Attention scales according to inferred real-world object size (original) (raw)

References

  1. Kosslyn, S. M. Information representation in visual images. Cogn. Psychol. 7, 341–370 (1975).
    Article Google Scholar
  2. Konkle, T. & Oliva, A. A real-world size organization of object responses in occipitotemporal cortex. Neuron 74, 1114–1124 (2012).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  3. Carrasco, M. Visual attention: the past 25 years. Vision Res. 51, 1484–1525 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
  4. Desimone, R. & Duncan, J. Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 18, 193–222 (1995).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  5. Posner, M. I., Snyder, C. R. R. & Davidson, B. J. Attention and the detection of signals. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 109, 160–174 (1980).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  6. Eriksen, C. W. & St. James, J. D. Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: a zoom lens model. Percept. Psychophys. 40, 225–240 (1986).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  7. Duncan, J. Selective attention and the organization of visual information. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 113, 501–517 (1984).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  8. Valdes-Sosa, M., Bobes, M. A., Rodriguez, V. & Pinilla, T. Switching attention without shifting the spotlight object-based attentional modulation of brain potentials. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 10, 137–151 (1998).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  9. O’Craven, K. M., Downing, P. E. & Kanwisher, N. fMRI evidence for objects as the units of attentional selection. Nature 401, 584–587 (1999).
    Article Google Scholar
  10. Egly, R., Driver, J. & Rafal, R. D. Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 123, 161–177 (1994).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  11. Drummond, L. & Shomstein, S. The timecourse of space- and object-based attentional prioritization with varying degrees of certainty. Front. Integr. Neurosci. 7, 1–10 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  12. Muller, N. G. & Kleinschmidt, A. Dynamic interaction of object- and space-based attention in retinotopic visual areas. J. Neurosci. 23, 9812–9816 (2003).
    Article Google Scholar
  13. Shomstein, S. & Behrmann, M. Cortical systems mediating visual attention to both objects and spatial locations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 11387–11392 (2006).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  14. Malcolm, G. L., Rattinger, M. & Shomstein, S. Intrusive effects of semantic information on visual selective attention. Attention, Perception, Psychophys. 78, 2066–2078 (2016).
    Article Google Scholar
  15. Konkle, T. & Oliva, A. Canonical visual size for real-world objects. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 37, 23–37 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
  16. Jefferies, L. N., Gmeindl, L. & Yantis, S. Attending to illusory differences in object size. Attention, Perception, Psychophys. 76, 1393–1402 (2014).
    Article Google Scholar
  17. Robertson, L. C. & Kim, M.-S. Effects of perceived space on spatial attention. Psychol. Sci. 10, 76–79 (1999).
    Article Google Scholar
  18. Murray, S. O., Boyaci, H. & Kersten, D. The representation of perceived angular size in human primary visual cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 9, 429–434 (2006).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  19. Konkle, T. & Oliva, A. Normative representation of objects: evidence for an ecological bias in perception and memory. In Proc. 29th Annual Cognitive Science Society (eds McNamara, D. S. & Trafton, J. G.) 407–412 (Cognitive Science Society, 2007).
  20. Epstein, W. & Baratz, S. S. Relative size in isolation as a stimulus for relative perceived distance. J. Exp. Psychol. 67, 507–513 (1964).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  21. Bar, M. Visual objects in context. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 5, 617–629 (2004).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  22. Long, B., Konkle, T., Cohen, M. A. & Alvarez, G. A. Mid-level perceptual features distinguish objects of different real-world sizes. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 145, 95–109 (2016).
    Article Google Scholar
  23. Konkle, T. & Oliva, A. A familiar-size Stroop effect: real-world size is an automatic property of object representation. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 38, 561–569 (2012).
    Article Google Scholar
  24. Malcolm, G. L. & Shomstein, S. Object-based attention in real-world scenes. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 144, 257–263 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
  25. Biederman, I. & Cooper, E. E. Size invariance in visual object priming. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 18, 121–133 (1992).
    Article Google Scholar
  26. Kosslyn, S. M., Thompson, W. L., Kim, I. J. & Alpert, N. M. Topographical representations of mental images in primary visual cortex. Nature 378, 783–785 (1995).
    Article Google Scholar
  27. Eckstein M. P., Koehler K., Welbourne L. E. & Akbas E. Humans, but not deep neural networks, often miss giant targets in scenes. Curr. Biol. 27, P2827–P2832 (2017).
    Article Google Scholar
  28. Wolfe, J. M. Visual attention: size matters. Curr. Biol. 27, R1002–R1003 (2017).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  29. Castiello, U. & Umiltá, C. Size of the attentional focus and efficiency of processing. Acta Psychol. (Amst.) 73, 195–209 (1990).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  30. Martin, A. The representation of object concepts in the brain. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 58, 25–45 (2007).
    Article Google Scholar
  31. Chao, L. L. & Martin, A. Representation of manipulable man-made objects in the dorsal stream. Neuroimage 12, 478–484 (2000).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  32. Lakens, D. Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for _t_-tests and ANOVAs. Front. Psychol. 4, 1–12 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  33. Sekuler, R. & Blake, R. Perception 3rd edn (McGraw-Hill Education, New York, 1994).
  34. Peterson, M. A. in Pioneer Visual Neuroscience: A Festschrift for Naomi Weisstein (ed. Brown, J.) 151–166 (Taylor Francis, New York, 2018).
  35. Galera, C., Von Grünau, M. & Panagopoulos, A. Automatic focusing of attention on object size and shape. Psicologica 26, 147–160 (2005).
    Google Scholar
  36. Herrmann, K., Montaser-Kouhsari, L., Carrasco, M. & Heeger, D. J. When size matters: attention affects performance by contrast or response gain. Nat. Neurosci. 13, 1554–1559 (2010).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  37. Kravitz, D. J., Saleem, K. S., Baker, C. I., Ungerleider, L. G. & Mishkin, M. The ventral visual pathway: an expanded neural framework for the processing of object quality. Trends. Cogn. Sci. 17, 26–49 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  38. Konkle, T. & Caramazza, A. Tripartite organization of the ventral stream by animacy and object size. J. Neurosci. 33, 10235–10242 (2013).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  39. Peirce, J. W. PsychoPy-Psychophysics software in Python. J. Neurosci. Methods 162, 8–13 (2007).
    Article Google Scholar
  40. Peirce, J. W. Generating stimuli for neuroscience using PsychoPy. Front. Neuroinform. 2, 1–8 (2009).
    Google Scholar
  41. Rosenholtz, R., Li, Y. & Nakano, L. Measuring visual clutter. J. Vis. 7, 1–22 (2007).
    Article Google Scholar

Download references