 1084–1097 (2007).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Marchini, J., Howie, B., Myers, S., McVean, G. & Donnely, P. A new multipoint method for genome-wide association studies via imputation of genotypes. Nature Genet. 39, 906–913 (2007).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Howie, B. N., Donnelly, P. & Marchini, J. A flexible and accurate genotype imputation method for the next generation of genome-wide association studies. PLoS Genet. 5, e1000529 (2009).
  Article Google Scholar
• Marchini, J. & Howie, B. Genotype imputation for genome-wide association studies. Nature Rev. Genet. 11, 499–511 (2010). This Review provides a comprehensive overview of available statistical methods for imputing genotypes and discusses various uses of imputation.
  CAS Google Scholar
• Huang, L. et al. The relationship between imputation error and statistical power in genetic association studies in diverse populations. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 85, 692–698 (2009).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Schaid, D. J., Rowland, C. M., Tines, D. E., Jacobson, R. M. & Poland, G. A. Score tests for association between traits and haplotypes when linkage phase is ambiguous. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 70, 425–434 (2002).
  Google Scholar
• Servin, B. & Stephens, M. Imputation-based analysis of association studies: candidate genes and quantitative traits. PLoS Genet. 3, e114 (2007).
  Google Scholar
• Hellmann, I. et al. Population genetic analysis of shotgun assemblies of genomic sequences from multiple individuals. Genome Res. 18, 1020–1029 (2008).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Johnson, P. L. F. & Slatkin, M. Accounting for bias from sequencing error in population genetic estimates. Mol. Biol. Evol. 25, 199–206 (2008).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Johnson, P. L. F. & Slatkin, M. Inference of population genetic parameters in metagenomics. A clean look at messy data. Genome Res. 16, 1320–1327 (2006).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Yi, X. et al. Sequencing of 50 human exomes reveals adaptation to high altitude. Science 329, 75–78 (2010).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Li, H. et al. The sequence alignment/map (SAM) format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 25, 2078–2079 (2009).
  Article Google Scholar
• Le, S. Q. & Durbin, R. SNP detection and genotyping from low-coverage sequencing data on multiple diploid samples. Genome Res. 27 Oct 2010 (doi:10.1101/gr.113084.110).
  Article Google Scholar