The recurrent impact of the Sagittarius dwarf on the star formation history of the Milky Way (original) (raw)
References
Gaia Collaboration et al. Gaia Data Release 2: summary of the contents and survey properties. Astron. Astrophys.616, A1 (2018). Google Scholar
Gallart, C., Zoccali, M. & Aparicio, A. The adequacy of stellar evolution models for the interpretation of the color-magnitude diagrams of resolved stellar populations. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.43, 387–434 (2005). ADS Google Scholar
Mor, R., Robin, A. C., Figueras, F., Roca-Fàbrega, S. & Luri, X. Gaia DR2 reveals a star formation burst in the disc 2-3 Gyr ago. Astron. Astrophys.624, L1 (2019). ADS Google Scholar
Heavens, A., Panter, B., Jimenez, R. & Dunlop, J. The star-formation history of the Universe from the stellar populations of nearby galaxies. Nature428, 625–627 (2004). ADS Google Scholar
Perryman, M. A. C. et al. The HIPPARCOS Catalogue. Astron. Astrophys.323, L49–L52 (1997). ADS Google Scholar
Bertelli, G. & Nasi, E. Star formation history in the solar vicinity. Astron. J.121, 1013–1023 (2001). ADS Google Scholar
Vergely, J.-L., Köppen, J., Egret, D. & Bienaymé, O. An inverse method to interpret colour-magnitude diagrams. Astron. Astrophys.390, 917–929 (2002). ADS Google Scholar
Cignoni, M., Degl’Innocenti, S., Prada Moroni, P. G. & Shore, S. N. Recovering the star formation rate in the solar neighborhood. Astron. Astrophys.459, 783–796 (2006). ADS Google Scholar
Haywood, M. et al. Phylogeny of the Milky Way’s inner disk and bulge populations: implications for gas accretion, (the lack of) inside-out thick disk formation, and quenching. Astron. Astrophys.618, A78 (2018). Google Scholar
Bernard, E. J. in IAU Symposium 334: Rediscovering Our Galaxy (eds Chiappini, C. et al.) 158–161 (IAU, 2018).
Feltzing, S., Holmberg, J. & Hurley, J. R. The solar neighbourhood age-metallicity relation—does it exist? Astron. Astrophys.377, 911–924 (2001). ADS Google Scholar
Bergemann, M. et al. The Gaia-ESO Survey: radial metallicity gradients and age-metallicity relation of stars in the Milky Way disk. Astron. Astrophys.565, A89 (2014). Google Scholar
Hayden, M. R. et al. Chemical cartography with APOGEE: metallicity distribution functions and the chemical structure of the Milky Way Disk. Astrophys. J.808, 132 (2015). ADS Google Scholar
Gaia Collaboration et al. Gaia Data Release 2: mapping the Milky Way disc kinematics. Astron. Astrophys.616, A11 (2018). Google Scholar
Gaia Collaboration et al. Gaia Data Release 2: observational Hertzsprung–Russell diagrams. Astron. Astrophys.616, A10 (2018). Google Scholar
Kennicutt, R. C. Jr., Keel, W. C., van der Hulst, J. M., Hummel, E. & Roettiger, K. A. The effects of interactions on spiral galaxies. II: disk star-formation rates. Astron. J.93, 1011–1023 (1987). ADS Google Scholar
Tissera, P. B., Domíguez-Tenreiro, R., Scannapieco, C. & Sáiz, A. Double starbursts triggered by mergers in hierarchical clustering scenarios. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.333, 327–338 (2002). ADS Google Scholar
Ellison, S. L., Mendel, J. T., Patton, D. R. & Scudder, J. M. Galaxy pairs in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey–VIII. The observational properties of post-merger galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.435, 3627–3638 (2013). ADS Google Scholar
Tinsley, B. M. & Larson, R. B. Stellar population explosions in proto-elliptical galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.186, 503–517 (1979). ADS Google Scholar
Freeman, K. & Bland-Hawthorn, J. The new galaxy: signatures of its formation. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.40, 487–537 (2002). ADS Google Scholar
Meza, A., Navarro, J. F., Abadi, M. G. & Steinmetz, M. Accretion relics in the solar neighbourhood: debris from ω Cen’s parent galaxy. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.359, 93–103 (2005). ADS Google Scholar
Gallart, C. et al. Uncovering the birth of the Milky Way through accurate stellar ages with Gaia. Nat. Astron3, 932–939 (2019). ADS Google Scholar
Naab, T. & Ostriker, J. P. Theoretical challenges in galaxy formation. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.55, 59–109 (2017). ADS Google Scholar
Ibata, R. A., Gilmore, G. & Irwin, M. J. A dwarf satellite galaxy in Sagittarius. Nature370, 194–196 (1994). ADS Google Scholar
Belokurov, V. et al. The field of streams: Sagittarius and its siblings. Astrophys. J.642, L137–L140 (2006). ADS Google Scholar
Law, D. R. & Majewski, S. R. The Sagittarius dwarf galaxy: a model for evolution in a triaxial Milky Way halo. Astrophys. J.714, 229–254 (2010). ADS Google Scholar
Purcell, C. W., Bullock, J. S., Tollerud, E. J., Rocha, M. & Chakrabarti, S. The Sagittarius impact as an architect of spirality and outer rings in the Milky Way. Nature477, 301–303 (2011). ADS Google Scholar
Laporte, C. F. P., Johnston, K. V., Gómez, F. A., Garavito-Camargo, N. & Besla, G. The influence of Sagittarius and the Large Magellanic Cloud on the stellar disc of the Milky Way Galaxy. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.481, 286–306 (2018). ADS Google Scholar
Eggen, O. J. The motions of the A Stars at the North Galactic Pole. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac.81, 741 (1969). ADS Google Scholar
Siebert, A. et al. Detection of a radial velocity gradient in the extended local disc with RAVE. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.412, 2026–2032 (2011). ADS Google Scholar
Williams, M. E. K. et al. The wobbly galaxy: kinematics north and south with RAVE red-clump giants. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.436, 101–121 (2013). ADS Google Scholar
Gómez, F. A. et al. Vertical density waves in the Milky Way disc induced by the Sagittarius dwarf galaxy. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.429, 159–164 (2013). ADS Google Scholar
Antoja, T. et al. A dynamically young and perturbed Milky Way disk. Nature561, 360–362 (2018). ADS Google Scholar
Laporte, C. F. P., Minchev, I., Johnston, K. V. & Gómez, F. A. Footprints of the Sagittarius dwarf galaxy in the Gaia data set. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.485, 3134–3152 (2019). ADS Google Scholar
de la Vega, A., Quillen, A. C., Carlin, J. L., Chakrabarti, S. & D’Onghia, E. Phase wrapping of epicyclic perturbations in the Wobbly Galaxy. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.454, 933–945 (2015). ADS Google Scholar
Mackereth, J. T. et al. The origin of accreted stellar halo populations in the Milky Way using APOGEE, Gaia, and the EAGLE simulations. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.482, 3426–3442 (2019). ADS Google Scholar
de Boer, T. J. L., Belokurov, V. & Koposov, S. The star formation history of the Sagittarius stream. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.451, 3489–3503 (2015). ADS Google Scholar
Siegel, M. H. et al. The ACS survey of galactic globular clusters: M54 and Young populations in the sagittarius dwarf spheroidal galaxy. Astrophys. J.667, L57–L60 (2007). ADS Google Scholar
Besla, G. et al. Are the Magellanic Clouds on their first passage about the Milky Way? Astrophys. J.668, 949–967 (2007). ADS Google Scholar
Laporte, C. F. P., Gómez, F. A., Besla, G., Johnston, K. V. & Garavito-Camargo, N. Response of the Milky Way’s disc to the Large Magellanic Cloud in a first infall scenario. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.473, 1218–1230 (2018). ADS Google Scholar
Laporte, C. F. P., Belokurov, V., Koposov, S. E., Smith, M. C. & Hill, V. Chemo-dynamical properties of the Anticenter Stream: a surviving disc fossil from a past satellite interaction. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.492, L61–L65 (2020). ADS Google Scholar
McConnachie, A. W. et al. The remnants of galaxy formation from a panoramic survey of the region around M31. Nature461, 66–69 (2009). ADS Google Scholar
Bernard, E. J. et al. The star formation history and dust content in the far outer disc of M31. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.420, 2625–2643 (2012). ADS Google Scholar
Mihos, J. C. & Hernquist, L. Triggering of starbursts in galaxies by minor mergers. Astrophys. J.425, L13–L16 (1994). ADS Google Scholar
Hernquist, L. & Mihos, J. C. Excitation of activity in galaxies by minor mergers. Astrophys. J.448, 41 (1995). ADS Google Scholar
Cox, T. J., Jonsson, P., Somerville, R. S., Primack, J. R. & Dekel, A. The effect of galaxy mass ratio on merger-driven starbursts. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.384, 386–409 (2008). ADS Google Scholar
Moreno, J. et al. Mapping galaxy encounters in numerical simulations: the spatial extent of induced star formation. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.448, 1107–1117 (2015). ADS Google Scholar
Teyssier, R., Chapon, D. & Bournaud, F. The driving mechanism of starbursts in galaxy mergers. Astrophys. J.720, L149–L154 (2010). ADS Google Scholar
Chien, L.-H. & Barnes, J. E. Dynamically driven star formation in models of NGC 7252. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.407, 43–54 (2010). ADS Google Scholar
Moster, B. P., Macciò, A. V., Somerville, R. S., Naab, T. & Cox, T. J. The effects of a hot gaseous halo in galaxy major mergers. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.415, 3750–3770 (2011). ADS Google Scholar
Luri, X. et al. Gaia Data Release 2: using Gaia parallaxes. Astron. Astrophys.616, A9 (2018). Google Scholar
Lindegren, L. et al. Gaia Data Release 2: the astrometric solution. Astron. Astrophys.616, A2 (2018). Google Scholar
Stassun, K. G. & Torres, G. Evidence for a systematic offset of -80 μas in the Gaia DR2 Parallaxes. Astrophys. J.862, 61 (2018). ADS Google Scholar
Riess, A. G. et al. Milky Way Cepheid standards for measuring cosmic distances and application to Gaia DR2: implications for the Hubble constant. Astrophys. J.861, 126 (2018). ADS Google Scholar
Zinn, J. C., Pinsonneault, M. H., Huber, D. & Stello, D. Confirmation of the Gaia DR2 parallax zero-point offset using asteroseismology and spectroscopy in the Kepler field. Astrophys. J.878, 136 (2019). ADS Google Scholar
Schönrich, R., McMillan, P. & Eyer, L. Distances and parallax bias in Gaia DR2. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.487, 3568–3580 (2019). ADS Google Scholar
Khan, S. et al. New light on the Gaia DR2 parallax zero-point: influence of the asteroseismic approach, in and beyond the Kepler field. Astron. Astrophys.628, A35 (2019). Google Scholar
Graczyk, D. et al. Testing systematics of Gaia DR2 parallaxes with empirical surface brightness: color relations applied to eclipsing binaries. Astrophys. J.872, 85 (2019). ADS Google Scholar
Hall, O. J. et al. Testing asteroseismology with Gaia DR2: hierarchical models of the red clump. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.486, 3569–3585 (2019). ADS Google Scholar
Leung, H. W. & Bovy, J. Simultaneous calibration of spectro-photometric distances and the Gaia DR2 parallax zero-point offset with deep learning. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.489, 2079–2096 (2019). ADS Google Scholar
Bailer-Jones, C. A. L., Rybizki, J., Fouesneau, M., Mantelet, G. & Andrae, R. Estimating distance from parallaxes. IV: distances to 1.33 billion stars in Gaia Data Release 2. Astron. J.156, 58 (2018). ADS Google Scholar
Anders, F. et al. Photo-astrometric distances, extinctions, and astrophysical parameters for Gaia DR2 stars brighter than G = 18. Astron. Astrophys.628, A94 (2019). Google Scholar
Lallement, R. et al. Three-dimensional maps of interstellar dust in the Local Arm: using Gaia, 2MASS, and APOGEE-DR14. Astron. Astrophys.616, A132 (2018). Google Scholar
Casagrande, L. & VandenBerg, D. A. On the use of Gaia magnitudes and new tables of bolometric corrections. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.479, L102–L107 (2018). ADS Google Scholar
Cignoni, M. & Tosi, M. Star formation histories of dwarf galaxies from the colour-magnitude diagrams of their resolved stellar populations. Adv. Astron.2010, 158568 (2010). ADS Google Scholar
Aparicio, A. & Hidalgo, S. L. IAC-pop: finding the star formation history of resolved galaxies. Astron. J.138, 558–567 (2009). ADS Google Scholar
Tolstoy, E., Hill, V. & Tosi, M. Star-formation histories, abundances, and kinematics of dwarf galaxies in the local group. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.47, 371–425 (2009). ADS Google Scholar
Monelli, M. et al. The ACS LCID Project. III. The star formation history of the Cetus dSph galaxy: a post-reionization fossil. Astrophys. J.720, 1225–1245 (2010). ADS Google Scholar
Pietrinferni, A., Cassisi, S., Salaris, M. & Castelli, F. A large stellar evolution database for population synthesis studies. I: scaled solar models and isochrones. Astrophys. J.612, 168–190 (2004). ADS Google Scholar
Kroupa, P. On the variation of the initial mass function. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.322, 231–246 (2001). ADS Google Scholar
Evans, D. W. et al. Gaia Data Release 2: photometric content and validation. Astron. Astrophys.616, A4 (2018). Google Scholar
Bernard, E. J. et al. The spatially-resolved star formation history of the M31 outer disc. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.453, L113–L117 (2015). ADS Google Scholar
Bernard, E. J. et al. Star formation history of the Galactic bulge from deep HST imaging of low reddening windows. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.477, 3507–3519 (2018). ADS Google Scholar
Ruiz-Lara, T. et al. Integrated-light analyses vs. colour-magnitude diagrams. II. Leo A: an extremely young dwarf in the Local Group. Astron. Astrophys.617, A18 (2018). Google Scholar
Hidalgo, S. L. et al. The ACS LCID Project. V. The star formation history of the dwarf galaxy LGS-3: clues to cosmic reionization and feedback. Astrophys. J.730, 14 (2011). ADS Google Scholar
Cassisi, S., Potekhin, A. Y., Pietrinferni, A., Catelan, M. & Salaris, M. Updated electron-conduction opacities: the impact on low-mass stellar models. Astrophys. J.661, 1094–1104 (2007). ADS Google Scholar
Hidalgo, S. L. et al. The updated BaSTI stellar evolution models and isochrones. I. Solar-scaled calculations. Astrophys. J.856, 125 (2018). ADS Google Scholar
Rusakov, V. et al. The bursty star formation history of the Fornax dwarf spheroidal galaxy revealed with the HST. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.09714 (2020).
Hunter, J. D. Matplotlib: a 2d graphics environment. Comput. Sci. Eng.9, 90–95 (2007). Google Scholar
Astropy Collaboration et al. Astropy: a community Python package for astronomy. Astron. Astrophys.558, A33 (2013). Google Scholar
Astropy Collaboration et al. The Astropy Project: building an open-science project and status of the v2.0 core package. Astron. J.156, 123 (2018). ADS Google Scholar