The promise and the peril of using social influence to reverse harmful traditions (original) (raw)

References

  1. Nyborg, K. et al. Social norms as solutions. Science 354, 42–43 (2016).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  2. Shell-Duncan, B. & Hernlund, Y. Female ‘circumcision’ in Africa: dimensions of the practice and debates. In Female ‘Circumcision’ in Africa: Culture, Controversy, and Change (eds. Shell-Duncan, B. & Hernlund, Y.) 1–40 (Lynne Rienner, 2000).
  3. Cloward, K. When Norms Collide: Local Responses to Activism Against Female Genital Mutilation and Early Marriage (Oxford University Press, 2016).
  4. Shell-Duncan, B. From health to human rights: female genital cutting and the politics of intervention. Am. Anthropol. 110, 225–236 (2008).
    Article Google Scholar
  5. Richerson, P. J. & Boyd, R. Not By Genes Alone: How Culture Transformed the Evolutionary Process. (University of Chicago Press, 2005).
  6. Dolan, P. et al. Influencing behaviour: the mindspace way. J. Economic Psychol. 33, 264–277 (2012).
    Article Google Scholar
  7. World Bank Group. Mind, Society, and Behavior: World Development Report 2015. (The World Bank, 2015).
  8. Bicchieri, C. Norms in the Wild: How to Diagnose, Measure, and Change Social Norms (Oxford University Press, 2016).
  9. Shell-Duncan, B., Wander, K., Hernlund, Y. & Moreau, A. Dynamics of change in the practice of female genital cutting in Senegambia. Soc. Sci. Med. 73, 1275–1283 (2011).
    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  10. UNFPA-UNICEF. Joint Evaluation of the UNFPA-UNICEF Joint Programme on Female Genital Mutilation/cutting: Accelerating Change. https://www.unfpa.org/admin-resource/unfpa-unicef-joint-evaluation-unfpa-unicef-joint-programme-female-genital (UNFPA, 2013).
  11. Mackie, G., Moneti, F., Shakya, H. & Denny, E. What are social norms? How are they measured. https://www.unicef.org/protection/files/4_09_30_Whole_What_are_Social_Norms.pdf (UNICEF, 2015).
  12. Platteau, J.-P., Camilotti, G. & Auriol, E. Eradicating women-hurting customs. In Towards Gender Equity in Development (eds Anderson, S., Beaman, L. & Platteau, J.) 319–356 (Oxford University Press, 2018).
  13. Malhotra, A., Warner, A., McGonagle, A. & Lee-Rife, S. Solutions to end child marriage: what the evidence shows. https://www.icrw.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Solutions-to-End-Child-Marriage.pdf (ICRW, 2011).
  14. Lee-Rife, S., Malhotra, A., Warner, A. & Glinski, A. M. What works to prevent child marriage: a review of the evidence. Stud. Fam. Plan. 43, 287–303 (2012).
    Article Google Scholar
  15. Bicchieri, C., Jiang, T. & Lindemans, J. W. A social norms perspective on child marriage: the general framework. http://repository.upenn.edu/pennsong/13/ (Penn Social Norms Group, 2014).
  16. Shakya, H. B., Christakis, N. A. & Fowler, J. H. Social network predictors of latrine ownership. Soc. Sci. Med. 125, 129–138 (2015).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  17. World Health Organization. Changing cultural and social norms that support violence. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/44147 (WHO, 2009).
  18. Christakis, N. A. & Fowler, J. H. The collective dynamics of smoking in a large social network. New Engl. J. Med. 358, 2249–2258 (2008).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  19. Mackie, G. Ending footbinding and infibulation: a convention account. Am. Sociol. Rev. 61, 999–1017 (1996).
    Article Google Scholar
  20. Prentice, D. A. & Miller, D. T. Pluralistic ignorance and alcohol use on campus: some consequences of misperceiving the social norm. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 64, 243–256 (1993).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  21. Young, H. P. The evolution of social norms. Annu. Rev. Econ. 7, 359–387 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
  22. Christakis, N. A. & Fowler, J. H. The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. New Engl. J. Med. 2007, 370–379 (2007).
    Article Google Scholar
  23. Paluck, E. L., Shepherd, H. & Aronow, P. M. Changing climates of conflict: a social network experiment in 56 schools. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 113, 566–571 (2016).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  24. Allcott, H. Social norms and energy conservation. J. Public Econ. 95, 1082–1095 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
  25. Hallsworth, M., List, J. A., Metcalfe, R. D. & Vlaev, I. The behavioralist as tax collector: using natural field experiments to enhance tax compliance. J. Public Econ. 148, 14–31 (2017).
    Article Google Scholar
  26. Castilla-Rho, J. C., Rojas, R., Andersen, M. S., Holley, C. & Mariethoz, G. Social tipping points in global groundwater management. Nat. Hum. Behav. 1, 640 (2017).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  27. Koch, C. M. & Nax, H. H. ‘Follow the Data’ – what data says about real-world behavior of commons problems. SSRN https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3075935 (2017).
  28. World Health Organization. Female genital mutilation. http://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/female-genital-mutilation (WHO, 2018).
  29. Hayford, S. R. Conformity and change: community effects on female genital cutting in Kenya. J. Health Soc. Behav. 46, 121–140 (2005).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  30. Bellemare, M. F., Novak, L. & Steinmetz, T. L. All in the family: explaining the persistence of female genital cutting in West Africa. J. Dev. Econ. 116, 252–265 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
  31. Efferson, C., Vogt, S., Elhadi, A., Ahmed, H. E. F. & Fehr, E. Female genital cutting is not a social coordination norm. Science 349, 1446–1447 (2015).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  32. Howard, J. A. & Gibson, M. A. Frequency-dependent female genital cutting behaviour confers evolutionary fitness benefits. Nat. Ecol. Evolution 1, 0049 (2017).
    Article Google Scholar
  33. Vogt, S., Zaid, N. A. M., Ahmed, H. E. F., Fehr, E. & Efferson, C. Changing cultural attitudes towards female genital cutting. Nature 538, 506–509 (2016).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  34. De Cao, E. & Lutz, C. Sensitive survey questions: measuring attitudes regarding female genital cutting through a list experiment. Oxf. Bull. Econ. Stat. 80, 871–892 (2018).
    Article Google Scholar
  35. Gibson, M. A., Gurmu, E., Cobo, B., Rueda, M. M. & Scott, I. M. Indirect questioning method reveals hidden support for female genital cutting in South Central Ethiopia. PloS One 13, e0193985 (2018).
    Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
  36. Efferson, C., Lalive, R., Richerson, P. J., McElreath, R. & Lubell, M. Conformists and mavericks: the empirics of frequency-dependent cultural transmission. Evol. Hum. Behav. 29, 56–65 (2008).
    Article Google Scholar
  37. Morgan, T. J. H., Rendell, L. E., Ehn, M., Hoppitt, W. & Laland, K. N. The evolutionary basis of human social learning. Proc. R. Soc. B 279, 653–662 (2012).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  38. Muthukrishna, M., Morgan, T. J. & Henrich, J. The when and who of social learning and conformist transmission. Evol. Hum. Behav. 37, 10–20 (2016).
    Article Google Scholar
  39. Efferson, C. & Vogt, S. Behavioural homogenization with spillovers in a normative domain. Proc. R. Soc. B 285, 20180492 (2018).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  40. Shell-Duncan, B. & Hernlund, Y. Are there ‘stages of change’ in the practice of female genital cutting? Qualitative research findings from Senegal and the Gambia. Afr. J. Reprod. Health 10, 57–71 (2006).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  41. Howard, J. A. & Gibson, M. A. Is there a link between paternity concern and female genital cutting in West Africa? Evol. Hum. Behav. 40, 1–11 (2019).
    Article Google Scholar
  42. Granovetter, M. Threshold models of collective behavior. Am. J. Sociol. 83, 1420–1443 (1978).
    Article Google Scholar
  43. Watts, D. J. & Dodds, P. Threshold models of social influence. in The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology (eds Bearman, P. & Hedström, P.) 475–497 (Oxford University Press, 2009).
  44. Young, H. P. Innovation diffusion in heterogeneous populations: contagion, social influence, and social learning. Am. Economic Rev. 99, 1899–1924 (2009).
    Article Google Scholar
  45. Vogt, S., Efferson, C. & Fehr, E. The risk of female genital cutting in Europe: comparing immigrant attitudes toward uncut girls with attitudes in a practicing country. SSM Popul. Health 3, 283–293 (2017).
    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  46. Schelling, T. C. Hockey helmets, concealed weapons, and daylight saving: a study of binary choices with externalities. J. Confl. Resolut. 17, 381–428 (1973).
    Article Google Scholar
  47. Xie, J. et al. Social consensus through the influence of committed minorities. Phys. Rev. E 84, 011130 (2011).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  48. Centola, D., Becker, J., Brackbill, D. & Baronchelli, A. Experimental evidence for tipping points in social convention. Science 360, 1116–1119 (2018).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  49. Baronchelli, A., Felici, M., Loreto, V., Caglioti, E. & Steels, L. Sharp transition towards shared vocabularies in multi-agent systems. J. Stat. Mech. Theory Exp. 2006, P06014 (2006).
    Article Google Scholar
  50. McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L. & Cook, J. M. Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 27, 415–444 (2001).
    Article Google Scholar
  51. Jackson, M. O. & López-Pintado, D. Diffusion and contagion in networks with heterogeneous agents and homophily. Netw. Sci. 1, 49–67 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  52. Young, H. P. The dynamics of social innovation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 108, 21285–21291 (2011).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  53. Lu, Q., Korniss, G. & Szymanski, B. K. The naming game in social networks: community formation and consensus engineering. J. Econ. Interact. Coord. 4, 221 (2009).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  54. Thomas, L. ‘Ngaitana (I Will Circumcise Myself)’: lessons from colonial campaigns to ban excision in Meru, Kenya. in Female ‘Circumcision’ in Africa: Culture, Controversy, and Change (eds. Shell-Duncan, B. & Hernlund, Y.) 129–150 (Lynne Rienner, 2000).
  55. Gruenbaum, E. The Female Circumcision Controversy: An Anthropological Perspective (University of Pennsylvania Press, 2001).
  56. Goodman, R. & Jinks, D. Socializing States: Promoting Human Rights through International Law (Oxford University Press, 2013).
  57. Shell-Duncan, B., Wander, K., Hernlund, Y. & Moreau, A. Legislating change? Responses to criminalizing female genital cutting in Senegal. Law Soc. Rev. 47, 803–835 (2013).
    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  58. Camilotti, G. Interventions to stop female genital cutting and the evolution of the custom: evidence on age at cutting in Senegal. J. Afr. Econ. 25, 133–158 (2016).
    Google Scholar
  59. Morgan, T. J. H. & Laland, K. N. The biological bases of conformity. Front. Neurosci. 6, 87 (2012).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  60. Molleman, L. & Gächter, S. Societal background influences social learning in cooperative decision making. Evol. Hum. Behav. 39, 547–555 (2018).
    Article Google Scholar
  61. Efferson, C., Lalive, R., Cacault, M. P. & Kistler, D. The evolution of facultative conformity based on similarity. PLoS One 11, e0168551 (2016).
    Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
  62. Molleman, L., van den Berg, P. & Weissing, F. J. Consistent individual differences in human social learning strategies. Nat. Commun. 5, 3570 (2014).
    Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
  63. Mesoudi, A., Chang, L., Dall, S. R. X. & Thornton, A. The evolution of individual and cultural variation in social learning. Trends Ecol. Evol. 31, 215–225 (2016).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  64. Boyd, R. & Richerson, P. J. Culture and the Evolutionary Process (University of Chicago Press, 1985).
  65. Krumpal, I. Determinants of social desirability bias in sensitive surveys: a literature review. Qual. Quant. 47, 2025–2047 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  66. Apicella, C. L., Marlowe, F. W., Fowler, J. H. & Christakis, N. A. Social networks and cooperation in hunter-gatherers. Nature 481, 497 (2012).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  67. Migliano, A. et al. Characterization of hunter-gatherer networks and implications for cumulative culture. Nat. Hum. Behav. 1, 0043 (2017).
    Article Google Scholar
  68. Centola, D. An experimental study of homophily in the adoption of health behavior. Science 334, 1269–1272 (2011).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Download references