Functional and evolutionary implications of gene orthology (original) (raw)

References

  1. Fitch, W. M. Distinguishing homologous from analogous proteins. Systemat. Zool. 19, 99–106 (1970).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  2. Fitch, W. M. Homology a personal view on some of the problems. Trends Genet. 16, 227–231 (2000).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  3. Koonin, E. V. Walter Fitch and the orthology paradigm. Brief. Bioinform. 12, 377–378 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
  4. Baldauf, S. L. Phylogeny for the faint of heart: a tutorial. Trends Genet. 19, 345–351 (2003).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  5. Sonnhammer, E. L. & Koonin, E. V. Orthology, paralogy and proposed classification for paralog subtypes. Trends Genet. 18, 619–620 (2002).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  6. Koonin, E. V. Orthologs, paralogs and evolutionary genomics. Annu. Rev. Genet. 39, 309–338 (2005).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  7. Dolinski, K. & Botstein, D. Orthology and functional conservation in eukaryotes. Annu. Rev. Genet. 41, 465–507 (2007).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  8. Studer, R. A. & Robinson-Rechavi, M. How confident can we be that orthologs are similar, but paralogs differ? Trends Genet. 25, 210–216 (2009).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  9. Nehrt, N. L., Clark, W. T., Radivojac, P. & Hahn, M. W. Testing the ortholog conjecture with comparative functional genomic data from mammals. PLoS Comput. Biol. 7, e1002073 (2011).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  10. Kuzniar, A., van Ham, R. C., Pongor, S. & Leunissen, J. A. The quest for orthologs: finding the corresponding gene across genomes. Trends Genet. 24, 539–551 (2008).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  11. Gabaldón, T. Large-scale assignment of orthology: back to phylogenetics? Genome Biol. 9, 235 (2008).
    Article Google Scholar
  12. Altenhoff, A. M. & Dessimoz, C. Phylogenetic and functional assessment of orthologs inference projects and methods. PLoS Comput. Biol. 5, e1000262 (2009).
    Article Google Scholar
  13. Trachana, K. et al. Orthology prediction methods: a quality assessment using curated protein families. Bioessays 33, 769–780 (2011).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  14. Kristensen, D. M., Wolf, Y. I., Mushegian, A. R. & Koonin, E. V. Computational methods for Gene Orthology inference. Brief. Bioinform. 12, 379–391 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
  15. Gabaldón, T. et al. Joining forces in the quest for orthologs. Genome Biol. 10, 403 (2009).
    Article Google Scholar
  16. Dessimoz, C., Gabaldón, T., Roos, D. S., Sonnhammer, E. L. & Herrero, J. Toward community standards in the quest for orthologs. Bioinformatics 28, 900–904 (2012).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  17. Descorps-Declere, S., Lemoine, F., Sculo, Q., Lespinet, O. & Labedan, B. The multiple facets of homology and their use in comparative genomics to study the evolution of genes, genomes, and species. Biochimie 90, 595–608 (2008).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  18. Mahmood, K., Webb, G. I., Song, J., Whisstock, J. C. & Konagurthu, A. S. Efficient large-scale protein sequence comparison and gene matching to identify orthologs and co-orthologs. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, e44 (2012).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  19. Roux, J. & Robinson-Rechavi, M. An ontology to clarify homology-related concepts. Trends Genet. 26, 99–102 (2010).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  20. Tatusov, R. L., Koonin, E. V. & Lipman, D. J. A genomic perspective on protein families. Science 278, 631–637 (1997).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  21. Remm, M., Storm, C. E. & Sonnhammer, E. L. Automatic clustering of orthologs and in-paralogs from pairwise species comparisons. J. Mol. Biol. 314, 1041–1052 (2001).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  22. Koonin, E. V., Aravind, L. & Kondrashov, A. S. The impact of comparative genomics on our understanding of evolution. Cell 101, 573–576 (2000).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  23. Sjolander, K., Datta, R. S., Shen, Y. & Shoffner, G. M. Ortholog identification in the presence of domain architecture rearrangement. Brief. Bioinform. 12, 413–422 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
  24. Forslund, K. & Sonnhammer, E. L. Evolution of protein domain architectures. Methods Mol. Biol. 856, 187–216 (2012).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  25. Hartmann, B. & Valcarcel, J. Decrypting the genome's alternative messages. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 21, 377–386 (2009).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  26. Irimia, M. & Blencowe, B. J. Alternative splicing: decoding an expansive regulatory layer. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 24, 323–332 (2012).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  27. Basu, M. K., Poliakov, E. & Rogozin, I. B. Domain mobility in proteins: functional and evolutionary implications. Brief. Bioinform. 10, 205–216 (2009).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  28. Ouzounis, C. Orthology: another terminology muddle. Trends Genet. 15, 445 (1999).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  29. Theissen, G. Birth, life and death of developmental control genes: new challenges for the homology concept. Theory Biosci. 124, 199–212 (2005).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  30. Bandyopadhyay, S., Sharan, R. & Ideker, T. Systematic identification of functional orthologs based on protein network comparison. Genome Res. 16, 428–435 (2006).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  31. Singh, R., Xu, J. & Berger, B. Global alignment of multiple protein interaction networks with application to functional orthology detection. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 12763–12768 (2008).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  32. Huynen, M. A. & Bork, P. Measuring genome evolution. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 5849–5856 (1998).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  33. Bromham, L. & Penny, D. The modern molecular clock. Nature Rev. Genet. 4, 216–224 (2003).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  34. Kumar, S. Molecular clocks: four decades of evolution. Nature Rev. Genet. 6, 654–662 (2005).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  35. Koski, L. B. & Golding, G. B. The closest BLAST hit is often not the nearest neighbor. J. Mol. Evol. 52, 540–542 (2001).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  36. Hulsen, T., Huynen, M. A., de Vlieg, J. & Groenen, P. M. Benchmarking ortholog identification methods using functional genomics data. Genome Biol. 7, R31 (2006).
    Article Google Scholar
  37. Wolf, Y. I. & Koonin, E. V. A tight link between orthologs and bidirectional best hits in bacterial and archaeal genomes. Genome Biol. Evol. 1286–1294 (2012).
  38. Koonin, E. V. Comparative genomics, minimal gene-sets and the last universal common ancestor. Nature Rev. Microbiol. 1, 127–136 (2003).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  39. Snel, B., Huynen, M. A. & Dutilh, B. E. Genome trees and the nature of genome evolution. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 59, 191–209 (2005).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  40. Blomme, T. et al. The gain and loss of genes during 600 million years of vertebrate evolution. Genome Biol. 7, R43 (2006).
    Article Google Scholar
  41. Makarova, K. S., Wolf, Y. I., Mekhedov, S. L., Mirkin, B. G. & Koonin, E. V. Ancestral paralogs and pseudoparalogs and their role in the emergence of the eukaryotic cell. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, 4626–4638 (2005).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  42. Huerta-Cepas, J. & Gabaldón, T. Assigning duplication events to relative temporal scales in genome-wide studies. Bioinformatics 27, 38–45 (2011).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  43. Forslund, K., Pekkari, I. & Sonnhammer, E. L. Domain architecture conservation in orthologs. BMC Bioinformatics 12, 326 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
  44. Koonin, E. V. et al. A comprehensive evolutionary classification of proteins encoded in complete eukaryotic genomes. Genome Biol. 5, R7 (2004).
    Article Google Scholar
  45. Peterson, M. E. et al. Evolutionary constraints on structural similarity in orthologs and paralogs. Protein Sci. 18, 1306–1315 (2009).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  46. Mushegian, A. R. & Koonin, E. V. A minimal gene set for cellular life derived by comparison of complete bacterial genomes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 10268–10273 (1996).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  47. Galperin, M. Y., Walker, D. R. & Koonin, E. V. Analogous enzymes: independent inventions in enzyme evolution. Genome Res. 8, 779–790 (1998).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  48. Omelchenko, M. V., Galperin, M. Y., Wolf, Y. I. & Koonin, E. V. Non-homologous isofunctional enzymes: a systematic analysis of alternative solutions in enzyme evolution. Biol. Direct 5, 31 (2010).
    Article Google Scholar
  49. Lynch, V. J. & Wagner, G. P. Resurrecting the role of transcription factor change in developmental evolution. Evolution 62, 2131–2154 (2008).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  50. Casci, T. Functional genomics: Degrees of similarity. Nature Rev. Genet. 12, 522 (2011).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  51. Thomas, P. D., Wood, V., Mungall, C. J., Lewis, S. E. & Blake, J. A. On the use of gene ontology annotations to assess functional similarity among orthologs and paralogs: a short report. PLoS Comput. Biol. 8, e1002386 (2012).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  52. Altenhoff, A. M., Studer, R. A., Robinson-Rechavi, M. & Dessimoz, C. Resolving the ortholog conjecture: orthologs tend to be weakly, but significantly, more similar in function than paralogs. PLoS Comput. Biol. 8, e1002514 (2012).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  53. Huerta-Cepas, J., Dopazo, J., Huynen, M. A. & Gabaldón, T. Evidence for short-time divergence and long-time conservation of tissue-specific expression after gene duplication. Brief. Bioinform. 12, 442–448 (2011).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  54. Chen, X. & Zhang, J. The ortholog conjecture is untestable by the current gene ontology but is supported by RNA sequencing data. PLoS Comput. Biol. 8, e1002784 (2012).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  55. Mohd-Padil, H., Mohd-Adnan, A. & Gabaldón, T. Phylogenetic analyses uncover a novel clade of transferring in non-mammalian vertebrates. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 894–905 (2013).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  56. Huerta-Cepas, J. et al. PhylomeDB v3.0: an expanding repository of genome-wide collections of trees, alignments and phylogeny-based orthology and paralogy predictions. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, D556–D560 (2011).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  57. Altschul, S. F. et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 3389–3402 (1997).
    Article CAS Google Scholar

Download references