An anti-CRISPR protein disables type V Cas12a by acetylation (original) (raw)

• Makarova, K. S. et al. An updated evolutionary classification of CRISPR-Cas systems. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 13, 722–736 (2015).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Marraffini, L. A. CRISPR-Cas immunity in prokaryotes. Nature 526, 55–61 (2015).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Westra, E. R. et al. The CRISPRs, they are a-changin’: how prokaryotes generate adaptive immunity. Annu. Rev. Genet. 46, 311–339 (2012).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Sorek, R., Lawrence, C. M. & Wiedenheft, B. CRISPR-mediated adaptive immune systems in bacteria and archaea. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 82, 237–266 (2013).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Ran, F. A. et al. Genome engineering using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Nat. Protoc. 8, 2281–2308 (2013).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Platt, R. J. et al. CRISPR-Cas9 knockin mice for genome editing and cancer modeling. Cell 159, 440–455 (2014).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Shalem, O. et al. Genome-scale CRISPR-Cas9 knockout screening in human cells. Science 343, 84–87 (2014).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Zetsche, B. et al. Multiplex gene editing by CRISPR-Cpf1 using a single crRNA array. Nat. Biotechnol. 35, 31–34 (2017).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Kleinstiver, B. P. et al. Genome-wide specificities of CRISPR-Cas Cpf1 nucleases in human cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 869–874 (2016).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Tang, X. et al. A CRISPR-Cpf1 system for efficient genome editing and transcriptional repression in plants. Nat. Plants 3, 17103 (2017).
  Article Google Scholar
• Nishimasu, H. et al. Crystal structure of Cas9 in complex with guide RNA and target DNA. Cell 156, 935–949 (2014).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Yamano, T. et al. Crystal structure of Cpf1 in complex with guide RNA and target DNA. Cell 165, 949–962 (2016).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Bondy-Denomy, J., Pawluk, A., Maxwell, K. L. & Davidson, A. R. Bacteriophage genes that inactivate the CRISPR/Cas bacterial immune system. Nature 493, 429–432 (2013).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• He, F. et al. Anti-CRISPR proteins encoded by archaeal lytic viruses inhibit subtype I-D immunity. Nat Microbiol 3, 461–469 (2018).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Pawluk, A. et al. Naturally occurring off-switches for CRISPR-Cas9. Cell 167, 1829–1838 e9 (2016).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Rauch, B. J. et al. Inhibition of CRISPR-Cas9 with bacteriophage proteins. Cell 168, 150–158 e10 (2017).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Dong et al. Structural basis of CRISPR-SpyCas9 inhibition by an anti-CRISPR protein. Nature 546, 436–439 (2017).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Stanley, S. Y. & Maxwell, K. L. Phage-encoded anti-CRISPR defenses. Annu. Rev. Genet. 52, 445–464 (2018).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Gunaratne, R. et al. Patient dissatisfaction following total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature. J. Arthroplasty 32, 3854–3860 (2017).
  Article Google Scholar
• Watters, K. E., Fellmann, C., Bai, H. B., Ren, S. M. & Doudna, J. A. Systematic discovery of natural CRISPR-Cas12a inhibitors. Science 362, 236–239 (2018).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Marino, N. D. et al. Discovery of widespread type I and type V CRISPR-Cas inhibitors. Science 362, 240–242 (2018).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Shmakov, S. A. et al. The CRISPR spacer space is dominated by sequences from species-specific mobilomes. MBio 8, e01397-17 (2017).
  Article Google Scholar
• Heussler, G. E. & O’Toole, G. A. Friendly fire: biological functions and consequences of chromosomal targeting by CRISPR-cas systems. J. Bacteriol. 198, 1481–1486 (2016).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Zhang, F. et al. CRISPRminer is a knowledge base for exploring CRISPR-Cas systems in microbe and phage interactions. Commun. Biol. 1, 180 (2018).
  Article Google Scholar
• Yang, H. & Patel, D. J. Inhibition mechanism of an anti-CRISPR suppressor AcrIIA4 targeting SpyCas9. Mol. Cell 67, 117–127 e5 (2017).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Salah Ud-Din, A. I., Tikhomirova, A. & Roujeinikova, A. Structure and functional diversity of GCN5-related N-acetyltransferases (GNAT). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 17, E1018 (2016).
• Holm, L. & Laakso, L. M. Dali server update. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, W351–W355 (2016).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Magin, R. S., Liszczak, G. P. & Marmorstein, R. The molecular basis for histone H4- and H2A-specific amino-terminal acetylation by NatD. Structure 23, 332–341 (2015).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Yamano, T. et al. Structural basis for the canonical and non-canonical PAM recognition by CRISPR-Cpf1. Mol. Cell 67, 633–645 e3 (2017).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Chowdhury, S. et al. Structure reveals mechanisms of viral suppressors that intercept a CRISPR RNA-guided surveillance complex. Cell 169, 47–57 e11 (2017).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Harrington, L. B. et al. A broad-spectrum inhibitor of CRISPR-Cas9. Cell 170, 1224–1233.e15 (2017).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Maxwell, K. L. et al. The solution structure of an anti-CRISPR protein. Nat .Commun. 7, 13134 (2016).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Bondy-Denomy, J. et al. Multiple mechanisms for CRISPR-Cas inhibition by anti-CRISPR proteins. Nature 526, 136–139 (2015).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Zetsche, B. et al. Cpf1 is a single RNA-guided endonuclease of a class 2 CRISPR-Cas system. Cell 163, 759–771 (2015).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Xiong, B. et al. Genome editing of Ralstonia eutropha using an electroporation-based CRISPR-Cas9 technique. Biotechnol. Biofuels 11, 172 (2018).
  Article Google Scholar
• Feng, X., Zhao, D., Zhang, X., Ding, X. & Bi, C. CRISPR/Cas9 assisted multiplex genome editing technique in Escherichia coli. Biotechnol. J. 13, e1700604 (2018).
  Article Google Scholar
• Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. Methods Enzymol. 276, 307–326 (1997).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• McCoy, A. J. et al. Phaser crystallographic software. J .Appl. Crystallogr. 40, 658–674 (2007).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Emsley, P. & Cowtan, K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D 60, 2126–2132 (2004).
  Article Google Scholar
• Adams, P. D. et al. PHENIX: building new software for automated crystallographic structure determination. Acta Crystallogr. D 58, 1948–1954 (2002).
  Article Google Scholar
• Mastronarde, D. N. Automated electron microscope tomography using robust prediction of specimen movements. J. Struct. Biol. 152, 36–51 (2005).
  Article Google Scholar
• Zheng, S. Q. et al. MotionCor2: anisotropic correction of beam-induced motion for improved cryo-electron microscopy. Nat. Methods 14, 331–332 (2017).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Zhang, K. Gctf: Real-time CTF determination and correction. J. Struct. Biol. 193, 1–12 (2016).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Shaikh, T. R. et al. SPIDER image processing for single-particle reconstruction of biological macromolecules from electron micrographs. Nat. Protoc. 3, 1941–1974 (2008).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Zivanov, J. et al. New tools for automated high-resolution cryo-EM structure determination in RELION-3. eLife 7, e42166 (2018).
• Grant, T., Rohou, A. & Grigorieff, N. cisTEM, user-friendly software for single-particle image processing. eL ife 7, e35383 (2018).
• Kucukelbir, A., Sigworth, F. J. & Tagare, H. D. Quantifying the local resolution of cryo-EM density maps. Nat. Methods 11, 63–65 (2014).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF Chimera—a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605–1612 (2004).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Chen, V. B. et al. MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 12–21 (2010).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Hovmoller, S., Zhou, T. & Ohlson, T. Conformations of amino acids in proteins. Acta Crystallogr. D 58, 768–776 (2002).
  Article Google Scholar
• Couvin, D. et al. CRISPRCasFinder, an update of CRISRFinder, includes a portable version, enhanced performance and integrates search for Cas proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, W246–W251 (2018).
  Article Google Scholar
• Edgar, R. C. PILER-CR: fast and accurate identification of CRISPR repeats. BMC Bioinformatics 8, 18 (2007).
  Article Google Scholar
• Arndt, D. et al. PHASTER: a better, faster version of the PHAST phage search tool. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, W16–W21 (2016).
  Article CAS Google Scholar