Field-experiment constraints on the enhancement of the terrestrial carbon sink by CO2 fertilization (original) (raw)

Data availability

Driver data of MsTMIP models are available from https://doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1220. The outputs of MsTMIP models are available from https://doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1225. Global Carbon Budget 2017 data (Global_Carbon_Budget_2017v1.3.xlsx) are available from https://doi.org/10.18160/GCP-2017. CRU climatology data (CRU CL v. 2.0) are available from https://crudata.uea.ac.uk/cru/data/hrg/.

Code availability

The code for fitting the two-box model, as given in equation (3), is shown in Supplementary Information.

References

  1. Field, C. B. & Raupach, M. R. The Global Carbon Cycle: Integrating Humans, Climate, and the Natural World (Island Press, 2004).
  2. Le Quéré, C. et al. Global Carbon Budget 2017. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 10, 405–448 (2018).
    Article Google Scholar
  3. Friedlingstein, P. et al. On the contribution of CO2 fertilization to the missing biospheric sink. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 9, 541–556 (1995).
    Article Google Scholar
  4. Shevliakova, E. et al. Historical warming reduced due to enhanced land carbon uptake. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 16730–16735 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  5. Schimel, D., Stephens, B. B. & Fisher, J. B. Effect of increasing CO2 on the terrestrial carbon cycle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112, 436–441 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
  6. Huntzinger, D. N. et al. Uncertainty in the response of terrestrial carbon sink to environmental drivers undermines carbon–climate feedback predictions. Sci. Rep. 7, 4765 (2017).
    Article Google Scholar
  7. Keenan, T. F. et al. Recent pause in the growth rate of atmospheric CO2 due to enhanced terrestrial carbon uptake. Nat. Commun. 7, 13428 (2016).
    Article Google Scholar
  8. Sitch, S. et al. Recent trends and drivers of regional sources and sinks of carbon dioxide. Biogeosciences 12, 653–679 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
  9. Ilyina, T. & Friedlingstein, P. WCRP Grand Challenge: Carbon feedbacks in the climate system. White paper (37th Session of the WCRP Joint Scientific Committee, 2016); https://www.wcrp-climate.org/component/content/article/872-carbon-feedbacks-overview?catid=139&Itemid=539
  10. Norby, R. J. & Zak, D. R. Ecological lessons from free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) experiments. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 42, 181–203 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
  11. Zaehle, S. et al. Evaluation of 11 terrestrial carbon–nitrogen cycle models against observations from two temperate free-air CO2 enrichment studies. New Phytol. 202, 803–822 (2014).
    Article Google Scholar
  12. Jastrow, J. D. et al. Elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide increases soil carbon. Glob. Change Biol. 11, 2057–2064 (2005).
    Article Google Scholar
  13. De Graaff, M. A., van Groenigen, K. J., Six, J., Hungate, B. & van Kessel, C. Interactions between plant growth and soil nutrient cycling under elevated CO2: a meta-analysis. Glob. Change Biol. 12, 2077–2091 (2006).
    Article Google Scholar
  14. Hickler, T. et al. CO2 fertilization in temperate FACE experiments not representative of boreal and tropical forests. Glob. Change Biol. 14, 1531–1542 (2008).
    Article Google Scholar
  15. Finzi, A. C. et al. Increases in nitrogen uptake rather than nitrogen-use efficiency support higher rates of temperate forest productivity under elevated CO2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 14014–14019 (2007).
    Article Google Scholar
  16. Drake, J. E. et al. Increases in the flux of carbon belowground stimulate nitrogen uptake and sustain the long-term enhancement of forest productivity under elevated CO2. Ecol. Lett. 14, 349–357 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
  17. Terrer, C., Vicca, S., Hungate, B. A., Phillips, R. P. & Prentice, I. C. Mycorrhizal association as a primary control of the CO2 fertilization effect. Science 353, 72–74 (2016).
    Article Google Scholar
  18. Cox, P. M. et al. Sensitivity of tropical carbon to climate change constrained by carbon dioxide variability. Nature 494, 341–344 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  19. Wenzel, S., Cox, P. M., Eyring, V. & Friedlingstein, P. Projected land photosynthesis constrained by changes in the seasonal cycle of atmospheric CO2. Nature 538, 499–501 (2016).
    Article Google Scholar
  20. Mystakidis, S., Davin, E. L., Gruber, N. & Seneviratne, S. I. Constraining future terrestrial carbon cycle projections using observation-based water and carbon flux estimates. Glob. Change Biol. 22, 2198–2215 (2016).
    Article Google Scholar
  21. Zhao, C. et al. Plausible rice yield losses under future climate warming. Nat. Plants 3, 16202 (2016).
    Article Google Scholar
  22. Lian, X. et al. Partitioning global land evapotranspiration using CMIP5 models constrained by observations. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 640–646 (2018).
    Article Google Scholar
  23. Huntzinger, D. N. et al. The North American Carbon Program Multi-scale Synthesis and Terrestrial Model Intercomparison Project - Part 1: overview and experimental design. Geosci. Model Dev. 6, 2121–2133 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  24. Norby, R. J., Warren, J. M., Iversen, C. M., Medlyn, B. E. & McMurtrie, R. E. CO2 enhancement of forest productivity constrained by limited nitrogen availability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 19368–19373 (2010).
    Article Google Scholar
  25. De Kauwe, M. G. et al. Where does the carbon go? A model-data intercomparison of vegetation carbon allocation and turnover processes at two temperate forest free-air CO2 enrichment sites. New Phytol. 203, 883–899 (2014).
    Article Google Scholar
  26. Franks, P. J. et al. Sensitivity of plants to changing atmospheric CO2 concentration: from the geological past to the next century. New Phytol. 197, 1077–1094 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  27. Wang, H. et al. Towards a universal model for carbon dioxide uptake by plants. Nat. Plants 3, 734–741 (2017).
    Article Google Scholar
  28. Bacastow, R. & Keeling, C. D. in Carbon and the Biosphere (eds Woodwell, G. M. & Pecan, E. V.) 86–135 (US Dep. of Comm., 1973).
  29. Peñuelas, J. et al. Human-induced nitrogen–phosphorus imbalances alter natural and managed ecosystems across the globe. Nat. Commun. 4, 2934 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  30. McCarthy, H. R. et al. Re-assessment of plant carbon dynamics at the Duke free-air CO2 enrichment site: interactions of atmospheric [CO2] with nitrogen and water availability over stand development. New Phytol. 185, 514–528 (2010).
    Article Google Scholar
  31. Reich, P. B. & Hobbie, S. E. Decade-long soil nitrogen constraint on the CO2 fertilization of plant biomass. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 278–282 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  32. Norby, R. J. et al. Model-data synthesis for the next generation of forest free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) experiments. New Phytol. 209, 17–28 (2016).
    Article Google Scholar
  33. Drake, J. E. et al. Short-term carbon cycling responses of a mature eucalypt woodland to gradual stepwise enrichment of atmospheric CO2 concentration. Glob. Change Biol. 22, 380–390 (2016).
    Article Google Scholar
  34. Medlyn, B. E. et al. Using ecosystem experiments to improve vegetation models. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 528–534 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
  35. Huntzinger, D. N. et al. NACP MsTMIP: Global 0.5-deg Terrestrial Biosphere Model Outputs in Standard Format. v.1.0 (ORNL DAAC, 2016); https://doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1225
  36. Wei, Y. et al. NACP MsTMIP: Global and North American Driver Data for Multi-model Intercomparison (ORNL DAAC, 2014); https://doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1220
  37. Supplemental data of Global Carbon Budget 2017 v.1.0 (Global Carbon Project, 2017); https://doi.org/10.18160/gcp-2017
  38. Jung, M., Henkel, K., Herold, M. & Churkina, G. Exploiting synergies of global land cover products for carbon cycle modeling. Remote Sens. Environ. 101, 534–553 (2006).
    Article Google Scholar
  39. Wei, Y. et al. The North American Carbon Program Multi-scale Synthesis and Terrestrial Model Intercomparison Project: part 2: environmental driver data. Geosci. Model Dev. 7, 2875–2893 (2014).
    Article Google Scholar
  40. Farquhar, G. D., Caemmerer, S. V. & Berry, J. A. A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species. Planta 149, 78–90 (1980).
    Article Google Scholar
  41. Maire, V. et al. The coordination of leaf photosynthesis links C and N fluxes in C3 plant species. PLoS ONE 7, e38345 (2012).
    Article Google Scholar
  42. Togashi, H. F. et al. Thermal acclimation of leaf photosynthetic traits in an evergreen woodland, consistent with the coordination hypothesis. Biogeosciences 15, 3461–3474 (2018).
    Article Google Scholar
  43. Mark, N., David, L., Mike, H. & Ian, M. A high-resolution data set of surface climate over global land areas. Clim. Res. 21, 1–25 (2002).
    Article Google Scholar
  44. Ito, A. et al. Decadal trends in the seasonal-cycle amplitude of terrestrial CO2 exchange resulting from the ensemble of terrestrial biosphere models. Tellus B Chem. Phys. Meteor. 68, 28968 (2016).
    Article Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Strategic Priority Research Program (A) of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant XDA20050101), the National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFA0604702), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41861134036, 41701089). The full list of acknowledgements is provided in the Supplementary Information.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Key Laboratory of Alpine Ecology, Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
    Yongwen Liu, Shilong Piao & Tao Wang
  2. CAS Center for Excellence in Tibetan Plateau Earth Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
    Yongwen Liu, Shilong Piao & Tao Wang
  3. Sino-French Institute for Earth System Science, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China
    Shilong Piao, Hui Yang, Mengtian Huang, Kai Wang & Xuhui Wang
  4. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria
    Thomas Gasser
  5. Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement, CEA-CNRS-UVSQ, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
    Philippe Ciais
  6. Department of Earth System Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
    Han Wang
  7. Climate and Ecosystem Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA
    Trevor F. Keenan
  8. Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
    Trevor F. Keenan
  9. College of Life Sciences, Hebei University, Baoding, Hebei, China
    Shiqiang Wan & Jian Song
  10. Department of Biology, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium
    Ivan A. Janssens
  11. CREAF, Cerdanyola del Valles, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
    Josep Peñuelas
  12. CSIC, Global Ecology Unit CREAF- CSIC-UAB, Bellaterra, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
    Josep Peñuelas
  13. Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Wallingford, UK
    Chris Huntingford
  14. School of Geography and Earth Sciences and McMaster Centre for Climate Change, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
    Muhammad Altaf Arain
  15. Department of Global Ecology, Carnegie Institution for Science, Stanford, CA, USA
    Yuanyuan Fang & Anna M. Michalak
  16. Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA
    Joshua B. Fisher
  17. Atmospheric Sciences and Global Change Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA
    Maoyi Huang
  18. School of Earth Sciences and Environmental Sustainability, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA
    Deborah N. Huntzinger
  19. National Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba, Japan
    Akihiko Ito
  20. Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA
    Atul K. Jain
  21. Environmental Sciences Division and Climate Change Science Institute, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA
    Jiafu Mao, Xiaoying Shi & Yaxing Wei
  22. Department of Biology Sciences, Institute of Environment Sciences, University of Quebec at Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
    Changhui Peng
  23. Laboratory for Ecological Forecasting and Global Change, College of Forestry, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, China
    Changhui Peng
  24. NASA GSFC, Biospheric Sciences Lab., Greenbelt, MD, USA
    Benjamin Poulter
  25. Woods Hole Research Center, Falmouth, MA, USA
    Christopher Schwalm
  26. Center for Ecosystem Science and Society, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA
    Christopher Schwalm
  27. International Center for Climate and Global Change Research and School of Forestry and Wildlife Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA
    Hanqin Tian
  28. Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
    Ning Zeng
  29. State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, China
    Qiuan Zhu

Authors

  1. Yongwen Liu
  2. Shilong Piao
  3. Thomas Gasser
  4. Philippe Ciais
  5. Hui Yang
  6. Han Wang
  7. Trevor F. Keenan
  8. Mengtian Huang
  9. Shiqiang Wan
  10. Jian Song
  11. Kai Wang
  12. Ivan A. Janssens
  13. Josep Peñuelas
  14. Chris Huntingford
  15. Xuhui Wang
  16. Muhammad Altaf Arain
  17. Yuanyuan Fang
  18. Joshua B. Fisher
  19. Maoyi Huang
  20. Deborah N. Huntzinger
  21. Akihiko Ito
  22. Atul K. Jain
  23. Jiafu Mao
  24. Anna M. Michalak
  25. Changhui Peng
  26. Benjamin Poulter
  27. Christopher Schwalm
  28. Xiaoying Shi
  29. Hanqin Tian
  30. Yaxing Wei
  31. Ning Zeng
  32. Qiuan Zhu
  33. Tao Wang

Contributions

S.P., Y.L., T.G. and P.C. designed the study. Y.L. performed the analysis. Y.L. and S.P. drafted the paper. All authors contributed to the interpretation of the results and to the text.

Corresponding author

Correspondence toShilong Piao.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, Y., Piao, S., Gasser, T. et al. Field-experiment constraints on the enhancement of the terrestrial carbon sink by CO2 fertilization.Nat. Geosci. 12, 809–814 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-019-0436-1

Download citation