Reciprocity and the tragedies of maintaining and providing the commons (original) (raw)

References

1. Van Lange, P. A. M., Balliet, D., Parks, C. D. & Van Vugt, M. Social Dilemmas. The Psychology of Human Cooperation (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2014).
   Google Scholar
2. Hardin, G. The tragedy of the commons. Science 162, 1243–1248 (1968).
   Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
3. Ostrom, E. Governing the Commons. The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1990).
   Book Google Scholar
4. Collier, P. The Plundered Planet (Penguin Books, London, 2011).
   Google Scholar
5. Gintis, H., Bowles, S., Boyd, R. & Fehr, E. Moral Sentiments and Material Interests. The Foundations of Cooperation in Economic Life (MIT Press, Cambridge, 2005).
   Google Scholar
6. Samuelson, W. & Zeckhauser, R. Status quo bias in decision making. J. Risk Uncertain. 1, 7–59 (1988).
   Article Google Scholar
7. Trivers, R. L. The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Q. Rev. Biol. 46, 35–57 (1971).
   Article Google Scholar
8. Axelrod, R. & Hamilton, W. The evolution of cooperation. Science 211, 1390–1396 (1981).
   Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
9. Bowles, S. & Gintis, H. A Cooperative Species: Human Reciprocity and its Evolution (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, 2011).
   Book Google Scholar
10. Rand, D. G. & Nowak, M. A. Human cooperation. Trends Cogn. Sci. 17, 413–425 (2013).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
11. Nowak, M. A. & Highfield, R. Supercooperators: Altruism, Evolution, and Why We Need Each Other to Succeed (Free Press, New York, 2011).
    Google Scholar
12. Turchin, P. Ultrasociety: How 10,000 Years of War Made Humans the Greatest Cooperators on Earth (Beresta Books, Chaplin, CT, 2016).
    Google Scholar
13. Tomasello, M. A Natural History of Human Morality (Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA, 2016).
    Book Google Scholar
14. Andreoni, J. Warm glow versus cold prickle—the effects of positive and negative framing on cooperation in experiments. Q. J. Econ. 110, 1–21 (1995).
    Article Google Scholar
15. Park, E.-S. Warm-glow versus cold-prickle: a further experimental study of framing effects on free-riding. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 43, 405–421 (2000).
    Article Google Scholar
16. Khadjavi, M. & Lange, A. Doing good or doing harm: experimental evidence on giving and taking in public good games. Exp. Econ. 18, 432–441 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
17. Cox, C. A. Decomposing the effects of negative framing in linear public goods games. Econ. Lett. 126, 63–65 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
18. Sell, J. & Son, Y. Comparing public goods and common pool resources: three experiments. Soc. Psychol. Q. 60, 118–137 (1997).
    Article Google Scholar
19. Van Dijk, E. & Wilke, H. Is it mine or is it ours? Framing property rights and decision making in social dilemmas. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 71, 195–209 (1997).
    Article Google Scholar
20. Cubitt, R., Drouvelis, M. & Gächter, S. Framing and free riding: emotional responses and punishment in social dilemma games. Exp. Econ. 14, 254–272 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
21. Dufwenberg, M., Gächter, S. & Hennig-Schmidt, H. The framing of games and the psychology of play. Games Econ. Behav. 73, 459–478 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
22. Messer, K. D., Zarghamee, H., Kaiser, H. M. & Schulze, W. D. New hope for the voluntary contributions mechanism: the effects of context. J. Public Econ. 91, 1783–1799 (2007).
    Article Google Scholar
23. Cox, J. C., Ostrom, E., Sadiraj, V. & Walker, J. M. Provision versus appropriation in symmetric and asymmetric social dilemmas. South. Econ. J. 79, 496–512 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
24. Apesteguía, J. & Maier-Rigaud, F. P. The role of rivalry. Public goods versus common-pool resources. J. Confl. Resolut. 50, 646–663 (2006).
    Article Google Scholar
25. Levin, S. A. Public goods in relation to competition, cooperation, and spite. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 10838–10845 (2014).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
26. Brewer, M. B. & Kramer, R. M. Choice behavior in social dilemmas: effects of social identity, group size, and decision framing. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 50, 543–549 (1986).
    Article Google Scholar
27. De Dreu, C. K. & McCusker, C. Gain–loss frames and cooperation in two-person social dilemmas: a transformational analysis. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 72, 1093–1106 (1997).
    Article Google Scholar
28. Van Dijk, E., Wilke, H., Wilke, M. & Metman, L. What information do we use in social dilemmas? Environmental uncertainty and the employment of coordination rules. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 35, 109–135 (1999).
    Article Google Scholar
29. McCusker, C. & Carnevale, P. J. Framing in resource dilemmas: loss aversion and the moderating effects of sanctions. Organ. Behav. Hum. Dec. Process. 61, 190–201 (1995).
    Article Google Scholar
30. Fischbacher, U. & Gächter, S. Social preferences, beliefs, and the dynamics of free riding in public good experiments. Am. Econ. Rev. 100, 541–556 (2010).
    Article Google Scholar
31. Janssen, M. A., Holahan, R., Lee, A. & Ostrom, E. Lab experiments for the study of social-ecological systems. Science 328, 613–617 (2010).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
32. Keser, C. & van Winden, F. Conditional cooperation and voluntary contributions to public goods. Scand. J. Econ. 102, 23–39 (2000).
    Article Google Scholar
33. Andreoni, J. Why free ride—strategies and learning in public-goods experiments. J. Public Econ. 37, 291–304 (1988).
    Article Google Scholar
34. Rustagi, D., Engel, S. & Kosfeld, M. Conditional cooperation and costly monitoring explain success in forest commons management. Science 330, 961–965 (2010).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
35. Fosgaard, T. R., Hansen, L. G. & Wengström, E. Understanding the nature of cooperation variability. J. Public Econ. 120, 134–143 (2014).
    Article Google Scholar
36. Gintis, H. Strong reciprocity and human sociality. J. Theor. Biol. 206, 169–179 (2000).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
37. Fehr, E. & Fischbacher, U. Social norms and human cooperation. Trends Cogn. Sci. 8, 185–190 (2004).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
38. Nyborg, K. et al. Social norms as solutions. Science 354, 42–43 (2016).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
39. Fehr, E. & Gächter, S. Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature 415, 137–140 (2002).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
40. Sigmund, K. Punish or perish? Retaliation and collaboration among humans. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22, 593–600 (2007).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
41. Cubitt, R., Drouvelis, M., Gächter, S. & Kabalin, R. Moral judgments in social dilemmas: how bad is free riding? J. Public Econ. 95, 253–264 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
42. Cox, J. C., Friedman, D. & Sadiraj, V. Revealed altruism. Econometrica 76, 31–69 (2008).
    Article Google Scholar
43. Cox, J. C., Servátka, M. & Vadovič, R. Status quo effects in fairness games: reciprocal responses to acts of commission versus acts of omission. Exp. Econ. 20, 1–18 (2017).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
44. Fleishman, J. A. The effects of decision framing and others’ behavior on cooperation in a social dilemma. J. Confl. Resolut. 32, 162–180 (1988).
    Article Google Scholar
45. Frackenpohl, G., Hillenbrand, A. & Kube, S. Leadership effectiveness and institutional frames. Exp. Econ. 19, 842–863 (2016).
    Article Google Scholar
46. Fehr-Duda, H. & Fehr, E. Game human nature. Nature 530, 413–415 (2016).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
47. MacKay, D. J. C., Cramton, P., Ockenfels, A. & Stoft, S. Price carbon—I will if you will. Nature 326, 315–316 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
48. Rand, D. G., Yoeli, E. & Hoffman, M. Harnessing reciprocity to promote cooperation and the provisioning of public goods. Policy Insights Behav. Brain Sci. 1, 263–269 (2014).
    Google Scholar
49. Bowles, S. Policies designed for self-interested citizens may undermine “the moral sentiments”: evidence from economic experiments. Science 320, 1605–1609 (2008).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
50. Fischbacher, U., Gächter, S. & Fehr, E. Are people conditionally cooperative? Evidence from a public goods experiment. Econ. Lett. 71, 397–404 (2001).
    Article Google Scholar
51. Rand, D. G. et al. Positive interactions promote public cooperation. Science 325, 1272–1275 (2009).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
52. Greiner, B. Subject pool recruitment procedures: organizing experiments with ORSEE. J. Econ. Sci. Assoc. 1, 114–125 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
53. Fischbacher, U. Z-tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Exp. Econ. 10, 171–178 (2007).
    Article Google Scholar
54. Fischbacher, U., Gächter, S. & Quercia, S. The behavioral validity of the strategy method in public good experiments. J. Econ. Psychol. 33, 897–913 (2012).
    Article Google Scholar
55. Bardsley, N. & Moffatt, P. G. The experimetrics of public goods: inferring motivations from contributions. Theory Decis. 62, 161–193 (2007).
    Article Google Scholar

Download references