Why setting a climate deadline is dangerous (original) (raw)

• Comment
• Published: 22 July 2019

Nature Climate Change volume 9, pages 570–572 (2019) Cite this article

• 9615 Accesses
• 93 Citations
• 548 Altmetric
• Metrics details

Subjects

The publication of the IPCC Special Report on global warming of 1.5 oC paved the way for the rise of the political rhetoric of setting a fixed deadline for decisive actions on climate change. However, the dangers of such deadline rhetoric suggest the need for the IPCC to take responsibility for its report and openly challenge the credibility of such a deadline.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

• Warming of +1.5 °C is too high for polar ice sheets

  • Chris R. Stokes
  • , Jonathan L. Bamber
  • … Robert M. DeConto
    Communications Earth & Environment Open Access 20 May 2025

• Public perceptions on solar geoengineering from focus groups in 22 countries

  • Sean Low
  • , Livia Fritz
  • … Benjamin K. Sovacool
    Communications Earth & Environment Open Access 27 June 2024

• Landing a global report on national territories: the reception of AR6 in France and Switzerland

  • Adèle Gaveau
    npj Climate Action Open Access 08 May 2024

Access options

Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals

Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription

$32.99 / 30 days

cancel any time

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 12 print issues and online access

$259.00 per year

only $21.58 per issue

Buy this article

• Purchase on SpringerLink
• Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

• Log in
• Learn about institutional subscriptions
• Read our FAQs
• Contact customer support

References

1. IPCC. Special Report: Global Warming of 1.5 °C (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) (IPCC, 2018).
2. Watts, J. We have 12 years to limit climate change catastrophe, warns UN. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/oct/08/global-warming-must-not-exceed-15c-warns-landmark-un-report (2018).
3. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC, 1992).
4. Leemans, R. & Vellinga, P. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 26–27, 134–142 (2017).
   Article Google Scholar
5. Morseletto, P., Biermann, F. & Pattberg, P. Int. Environ. Agreements Polit. Law Econ. 17, 655–676 (2017).
   Article Google Scholar
6. Knutti, R., Rogelj, J., Sedlácek, J. & Fischer, E. Nat. Geosci. 9, 13–18 (2016).
   Article CAS Google Scholar
7. Schleussner, C.-F. et al. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 827–835 (2016).
   Article Google Scholar
8. MacDougall, A. Curr. Clim. Change Rep. 2, 39–47 (2016).
   Article Google Scholar
9. Millar, R., Allen, M., Rogelj, J. & Friedlingstein, P. Oxford Rev. Econ. Policy 32, 323–342 (2016).
   Article Google Scholar
10. Matthews, H. D., Solomon, S. & Pierrehumbert, R. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 370, 4365–4379 (2012).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
11. Leach, N. et al. Nat. Geosci. 11, 574–579 (2018).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
12. Tokarska, K. Nat. Geosci. 11, 546–547 (2018).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
13. Jasanoff, S. Theory Cult. Soc. 27, 233–253 (2010).
    Article Google Scholar
14. Geden, O. Nat. Geosci. 11, 380–383 (2018).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
15. Rogelj, J. et al. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 245–252 (2016).
    Article Google Scholar
16. Geden, O. & Löschel, A. Nat. Geosci. 10, 881–882 (2017).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
17. Shah, A., Mullainathan, S. & Shafir, E. Science 338, 682–685 (2012).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
18. MacMartin, D., Ricke, K. & Keith, D. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 376, 20160454 (2018).
    Article Google Scholar
19. Asayama, S. & Hulme, M. Clim. Policy https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2019.1623165 (2019).
    Article Google Scholar
20. Heyward, C. & Rayner, S. in Anthropology and Climate Change: From Actions to Transformations (eds Crate, S. & Nuttall, M.) 86–104 (Routledge, 2016).
21. Sillmann, J. et al. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 290–292 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
22. Grundmann, R. Nat. Geosci. 9, 562–563 (2016).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
23. Evensen, D. Nat. Clim. Change 9, 428–430 (2019).
    Article Google Scholar
24. Allen, M. Why protesters should be wary of ‘12 years to climate breakdown’ rhetoric. https://theconversation.com/why-protesters-should-be-wary-of-12-years-to-climate-breakdown-rhetoric-115489 (2019).
25. Hulme, M. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 222–224 (2016).
    Article Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

S.A. acknowledges the support of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Grants-in-Aid for JSPS Research Fellow (17J02207). W.P. acknowledges the support of the Economic and Social Research Council Future Leaders Research programme, “Making Climate Social” project (ES/N002016/1)

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

1. Faculty of Political Science and Economics, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan
   Shinichiro Asayama
2. Department of Geography, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
   Shinichiro Asayama & Mike Hulme
3. Department of Geography, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
   Rob Bellamy
4. German Institute for International and Security Affairs, Berlin, Germany
   Oliver Geden
5. iHuman, Department of Sociological Studies, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
   Warren Pearce

Authors

1. Shinichiro Asayama
2. Rob Bellamy
3. Oliver Geden
4. Warren Pearce
5. Mike Hulme

Corresponding author

Correspondence toMike Hulme.

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Asayama, S., Bellamy, R., Geden, O. et al. Why setting a climate deadline is dangerous.Nat. Clim. Chang. 9, 570–572 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0543-4

Download citation

• Published: 22 July 2019
• Version of record: 22 July 2019
• Issue date: August 2019
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0543-4

This article is cited by