Achievements and needs for the climate change scenario framework (original) (raw)
References
Moss, R. H. et al. The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment. Nature463, 747 (2010). CAS Google Scholar
Ebi, K. L. et al. A new scenario framework for climate change research: background, process, and future directions. Climatic Change122, 363–372 (2014). Google Scholar
van Vuuren, D. P. et al. A new scenario framework for climate change research: scenario matrix architecture. Climatic Change122, 373–386 (2014). Google Scholar
O’Neill, B. C. et al. A new scenario framework for climate change research: the concept of shared socioeconomic pathways. Climatic Change122, 387–400 (2014). Google Scholar
Kriegler, E. et al. A new scenario framework for climate change research: the concept of shared climate policy assumptions. Climatic Change122, 401–414 (2014). Google Scholar
van Vuuren, D. P. et al. The representative concentration pathways: an overview. Climatic Change109, 5 (2011). Google Scholar
Riahi, K. et al. The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: an overview. Glob. Environ. Change42, 153–168 (2017). A synthesis of the SSP narratives, quantitative elements and integrated assessment model scenarios of energy, land use and emissions. Google Scholar
O’Neill, B. C. & Scientific Steering Committee. Forum on Scenarios of Climate and Societal Futures: Meeting Report (University of Denver, 2019); https://pardee.du.edu/forum-scenarios-climate-and-societal-futures-meeting-reportDocuments the wide variety oftopics being addressed by a growing and diverse community developing and using scenarios.
Chowdhury, S., Dey, S. & Smith, K. R. Ambient PM 2.5 exposure and expected premature mortality to 2100 in India under climate change scenarios. Nat. Commun.9, 318 (2018). Google Scholar
Williges, K., Mechler, R., Bowyer, P. & Balkovic, J. Towards an assessment of adaptive capacity of the European agricultural sector to droughts. Clim. Serv.7, 47–63 (2017). Google Scholar
Bauer, N. et al. Shared Socio-economic Pathways of the energy sector – quantifying the narratives. Glob. Environ. Change42, 316–330 (2017). Google Scholar
Popp, A. et al. Land-use futures in the shared socio-economic pathways. Glob. Environ. Change42, 331–345 (2017). Google Scholar
Rogelj, J. et al. Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5 °C. Nat. Clim. Change8, 325–332 (2018). CAS Google Scholar
Jones, B. & O’Neill, B. C. Spatially explicit global population scenarios consistent with the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways. Environ. Res. Lett.11, 084003 (2016). Google Scholar
Merkens, J.-L., Reimann, L., Hinkel, J. & Vafeidis, A. T. Gridded population projections for the coastal zone under the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways. Glob. Planet. Change145, 57–66 (2016). Google Scholar
Terama, E., Clarke, E., Rounsevell, M. D. A., Fronzek, S. & Carter, T. R. Modelling population structure in the context of urban land use change in Europe. Reg. Environ. Change19, 667–677 (2019). Google Scholar
Wear, D. N. & Prestemon, J. P. Spatiotemporal downscaling of global population and income scenarios for the United States. PLoS ONE14, e0219242 (2019). CAS Google Scholar
Rao, N. D., Sauer, P., Gidden, M. & Riahi, K. Income inequality projections for the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs). Futures105, 27–39 (2018). Google Scholar
Van der Mensbrugghe, D. Shared Socio-economic pathways and global income distribution. In 18th Annual Conference on Global Economic Analysis (GTAP, 2015).
Hallegatte, S. & Rozenberg, J. Climate change through a poverty lens. Nat. Clim. Change7, 250–256 (2017). Google Scholar
Byers, E. et al. Global exposure and vulnerability to multi-sector development and climate change hotspots. Environ. Res. Lett.13, 055012 (2018). Integrates a variety of climate and societal information to identify locations of high exposure and vulnerability. Google Scholar
Jones, B., Tebaldi, C., O’Neill, B. C., Oleson, K. & Gao, J. Avoiding population exposure to heat-related extremes: demographic change vs climate change. Climatic Change146, 423–437 (2018). Google Scholar
Harrington, L. J. & Otto, F. E. L. Changing population dynamics and uneven temperature emergence combine to exacerbate regional exposure to heat extremes under 1.5 °C and 2 °C of warming. Environ. Res. Lett.13, 034011 (2018). Google Scholar
Rohat, G. et al. Influence of changes in socioeconomic and climatic conditions on future heat-related health challenges in Europe. Glob. Planet. Change172, 45–59 (2019). Google Scholar
Rao, S. et al. Future air pollution in the Shared Socio-economic Pathways. Glob. Environ. Change42, 346–358 (2017). Google Scholar
Ebi, K. Health in the new scenarios for climate change research. Int. J. Env. Res. Pub. He.11, 30–46 (2013). Google Scholar
Graham, N. T. et al. Water sector assumptions for the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways in an integrated modeling framework. Water Resour. Res.54, 6423–6440 (2018). Google Scholar
Kemp-Benedict, E., de Jong, W. & Pacheco, P. In Forests Under Pressure, Local Responses to Global Issues (eds Katila, P. et al.) 539–553 (IUFRO, 2014).
Maury, O. et al. From Shared Socio-economic Pathways (SSPs) to oceanic system pathways (OSPs): building policy-relevant scenarios for global oceanic ecosystems and fisheries. Glob. Environ. Change45, 203–216 (2017). Google Scholar
Hegre, H. et al. Forecasting civil conflict along the shared socioeconomic pathways. Environ. Res. Lett.11, 054002 (2016). Google Scholar
Andrijevic, M., Cuaresma, J. C., Muttarak, R. & Schleussner, C.-F. Governance in socioeconomic pathways and its role for future adaptive capacity. Nat. Sustain.3, 35–41 (2020). Extends the SSPs with projections of governance to facilitate integrated studies. Google Scholar
Absar, S. M. & Preston, B. L. Extending the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways for sub-national impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability studies. Glob. Environ. Change33, 83–96 (2015). Google Scholar
Rohat, G., Flacke, J., Dao, H. & van Maarseveen, M. Co-use of existing scenario sets to extend and quantify the shared socioeconomic pathways. Climatic Change151, 619–636 (2018). Google Scholar
McManamay, R. A., DeRolph, C. R., Surendran-Nair, S. & Allen-Dumas, M. Spatially explicit land-energy-water future scenarios for cities: guiding infrastructure transitions for urban sustainability. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev.112, 880–900 (2019). Google Scholar
Kok, K., Pedde, S., Gramberger, M., Harrison, P. A. & Holman, I. P. New European socio-economic scenarios for climate change research: operationalising concepts to extend the shared socio-economic pathways. Reg. Environ. Change19, 643–654 (2019). Google Scholar
Harrison, P. A. et al. Differences between low-end and high-end climate change impacts in Europe across multiple sectors. Reg. Environ. Change19, 695–709 (2019). Google Scholar
Frantzeskaki, N. et al. Transition pathways to sustainability in greater than 2 °C climate futures of Europe. Reg. Environ. Change19, 777–789 (2019). Google Scholar
Hasegawa, T. et al. Risk of increased food insecurity under stringent global climate change mitigation policy. Nat. Clim. Change8, 699–703 (2018). Google Scholar
Hanasaki, N. et al. A global water scarcity assessment under Shared Socio-economic Pathways – Part 2: water availability and scarcity. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.17, 2393–2413 (2013). Google Scholar
Park, C. et al. Avoided economic impacts of energy demand changes by 1.5 and 2 °C climate stabilization. Environ. Res. Lett.13, 4 (2018). Google Scholar
IPCC Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5°C (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) (WMO, 2018).
IPCC Special Report on Climate Change and Land (eds Shukla, P. R. et al.) (WMO, 2019).
IPCC Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate (eds Pörtner, H.-O. et al.) (WMO, 2019).
Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES, 2019).
TWI2050 Report: Transformations to Achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (IIASA, 2018).
Global Environment Outlook – GEO-6: Healthy Planet, Healthy People (United Nations Environment Programme, 2019).
O’Neill, B. C. et al. The Scenario Model Intercomparison Project (ScenarioMIP) for CMIP6. Geosci. Model Dev.9, 3461–3482 (2016). Google Scholar
Rosa, I. M. D. et al. Challenges in producing policy-relevant global scenarios of biodiversity and ecosystem services. Glob. Ecol. Conserv.22, e00886 (2020). Addresses the extension of scenarios to the biodiversity community. Google Scholar
Mason-D’Croz, D. et al. Multi-factor, multi-state, multi-model scenarios: exploring food and climate futures for Southeast Asia. Environ. Modell. Soft.83, 255–270 (2016). Google Scholar
Cradock-Henry, N. A., Frame, B., Preston, B. L., Reisinger, A. & Rothman, D. S. Dynamic adaptive pathways in downscaled climate change scenarios. Climatic Change150, 333–341 (2018). Google Scholar
van Ruijven, B. J. et al. Enhancing the relevance of Shared Socioeconomic Pathways for climate change impacts, adaptation and vulnerability research. Climatic Change122, 481–494 (2014). Google Scholar
Scheffer, M. et al. Early-warning signals for critical transitions. Nature461, 53–59 (2009). CAS Google Scholar
Hazeleger, W. et al. Tales of future weather. Nat. Clim. Change5, 107–113 (2015). Google Scholar
Shepherd, T. G. et al. Storylines: an alternative approach to representing uncertainty in physical aspects of climate change. Climatic Change151, 555–571 (2018). Google Scholar
de Bruijn, K. M., Lips, N., Gersonius, B. & Middelkoop, H. The storyline approach: a new way to analyse and improve flood event management. Nat. Hazards81, 99–121 (2016). Google Scholar
Shepherd, T. G. Storyline approach to the construction of regional climate change information. P. Roy. Soc. A—Math. Phy.475, 20190013 (2019). Google Scholar
Sillmann, J. et al. Physical Modeling Supporting a Storyline Approach (CICERO Center for International Climate and Environmental Research, 2019).
Giorgi, F. & Gutowski, W. J. Regional dynamical downscaling and the CORDEX initiative. Annu. Rev. Env. Resour.40, 467–490 (2015). Google Scholar
Challinor, A. J., Adger, W. N. & Benton, T. G. Climate risks across borders and scales. Nat. Clim. Change7, 621–623 (2017). Google Scholar
van Ruijven, B. J., De Cian, E. & Sue Wing, I. Amplification of future energy demand growth due to climate change. Nat. Commun.10, 2762 (2019). Google Scholar
Biggs, R. et al. Linking futures across scales: a dialog on multiscale scenarios. Ecol. Soc.12, 17 (2007). Google Scholar
Zurek, M. B. & Henrichs, T. Linking scenarios across geographical scales in international environmental assessments. Technol. Forecast. Soc.74, 1282–1295 (2007). Google Scholar
Nilsson, A. E. et al. Towards extended shared socioeconomic pathways: a combined participatory bottom-up and top-down methodology with results from the Barents region. Glob. Environ. Change45, 124–132 (2017). Google Scholar
Mitter, H. Shared Socio-economic Pathways for European agriculture and food systems: the Eur-Agri-SSPs. Glob. Environ. Change65, 102159 (2020). Develops regional SSPs for application to the agricultural sector. Google Scholar
Kebede, A. S. et al. Applying the global RCP-SSP-SPA scenario framework at sub-national scale: a multi-scale and participatory scenario approach. Sci. Total Environ.635, 659–672 (2018). CAS Google Scholar
Tàbara, J. D. et al. Exploring institutional transformations to address high-end climate change in Iberia. Sustainability10, 161 (2018). Google Scholar
Hunt, D. V. L. et al. Scenario archetypes: converging rather than diverging themes. Sustainability4, 740–772 (2012). Google Scholar
van Vuuren, D. P., Kok, M. T. J., Girod, B., Lucas, P. L. & de Vries, B. Scenarios in global environmental assessments: key characteristics and lessons for future use. Glob. Environ. Change22, 884–895 (2012). Google Scholar
Guillaume Rohat, Johannes Flacke, Hy Dao, Martin van Maarseveen, (2018) Co-use of existing scenario sets to extend and quantify the shared socioeconomic pathways. Climatic Change 151 (3-4):619-636.
Reidmiller, D. R. et al. (eds) Impacts, Risks, and Adaptation in the United States: Fourth National Climate Assessment Volume II (US Global Change Research Program, 2018).
Pereira, L. M. et al. Developing multi-scale and integrative nature-people scenarios using the Nature Futures Framework. People and Naturehttps://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10146 (2020).
O’Neill, B. C. et al. The roads ahead: Narratives for shared socioeconomic pathways describing world futures in the 21st century. Glob. Environ. Change42, 169–180 (2017). Google Scholar
van Vuuren, D. P. et al. A proposal for a new scenario framework to support research and assessment in different climate research communities. Glob. Environ. Change22, 21–35 (2012). Google Scholar
Grant, N., Hawkes, A., Napp, T. & Gambhir, A. The appropriate use of reference scenarios in mitigation analysis. Nat. Clim. Change10, 605–610 (2020). Google Scholar
Roelfsema, M. Taking stock of climate policies: future impact of national policies in the context of the Paris Agreement climate goals. Nat. Commun.11, 2096 (2020). CAS Google Scholar
Wilbanks, T. J. & Ebi, K. L. SSPs from an impact and adaptation perspective. Climatic Change122, 473–479 (2014). Google Scholar
Otero, I. et al. Biodiversity policy beyond economic growth. Conserv. Lett.13, e12713 (2020). Google Scholar
Buhaug, H. & Vestby, J. On Growth Projections in the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways. Global Environ. Polit.19, 118–132 (2019). Google Scholar
Grubler, A. et al. A low energy demand scenario for meeting the 1.5 °C target and sustainable development goals without negative emission technologies. Nat. Energy3, 515–527 (2018). Google Scholar
van Vuuren, D. P. et al. Alternative pathways to the 1.5 °C target reduce the need for negative emission technologies. Nat. Clim. Change8, 391–397 (2018). Google Scholar
Cash, D. W. et al. Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA100, 8086–8091 (2003). CAS Google Scholar
Beck, S. & Mahony, M. The IPCC and the politics of anticipation. Nat. Clim. Change7, 311–313 (2017). Google Scholar
Edenhofer, O. & Kowarsch, M. Cartography of pathways: a new model for environmental policy assessments. Environ. Sci. Policy51, 56–64 (2015). Google Scholar
Kowarsch, M. & Jabbour, J. Solution-oriented global environmental assessments: opportunities and challenges. Environ. Sci. Policy77, 187–192 (2017). Google Scholar
Inayatullah, S. Deconstructing and reconstructing the future: predictive, cultural and critical epistemologies. Futures22, 115–141 (1990). Google Scholar
Sardar, Z. Colonizing the future: the ‘other’ dimension of futures studies. Futures25, 179–187 (1993). Google Scholar
Inayatullah, S. (eds) in The Causal Layered Analysis Reader: Theory and Case Studies of an Integrative and Transformative Methodology 1–52 (Tamkang Univ. Press, 2004).
Slaughter, R. A. From forecasting and scenarios to social construction: changing methodological paradigms in futures studies. Foresight4, 26–31 (2002). Google Scholar
Schweizer, V. J. & O’Neill, B. C. Systematic construction of global socioeconomic pathways using internally consistent element combinations. Climatic Change122, 431–445 (2014). Google Scholar
Lamontagne, J. R. et al. Large ensemble analytic framework for consequence‐driven discovery of climate change scenarios. Earth’s Future6, 488–504 (2018). Google Scholar
Carlsen, H., Lempert, R., Wikman-Svahn, P. & Schweizer, V. Choosing small sets of policy-relevant scenarios by combining vulnerability and diversity approaches. Environ. Modell. Soft.84, 155–164 (2016). Google Scholar
Clapp, C. & Sillmann, J. Facilitating climate-smart investments. One Earth1, 57–61 (2019). Google Scholar
Weber, C. et al. Mitigation scenarios must cater to new users. Nat. Clim. Change8, 845–848 (2018). Google Scholar
Vaughan, C. & Dessai, S. Climate services for society: origins, institutional arrangements, and design elements for an evaluation framework: climate services for society. WIREs Clim. Change5, 587–603 (2014). Google Scholar
Rogelj, J. et al. A new scenario logic for the Paris Agreement long-term temperature goal. Nature573, 357–363 (2019). CAS Google Scholar
Green, C. et al. Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs) Literature Database, v1, 2014–2019 (NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC), 2020); https://doi.org/10.7927/HN96-9703
Kriegler, E. et al. The need for and use of socio-economic scenarios for climate change analysis: a new approach based on shared socio-economic pathways. Glob. Environ. Change22, 807–822 (2012). Google Scholar
KC, S. & Lutz, W. The human core of the shared socioeconomic pathways: population scenarios by age, sex and level of education for all countries to 2100. Glob. Environ. Change42, 181–192 (2017). Google Scholar
Dellink, R., Chateau, J., Lanzi, E. & Magné, B. Long-term economic growth projections in the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways. Glob. Environ. Change42, 200–214 (2017). Google Scholar
Crespo Cuaresma, J. Income projections for climate change research: a framework based on human capital dynamics. Glob. Environ. Change42, 226–236 (2017). Google Scholar
Leimbach, M., Kriegler, E., Roming, N. & Schwanitz, J. Future growth patterns of world regions – a GDP scenario approach. Glob. Environ. Change42, 215–225 (2017). Google Scholar
Jiang, L. & O’Neill, B. C. Global urbanization projections for the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways. Glob. Environ. Change42, 193–199 (2017). Google Scholar
Gidden, M. J. et al. Global emissions pathways under different socioeconomic scenarios for use in CMIP6: a dataset of harmonized emissions trajectories through the end of the century. Geosci. Model Dev.12, 1443–1475 (2019). CAS Google Scholar
Taylor, K. E., Stouffer, R. J. & Meehl, G. A. An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.93, 485–498 (2011). Google Scholar
Frame, B., Lawrence, J., Ausseil, A.-G., Reisinger, A. & Daigneault, A. Adapting global shared socio-economic pathways for national and local scenarios. Clim. Risk Manag.21, 39–51 (2018). A regional extension to the framework that points the way to accommodating adaptation policy. Google Scholar
Spangenberg, J. H. et al. Scenarios for investigating risks to biodiversity. Global Ecol. Biogeogr.21, 5–18 (2012). Google Scholar
Le Quéré, C. et al. Temporary reduction in daily global CO2 emissions during the COVID-19 forced confinement. Nat. Clim. Change10, 647–653 (2020). Google Scholar
Forster, P. M. et al. Current and future global climate impacts resulting from COVID-19. Nat. Clim. Change10, 913–919 (2020). CAS Google Scholar
Samset, B. H., Fuglestvedt, J. S. & Lund, M. T. Delayed emergence of a global temperature response after emission mitigation. Nat. Commun.11, 3261 (2020). CAS Google Scholar
David Tàbara, J. et al. Positive tipping points in a rapidly warming world. Curr. Opin. Env. Sust.31, 120–129 (2018). Google Scholar
Scheidel, W. The Great Leveler: Violence and the History of Inequality from the Stone Age to the Twenty-First Century (Princeton Univ. Press, 2018).
Osterhammel, J. The Transformation of the World: A Global History of the Nineteenth Century (Princeton Univ. Press, 2015).
Raskin, P. & Swart, R. Excluded futures: the continuity bias in scenario assessments. Sustain. Earth3, 8 (2020). Google Scholar
Kaivo-oja, J. Weak signals analysis, knowledge management theory and systemic socio-cultural transitions. Futures44, 206–217 (2012). Google Scholar