Light-sheet microscopy for slide-free non-destructive pathology of large clinical specimens (original) (raw)

• Surveillance Research Program, N.C.I. Fast Stats: An Interactive Tool for Access to SEER Cancer Statistics (2016); https://seer.cancer.gov/faststats/
• Barakat, F. H., Sulaiman, I. & Sughayer, M. A. Reliability of frozen section in breast sentinel lymph node examination. Breast Cancer 21, 576– 582 (2014).
  Article Google Scholar
• McKenney, J. K. et al. The potential impact of reproducibility of Gleason grading in men with early stage prostate cancer managed by active surveillance: a multi-institutional study. J. Urol. 186, 465–469 (2011).
  Article Google Scholar
• Shah, R. B. et al. Diagnosis of Gleason pattern 5 prostate adenocarcinoma on core needle biopsy: an interobserver reproducibility study among urologic pathologists. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 39, 1242–1249 (2015).
  Article Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. S. et al. Breast carcinoma malignancy grading by Bloom-Richardson system vs proliferation index: reproducibility of grade and advantages of proliferation index. Mod. Pathol. 18, 1067–1078 (2005).
  Article Google Scholar
• Tozbikian, G . et al. Atypical ductal hyperplasia bordering on ductal carcinoma in situ: interobserver variability and outcomes in 105 cases. Int. J. Surg. Pathol. 25, 100–107 (2016).
  Article Google Scholar
• Bedossa, P., Dargere, D. & Paradis, V. Sampling variability of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology 38, 1449–1457 (2003).
  Article Google Scholar
• Roberts, N. et al. Toward routine use of 3D histopathology as a research tool. Am. J. Pathol. 180, 1835–1842 (2012).
  Article Google Scholar
• Carlson, R. O., Amirahmadi, F. & Hernandez, J. S. A primer on the cost of quality for improvement of laboratory and pathology specimen processes. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 138, 347–354 (2012).
  Article Google Scholar
• Gareau, D. S. et al. Confocal mosaicing microscopy in Mohs skin excisions: feasibility of rapid surgical pathology. J. Biomed. Opt. 13, 054001 (2008).
  Article Google Scholar
• Van Royen, M. E. et al. Three-dimensional microscopic analysis of clinical prostate specimens. Histopathology 69, 985–992 (2016).
  Article Google Scholar
• Fereidouni, F . et al. Microscopy with UV Surface Excitation (MUSE) for slide-free histology and pathology imaging. Proc. SPIE 9318, 93180F (2015).
  Article Google Scholar
• Wang, M. et al. High-resolution rapid diagnostic imaging of whole prostate biopsies using video-rate fluorescence structured illumination microscopy. Cancer Res. 75, 4032–4041 (2015).
  Article Google Scholar
• Wang, M. et al. Gigapixel surface imaging of radical prostatectomy specimens for comprehensive detection of cancer-positive surgical margins using structured illumination microscopy. Sci. Rep. 6, 27419 (2016 ).
  Article Google Scholar
• Tao, Y. K. et al. Assessment of breast pathologies using nonlinear microscopy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 15304–15309 (2014).
  Article Google Scholar
• Orringer, D. A. et al. Rapid intraoperative histology of unprocessed surgical specimens via fibre-laser-based stimulated Raman scattering microscopy. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 1, 0027 (2017).
  Article Google Scholar
• Tu, H. et al. Stain-free histopathology by programmable supercontinuum pulses. Nat. Photon. 10, 534–540 (2016).
  Article Google Scholar
• Olson, E., Levene, M. J. & Torres, R. Multiphoton microscopy with clearing for three dimensional histology of kidney biopsies. Biomed. Opt. Express 7, 3089–3096 (2016).
  Article Google Scholar
• Jonkman, J. & Brown, C. M. Any way you slice it—a comparison of confocal microscopy techniques. J. Biomol. Tech. 26, 54–65 (2015).
  Google Scholar
• Mertz, J. Optical sectioning microscopy with planar or structured illumination. Nat. Methods 8, 811–819 (2011).
  Article Google Scholar
• Vakoc, B. J. et al. Three-dimensional microscopy of the tumor microenvironment in vivo using optical frequency domain imaging. Nat. Med. 15, 1219–1223 (2009).
  Article Google Scholar
• Assayag, O. et al. Large field, high resolution full-field optical coherence tomography: a pre-clinical study of human breast tissue and cancer assessment. Technol. Cancer Res. Treat. 13, 455–468 (2014).
  Google Scholar
• Zysk, A. M. et al. Optical coherence tomography: a review of clinical development from bench to bedside. J. Biomed. Opt. 12, 051403 (2007).
  Article Google Scholar
• Siedentopf, H. & Zsigmondy, R. Uber Sichtbarmachung und Größenbestimmung ultramikoskopischer Teilchen, mit besonderer Anwendung auf Goldrubingläser. Annal. Phys. 315, 1–39 (1902).
  Article Google Scholar
• Dodt, H. U. et al. Ultramicroscopy: three-dimensional visualization of neuronal networks in the whole mouse brain. Nat. Methods 4, 331–336 (2007).
  Article Google Scholar
• Keller, P. J. et al. Reconstruction of zebrafish early embryonic development by scanned light sheet microscopy. Science 322, 1065–1069 (2008).
  Article Google Scholar
• Cella Zanacchi, F. et al. Live-cell 3D super-resolution imaging in thick biological samples. Nat. Methods 8, 1047–1049 (2011).
  Article Google Scholar
• Huisken, J. et al. Optical sectioning deep inside live embryos by selective plane illumination microscopy. Science 305, 1007–1009 (2004).
  Article Google Scholar
• Glaser, A. K., Wang, Y. & Liu, J. T. Assessing the imaging performance of light sheet microscopies in highly scattering tissues. Biomed. Opt. Express 7, 454–466 (2016).
  Article Google Scholar
• Pitrone, P. G. et al. OpenSPIM: an open-access light-sheet microscopy platform. Nat. Methods 10, 598–599 (2013).
  Article Google Scholar
• Reynaud, E. G. et al. Guide to light-sheet microscopy for adventurous biologists. Nat. Methods 12, 30–34 (2015).
  Article Google Scholar
• Kumar, A. et al. Dual-view plane illumination microscopy for rapid and spatially isotropic imaging. Nat. Protoc. 9, 2555–2573 (2014).
  Article Google Scholar
• Strnad, P. et al. Inverted light-sheet microscope for imaging mouse pre-implantation development. Nat. Methods 13, 139–142 (2016).
  Article Google Scholar
• Yang, Z. et al. An inverted light sheet microscope optimized for studies in neuroscience_. Conf. CLEO_ Atu3O.5 (2016).
• Wu, Y. et al. Inverted selective plane illumination microscopy (iSPIM) enables coupled cell identity lineaging and neurodevelopmental imaging in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 17708–17713 (2011).
  Article Google Scholar
• Power, R. M. & Huisken, J. A guide to light-sheet fluorescence microscopy for multiscale imaging. Nat. Methods 14, 360–373 (2017).
  Article Google Scholar
• McGorty, R. et al. Open-top selective plane illumination microscope for conventionally mounted specimens. Opt. Express 23, 16142–16153 (2015).
  Article Google Scholar
• Kino, G. S. Applications and theory of the solid immersion lens. Proc. SPIE 3609, 56 (1999).
  Google Scholar
• Liu, J. T. et al. Efficient rejection of scattered light enables deep optical sectioning in turbid media with low-numerical-aperture optics in a dual-axis confocal architecture. J. Biomed. Opt. 13, 034020 (2008).
  Article Google Scholar
• Hall, G. S., Kramer, C. E. & Epstein, J. I. Evaluation of radical prostatectomy specimens. A comparative analysis of sampling methods. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 16, 315–324 (1992).
  Article Google Scholar
• Chung, K. et al. Structural and molecular interrogation of intact biological systems. Nature 497, 332–337 (2013).
  Article Google Scholar
• Elfer, K. N. et al. DRAQ5 and eosin ('D&E') as an analog to hematoxylin and eosin for rapid fluorescence histology of fresh tissues. PLoS ONE 11, e0165530 (2016).
  Article Google Scholar
• Moffitt, J. R. et al. High-performance multiplexed fluorescence in situ hybridization in culture and tissue with matrix imprinting and clearing. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 14456–14461 (2016).
  Article Google Scholar
• Chen, F. et al. Nanoscale imaging of RNA with expansion microscopy. Nat. Methods 13, 679–684 (2016).
  Article Google Scholar
• Schmid, H. P. & McNeal, J. E. An abbreviated standard procedure for accurate tumor volume estimation in prostate cancer. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 16, 184–191 (1992).
  Article Google Scholar
• Sehdev, A. E., Pan, C. C. & Epstein, J. I. Comparative analysis of sampling methods for grossing radical prostatectomy specimens performed for nonpalpable (stage T1c) prostatic adenocarcinoma. Hum. Pathol. 32, 494–499 (2001).
  Article Google Scholar
• Jacobs, L. Positive margins: the challenge continues for breast surgeons. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 15, 1271–1272 (2008).
  Article Google Scholar
• Moran, M. S. et al. Society of Surgical Oncology-American Society for Radiation Oncology consensus guideline on margins for breast-conserving surgery with whole-breast irradiation in stages I and II invasive breast cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 32, 1507–1515 (2014).
  Article Google Scholar
• Adams, B. J. et al. The role of margin status and reexcision in local recurrence following breast conservation surgery. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 20, 2250–2255 (2013).
  Article Google Scholar
• Singletary, S. E. et al. Revision of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for breast cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 20, 3628–3636 (2002).
  Article Google Scholar
• Zhou, M. et al. Diagnosis of "poorly formed glands" Gleason pattern 4 prostatic adenocarcinoma on needle biopsy: an interobserver reproducibility study among urologic pathologists with recommendations. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 39, 1331–1339 (2015).
  Article Google Scholar
• Vettenburg, T. et al. Light-sheet microscopy using an Airy beam. Nat. Methods 11, 541–544 (2014).
  Article Google Scholar
• Fahrbach, F. O. & Rohrbach, A. Propagation stability of self-reconstructing Bessel beams enables contrast-enhanced imaging in thick media. Nat. Commun. 3, 632 (2012).
  Article Google Scholar
• Fu, Q. et al. Imaging multicellular specimens with real-time optimized tiling light-sheet selective plane illumination microscopy. Nat. Commun. 7, 11088 (2016).
  Article Google Scholar
• De Medeiros, G. et al. Confocal multiview light-sheet microscopy. Nat. Commun. 6, 8881 (2015).
  Article Google Scholar
• Tomer, R. et al. Quantitative high-speed imaging of entire developing embryos with simultaneous multiview light-sheet microscopy. Nat. Methods 9, 755–763 (2012).
  Article Google Scholar
• Dean, K. M. et al. Imaging subcellular dynamics with fast and light-efficient volumetrically parallelized microscopy. Optica 4, 263–271 (2017).
  Article Google Scholar
• Munch, B. et al. Stripe and ring artifact removal with combined wavelet—Fourier filtering. Opt. Express 17, 8567–8591 (2009).
  Article Google Scholar
• Preibisch, S., Saalfeld, S. & Tomancak, P. Globally optimal stitching of tiled 3D microscopic image acquisitions. Bioinformatics 25, 1463–1465 (2009).
  Article Google Scholar
• Aguet, F., Van De Ville, D. & Unser, M. Model-based 2.5-d deconvolution for extended depth of field in brightfield microscopy. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 17, 1144–1153 (2008).
  Article Google Scholar
• Giacomelli, M. G. et al. Virtual hematoxylin and eosin transillumination microscopy using epi-fluorescence imaging. PLoS ONE 11, e0159337 (2016).
  Article Google Scholar