Synthetic alternatives to Matrigel (original) (raw)

References

1. Orkin, R. W. et al. A murine tumor producing a matrix of basement membrane. J. Exp. Med. 145, 204–220 (1977).
   CAS Google Scholar
2. LeBleu, V. S., Macdonald, B. & Kalluri, R. Structure and function of basement membranes. Exp. Biol. Med. 232, 1121–1129 (2007).
   CAS Google Scholar
3. Kubota, Y., Kleinman, H. K., Martin, G. R. & Lawley, T. J. Role of laminin and basement membrane in the morphological differentiation of human endothelial cells into capillary-like structures. J. Cell Biol. 107, 1589–1598 (1988).
   CAS Google Scholar
4. Kleinman, H. K. et al. Basement membrane complexes with biological activity. Biochemistry 25, 312–318 (1986). This paper investigates the protein composition and biological activity of the basement-membrane extract from EHS mouse chondrosarcomas; this extract was later developed and commercialized as Matrigel.
   CAS Google Scholar
5. Kleinman, H. K. & Martin, G. R. Matrigel: basement membrane matrix with biological activity. Semin. Cancer Biol. 15, 378–386 (2005).
   CAS Google Scholar
6. Corning Incorporated Life Sciences. Corning Matrigel matrix. Frequently asked questions (Corning, 2019).
7. Hughes, C. S., Postovit, L. M. & Lajoie, G. A. Matrigel: a complex protein mixture required for optimal growth of cell culture. Proteomics 10, 1886–1890 (2010). A full proteomic analysis of Matrigel and GFR Matrigel, reporting their complex, ill-defined and variable composition.
   CAS Google Scholar
8. Timpl, R. et al. Laminin — a glycoprotein from basement membranes. J. Biol. Chem. 254, 9933–9937 (1979).
   CAS Google Scholar
9. Terranova, V. P., Aumailley, M., Sultan, L. H., Martin, G. R. & Kleinman, H. K. Regulation of cell attachment and cell number by fibronectin and laminin. J. Cell. Physiol. 127, 473–479 (1986).
   CAS Google Scholar
10. Miyazaki, T. et al. Recombinant human laminin isoforms can support the undifferentiated growth of human embryonic stem cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 375, 27–32 (2008).
    CAS Google Scholar
11. Ponce, M. L. et al. Identification of endothelial cell binding sites on the laminin γ1 chain. Circ. Res. 84, 688–694 (1999).
    CAS Google Scholar
12. Wang, K., Ji, L. & Hua, Z. Functional peptides from laminin-1 improve the cell adhesion capacity of recombinant mussel adhesive protein. Protein Pept. Lett. 24, 348–352 (2017).
    Google Scholar
13. Heaton, M. B. & Swanson, D. J. The influence of laminin on the initial differentiation of cultured neural tube neurons. J. Neurosci. Res. 19, 212–218 (1988).
    CAS Google Scholar
14. Farrukh, A. et al. Bifunctional hydrogels containing the laminin motif IKVAV promote neurogenesis. Stem Cell Rep. 9, 1432–1440 (2017).
    CAS Google Scholar
15. Ali, S., Saik, J. E., Gould, D. J., Dickinson, M. E. & West, J. L. Immobilization of cell-adhesive laminin peptides in degradable PEGDA hydrogels influences endothelial cell tubulogenesis. BioResearch Open Access 2, 241–249 (2013).
    CAS Google Scholar
16. Engbring, J. A. & Kleinman, H. K. The basement membrane matrix in malignancy. J. Pathol. 200, 465–470 (2003).
    CAS Google Scholar
17. Kikkawa, Y. et al. Laminin-111-derived peptides and cancer. Cell Adh. Migr. 7, 150–159 (2013).
    Google Scholar
18. Vukicevic, S. et al. Identification of multiple active growth factors in basement membrane Matrigel suggests caution in interpretation of cellular activity related to extracellular matrix components. Exp. Cell Res. 202, 1–8 (1992). This study identifies multiple active growth factors in Matrigel and suggests caution when interpreting cellular activity when cultured on Matrigel.
    CAS Google Scholar
19. Talbot, N. C. & Caperna, T. J. Proteome array identification of bioactive soluble proteins/peptides in Matrigel: relevance to stem cell responses. Cytotechnology 67, 873–883 (2015).
    CAS Google Scholar
20. Gillette, K. M., Forbes, K. & Sehgal, I. Detection of matrix metalloproteinases (MMP), tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-2, urokinase and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 within Matrigel and growth factor-reduced Matrigel basement membrane. Tumori 89, 421–425 (2003).
    CAS Google Scholar
21. Xu, C. et al. Feeder-free growth of undifferentiated human embryonic stem cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 19, 971–974 (2001).
    CAS Google Scholar
22. Qian, L. & Saltzman, W. M. Improving the expansion and neuronal differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells through culture surface modification. Biomaterials 25, 1331–1337 (2004).
    CAS Google Scholar
23. Lee, S.-W. et al. Optimization of Matrigel-based culture for expansion of neural stem cells. Anim. Cell Syst. 19, 175–180 (2015).
    CAS Google Scholar
24. Laflamme, M. A. et al. Cardiomyocytes derived from human embryonic stem cells in pro-survival factors enhance function of infarcted rat hearts. Nat. Biotechnol. 25, 1015–1024 (2007).
    CAS Google Scholar
25. Ponce, M. L. Tube formation: an in vitro Matrigel angiogenesis assay. Methods Mol. Biol. 467, 183–188 (2009).
    CAS Google Scholar
26. Ponce, M. L. In vitro Matrigel angiogenesis assays. Methods Mol. Med. 46, 205–209 (2001).
    CAS Google Scholar
27. Mondrinos, M. J. et al. Engineering three-dimensional pulmonary tissue constructs. Tissue Eng. 12, 717–728 (2006).
    CAS Google Scholar
28. Li, Z. & Guan, J. Hydrogels for cardiac tissue engineering. Polymers 3, 740–761 (2011).
    CAS Google Scholar
29. Lancaster, M. A. & Knoblich, J. A. Organogenesis in a dish: modeling development and disease using organoid technologies. Science 345, 1247125 (2014).
    Google Scholar
30. Lancaster, M. A. et al. Cerebral organoids model human brain development and microcephaly. Nature 501, 373–379 (2013).
    CAS Google Scholar
31. Benton, G., Kleinman, H. K., George, J. & Arnaoutova, I. Multiple uses of basement membrane-like matrix (BME/Matrigel) in vitro and in vivo with cancer cells. Int. J. Cancer 128, 1751–1757 (2011).
    CAS Google Scholar
32. Cruz-Acuña, R. & García, A. J. Synthetic hydrogels mimicking basement membrane matrices to promote cell-matrix interactions. Matrix Biol. 57–58, 324–333 (2017).
    Google Scholar
33. Polykandriotis, E., Arkudas, A., Horch, R. E., Kneser, U. & Mitchell, G. To Matrigel or not to Matrigel. Am. J. Pathol. 172, 1441–1442 (2008).
    Google Scholar
34. Kohen, N. T., Little, L. E. & Healy, K. E. Characterization of Matrigel interfaces during defined human embryonic stem cell culture. Biointerphases 4, 69–79 (2009).
    Google Scholar
35. Soofi, S. S., Last, J. A., Liliensiek, S. J., Nealey, P. F. & Murphy, C. J. The elastic modulus of Matrigel as determined by atomic force microscopy. J. Struct. Biol. 167, 216–219 (2009).
    CAS Google Scholar
36. Dirami, G. et al. Identification of transferrin and inhibin-like proteins in Matrigel. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Anim. 31, 409–411 (1995).
    CAS Google Scholar
37. Hansen, K. C. et al. An in-solution ultrasonication-assisted digestion method for improved extracellular matrix proteome coverage. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 8, 1648–1657 (2009).
    CAS Google Scholar
38. Zaman, M. H. et al. Migration of tumor cells in 3D matrices is governed by matrix stiffness along with cell-matrix adhesion and proteolysis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 10889–10894 (2006).
    CAS Google Scholar
39. Semler, E. J., Ranucci, C. S. & Moghe, P. V. Mechanochemical manipulation of hepatocyte aggregation can selectively induce or repress liver-specific function. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 69, 359–369 (2000).
    CAS Google Scholar
40. Kane, K. I. W. et al. Determination of the rheological properties of Matrigel for optimum seeding conditions in microfluidic cell cultures. AIP Adv. 8, 125332 (2018).
    Google Scholar
41. Alcaraz, J. et al. Laminin and biomimetic extracellular elasticity enhance functional differentiation in mammary epithelia. EMBO J. 27, 2829–2838 (2008).
    CAS Google Scholar
42. Reed, J., Walczak, W. J., Petzold, O. N. & Gimzewski, J. K. In situ mechanical interferometry of Matrigel films. Langmuir 25, 36–39 (2009).
    CAS Google Scholar
43. Peterson, N. C. From bench to cageside: risk assessment for rodent pathogen contamination of cells and biologics. ILAR J. 49, 310–315 (2008).
    CAS Google Scholar
44. Liu, H. et al. Removal of lactate dehydrogenase-elevating virus from human-in-mouse breast tumor xenografts by cell-sorting. J. Virol. Methods 173, 266–270 (2011).
    CAS Google Scholar
45. Ammann, C. G., Messer, R. J., Peterson, K. E. & Hasenkrug, K. J. Lactate dehydrogenase-elevating virus induces systemic lymphocyte activation via TLR7-dependent IFNα responses by plasmacytoid dendritic cells. PLoS One 4, e6105 (2009).
    Google Scholar
46. Riley, V. et al. The LDH virus: an interfering biological contaminant. Science 200, 124–126 (1978).
    CAS Google Scholar
47. Caliari, S. R. & Burdick, J. A. A practical guide to hydrogels for cell culture. Nat. Methods 13, 405–414 (2016).
    CAS Google Scholar
48. Li, X., Sun, Q., Li, Q., Kawazoe, N. & Chen, G. Functional hydrogels with tunable structures and properties for tissue engineering applications. Front. Chem. 6, 499 (2018).
    CAS Google Scholar
49. Fischer, R. S., Myers, K. A., Gardel, M. L. & Waterman, C. M. Stiffness-controlled three-dimensional extracellular matrices for high-resolution imaging of cell behavior. Nat. Protoc. 7, 2056–2066 (2012).
    CAS Google Scholar
50. Tse, J. R. & Engler, A. J. Preparation of hydrogel substrates with tunable mechanical properties. Curr. Protoc. Cell Biol. 47, 10.16.1–10.16.16 (2010).
    Google Scholar
51. Pelham, R. J. Jr. & Wang, Y.-l. Cell locomotion and focal adhesions are regulated by substrate flexibility. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 13661–13665 (1997).
    CAS Google Scholar
52. Zustiak, S. P. & Leach, J. B. Hydrolytically degradable poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogel scaffolds with tunable degradation and mechanical properties. Biomacromolecules 11, 1348–1357 (2010).
    CAS Google Scholar
53. Krsko, P. & Libera, M. Biointeractive hydrogels. Mater. Today 8, 36–44 (2005).
    CAS Google Scholar
54. Zhu, J. Bioactive modification of poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 31, 4639–4656 (2010).
    CAS Google Scholar
55. Lin, C.-C. & Anseth, K. S. PEG hydrogels for the controlled release of biomolecules in regenerative medicine. Pharm. Res. 26, 631–643 (2009).
    CAS Google Scholar
56. Tibbitt, M. W. & Anseth, K. S. Hydrogels as extracellular matrix mimics for 3D cell culture. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 103, 655–663 (2009).
    CAS Google Scholar
57. Fairbanks, B. D. et al. A versatile synthetic extracellular matrix mimic via thiol-norbornene photopolymerization. Adv. Mater. 21, 5005–5010 (2009).
    CAS Google Scholar
58. Bryant, S. & Anseth, K. in Scaffolding in Tissue Engineering (eds Ma, P. X. & Elisseeff, J.) 71–90 (CRC, 2005).
59. Nguyen, K. T. & West, J. L. Photopolymerizable hydrogels for tissue engineering applications. Biomaterials 23, 4307–4314 (2002).
    CAS Google Scholar
60. Nair, D. P. et al. The thiol-Michael addition click reaction: a powerful and widely used tool in materials chemistry. Chem. Mater. 26, 724–744 (2014).
    CAS Google Scholar
61. Schense, J. C. & Hubbell, J. A. Cross-linking exogenous bifunctional peptides into fibrin gels with factor XIIIa. Bioconjug. Chem. 10, 75–81 (1999).
    CAS Google Scholar
62. Ehrbar, M. et al. Biomolecular hydrogels formed and degraded via site-specific enzymatic reactions. Biomacromolecules 8, 3000–3007 (2007).
    CAS Google Scholar
63. Bryant, S. J., Chowdhury, T. T., Lee, D. A., Bader, D. L. & Anseth, K. S. Crosslinking density influences chondrocyte metabolism in dynamically loaded photocrosslinked poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 32, 407–417 (2004).
    Google Scholar
64. Roberts, J. J. & Bryant, S. J. Comparison of photopolymerizable thiol-ene PEG and acrylate-based PEG hydrogels for cartilage development. Biomaterials 34, 9969–9979 (2013).
    CAS Google Scholar
65. Burdick, J. A. & Anseth, K. S. Photoencapsulation of osteoblasts in injectable RGD-modified PEG hydrogels for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 23, 4315–4323 (2002).
    CAS Google Scholar
66. Kharkar, P. M., Rehmann, M. S., Skeens, K. M., Maverakis, E. & Kloxin, A. M. Thiol–ene click hydrogels for therapeutic delivery. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2, 165–179 (2016).
    CAS Google Scholar
67. Thomson, J. A. et al. Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science 282, 1145–1147 (1998).
    CAS Google Scholar
68. Avior, Y., Sagi, I. & Benvenisty, N. Pluripotent stem cells in disease modelling and drug discovery. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 17, 170–182 (2016).
    CAS Google Scholar
69. Singh, V. K., Kalsan, M., Kumar, N., Saini, A. & Chandra, R. Induced pluripotent stem cells: applications in regenerative medicine, disease modeling, and drug discovery. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 3, 2 (2015).
    Google Scholar
70. Shi, Y., Inoue, H., Wu, J. C. & Yamanaka, S. Induced pluripotent stem cell technology: a decade of progress. Nat. Rev. Drug. Discov. 16, 115–130 (2017).
    CAS Google Scholar
71. Ortiz-Vitali, J. L. & Darabi, R. iPSCs as a platform for disease modeling, drug screening, and personalized therapy in muscular dystrophies. Cells 8, 20 (2019).
    CAS Google Scholar
72. Hovatta, O. Derivation of human embryonic stem cell lines, towards clinical quality. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 18, 823–828 (2006).
    Google Scholar
73. Qian, X., Villa-Diaz, L. G., Kumar, R., Lahann, J. & Krebsbach, P. H. Enhancement of the propagation of human embryonic stem cells by modifications in the gel architecture of PMEDSAH polymer coatings. Biomaterials 35, 9581–9590 (2014).
    CAS Google Scholar
74. Nandivada, H. et al. Fabrication of synthetic polymer coatings and their use in feeder-free culture of human embryonic stem cells. Nat. Protoc. 6, 1037–1043 (2011).
    CAS Google Scholar
75. Villa-Diaz, L. G. et al. Synthetic polymer coatings for long-term growth of human embryonic stem cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 28, 581–583 (2010). Along with reference 74, this was one of the first studies to develop a fully synthetic, chemically defined scaffold for long-term hESC culture and to directly compare the performance with that of Matrigel.
    CAS Google Scholar
76. Brafman, D. A. et al. Long-term human pluripotent stem cell self-renewal on synthetic polymer surfaces. Biomaterials 31, 9135–9144 (2010).
    CAS Google Scholar
77. Meng, Y. et al. Characterization of integrin engagement during defined human embryonic stem cell culture. FASEB J. 24, 1056–1065 (2009).
    Google Scholar
78. Rowland, T. J. et al. Roles of integrins in human induced pluripotent stem cell growth on Matrigel and vitronectin. Stem Cell Dev. 19, 1231–1240 (2010).
    CAS Google Scholar
79. Mondal, G., Barui, S. & Chaudhuri, A. The relationship between the cyclic-RGDfK ligand and αvβ3 integrin receptor. Biomaterials 34, 6249–6260 (2013).
    CAS Google Scholar
80. Lambshead, J. W. et al. Long-term maintenance of human pluripotent stem cells on cRGDfK-presenting synthetic surfaces. Sci. Rep. 8, 701 (2018).
    Google Scholar
81. Nguyen, E. H. et al. Versatile synthetic alternatives to Matrigel for vascular toxicity screening and stem cell expansion. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 1, 0096 (2017). This study uses a high-throughput screening method of synthetic scaffolds to determine a synthetic alternative to Matrigel, finding that matrix-induced effects caused by the biological function of Matrigel can affect toxicity screenings.
    CAS Google Scholar
82. Hayman, E. G., Pierschbacher, M. D., Suzuki, S. & Ruoslahti, E. Vitronectin — a major cell attachment-promoting protein in fetal bovine serum. Exp. Cell Res. 160, 245–258 (1985).
    CAS Google Scholar
83. Melkoumian, Z. et al. Synthetic peptide-acrylate surfaces for long-term self-renewal and cardiomyocyte differentiation of human embryonic stem cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 28, 606–610 (2010). An early report on tethering synthetic peptides to synthetic scaffolds that provides a direct comparison with Matrigel.
    CAS Google Scholar
84. Deng, Y. et al. Long-term self-renewal of human pluripotent stem cells on peptide-decorated poly(OEGMA-co-HEMA) brushes under fully defined conditions. Acta Biomater. 9, 8840–8850 (2013).
    CAS Google Scholar
85. Higuchi, A. et al. Long-term xeno-free culture of human pluripotent stem cells on hydrogels with optimal elasticity. Sci. Rep. 5, 18136 (2015).
    CAS Google Scholar
86. Jin, S., Yao, H., Weber, J. L., Melkoumian, Z. K. & Ye, K. A synthetic, xeno-free peptide surface for expansion and directed differentiation of human induced pluripotent stem cells. PLoS One 7, e50880 (2012).
    CAS Google Scholar
87. Yasuda, S. et al. Chemically defined and growth-factor-free culture system for the expansion and derivation of human pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2, 173–182 (2018).
    CAS Google Scholar
88. Farach-Carson, M. C. & Carson, D. D. Perlecan — a multifunctional extracellular proteoglycan scaffold. Glycobiology 17, 897–905 (2007).
    CAS Google Scholar
89. Furue, M. K. et al. Heparin promotes the growth of human embryonic stem cells in a defined serum-free medium. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 13409–13414 (2008).
    CAS Google Scholar
90. Spivak-Kroizman, T. et al. Heparin-induced oligomerization of FGF molecules is responsible for FGF receptor dimerization, activation, and cell proliferation. Cell 79, 1015–1024 (1994).
    CAS Google Scholar
91. Vlodavsky, I., Miao, H. Q., Medalion, B., Danagher, P. & Ron, D. Involvement of heparan sulfate and related molecules in sequestration and growth promoting activity of fibroblast growth factor. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 15, 177–186 (1996).
    CAS Google Scholar
92. Chang, C.-W. et al. Engineering cell–material interfaces for long-term expansion of human pluripotent stem cells. Biomaterials 34, 912–921 (2013).
    CAS Google Scholar
93. Klim, J. R., Li, L., Wrighton, P. J., Piekarczyk, M. S. & Kiessling, L. L. A defined glycosaminoglycan-binding substratum for human pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Methods 7, 989–994 (2010).
    CAS Google Scholar
94. Musah, S. et al. Glycosaminoglycan-binding hydrogels enable mechanical control of human pluripotent stem cell self-renewal. ACS Nano 6, 10168–10177 (2012).
    CAS Google Scholar
95. Gerecht, S. et al. Hyaluronic acid hydrogel for controlled self-renewal and differentiation of human embryonic stem cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 11298–11303 (2007).
    CAS Google Scholar
96. Lei, Y. & Schaffer, D. V. A fully defined and scalable 3D culture system for human pluripotent stem cell expansion and differentiation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, E5039–E5048 (2013).
    CAS Google Scholar
97. Ovadia, E. M., Colby, D. W. & Kloxin, A. M. Designing well-defined photopolymerized synthetic matrices for three-dimensional culture and differentiation of induced pluripotent stem cells. Biomater. Sci. 6, 1358–1370 (2018).
    CAS Google Scholar
98. Murphy, W. L., McDevitt, T. C. & Engler, A. J. Materials as stem cell regulators. Nat. Mater. 13, 547–557 (2014).
    CAS Google Scholar
99. Folkman, J. & Moscona, A. Role of cell shape in growth control. Nature 273, 345–349 (1978).
    CAS Google Scholar
100. Caiazzo, M. et al. Defined three-dimensional microenvironments boost induction of pluripotency. Nat. Mater. 15, 344–352 (2016).
     CAS Google Scholar
101. Khalil, A. S., Xie, A. W. & Murphy, W. L. Context clues: the importance of stem cell–material interactions. ACS Chem. Biol. 9, 45–56 (2014).
     CAS Google Scholar
102. Eve, D. J. The continued promise of stem cell therapy in regenerative medicine. Med. Sci. Monit. 17, RA292–RA305 (2011).
     Google Scholar
103. Helmy, K. Y., Patel, S. A., Silverio, K., Pliner, L. & Rameshwar, P. Stem cells and regenerative medicine: accomplishments to date and future promise. Ther. Deliv. 1, 693–705 (2010).
     Google Scholar
104. Hoffman, T., Khademhosseini, A. & Langer, R. Chasing the paradigm: clinical translation of 25 years of tissue engineering. Tissue Eng. Part A 25, 679–687 (2019).
     Google Scholar
105. Hwang, N. S., Varghese, S. & Elisseeff, J. Controlled differentiation of stem cells. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 60, 199–214 (2008).
     CAS Google Scholar
106. Burdick, J. A. & Vunjak-Novakovic, G. Engineered microenvironments for controlled stem cell differentiation. Tissue Eng. Part A 15, 205–219 (2009).
     CAS Google Scholar
107. Lutolf, M. P., Gilbert, P. M. & Blau, H. M. Designing materials to direct stem-cell fate. Nature 462, 433–441 (2009).
     CAS Google Scholar
108. Uriel, S. et al. Extraction and assembly of tissue-derived gels for cell culture and tissue engineering. Tissue Eng. Part C 15, 309–321 (2009).
     CAS Google Scholar
109. Enemchukwu, N. O. et al. Synthetic matrices reveal contributions of ECM biophysical and biochemical properties to epithelial morphogenesis. J. Cell Biol. 212, 113–124 (2016).
     CAS Google Scholar
110. Le, N. N. T., Zorn, S., Schmitt, S. K., Gopalan, P. & Murphy, W. L. Hydrogel arrays formed via differential wettability patterning enable combinatorial screening of stem cell behavior. Acta Biomater. 34, 93–103 (2016).
     CAS Google Scholar
111. Koepsel, J. T., Brown, P. T., Loveland, S. G., Li, W.-J. & Murphy, W. L. Combinatorial screening of chemically defined human mesenchymal stem cell culture substrates. J. Mater. Chem. 22, 19474–19481 (2012).
     CAS Google Scholar
112. Koutsopoulos, S. & Zhang, S. Long-term three-dimensional neural tissue cultures in functionalized self-assembling peptide hydrogels, Matrigel and Collagen I. Acta Biomater. 9, 5162–5169 (2013).
     CAS Google Scholar
113. Zhang, J. et al. A genome-wide analysis of human pluripotent stem cell-derived endothelial cells in 2D or 3D culture. Stem Cell Rep. 8, 907–918 (2017).
     CAS Google Scholar
114. Farhat, W. et al. Hydrogels for advanced stem cell therapies: a biomimetic materials approach for enhancing natural tissue function. IEEE Rev. Biomed. Eng. 12, 333–351 (2019).
     Google Scholar
115. Tsou, Y.-H., Khoneisser, J., Huang, P.-C. & Xu, X. Hydrogel as a bioactive material to regulate stem cell fate. Bioact. Mater. 1, 39–55 (2016).
     Google Scholar
116. Donnelly, H., Salmeron-Sanchez, M. & Dalby, M. J. Designing stem cell niches for differentiation and self-renewal. J. R. Soc. Interface 15, 20180388 (2018).
     Google Scholar
117. Vining, K. H. & Mooney, D. J. Mechanical forces direct stem cell behaviour in development and regeneration. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 18, 728–742 (2017).
     CAS Google Scholar
118. Engler, A. J., Sen, S., Sweeney, H. L. & Discher, D. E. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 126, 677–689 (2006).
     CAS Google Scholar
119. Slater, K., Partridge, J. & Nandivada, H. Tuning the elastic moduli of Corning Matrigel and collagen I 3D matrices by varying the protein concentration (Corning, 2018).
120. Gobaa, S. et al. Artificial niche microarrays for probing single stem cell fate in high throughput. Nat. Methods 8, 949–955 (2011).
     CAS Google Scholar
121. Rape, A. D., Zibinsky, M., Murthy, N. & Kumar, S. A synthetic hydrogel for the high-throughput study of cell–ECM interactions. Nat. Commun. 6, 8129 (2015).
     Google Scholar
122. Nemir, S. & West, J. L. Synthetic materials in the study of cell response to substrate rigidity. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 38, 2–20 (2010).
     Google Scholar
123. Sill, T. J. & von Recum, H. A. Electrospinning: applications in drug delivery and tissue engineering. Biomaterials 29, 1989–2006 (2008).
     CAS Google Scholar
124. Xu, C., Inai, R., Kotaki, M. & Ramakrishna, S. Electrospun nanofiber fabrication as synthetic extracellular matrix and its potential for vascular tissue engineering. Tissue Eng. 10, 1160–1168 (2004).
     CAS Google Scholar
125. Rashidi, H., Yang, J. & M. Shakesheff, K. Surface engineering of synthetic polymer materials for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine applications. Biomater. Sci. 2, 1318–1331 (2014).
     CAS Google Scholar
126. Yim, E. K. F., Pang, S. W. & Leong, K. W. Synthetic nanostructures inducing differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells into neuronal lineage. Exp. Cell Res. 313, 1820–1829 (2007).
     CAS Google Scholar
127. Zhu, W. et al. 3D printing of functional biomaterials for tissue engineering. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 40, 103–112 (2016).
     CAS Google Scholar
128. Yamazoe, T. et al. A synthetic nanofibrillar matrix promotes in vitro hepatic differentiation of embryonic stem cells and induced pluripotent stem cells. J. Cell Sci. 126, 5391–5399 (2013).
     CAS Google Scholar
129. Franzin, C. et al. Single-cell PCR analysis of murine embryonic stem cells cultured on different substrates highlights heterogeneous expression of stem cell markers. Biol. Cell 105, 549–560 (2013).
     CAS Google Scholar
130. Highet, A. R., Zhang, V. J., Heinemann, G. K. & Roberts, C. T. Use of Matrigel in culture affects cell phenotype and gene expression in the first trimester trophoblast cell line HTR8/SVneo. Placenta 33, 586–588 (2012).
     CAS Google Scholar
131. Sampaziotis, F. et al. Directed differentiation of human induced pluripotent stem cells into functional cholangiocyte-like cells. Nat. Protoc. 12, 814–827 (2017).
     CAS Google Scholar
132. Ranga, A. et al. Neural tube morphogenesis in synthetic 3D microenvironments. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, E6831–E6839 (2016).
     CAS Google Scholar
133. Schneider, M. C. et al. Local heterogeneities improve matrix connectivity in degradable and photoclickable poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels for applications in tissue engineering. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 3, 2480–2492 (2017).
     CAS Google Scholar
134. Chu, S. et al. Understanding the spatiotemporal degradation behavior of aggrecanase-sensitive poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels for use in cartilage tissue engineering. Tissue Eng. Part A 23, 795–810 (2017).
     CAS Google Scholar
135. Dolo, V. et al. Matrix-degrading proteinases are shed in membrane vesicles by ovarian cancer cells in vivo and in vitro. Clin. Exp. Metastasis 17, 131–140 (1999).
     CAS Google Scholar
136. Balduyck, M. et al. Specific expression of matrix metalloproteinases 1, 3, 9 and 13 associated with invasiveness of breast cancer cells in vitro. Clin. Exp. Metastasis 18, 171–178 (2000).
     CAS Google Scholar
137. Wong, A. P., Cortez, S. L. & Baricos, W. H. Role of plasmin and gelatinase in extracellular matrix degradation by cultured rat mesangial cells. Am. J. Physiol. 263, F1112–F1118 (1992).
     CAS Google Scholar
138. Wolf, M. Influence of matrigel on biodistribution studies in cancer research. Pharmazie 63, 43–48 (2008).
     CAS Google Scholar
139. Shen, D., Wen, R., Tuo, J., Bojanowski, C. M. & Chan, C.-C. Exacerbation of retinal degeneration and choroidal neovascularization induced by subretinal injection of Matrigel in CCL2/MCP-1-deficient mice. Ophthalmic Res. 38, 71–73 (2006).
     CAS Google Scholar
140. Kano, M. R. et al. VEGF-A and FGF-2 synergistically promote neoangiogenesis through enhancement of endogenous PDGF-B-PDGFRbeta signaling. J. Cell Sci. 118, 3759–3768 (2005).
     CAS Google Scholar
141. Lee, J. H. Injectable hydrogels delivering therapeutic agents for disease treatment and tissue engineering. Biomater. Res. 22, 27 (2018).
     Google Scholar
142. Yu, L. & Ding, J. Injectable hydrogels as unique biomedical materials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 37, 1473–1481 (2008).
     CAS Google Scholar
143. Kretlow, J. D., Klouda, L. & Mikos, A. G. Injectable matrices and scaffolds for drug delivery in tissue engineering. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 59, 263–273 (2007).
     CAS Google Scholar
144. Pascual-Garrido, C. et al. Current and novel injectable hydrogels to treat focal chondral lesions: properties and applicability. J. Orthop. Res. 36, 64–75 (2018).
     CAS Google Scholar
145. Kharkar, P. M., Kiick, K. L. & Kloxin, A. M. Designing degradable hydrogels for orthogonal control of cell microenvironments. Chem. Soc. Rev. 42, 7335–7372 (2013).
     CAS Google Scholar
146. Han, W. M. et al. Synthetic matrix enhances transplanted satellite cell engraftment in dystrophic and aged skeletal muscle with comorbid trauma. Sci. Adv. 4, eaar4008 (2018).
     CAS Google Scholar
147. Fernandes, S., Kuklok, S., McGonigle, J., Reinecke, H. & Murry, C. E. Synthetic matrices to serve as niches for muscle cell transplantation. Cells Tissues Organs 195, 48–59 (2012).
     CAS Google Scholar
148. Nagahama, K. et al. Nanocomposite injectable gels capable of self-replenishing regenerative extracellular microenvironments for in vivo tissue engineering. Biomater. Sci. 6, 550–561 (2018).
     CAS Google Scholar
149. Clevers, H. Modeling development and disease with organoids. Cell 165, 1586–1597 (2016).
     CAS Google Scholar
150. Camp, J. G. et al. Human cerebral organoids recapitulate gene expression programs of fetal neocortex development. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 15672–15677 (2015).
     CAS Google Scholar
151. Murrow, L. M., Weber, R. J. & Gartner, Z. J. Dissecting the stem cell niche with organoid models: an engineering-based approach. Development 144, 998–1007 (2017).
     CAS Google Scholar
152. Astashkina, A. I., Mann, B. K., Prestwich, G. D. & Grainger, D. W. A 3-D organoid kidney culture model engineered for high-throughput nephrotoxicity assays. Biomaterials 33, 4700–4711 (2012).
     CAS Google Scholar
153. Takebe, T. et al. Vascularized and functional human liver from an iPSC-derived organ bud transplant. Nature 499, 481–484 (2013).
     CAS Google Scholar
154. Eiraku, M. et al. Self-organizing optic-cup morphogenesis in three-dimensional culture. Nature 472, 51–56 (2011).
     CAS Google Scholar
155. Dye, B. R. et al. In vitro generation of human pluripotent stem cell derived lung organoids. eLife 4, e05098 (2015).
     Google Scholar
156. Cruz-Acuña, R. et al. Synthetic hydrogels for human intestinal organoid generation and colonic wound repair. Nat. Cell Biol. 19, 1326–1335 (2017). The authors present a protocol to generate human intestinal and lung organoids using a fully synthetic, chemically defined PEG hydrogel scaffold.
     Google Scholar
157. Chua, C. W. et al. Single luminal epithelial progenitors can generate prostate organoids in culture. Nat. Cell Biol. 16, 951–961 (2014).
     CAS Google Scholar
158. Ardalani, H. et al. 3-D culture and endothelial cells improve maturity of human pluripotent stem cell-derived hepatocytes. Acta Biomater. 95, 371–381 (2019).
     CAS Google Scholar
159. Ramachandran, S. D. et al. In vitro generation of functional liver organoid-like structures using adult human cells. PLoS One 10, e0139345 (2015).
     Google Scholar
160. Spence, J. R. et al. Directed differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells into intestinal tissue in vitro. Nature 470, 105–109 (2011).
     Google Scholar
161. Cruz-Acuña, R. et al. PEG-4MAL hydrogels for human organoid generation, culture, and in vivo delivery. Nat. Protoc. 13, 2102 (2018).
     Google Scholar
162. Gjorevski, N. et al. Designer matrices for intestinal stem cell and organoid culture. Nature 539, 560–564 (2016).
     CAS Google Scholar
163. Gjorevski, N. & Lutolf, M. P. Synthesis and characterization of well-defined hydrogel matrices and their application to intestinal stem cell and organoid culture. Nat. Protoc. 12, 2263–2274 (2017).
     CAS Google Scholar
164. Fatehullah, A., Tan, S. H. & Barker, N. Organoids as an in vitro model of human development and disease. Nat. Cell Biol. 18, 246–254 (2016).
     Google Scholar
165. Bray, L. J. et al. A three-dimensional ex vivo tri-culture model mimics cell-cell interactions between acute myeloid leukemia and the vascular niche. Haematologica 102, 1215–1226 (2017).
     CAS Google Scholar
166. Papadimitriou, C. et al. 3D culture method for Alzheimer’s disease modeling reveals interleukin-4 rescues Aβ42-induced loss of human neural stem cell plasticity. Dev. Cell 46, 85–101.e8 (2018).
     CAS Google Scholar
167. Nowak, M., Freudenberg, U., Tsurkan, M. V., Werner, C. & Levental, K. R. Modular GAG-matrices to promote mammary epithelial morphogenesis in vitro. Biomaterials 112, 20–30 (2017).
     CAS Google Scholar
168. Weber, H. M., Tsurkan, M. V., Magno, V., Freudenberg, U. & Werner, C. Heparin-based hydrogels induce human renal tubulogenesis in vitro. Acta Biomater. 57, 59–69 (2017).
     CAS Google Scholar
169. Livingston, M. K. et al. Evaluation of PEG-based hydrogel influence on estrogen-receptor-driven responses in MCF7 breast cancer cells. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 5, 6089–6098 (2019).
     CAS Google Scholar
170. Edmondson, R., Adcock, A. F. & Yang, L. Influence of matrices on 3D-cultured prostate cancer cells’ drug response and expression of drug-action associated proteins. PLoS One 11, e0158116 (2016).
     Google Scholar
171. Collier, J. H. & Segura, T. Evolving the use of peptides as biomaterials components. Biomaterials 32, 4198–4204 (2011).
     CAS Google Scholar
172. Hosoyama, K., Lazurko, C., Muñoz, M., McTiernan, C. D. & Alarcon, E. I. Peptide-based functional biomaterials for soft-tissue repair. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 7, 205 (2019).
     Google Scholar
173. Xie, A. W. & Murphy, W. L. Engineered biomaterials to mitigate growth factor cost in cell biomanufacturing. Curr. Opin. Biomed. Eng. 10, 1–10 (2019).
     Google Scholar
174. Heidariyan, Z. et al. Efficient and cost-effective generation of hepatocyte-like cells through microparticle-mediated delivery of growth factors in a 3D culture of human pluripotent stem cells. Biomaterials 159, 174–188 (2018).
     CAS Google Scholar
175. Bratt-Leal, A. M., Nguyen, A. H., Hammersmith, K. A., Singh, A. & McDevitt, T. C. A microparticle approach to morphogen delivery within pluripotent stem cell aggregates. Biomaterials 34, 7227–7235 (2013).
     CAS Google Scholar
176. Alberti, K. et al. Functional immobilization of signaling proteins enables control of stem cell fate. Nat. Methods 5, 645–650 (2008).
     CAS Google Scholar
177. Platt, M. O. et al. Sustained epidermal growth factor receptor levels and activation by tethered ligand binding enhances osteogenic differentiation of multi-potent marrow stromal cells. J. Cell. Physiol. 221, 306–317 (2009).
     CAS Google Scholar
178. Yu, X. et al. Nanostructured mineral coatings stabilize proteins for therapeutic delivery. Adv. Mater. 29, 1701255 (2017).
     Google Scholar
179. Khalil, A. S., Xie, A. W., Johnson, H. J. & Murphy, W. L. Sustained release and protein stabilization reduce the growth factor dosage required for human pluripotent stem cell expansion. Biomaterials 248, 120007 (2020).
     CAS Google Scholar
180. Belair, D. G., Le, N. N. & Murphy, W. L. Design of growth factor sequestering biomaterials. Chem. Commun. 50, 15651–15668 (2014).
     CAS Google Scholar
181. Belair, D. G. & Murphy, W. L. Specific VEGF sequestering to biomaterials: influence of serum stability. Acta Biomater. 9, 8823–8831 (2013).
     CAS Google Scholar
182. Yan, H. J. et al. Synthetic design of growth factor sequestering extracellular matrix mimetic hydrogel for promoting in vivo bone formation. Biomaterials 161, 190–202 (2018).
     CAS Google Scholar
183. Jha, A. K. et al. Enhanced survival and engraftment of transplanted stem cells using growth factor sequestering hydrogels. Biomaterials 47, 1–12 (2015).
     CAS Google Scholar
184. Chen, K. G., Mallon, B. S., McKay, R. D. G. & Robey, P. G. Human pluripotent stem cell culture: considerations for maintenance, expansion, and therapeutics. Cell Stem Cell 14, 13–26 (2014).
     CAS Google Scholar
185. Julavijitphong, S. et al. A xeno-free culture method that enhances Wharton’s jelly mesenchymal stromal cell culture efficiency over traditional animal serum-supplemented cultures. Cytotherapy 16, 683–691 (2014).
     CAS Google Scholar
186. Thirumala, S., Goebel, W. S. & Woods, E. J. Manufacturing and banking of mesenchymal stem cells. Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 13, 673–691 (2013).
     CAS Google Scholar
187. Halme, D. G. & Kessler, D. A. FDA regulation of stem-cell-based therapies. N. Engl. J. Med. 355, 1730–1735 (2006).
     CAS Google Scholar
188. Xiao, J., Yang, D., Li, Q., Tian, W. & Guo, W. The establishment of a chemically defined serum-free culture system for human dental pulp stem cells. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 9, 191 (2018).
     CAS Google Scholar
189. Hirata, T. M. et al. Expression of multiple stem cell markers in dental pulp cells cultured in serum-free media. J. Endod. 36, 1139–1144 (2010).
     Google Scholar
190. Chen, G. et al. Chemically defined conditions for human iPSC derivation and culture. Nat. Methods 8, 424–429 (2011).
     CAS Google Scholar
191. Beers, J. et al. A cost-effective and efficient reprogramming platform for large-scale production of integration-free human induced pluripotent stem cells in chemically defined culture. Sci. Rep. 5, 11319 (2015).
     CAS Google Scholar
192. Xie, A. W. et al. Controlled self-assembly of stem cell aggregates instructs pluripotency and lineage bias. Sci. Rep. 7, 14070 (2017).
     Google Scholar
193. Leong, M. F. et al. Electrospun polystyrene scaffolds as a synthetic substrate for xeno-free expansion and differentiation of human induced pluripotent stem cells. Acta Biomater. 46, 266–277 (2016).
     CAS Google Scholar

Download references