The evolutionary causes and consequences of sex-biased gene expression (original) (raw)

References

  1. Ellegren, H. & Parsch, J. The evolution of sex-biased genes and sex-biased gene expression. Nature Rev. Genet. 8, 689–698 (2007).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  2. Arnqvist, G. & Rowe, L. Sexual Conflict (Princeton Univ. Press, 2005).
    Book Google Scholar
  3. Chippindale, A. K., Gibson, J. R. & Rice, W. R. Negative genetic correlation for adult fitness between sexes reveals ontogenetic conflict in Drosophila. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 1671–1675 (2001).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  4. Innocetti, P. & Morrow, E. H. The sexually antagonistic genes of Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS Biol. 16, e1000335 (2010).
    Article Google Scholar
  5. Connallon, T. & Clark, A. G. Association between sex-biased gene expression and mutations with sex-specific phenotypic consequences in Drosophila. Genome Biol. Evol. 3, 151–155 (2011).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  6. Telonis-Scott, M., Kopp, A., Wayne, M. L., Nuzhdin, S. V. & McIntyre, L. M. Sex-specific splicing in Drosophila: widespread occurrence, tissue specificity and evolutionary conservation. Genetics 181, 421–434 (2009).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  7. Hartmann, B. et al. Distinct regulatory programs establish widespread sex-specific alternative splicing in Drosophila melanogaster. RNA 17, 453–468 (2011).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  8. Gallach, M., Chandrasekaran, C. & Betran, E. Analyses of nuclearly encoded mitochondrial genes suggest gene duplication as a mechanism for resolving intralocus sexually antagonistic conflict in Drosophila. Genome Biol. Evol. 2, 835–850 (2010).
    Article Google Scholar
  9. Connallon, T. & Clark, A. G. The resolution of sexual antagonism by gene duplication. Genetics 187, 919–937 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
  10. Gallach, M. & Betrán, E. Intralocus sexual conflict resolved through gene duplication. Trends Ecol. Evol. 26, 222–228 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
  11. Wyman, M. J., Cutter, A. D. & Rowe, L. Gene duplication in the evolution of sexual dimorphism. Evolution 66, 1556–1566 (2012).
    Article Google Scholar
  12. Chen, S. et al. Reshaping of global gene expression networks and sex-biased gene expression by integration of a young gene. EMBO J. 31, 2798–2809 (2012).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  13. Cocquet, J. et al. A genetic basis for a postmeiotic X versus Y chromosome intragenomic conflict in the mouse. PLoS Genet. 8, e1002900 (2012).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  14. Parisi, M. et al. Paucity of genes on the D. melanogaster X chromosome showing male-biased expression. Science 299, 697–700 (2003).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  15. Meisel, R. P., Malone, J. H. & Clark, A. G. Disentangling the relationship between sex-biased gene expression and X-linkage. Genome Res. 22, 1255–1265 (2012).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  16. Assis, R., Zhou, Q. & Bachtrog, D. Sex-biased transcriptome evolution in Drosophila. Genome Biol. Evol. 4, 1189–1200 (2012).
    Article Google Scholar
  17. Reinius, B. et al. Abundance of female-biased and paucity of male-biased somatically expressed genes on the mouse X-chromosome. BMC Genomics 13, 607 (2012).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  18. Itoh, Y. et al. Dosage compensation is less effective in birds than in mammals. J. Biol. 6, 2 (2007).
    Article Google Scholar
  19. Ellegren, H. et al. Faced with inequality: chicken do not have a general dosage compensation of sex-linked genes. BMC Biol. 5, 40 (2007).
    Article Google Scholar
  20. Zha, X. et al. Dosage analysis of Z chromosome genes using microarray in silkworm, Bombyx mori. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 39, 315–321 (2009).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  21. Vicoso, B. & Bachtrog, D. Lack of global dosage compensation in Schistosoma mansoni, a female-heterogametic parasite. Genome Biol. Evol. 3, 230–235 (2011).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  22. Kaiser, V. B. & Ellegren, H. Nonrandom distribution of genes with sex-biased expression in the chicken genome. Evolution 60, 1945–1951 (2006).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  23. Arunkumar, K. P., Mita, K. & Nagaraju, J. The silkworm Z chromosome is enriched in testis-specific genes. Genetics 182, 493–501 (2009).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  24. Leder, E. H. et al. Female-biased expression on the X chromosome as a key step in sex chromosome evolution in threespine sticklebacks. Mol. Biol. Evol. 27, 1495–1503 (2010).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  25. Prince, E. G., Kirkland, D. & Demuth, J. P. Hyperexpression of the X chromosome in both sexes results in extensive female bias of X-linked genes in the flour beetle. Genome Biol. Evol. 2, 336–346 (2010).
    Article Google Scholar
  26. Gupta, V. et al. Global analysis of X-chromosome dosage compensation. J. Biol. 5, 3 (2006).
    Article Google Scholar
  27. Meiklejohn, C. D., Landeen, E. L., Cook, J. M., Kingan, S. B. & Presgraves, D. C. Sex chromosome-specific regulation in the Drosophila male germline but little evidence for chromosomal dosage compensation or meiotic inactivation. PLoS Biol. 9, e1001126 (2011).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  28. Meiklejohn, C. D. & Presgraves, D. C. Little evidence for demasculinization of the Drosophila X chromosome among genes expressed in the male germline. Genome Biol. Evol. 4, 895–904 (2012).
    Article Google Scholar
  29. Chang, P. L., Dunham, J. P., Nuzhdin, S. V. & Arbeitman, M. N. Somatic sex-specific transcriptome differences in Drosophila revealed by whole transcriptome sequencing. BMC Genomics 12, 364 (2011).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  30. Catalán, A., Hutter, S. & Parsch, J. Population and sex differences in Drosophila melanogaster brain gene expression. BMC Genomics 13, 654 (2012).
    Article Google Scholar
  31. Lemos, B., Araripe, L. O. & Hartl, D. L. Polymorphic Y chromosomes harbor cryptic variation with manifold functional consequences. Science 319, 91–93 (2008).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  32. Lemos, B., Branco, A. T. & Hartl, D. L. Epigenetic effects of polymorphic Y chromosomes modulate chromatin components, immune response, and sexual conflict. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 15826–15831 (2010).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  33. Kashimada, K. & Koopman, P. Sry: the master switch in mammalian sex determination. Development 137, 3921–3930 (2010).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  34. Mank, J. E., Nam, K., Brunström, B. & Ellegren, H. Ontogenetic complexity of sexual dimorphism and sex-specific selection. Mol. Biol. Evol. 27, 1570–1578 (2010).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  35. Baker, D. A. et al. A comprehensive gene expression atlas of sex- and tissue-specificity in the malaria vector, Anopheles gambiae. BMC Genomics 12, 296 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
  36. Haerty, W. et al. Evolution in the fast lane: rapidly evolving sex-related genes in Drosophila. Genetics 177, 1321–1335 (2007).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  37. Demuth, J. P. & Wade, M. J. Maternal expression increases the rate of bicoid evolution by relaxing selective constraint. Genetica 129, 37–43 (2007).
    Article Google Scholar
  38. Meisel, R. P. Towards a more nuanced understanding of the relationship between sex-biased gene expression and rates of protein-coding sequence evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28, 1893–1900 (2011).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  39. Grath, S. & Parsch, J. Rate of amino acid substitution is influenced by the degree and conservation of male-biased transcription over 50 myr of Drosophila evolution. Genome Biol. Evol. 4, 346–359 (2012).
    Article Google Scholar
  40. Swanson, W. J. & Vacquier, V. D. The rapid evolution of reproductive proteins. Nature Rev. Genet. 3, 137–144 (2002).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  41. Charlesworth, B., Coyne, J. A. & Barton, N. H. The relative rates of evolution of sex chromosomes and autosomes. Am. Nat. 130, 113–146 (1987).
    Article Google Scholar
  42. Orr, H. A. & Betancourt, A. J. Haldane's sieve and adaptation from the standing genetic variation. Genetics 157, 875–884 (2001).
    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  43. Vicoso, B. & Charlesworth, B. Effective population size and the faster-X effect, an extended model. Evolution 63, 2413–2426 (2009).
    Article Google Scholar
  44. Baines, J. F., Sawyer, S. A., Hartl, D. L. & Parsch, J. Effects of X-linkage and sex-biased gene expression on the rate of adaptive protein evolution in Drosophila. Mol. Biol. Evol. 25, 1639–1650 (2008).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  45. Sella, G., Petrov, D. A., Przeworski, M. & Andolfatto, P. Pervasive natural selection in the Drosophila genome? PLoS Genet. 5, e1000495 (2009).
    Article Google Scholar
  46. Eyre-Walker, A. & Keightley, P. D. Estimating the rate of adaptive molecular evolution in the presence of slightly deleterious mutations and population size change. Mol. Biol. Evol. 26, 2097–2108 (2009).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  47. Wilson, D. J., Hernandez, R. D., Andolfatto, P. & Przeworski, M. A population genetics-phylogenetics approach to inferring natural selection in coding sequences. PLoS Genet. 7, e1002395 (2011).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  48. Mank, J. E., Axelsson, E. & Ellegren, H. Fast-X on the Z: rapid evolution of sex-linked genes in birds. Genome Res. 17, 618–624 (2007).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  49. Mank, J. E., Nam, K. & Ellegren, H. Faster-Z evolution is predominantly due to genetic drift. Mol. Biol. Evol. 27, 661–670 (2010).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  50. Mank, J. E., Vicoso, B., Berlin, S. & Charlesworth, B. Effective population size and the faster-X effect, empirical results and their interpretation. Evolution 64, 663–674 (2010).
    Article Google Scholar
  51. Llopart, A. The rapid evolution of X-linked male-biased gene expression and the large-X effect in Drosophila yakuba, D. santomea, and their hybrids. Mol. Biol. Evol. 29, 3873–3886 (2012).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  52. Meisel, R. P., Malone, J. H. & Clark, A. G. Faster-X evolution of gene expression in Drosophila. PLoS Genet. 8, e1003013 (2012).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  53. Gnad, F. & Parsch, J. Sebida: a database for the functional and evolutionary analysis of genes with sex-biased expression. Bioinformatics 22, 2577–2579 (2006).
    Article CAS Google Scholar

Download references