Climate and air-quality benefits of a realistic phase-out of fossil fuels (original) (raw)

• Myhre, G. et al. in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).
• Cohen, A. J. et al. Estimates and 25-year trends of the global burden of disease attributable to ambient air pollution: an analysis of data from the Global Burden of Diseases Study 2015. Lancet 389, 1907–1918 (2017).
  Article Google Scholar
• Butt, E. W. et al. Global and regional trends in particulate air pollution and attributable health burden over the past 50 years. Environ. Res. Lett. 12, 104017 (2017).
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• Samset, B. H. et al. Climate impacts from a removal of anthropogenic aerosol emissions. Geophys. Res. Lett. 45, 1020–1029 (2018).
  Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
• Raes, F. & Seinfeld, J. H. New directions: climate change and air pollution abatement: a bumpy road. Atmos. Environ. 43, 5132–5133 (2009).
  Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
• Andreae, M. O., Jones, C. D. & Cox, P. M. Strong present-day aerosol cooling implies a hot future. Nature 435, 1187–1190 (2005).
  Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
• Li, B. et al. The contribution of China’s emissions to global climate forcing. Nature 531, 357–361 (2016).
  Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
• Arneth, A., Unger, N., Kulmala, M. & Andreae, M. O. Clean the air, heat the planet? Science 326, 672–673 (2009).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Lelieveld, J., Klingmüller, K., Pozzer, A., Burnett, R. T., Haines, A. & Ramanathan, V. Effects of fossil fuel and total anthropogenic emission removal on public health and climate. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 7192–7197 (2019).
  Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
• Kloster, S. et al. A GCM study of future climate response to aerosol pollution reductions. Clim. Dyn. 34, 1177–1194 (2010).
  Article Google Scholar
• Schellnhuber, H. J. Global warming: stop worrying, start panicking? Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 14239–14240 (2008).
  Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
• Ramanathan, V. & Feng, Y. On avoiding dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system: formidable challenges ahead. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 14245–14250 (2008).
  Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
• Brasseur, G. P. & Roeckner, E. Impact of improved air quality on the future evolution of climate. Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, L23704 (2005).
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• Collins, M. et al. in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).
• Matthews, H. D. & Zickfeld, K. Climate response to zeroed emissions of greenhouse gases and aerosols. Nat. Clim. Change 2, 338–341 (2012).
  Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
• Hare, B. & Meinshausen, M. How much warming are we committed to and how much can be avoided? Clim. Change 75, 111–149 (2006).
  Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
• Smith, C. J. et al. Current fossil fuel infrastructure does not yet commit us to 1.5 °C warming. Nat. Commun. 10, 101 (2019).
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• Hienola, A. et al. The impact of aerosol emissions on the 1.5 degrees C pathways. Environ. Res. Lett. 13 https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aab1b2 (2018).
• Fitzpatrick, B. Scrubbing aerosol particles from the atmosphere ‘a Faustian bargain,’ study finds. National Post https://nationalpost.com/news/world/scrubbing-aerosol-particles-from-the-atmosphere-a-faustian-bargain-study-finds (2018).
• Rogelj, J. et al. in Global Warming of 1.5 °C (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2018).
• de Coninck, H. et al. in Global Warming of 1.5 °C (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2018).
• Haegel, N. M. et al. Terawatt-scale photovoltaics: trajectories and challenges. Science 356, 141–143 (2017).
  Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
• Smith, C. J. et al. FAIR v1.3: a simple emissions-based impulse response and carbon cycle model. Geosci. Model Dev. 11, 2273–2297 (2018).
  Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
• Millar, R. J., Nicholls, Z. R., Friedlingstein, P. & Allen, M. R. A modified impulse-response representation of the global near-surface air temperature and atmospheric concentration response to carbon dioxide emissions. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2017, 7213–7228 (2017).
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• Philipona, R., Behrens, K. & Ruckstuhl, C. How declining aerosols and rising greenhouse gases forced rapid warming in Europe since the 1980s. Geophys. Res. Lett. 36, L02806 (2009).
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• Leibensperger, E. et al. Climatic effects of 1950–2050 changes in US anthropogenic aerosols—Part 2: climate response. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 12, 3349–3362 (2012).
  Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
• Zheng, B. et al. Trends in China’s anthropogenic emissions since 2010 as the consequence of clean air actions. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 18, 14095–14111 (2018).
  Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
• Silva, R. A. et al. The effect of future ambient air pollution on human premature mortality to 2100 using output from the ACCMIP model ensemble. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 16, 9847–9862 (2016).
  Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
• Shindell, D., Faluvegi, G., Seltzer, K. & Shindell, C. Quantified, localized health benefits of accelerated carbon dioxide emissions reductions. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 291–295 (2018).
  Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
• Landrigan, P. J. et al. The Lancet Commission on pollution and health. Lancet 391, 462–512 (2018).
  Article Google Scholar
• The Economic Consequences of Outdoor Air Pollution (OECD, 2016)
• Huppmann, D., Rogelj, J., Kriegler, E., Krey, V. & Riahi, K. A new scenario resource for integrated 1.5 °C research. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 1027–1030 (2018).
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• Huppmann, D. et al. IAMC 1.5 °C Scenario Explorer and Data hosted by IIASA (Integrated Assessment Modeling Consortium & International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, 2018).
• Clarke, L. et al. in Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change (eds Edenhofer, O. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).
• Raupach, M. R. et al. Global and regional drivers of accelerating CO2 emissions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 10288–10293 (2007).
  Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
• Andrews, T., Gregory, J. M., Webb, M. J. & Taylor, K. E. Forcing, feedbacks and climate sensitivity in CMIP5 coupled atmosphere-ocean climate models. Geophys. Res. Lett. 39, L09712 (2012).
  ADS Google Scholar
• Etminan, M., Myhre, G., Highwood, E. J. & Shine, K. P. Radiative forcing of carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide: a significant revision of the methane radiative forcing. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 12614–12623 (2016).
  Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
• Myhre, G. et al. Radiative forcing of the direct aerosol effect from AeroCom Phase II simulations. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 13, 1853–1877 (2013).
  Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
• Ghan, S. J. et al. A simple model of global aerosol indirect effects. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 118, 6688–6707 (2013).
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• Joos, F. et al. Carbon dioxide and climate impulse response functions for the computation of greenhouse gas metrics: a multi-model analysis. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 13, 2793–2825 (2013).
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• Thompson, D. W. J., Barnes, E. A., Deser, C., Foust, W. E. & Phillips, A. S. Quantifying the role of internal climate variability in future climate trends. J. Clim. 28, 6443–6456 (2015).
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• Morice, C. P., Kennedy, J. J., Rayner, N. A. & Jones, P. D. Quantifying uncertainties in global and regional temperature change using an ensemble of observational estimates: the HadCRUT4 dataset. J. Geophys. Res. 117, D08101 (2012).
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• Hansen, J., Ruedy, R., Sato, M. & Lo, K. Global surface temperature change. Rev. Geophys. 48, RG4004 (2010).
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• Vose, R. S. et al. NOAA’s merged land–ocean surface temperature analysis. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 93, 1677–1685 (2012).
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• Meinshausen, M., Raper, S. C. B. & Wigley, T. M. L. Emulating coupled atmosphere-ocean and carbon cycle models with a simpler model, MAGICC6—Part 1: Model description and calibration. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 11, 1417–1456 (2011).
  Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
• Leach, N. J. et al. Current level and rate of warming determine emissions budgets under ambitious mitigation. Nat. Geosci. 11, 574–579 (2018).
  Article CAS ADS Google Scholar
• Forster, P. M. et al. Evaluating adjusted forcing and model spread for historical and future scenarios in the CMIP5 generation of climate models. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 118, 1139–1150 (2013).
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• Millar, R. J. et al. Model structure in observational constraints on transient climate response. Clim. Change 131, 199–211 (2015).
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• Shindell, D., Lee, Y. & Faluvegi, G. Climate and health impacts of US emissions reductions consistent with 2 °C. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 503–507 (2016).
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• Cowtan, K. & Way, R. G. Coverage bias in the HadCRUT4 temperature series and its impact on recent temperature trends. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 140, 1935–1944 (2014).
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• Rohde, R. et al. Berkeley Earth temperature averaging process. Geoinfor. Geostat. An Overview 1, https://doi.org/10.4172/2327-4581.1000103 (2013).