The large obliquity of Saturn explained by the fast migration of Titan (original) (raw)

Nature Astronomy volume 5, pages 345–349 (2021)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

The obliquity of a planet is the tilt between its equator and its orbital plane. Giant planets are expected to form with near-zero obliquities1,2. After the formation of Saturn, some dynamical mechanism must therefore have tilted Saturn up to its current obliquity of 26.7°. This event is traditionally thought to have happened more than 4 Gyr ago during the late planetary migration3,4,5 because of the crossing of a resonance between the spin-axis precession of Saturn and the nodal orbital precession mode of Neptune6. Here, we show that the fast tidal migration of Titan for which the measurement is reported in ref. 7 is incompatible with this scenario, and that it offers a new explanation for Saturn’s current obliquity. A substantial migration of Titan would prevent any early resonance, which would invalidate previous constraints on the late planetary migration that were set by the tilting of Saturn8,9,10. We propose instead that the resonance was encountered more recently, about 1 Gyr ago, and forced Saturn’s obliquity to increase from a small value (possibly less than 3°) to its current state. This scenario suggests that Saturn’s normalized polar moment of inertia lies between 0.224 and 0.237. Our findings bring out a new paradigm for the spin-axis evolution of Saturn, Jupiter11 and possibly giant exoplanets in multiple systems, whereby obliquities are not settled once for all but evolve continuously as a result of the migration of their satellites.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals

Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription

$29.99 / 30 days

cancel any time

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles

$119.00 per year

only $9.92 per issue

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Source Data for the figures are provided with this paper. The data supporting other findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Code availability

The parameters and equations of motion are fully described within the paper. All data can be reproduced using any standard implementation. The numerical integration scheme used is fully available from ref. 29.

References

  1. Ward, W. R. & Hamilton, D. P. Tilting Saturn. I. Analytic model. Astron. J. 128, 2501–2509 (2004).
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  2. Rogoszinski, Z. & Hamilton, D. P. Tilting ice giants with a spin–orbit resonance. Astrophys. J. 888, 60 (2020).
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  3. Malhotra, R. The origin of Pluto’s peculiar orbit. Nature 365, 819–821 (1993).
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  4. Tsiganis, K., Gomes, R., Morbidelli, A. & Levison, H. F. Origin of the orbital architecture of the giant planets of the Solar System. Nature 435, 459–461 (2005).
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  5. Nesvorný, D. & Morbidelli, A. Statistical study of the early Solar System’s instability with four, five, and six giant planets. Astron. J. 144, 117 (2012).
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  6. Hamilton, D. P. & Ward, W. R. Tilting Saturn. II. Numerical model. Astron. J. 128, 2510–2517 (2004).
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  7. Lainey, V. et al. New tidal paradigm in giant planets supported by rapid orbital expansion of Titan. Nat. Astron. 4, 1053–1058 (2020).
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  8. Boué, G., Laskar, J. & Kuchynka, P. Speed limit on Neptune migration imposed by Saturn tilting. Astrophys. J. 702, L19–L22 (2009).
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  9. Brasser, R. & Lee, M. H. Tilting Saturn without tilting Jupiter: constraints on giant planet migration. Astron. J. 150, 157 (2015).
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  10. Vokrouhlický, D. & Nesvorný, D. Tilting Jupiter (a bit) and Saturn (a lot) during planetary migration. Astrophys. J. 806, 143 (2015).
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  11. Saillenfest, M., Lari, G. & Courtot, A. The future large obliquity of Jupiter. Astron. Astrophys. 640, A11 (2020).
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  12. Laskar, J. & Robutel, P. The chaotic obliquity of the planets. Nature 361, 608–612 (1993).
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  13. Ward, W. R. Tidal friction and generalized Cassini’s laws in the solar system. Astron. J. 80, 64–70 (1975).
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  14. Fuller, J., Luan, J. & Quataert, E. Resonance locking as the source of rapid tidal migration in the Jupiter and Saturn moon systems. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 458, 3867–3879 (2016).
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  15. Millholland, S. & Laughlin, G. Obliquity-driven sculpting of exoplanetary systems. Nat. Astron. 3, 424–433 (2019).
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  16. Saillenfest, M., Laskar, J. & Boué, G. Secular spin-axis dynamics of exoplanets. Astron. Astrophys. 623, A4 (2019).
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  17. Laskar, J. The chaotic motion of the solar system: a numerical estimate of the size of the chaotic zones. Icarus 88, 266–291 (1990).
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  18. Charnoz, S., Canup, R. M., Crida, A. & Dones, L. in Planetary Ring Systems: Properties, Structure, and Evolution (eds Tiscareno, M. S. & Murray, C. D.) 517–538 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2018).
  19. Millholland, S. & Batygin, K. Excitation of planetary obliquities through planet–disk interactions. Astrophys. J. 876, 119 (2019).
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  20. Safronov, V. S. Sizes of the largest bodies falling onto the planets during their formation. Sov. Astron. 9, 987–991 (1966).
    ADS Google Scholar
  21. Kipping, D. M. In search of exomoons. In Proc. Frank N. Bash Symposium 2013: New Horizons in Astronomy, 012 (PoS, 2014).
  22. Kreyche, S. M. et al. Retrograde-rotating exoplanets experience obliquity excitations in an eccentricity-enabled resonance. Planet. Sci. J. 1, 8 (2020).
    Article Google Scholar
  23. Archinal, B. A. et al. Report of the IAU Working Group on Cartographic Coordinates and Rotational Elements: 2015. Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron. 130, 22 (2018).
    Article ADS MathSciNet Google Scholar
  24. Iess, L. et al. Measurement and implications of Saturn’s gravity field and ring mass. Science 364, aat2965 (2019).
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  25. Hubbard, W. B. & Marley, M. S. Optimized Jupiter, Saturn, and Uranus interior models. Icarus 78, 102–118 (1989).
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  26. French, R. G. et al. Geometry of the Saturn system from the 3 July 1989 occultation of 28 Sgr and Voyager observations. Icarus 103, 163–214 (1993).
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  27. Fortney, J. J. et al. in Saturn in the 21st Century (eds Baines, K. H. et al.) 44–68 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2018).
  28. Hesselbrock, A. J. & Minton, D. A. An ongoing satellite–ring cycle of Mars and the origins of Phobos and Deimos. Nat. Geosci. 10, 266–269 (2017).
    Article ADS Google Scholar
  29. Rein, H. & Spiegel, D. S. IAS15: a fast, adaptive, high-order integrator for gravitational dynamics, accurate to machine precision over a billion orbits. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 446, 1424–1437 (2015).
    Article ADS Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank L. Gomez Casajus for fruitful discussions and S. Renner for his suggestions during the writing of our manuscript. G.L. acknowledges financial support from the Italian Space Agency (ASI) through agreement no. 2017-40-H.0.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. IMCCE, Observatoire de Paris, PSL Research University, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, Université de Lille, Paris, France
    Melaine Saillenfest & Gwenaël Boué
  2. Department of Mathematics, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
    Giacomo Lari

Authors

  1. Melaine Saillenfest
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  2. Giacomo Lari
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  3. Gwenaël Boué
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

G.B. conceived the original idea. G.L. compiled the data. G.L. and M.S. made the computations. M.S. wrote the article. All authors participated in supervising the whole study.

Corresponding author

Correspondence toMelaine Saillenfest.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Astronomy thanks David Nesvorny and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Source data

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Saillenfest, M., Lari, G. & Boué, G. The large obliquity of Saturn explained by the fast migration of Titan.Nat Astron 5, 345–349 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-020-01284-x

Download citation

This article is cited by

Associated content