Where do you know what you know? The representation of semantic knowledge in the human brain (original) (raw)

References

1. Tulving, E. in Organisation of Memory (eds Tulving, E. & Donaldson, W.) 381–403 (Academic, New York, 1972).
   Google Scholar
2. Fodor, J. A. The Modularity of Mind (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, 1983).
   Book Google Scholar
3. Thompson-Schill, S. L. Neuroimaging studies of semantic memory: inferring “how” from “where”. Neuropsychologia 41, 280–292 (2003). This review of neuropsychological and functional imaging studies offers a succinct overview of the modality-specific components of the cortical semantic network and addresses the role of prefrontal regions in control or selection of semantic information.
   Article PubMed Google Scholar
4. Allport, D. A. in Current Perspectives in Dysphasia (eds Newman, S. K. & Epstein, R.) 32–60 (Churchill Livingston, Edinburgh, 1985).
   Google Scholar
5. Martin, A. The representation of object concepts in the brain. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 58, 25–45 (2007). This is an elegant review of evidence for a distributed network of semantic features linked to the sensory and motor systems that analyse such features as input. It also argues for categorical organization of semantic memory.
   Article PubMed Google Scholar
6. Saffran, E. M. & Schwartz, M. F. in Attention and Performance XV (eds Umilta, C. & Moscovitch, M.) 507–535 (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., Hillsdale, 1994).
   Google Scholar
7. Riddoch, M. J., Humphreys, G. W., Coltheart, M. & Funnell, E. Semantic systems or system? Neuropsychological evidence re-examined. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 5, 3–25 (1988).
   Article Google Scholar
8. Caramazza, A., Hillis, A. E., Rapp, B. C. & Romani, C. The multiple semantic hypothesis: multiple confusions? Cogn. Neuropsychol. 7, 161–189 (1990).
   Article Google Scholar
9. Damasio, A. R. The brain binds entities and events by multiregional activation from convergence zones. Neural Comput. 1, 123–132 (1989).
   Article Google Scholar
10. Damasio, A. R. & Damasio, H. in Large-Scale Neuronal Theories of the Brain (ed. Koch, C.) 61–74 (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, 1994).
    Google Scholar
11. Damasio, H., Grabowski, T. J., Tranel, D., Hichwa, R. D. & Damasio, A. R. A neural basis for lexical retrieval. Nature 380, 499–505 (1996). This landmark paper combined lesion analysis in a large group of patients and PET imaging in normal individuals to identify brain regions crucial to retrieval of names for entities in different semantic categories (famous people, animals and tools).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
12. Tranel, D., Damasio, H. & Damasio, A. R. A neural basis for the retrieval of conceptual knowledge. Neuropsychologia 35, 1319–11327 (1997).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
13. Damasio, H., Tranel, D., Grabowski, T., Adolphs, R. & Damasio, A. R. Neural systems behind word and concept retrieval. Cognition 92, 179–229 (2004).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
14. Beauchamp, M. S., Argall, B. D., Bodurka, J., Duyn, J. H. & Martin, A. Unravelling multisensory integration: patchy organization within human STS multisensory cortex. Nature Neurosci. 7, 1190–1192 (2004).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
15. Snowden, J. S., Neary, D. & Mann, D. M. A. Fronto-Temporal Lobar Degeneration: Fronto-Temporal Dementia, Progressive Aphasia, Semantic Dementia (Churchill Livingstone, New York, 1996).
    Google Scholar
16. Davies, R. R. et al. The pathological basis of semantic dementia. Brain 128, 1962–1963 (2005).
    Article Google Scholar
17. Warrington, E. K. The selective impairment of semantic memory. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 27, 635–657 (1975). This article represents one of the first, and still one of the very best and most creative, neuropsychological investigations of semantic dementia.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
18. Schwartz, M. F., Martin, O. S. M. & Saffran, E. M. Dissociations of language function in dementia: a case study. Brain Lang. 7, 277–306 (1979).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
19. Snowden, J. S., Goulding, P. J. & Neary, D. Semantic dementia: a form of circumscribed cerebral atrophy. Behav. Neurol. 2, 111–138 (1989).
    Google Scholar
20. Delacourte, A. et al. The biochemical pathway of neurofibrillary degeneration in aging and Alzheimer's disease. Neurology 52, 1158–1165 (1999).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
21. Nestor, P. J., Fryer, T. D., Smielewski, P. & Hodges, J. R. Limbic hypometabolism in Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment. Ann. Neurol. 54, 343–351 (2003).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
22. Giffard, B. et al. The nature of semantic memory deficits in Alzheimer's disease. Brain 124, 1522–1532 (2001).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
23. Grossman, M. et al. Neural basis for semantic memory difficulty in Alzheimer's disease: an fMRI study. Brain 126, 292–311 (2003).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
24. Galton, C. J., Patterson, K., Xuereb, J. H. & Hodges, J. R. Atypical and typical presentations of Alzheimer's disease: a clinical, neuropsychological, neuroimaging and pathological study of 13 cases. Brain 123, 484–498 (2000).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
25. Lambon Ralph, M. A., Lowe, C. & Rogers, T. T. Neural basis of category-specific deficits for living things: evidence from semantic dementia, HSVE and a neural network model. Brain 130, 1127–1137 (2007).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
26. Noppeney, U. et al. Temporal lobe lesions and semantic impairment: a comparison of herpes simplex virus encephalitis and semantic dementia. Brain 130, 1138–1147 (2007).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
27. Caramazza, A. & Shelton, J. R. Domain specific knowledge systems in the brain: the animate-inanimate distinction. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 10, 1–34 (1998).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
28. Farah, M. J. & McClelland, J. L. A computational model of semantic memory impairment: modality specificity and emergent category specificity. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 120, 339–357 (1991).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
29. Warrington, E. K. & Shallice, T. Category-specific semantic impairment. Brain 107, 829–854 (1984).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
30. Shallice, T. From Neuropsychology to Mental Structure (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK 1998).
    Google Scholar
31. Jefferies, E. & Lambon Ralph, M. A. Semantic impairment in stroke aphasia versus semantic dementia: a case-series comparison. Brain 129, 2132–2147 (2006).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
32. Jefferies, E., Patterson, K. & Lambon Ralph, M. A. Deficits of knowledge vs. executive control in semantic cognition: insights from cued naming. Neuropsychologia 18 Sep 2004 (doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.09.007).
33. Graham K., Patterson, K. & Hodges, J. R. Progressive pure anomia: insufficient activation of phonology by meaning. Neurocase 1, 25–38 (1995).
    Article Google Scholar
34. Berthier, M. Transcortical Aphasias (Psychology, Hove East Sussex, 1999).
    Google Scholar
35. Badre, D., Poldrack, R., Paré-Blagoev E., Insler R. & Wagner, A. Dissociable controlled retrieval and generalized selection mechanisms in ventrolateral prefrontal cortex. Neuron 47, 907–918 (2005).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
36. Gold, B. T. et al. Dissociation of automatic and strategic lexical-semantics: functional magnetic resonance imaging evidence for differing roles of multiple frontotemporal regions. J. Neurosci. 26, 6523–6532 (2006).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
37. Diehl, B. et al. Cerebral metabolic patterns at early stages of frontotemporal dementia and semantic dementia. A PET study. Neurobiol. Aging 25, 1051–1056 (2004).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
38. Desgranges, B. et al. Anatomical and functional alterations in semantic dementia: a voxel-based MRI and PET study. Neurobiol. Aging 28, 1904–1913.
39. Nestor, P. J., Fryer T. D. & Hodges J. R. Declarative memory impairments in Alzheimer's disease and semantic dementia. Neuroimage 30, 1010–1020 (2006). This study highlighted that the lesions (defined by FDG-PET metabolism) associated with the semantic deficit in semantic dementia are restricted to the anterior temporal lobes, whereas posterior temporal hypometabolism was evident in an Alzheimer group with absent or very mild semantic deficits.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
40. Chan, D. et al. Patterns of temporal lobe atrophy in semantic dementia and Alzheimer's disease. Ann. Neurol. 49, 433–442 (2001).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
41. Davies, R. R., Graham, K. S., Xuereb, J. H., Williams, G. B. & Hodges, J. R. The human perirhinal cortex and semantic memory. Eur. J. Neurosci. 20, 2441–2446 (2004).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
42. Mummery, C. J. et al. A voxel-based morphometry study of semantic dementia: relationship between temporal lobe atrophy and semantic memory. Ann. Neurol. 47, 36–45 (2000).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
43. Seeley, W. W. et al. The natural history of temporal variant frontotemporal dementia. Neurology 64, 1384–1390 (2005).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
44. Chao, L. L., Haxby, J. V. & Martin, A. Attribute-based neural substrates in temporal cortex for perceiving and knowing about objects. Nature Neurosci. 2, 913–919 (1999).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
45. Goldberg, R. F., Perfetti, C. A. & Schneider, W. Perceptual knowledge retrieval activates sensory brain regions. J. Neurosci. 26, 4917–4921 (2006).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
46. Hauk, O., Johnsrude, I. & Pulvermuller, F. Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex. Neuron 41, 301–307 (2004).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
47. James, T. W. & Gauthier, I. Auditory and action semantic features activate sensory-specific perceptual brain regions. Curr. Biol. 13, 1792–1796 (2003).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
48. Kellenbach, M. L., Brett, M. & Patterson, K. Large, colourful or noisy? Attribute- and modality-specific activations during retrieval of perceptual attribute knowledge. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 1, 207–221 (2001).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
49. Kellenbach, M. L., Brett, M. & Patterson, K. Actions speak louder than functions: the importance of manipulability and action in tool representations. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 15, 20–46.
50. Joseph, J. E. Functional neuroimaging studies of category specificity in object recognition: a critical review and meta-analysis. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 1, 119–136.
51. Moore, C. J. & Price, C. J. Three distinct ventral occipitotemporal regions for reading and object naming. Neuroimage 10, 181–192 (1999).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
52. Devlin, J. T. et al. Susceptibility-induced loss of signal: comparing PET and fMRI on a semantic task. Neuroimage 11, 589–600 (2000). These experiments highlighted an important methodological issue for fMRI. Using a semantic categorization paradigm and a comparison of imaging methods, the authors established that the significant anterior temporal lobe activation evident with H 2 15 0-PET was largely absent with fMRI — a consequence of MRI susceptibility artefact.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
53. Mummery, C. J., Patterson, K., Hodges, J. R. & Wise, R. J. S. Generating 'tiger' as an animal name or a word beginning with T: differences in brain activation. Proc. Biol. Sci. 263, 989–995 (1996).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
54. Price, C. J., Devlin, J. T., Moore, C. J., Morton, C. & Laird, A. R. Meta-analyses of object naming: effect of baseline. Hum. Brain Mapp. 25, 70–82 (2005).
    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
55. Rogers, T. T. et al. Anterior temporal cortex and semantic memory: reconciling findings from neuropsychology and functional imaging. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 6, 201–213 (2006).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
56. Bright, P., Moss, H. & Tyler, L. K. Unitary vs multiple semantics: PET studies of word and picture processing. Brain Lang. 89, 417–432 (2004). This publication is significant because its conjunction analysis of four PET studies, using different kinds of semantic tasks and stimuli, revealed common activation in the anterior temporal lobe, and because it highlights the impact of specificity of semantic processing.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
57. Crinion, J. T., Lambon-Ralph, M. A., Warburton, E. A., Howard, D. & Wise, R. J. S. Temporal lobe regions engaged in normal speech comprehension. Brain 126, 1193–1201 (2003).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
58. Scott, S. K., Blank, C. C., Rosen, S. & Wise, R. J. S. Identification of a pathway for intelligible speech in the left temporal lobe. Brain 123, 2400–2406 (2000).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
59. Lindenberg, R. & Scheef, L. Supramodal language comprehension: role of the left temporal lobe for listening and reading. Neuropsychologia 45, 2407–2415 (2007).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
60. Marinkovic K. et al. Spatiotemporal dynamics of modality-specific and supramodal word processing. Neuron 28, 487–497 (2003). This paper demonstrated the potential of MEG to map the early temporal sequence of regional activation in a semantic paradigm. Auditory and visual stimuli each initially engaged their respective sensory cortices but ultimately the activation from each converged on the anterior temporal lobes.
    Article Google Scholar
61. Grabowski, T. J. et al. A role for left temporal pole in the retrieval of words for unique entities. Hum. Brain Mapp. 13, 199–212 (2001).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
62. Gorno-Tempini, M. L. & Price, C. J. Identification of famous faces and buildings: a functional neuroimaging study of semantically unique items. Brain 124, 2087–2097 (2001).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
63. Nakamura, K. et al. Functional delineation of the human occipito-temporal areas related to face and scene processing: a PET study. Brain 123, 1903–1912 (2000).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
64. Gorno-Tempini, M. L. et al. The neural systems sustaining face and proper-name processing. Brain 121, 2103–2118 (1998).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
65. Tsukiura, T., Mochizuki-Kawai, H. & Fujii, T. Dissociable roles of the bilateral anterior temporal lobe in face-name associations: an event-related fMRI study. Neuroimage 30, 617–626 (2006).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
66. Nakamura, K., et al. Neural substrates for recognition for familiar voices: a PET study. Neuropsychologia 39, 1047–1054 (2001).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
67. Snowden, J. S., Thompson, J. C. & Neary D. Knowledge of famous faces and names in semantic dementia. Brain 4, 860–872 (2004).
    Article Google Scholar
68. Hodges, J. R., Graham, N. & Patterson, K. Charting the progression in semantic dementia: implications for the organisation of semantic memory. Memory 3, 463–495 (1995).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
69. Hodges, J. R., Patterson, K. & Tyler, L. K. Loss of semantic memory: implications for the modularity of mind. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 11, 505–542 (1994).
    Article Google Scholar
70. Rogers, T. T., Lambon Ralph, M. A., Hodges, J. R. & Patterson, K. Natural selection: the impact of semantic impairment on lexical and object decision. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 21, 331–352 (2004).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
71. Patterson, K. & Erzinçlioglu, S. in Drawing and Non-Verbal Intelligence (eds Lange-Kuettner, C. & Vinter, A.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, in the press).
72. Rogers, T. T. & Patterson, K. Object categorization: reversals and explanations of the basic-level advantage. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen., 136, 451–469 (2007).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
73. Gorno-Tempini, M. L., Cipolotti, L. & Price, C. J. Category differences in brain activation studies: where do they come from? Proc. Biol. Sci. 267, 1253–1258 (2000).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
74. Gauthier, I., Anderson, A. W., Tarr, M. J., Skudlarski, P. & Gore, J. C. Levels of categorization in visual recognition studied using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Curr. Biol. 7, 645–651 (1997).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
75. Tyler, L. K. et al. Processing objects at different levels of specificity. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 16, 351–362 (2004).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
76. Buxbaum, L. J. & Saffran, E. M. Knowledge of object manipulation and object function: dissociations in apraxic and nonapraxic subjects. Brain Lang. 82, 179–199 (2002).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
77. Chao, L. L. & Martin, A. Representation of manipulable man-made objects in the dorsal stream. Neuroimage 12, 478–484 (2000).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
78. Hodges, J. R., Bozeat, S., Lambon Ralph, M. A., Patterson, K. & Spatt, J. The role of conceptual knowledge in object use: evidence from semantic dementia. Brain 123, 1913–1925 (2000).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
79. Bozeat, S., Lambon Ralph, M. A., Patterson, K. & Hodges, J. R. When objects lose their meaning: what happens to their use? Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 2, 236–251 (2002).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
80. Adlam, A. L. et al. Semantic dementia and fluent primary progressive aphasia: two sides of the same coin? Brain 129, 3066–80 (2006).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
81. Rogers, T. T., Patterson, K. & Graham, K. S. Colour knowledge in semantic dementia: it's not all black and white. Neuropsychologia (in the press).
82. Rogers, T. T. & McClelland, J. L. Semantic Cognition: A Parallel Distributed Processing Approach (MIT press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, 2004). The general theory of human semantic abilities described in this book explains how we come to know which properties are important for representing which concepts, and why this ability may critically depend upon neuroanatomical convergence within the cortical semantic network.
    Book Google Scholar
83. Plaut, D. C. Graded modality-specific specialization in semantics: a computational account of optic aphasia. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 19, 603–639 (2002).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
84. Macario, J. F. Young children's use of color in classification: foods and canonically colored objects. Cogn. Dev. 6, 17–46 (1991).
    Article Google Scholar
85. Gelman, R. & Williams, E. M. in Handbook of Child Psychology, Vol. II: Cognition, Perception and Development (eds Kuhn, D. & Siegler, R.) 575–530 (Wiley, New York, 1998).
    Google Scholar
86. Keil, F. C. Concepts, Kinds and Cognitive Development (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, 1989).
    Google Scholar
87. Murphy, G. L. & Medin, D. L. The role of theories in conceptual coherence. Psychol. Rev. 92, 289–316 (1985).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
88. Rogers, T. T. et al. Structure and deterioration of semantic memory: a neuropsychological and computational investigation. Psychol. Rev. 111, 205–235 (2004). This paper describes a model implementation of the distributed-plus-hub theory and uses the model to explain many different aspects of the semantic impairment observed in semantic dementia.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
89. Garrard, P., Lambon Ralph, M. A., Hodges, J. R. & Patterson, K. Prototypicality, distinctiveness and intercorrelation: analyses of the semantic attributes of living and nonliving items. Cogn. Neuropsychol. 18, 125–174 (2001).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
90. Patterson, K. The reign of typicality in semantic memory. philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 362, 813–821 (2007).
    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
91. Hodges, J. R., Patterson, K., Oxbury, S. & Funnell, E. Semantic dementia: progressive fluent aphasia with temporal lobe atrophy. Brain 115, 1783–1806 (1992).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
92. Patterson, K. et al. 'Pre-semantic' cognition in semantic dementia: six deficits in search of an explanation. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 18, 169–183 (2006). This paper demonstrates that the amodal semantic deficit in semantic dementia produces the same pattern of impaired performance across a range of tasks differing in modality of input and output.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
93. Gloor, P. The Temporal Lobe and Limbic System (OUP, New York, 1997).
    Google Scholar
94. Hickok, G. & Poeppel, D. The cortical organization of speech processing. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 8, 393–402 (2007).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
95. Adolphs, R. & Spezio, M. Role of the amygdala in processing social stimuli. Prog. Brain Res. 156, 363–378 (2006).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
96. Martin, A. & Chao, L. L. Semantic memory and the brain: structure and processes. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 11, 194–201 (2001).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
97. Snodgrass, J. G. & Vanderwart, M. A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity and visual complexity. J. Exp. Psychol. 6, 174–215 (1980).
    CAS Google Scholar
98. Howard, D. & Patterson, K. Pyramids and Palm Trees: A Test of Semantic Access from Pictures and Words. (Thames Valley test Co., Bury St Edmunds, UK, 1992)
    Google Scholar
99. Binder, J. R. et al. Human temporal lobe activation by speech and nonspeech sounds. Cereb. Cortex 10, 512–528 (2000).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
100. Davis, M. H. & Johnsrude, I. S. Hierarchical processing in spoken language comprehension. J. Neurosci. 23, 3423–3431 (2003).
     Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
101. Scott, S. K., Rosen, S., Lang, H. & Wise, R. J. Neural correlates of intelligibility in speech investigated with noise vocoded-speech—-a positron emission tomography study. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 120, 1075–1083 (2006).
     Article PubMed Google Scholar
102. Ferstl, E. C., Rinck, M. & von Cramon, D. Y. Emotional and temporal aspects of situation model processing during text comprehension: an event-related fMRI study. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 17, 724–739 (2005).
     Article PubMed Google Scholar
103. Noppeney, U., Price, C. J., Duncan, J. S. & Koepp, M. J. Reading skills after left anterior temporal lobe resection: an fMRI study. Brain 128, 1377–1385 (2005).
     Article PubMed Google Scholar
104. Devlin, J. T. et al. Is there an anatomical basis for category-specificity? Semantic memory studies in PET and fMRI. Neuropsychologia 40, 54–75 (2002).
     Article PubMed Google Scholar
105. Noppeney, U. & Price, C. J. Retrieval of visual, auditory, and abstract semantics. Neuroimage 15, 917–926 (2002).
     Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
106. Papathanassiou, D. et al. A common language network for comprehension and production: a contribution to the definition of language epicentres with PET. Neuroimage 11, 347–357 (2000).
     Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
107. Tranel, D., Grabowski, T. J., Lyon, J. & Damasio, H. Naming the same entities from visual or from auditory stimulation engages similar regions of left inferotemporal cortices. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 17, 1293–1305 (2005).
     Article PubMed Google Scholar
108. Binder, J. R., Westbury, C. F., McKiernan, K. A., Possing, E. T. & Medler, D. A. Distinct brain systems for processing concrete and abstract concepts. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 17, 905–917 (2005).
     Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
109. Mummery, C. J., Shallice, T. & Price, C. J. Dual-process model in semantic priming: a functional imaging perspective. Neuroimage 9, 516–525 (1999).
     Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
110. Small, D. M., Jones-Gotman, M., Zatorre, R. J., Petrides, M. & Evans A. C. A role for the right anterior temporal lobe in taste quality recognition. J. Neurosci. 17, 5136–5142 (1997).
     Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
111. Simons, J. S., Koutstaal, W., Prince, S., Wagner, A. & Schacter, D. Neural mechanisms of visual object priming: evidence for perceptual and semantic distinctions in fusiform cortex. Neuroimage 19, 613–626 (2003).
     Article PubMed Google Scholar
112. Vuilleumier, P., Henson, R. N., Driver, J. & Dolan, R. J. Multiple levels of visual object constancy revealed by event-related fMRI of repetition priming. Nature Neurosci. 5, 491–499 (2002).
     Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
113. Phillips, J. A., Humphreys, G. W., Noppeney, U. & Price, C. J. The neural substrates of action retrieval: an examination of semantic and visual routes to action. Vis. Cogn. 9, 662–684 (2002).
     Article Google Scholar
114. Brett, M. The MNI brain and the Talairach atlas. MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit [online] (2002).
     Google Scholar

Download references