Biosynthesis and Extracellular Concentrations of N,N-dimethyltryptamine (DMT) in Mammalian Brain (original) (raw)

Introduction

_N,N_-dimethyltryptamine (DMT) belongs to a class of serotonergic psychedelics that includes lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) and psilocybin[1](/articles/s41598-019-45812-w#ref-CR1 "The Hallucinogens by Hoffer, A. & Osmondm, H.: Academic Press Hardcover, 1st Edition - bookseller e.g. Wolfgang Risch. Available at, https://www.abebooks.com/first-edition/Hallucinogens-A-Hoffer-H-Osmond-Academic/10736817745/bd

              ."). DMT, like all serotonergic psychedelics, reliably elicits a wide spectrum of subjective effects on brain functions including perception, affect, and cognition[2](/articles/s41598-019-45812-w#ref-CR2 "Strassman, R. J., Qualls, C. R., Uhlenhuth, E. H. & Kellner, R. Dose-response study of N,N-dimethyltryptamine in humans. II. Subjective effects and preliminary results of a new rating scale. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 51, 98–108 (1994)."). These compounds share structural and functional similarities with serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT), and interact with 5-HT and other receptors to produce their effects[3](#ref-CR3 "Geyer, M. A. & Vollenweider, F. X. Serotonin research: contributions to understanding psychoses. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 29, 445–453 (2008)."),[4](#ref-CR4 "Ray, T. S. Psychedelics and the Human Receptorome. Plos One 5, e9019 (2010)."),[5](/articles/s41598-019-45812-w#ref-CR5 "Nichols, D. E. Psychedelics. Pharmacol Rev 68, 264–355 (2016)."). Unlike other psychedelics, however, DMT is endogenously produced in animals[6](#ref-CR6 "Christian, S. T., Harrison, R., Quayle, E., Pagel, J. & Monti, J. The in vitro identification of dimethyltryptamine (DMT) in mammalian brain and its characterization as a possible endogenous neuroregulatory agent. Biochemical Medicine 18, 164–183 (1977)."),[7](#ref-CR7 "Beaton, J. M. & Morris, P. E. Ontogeny of N,N-dimethyltryptamine and related indolealkylamine levels in neonatal rats. Mech. Ageing Dev. 25, 343–347 (1984)."),[8](/articles/s41598-019-45812-w#ref-CR8 "Barker, S. A., Borjigin, J., Lomnicka, I. & Strassman, R. LC/MS/MS analysis of the endogenous dimethyltryptamine hallucinogens, their precursors, and major metabolites in rat pineal gland microdialysate. Biomed. Chromatogr. 27, 1690–1700 (2013)."), including humans[9](#ref-CR9 "Franzen, F. & Gross, H. Tryptamine, N,N-Dimethyltryptamine, N,N-Dimethyl-5-hydroxytryptamine and 5-Methoxytryptamine in Human Blood and Urine. Nature 206, 1052–1052 (1965)."),[10](#ref-CR10 "Kärkkäinen, J. et al. Potentially hallucinogenic 5‐hydroxytryptamine receptor ligands bufotenine and dimethyltryptamine in blood and tissues. Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation 65, 189–199 (2005)."),[11](/articles/s41598-019-45812-w#ref-CR11 "Barker, S. A., McIlhenny, E. H. & Strassman, R. A critical review of reports of endogenous psychedelic N, N-dimethyltryptamines in humans: 1955-2010. Drug Test Anal 4, 617–635 (2012)."). In addition to the subjective psychedelic effects exogenous administration of DMT has on conscious experience, it has other well-documented anti-hypoxic[12](/articles/s41598-019-45812-w#ref-CR12 "Szabo, A. et al. The Endogenous Hallucinogen and Trace Amine N,N-Dimethyltryptamine (DMT) Displays Potent Protective Effects against Hypoxia via Sigma-1 Receptor Activation in Human Primary iPSC-Derived Cortical Neurons and Microglia-Like Immune Cells. Front. Neurosci. 423, 
                https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2016.00423
                
               (2016)."), antidepressant[13](/articles/s41598-019-45812-w#ref-CR13 "Cameron, L. P., Benson, C. J., Dunlap, L. E. & Olson, D. E. Effects of N, N-Dimethyltryptamine on Rat Behaviors Relevant to Anxiety and Depression. ACS Chem Neurosci 9, 1582–1590 (2018)."), and plasticity-promoting actions[14](/articles/s41598-019-45812-w#ref-CR14 "Ly, C. et al. Psychedelics Promote Structural and Functional Neural Plasticity. Cell Reports 23, 3170–3182 (2018)."). Taking these facts together, a further understanding of why DMT is present in mammals is of interest.

Biosynthesis of DMT from tryptamine requires double methylation reactions catalyzed by indolethylamine-_N_-methyltransferase (INMT)15,16. INMT mRNA was identified at high levels in peripheral tissues in rabbits17 and in humans18. However, this peripheral INMT also methylates other ligands such as histamine17,19. In the brain, INMT mRNA was found at very low levels in rabbits17 and was undetectable in humans18. No study to date has yet identified INMT in the cerebral cortex in any species. In addition to INMT, production of DMT requires aromatic-_L_-amino acid decarboxylase (AADC), which removes the carboxyl group from dietary tryptophan to form tryptamine, the essential DMT precursor that can be rapidly metabolized by monoamine oxidase20. While high levels of INMT mRNA expression in the periphery17,18 have been assumed to indicate the potential for correspondingly high levels of DMT, cellular colocalization of INMT and AADC transcripts has not yet been reported in any tissue. Moreover, studies to date assessing levels of DMT in human peripheral bodily fluids have only reported it in trace amounts11, calling into question any physiological role.

In order to address some of these issues, this study examined expression of INMT mRNA in rat and human brain tissues using in situ hybridization. In addition, we conducted double in situ hybridization studies to probe the co-expression of INMT and AADC mRNA in rat brain and periphery. To investigate the presence of DMT in rat brain, we analyzed DMT content in microdialysis samples collected directly from the visual cortices of living pineal-intact and pinealectomized rats. Pinealectomized animals were studied because previous data established the presence of DMT in living rat pineal dialysate8. To investigate whether DMT brain levels are inducible by physiological alterations, we assessed its levels in rat brain following cardiac arrest with or without the pineal gland, as a prior study from our lab demonstrated a surge in the levels of select neurotransmitters in rat visual cortex following cardiac arrest using this technique21.

Results

INMT mRNA is expressed in rat and human brain

To investigate the cortical localization of INMT transcripts, we first conducted in situ hybridization for INMT mRNA on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) rat brain tissue sections (Fig. 1). INMT mRNA, stained red/pink for the single staining in situ experiments, was consistently detected in rat visual cortex (panel A), human medial frontal cortex (panel B), rat (panel C) and human (panel D) pineal gland, and rat (panel E) and human (panel F) choroid plexus.

Figure 1

INMT mRNA is expressed in the brain. Images show results of in situ hybridization of INMT mRNA probes on rat (first column) or human (second column) brain FFPE sections. Where applicable, small black and white arrows denote exemplary cells positive and negative for INMT mRNA expression, respectively. Insets are magnifications of these cells. INMT mRNA expression is seen as pink punctate dots in cortical cells within rat visual cortex (A), in cells of the human medial frontal cerebral cortex (B), in pinealocytes within rat (C) and human (D) pineal gland, and in select ependymal cells of rat (E) and human (F) choroid plexus. In this and the additional in situ panels in Figs 2 and 3, nuclear counterstain (blue/gray staining in all images) identifies all cells/nuclei = 50% hematoxylin. All large panel images = 100x oil magnification. Histology sections are all coronal.

Full size image

INMT and AADC mRNA colocalize in rat brain tissues

A series of double in situ hybridization experiments was conducted on rat brain tissue sections (Fig. 2), adjacent to those used for single in situ hybridization (Fig. 1), to assess cellular colocalization of INMT with AADC transcripts. INMT (green) and AADC (red) mRNA colocalized extensively within the visual cortex (panel A), the hippocampus (panel B), the pineal gland (panel C), and the choroid plexus (panel D).

Figure 2

INMT mRNA is colocalized with AADC mRNA in the brain. Images show results of in situ hybridization on rat brain FFPE sections using INMT (green) and AADC (pink) mRNA probes. (A) INMT and AADC mRNA are colocalized in cells of the visual cortex (panel A), in cells of the hippocampus (B), in the pinealocytes (C), and in the ependymal cells of the choroid plexus (D).

Full size image

A series of control experiments using positive and negative control probes was conducted to assess the in situ technique, as well as to sample mRNA quality. As shown in Fig. S1, positive control probes (targeting PPIB and POLR2A, see Supplemental Information) produced the expected staining patterns in each of the rat brain sections (Fig. S1A,D,G,J), adjacent to those used in Fig. 2A–D; this demonstrates proper preparation of the rat brain FFPE sections. As expected, the negative control probe (a bacteria-specific gene, dapB) showed no appreciable staining (Fig. S1B,E,H,K) in the rat brain sections adjacent to those in Fig. 2A–D. Quantification of mRNA signal strength (calculated as fraction of total area in pixels) in Figs 2 and S1 images showed that the summated INMT and AADC mRNA signals in each rat brain tissue section were comparable to that of the positive control probes and well above negative control staining levels (Fig. S1C,F,I,L), thereby confirming the quality of the INMT and AADC mRNA signals following the chromogenic double in situ procedures. These data provide validation of the duplex in situ technique used to demonstrate the cellular colocalization of INMT and AADC mRNA (Fig. 2).

INMT and AADC mRNA are sparsely colocalized in rat peripheral tissues

The in situ hybridization duplex assay was repeated on rat peripheral tissues including adrenal, kidney, lung, and heart (Fig. 3). While INMT mRNA was found at varying levels in all tissues tested (Fig. 3), AADC mRNA was only detectable in a subset of these tissues. The adrenal cortex was positive for INMT but not for AADC transcript (panel A), whereas the adrenal medulla stained more abundantly for AADC mRNA, with INMT transcript staining noted in only some cells (panel B). This pattern of adrenal medulla-specific AADC mRNA localization accords with previous literature22,23. Colocalization for INMT and AADC mRNA in rat adrenal gland was sparse, detected within select cells in adrenal medulla only (black arrows in panel B). INMT and AADC transcripts were both expressed in renal tubules in the kidney (panels C and D), but they were compartmentalized to discrete anatomical locales. Consistent with previous literature22,23, AADC mRNA expression was restricted to the renal cortex (panel C) with no appreciable expression observable in the kidney medulla (panel D). In clear contrast to AADC mRNA expression, INMT mRNA was localized to the kidney medulla (panel D) rather than the cortex (panel C). INMT mRNA was abundantly found in the lung, but AADC mRNA expression was scant (panels E and F), in accord with previous studies assessing AADC mRNA in rodent lung tissues23. Very few cells in rat lung tissues were found to express both INMT and AADC transcripts (panels E and F). Likewise, INMT mRNA was highly expressed in rat heart in selected areas (panel G), as noted in previous Northern blot data reported in humans18, but AADC expression was not observed in appreciable levels (panels G and H), consistent with a prior study in rodents23.

Figure 3

INMT and AADC mRNA expression is largely non-overlapping in rat peripheral tissues. Two representative regions (Area A and Area B) are shown for each tissue type. Insets show magnifications of areas of the main images wherein cells are positive (black arrows) or negative (white arrows) for either INMT (A,D–G), AADC (C), or both INMT and AADC (B) transcripts. INMT mRNA (green punctate dots) was highly expressed in the adrenal cortex (A), the renal tubules of the kidney medulla (D), the lung (E,F), and the heart (G). INMT transcripts were not uniformly distributed in these tissues, as INMT is found at very low levels in the adrenal medulla (B), renal cortex (C), and select areas of the heart (H). AADC mRNA (pink punctate dots) was expressed in adrenal medulla (B), where it is colocalized with INMT mRNA in select cells (black arrows in B), and in renal cortex (C) where it is not found together with INMT in the same cells. In the lung (E,F) and heart (G,H), AADC mRNA was nearly absent.

Full size image

DMT is present in the brain at concentrations comparable to known monoamine neurotransmitters

To determine if DMT is present in the brain, we quantified rat brain microdialysates by conventional fluorescence detection coupled to a HPLC system (Fig. 4), a method that has been used in our laboratory to detect physiological neurochemicals like 5-HT and melatonin24. DMT as well as 5-HT were detected in rat brain (Fig. 4) in microdialysates collected from the visual cortex via this technique24. Under baseline conditions, the normal rat brain contained detectable levels of DMT (seen at retention time of 7.2 min; blue tracing in panel Aa), ranging 0.05–1.8 nM with an average of 0.56 nM (blue dots in panel Ab).

Figure 4

DMT is present in the brain at concentrations comparable to known monoamine neurotransmitters. (A) DMT levels in pineal-intact rats (n = 25) rose following cardiac arrest. DMT, sampled 0.5 hr before cardiac arrest shown (retention time = 7.2 minutes) on a representative raw chromatogram (a, blue tracing), ranged between 0.05–1.8 nM (averaged 0.56 nM; b, blue dots) during baseline. DMT levels increased within one hr of cardiac arrest (a, red tracing), averaging 1.35 nM with maximum 5.01 nM (b, red dots). DMT increase was significant (***p = 0.00027; mean of differences = 0.80; SD = 0.93; 95% CI = 0.41 to 1.18; t(24) = −4.26). (B) DMT levels persisted in brains of pinealectomized rats (n = 11). DMT levels sampled 0.5–1 hr following cardiac arrest shown (retention time = 7.5 minutes) on a representative raw chromatogram (a, blue tracing), ranged between 0.25–2.2 nM (averaged 1.02 nM; b, blue dots) during baseline. DMT levels increased within one hr of cardiac arrest (a, red tracing), averaging 1.83 nM with maximum of 5.11 nM (b, red dots). DMT increase was significant (*p = 0.034; mean of differences = 0.81; SD = 1.10; 95% CI = 0.075 to 1.55; t(10) = 2.45). (C) There was no difference in brain concentrations of DMT at baseline (a) between rats without (−pineal; mean = 1.02 nM; SD, blue bar = 0.63) and with ( + pineal; mean = 0.56 nM; SD, blue bar = 0.49) the pineal gland (p = 0.05, Welch’s unpaired t-test). No difference between brain concentrations of DMT following cardiac arrest (b) without (− pineal; mean = 1.83 nM; SD, red bar = 1.38) and with (+pineal; mean = 1.35 nM; SD, red bar = 1.27) the pineal gland was detected (p = 0.34, unpaired t-test with Welch’s correction). Baseline levels of DMT were about half those of 5-HT levels (c; *p = 0.026; mean of differences = 1.08; SD = 1.37; 95% CI = 0.16 to 2.0; t(10) = −2.62) in the visual cortex of pinealectomized rats (mean DMT = 1.02 nM; SD, blue bar = 0.63; mean 5-HT = 2.10 nM; SD, blue bar = 1.67).

Full size image

In our previous report of DMT in the rat brain8, it was unclear whether the detected DMT was from the cerebral cortex, pineal gland, or both, since the microdialysis probe traversed the rat brain through both the cortex as well as the pineal gland (see probe design in24). To determine the contribution of the cortex to DMT secretion, we compared normal rats (panel A) to pineolectomized animals (panel B). DMT in rats without the pineal gland, still detectable under baseline (seen at retention time of 7.5 min; blue tracing in panel Ba), ranged 0.25–2.2 nM with an average of 1.02 nM (blue dots in panel Bb). Cortical levels of DMT did not show significant difference between rats with and without the pineal gland under baseline conditions (panel Ca; p = 0.05, via unpaired t-tests with Welch’s correction).

To determine if DMT levels in the rat brain are regulated by physiological perturbations, we monitored the brain concentration of DMT before and after experimentally-induced cardiac arrest. Several hours of DMT baseline levels were first established in the brains of freely behaving and pineal-intact (panel A) and pinealectomized rats (panel B). DMT concentrations following cardiac arrest (red tracings) increased significantly over baseline (blue tracings) in both brains of the pineal-intact group (panel Ab; p = 0.00027) and the pinealectomized group (panel Bb; p = 0.034). We found that 60% (15/25) of normal pineal-intact rats demonstrated more than two-fold increases in DMT while 32% (8/25) showed less than 1.5-fold change (panel Ab). Of the rats without the pineal gland, 45% (5/11) showed more than two-fold increase in DMT whereas 55% (6/11) of rats exhibited minimum change (<1.5-fold; panel Bb) following the onset of cardiac arrest. Average fold increase following cardiac arrest for DMT in the brain was 2.84 ± 1.65 for the pineal-intact group (with a maximum of 6.18-fold), and 1.84 ± 0.89 for the pinealectomized group (with a maximum of 3.47-fold). DMT concentrations in rats exposed to experimentally-induced cardiac arrest did not differ significantly between pineal-intact and pinealectomized rats (panel Cb; p = 0.34 via unpaired t-tests with Welch’s correction).

To probe the relative abundance of extracellular DMT compared to 5-HT in cortical dialysates from the same rats, we quantified brain 5-HT, a monoamine neurotransmitter structurally related to DMT, in rats without the pineal gland. 5-HT was clearly detectable at baseline in the rat cerebral cortex in the absence of the pineal gland (panel Ba). Mean extracellular concentration of 5-HT was 2.10 ± 1.67 nM in these rat brain dialysates (panel Cc). In comparison, basal DMT levels were 1.02 ± 0.63 nM from the same cortical dialysates (panel Cc). Although DMT concentrations are lower than those of 5-HT levels (Fig. 4Cc) under basal conditions, they are comparable to the extracellular levels of all known monoamine neurotransmitters measured by in vivo microdialysis in rat brain25.

Discussion

We report [1] cortical expression of INMT mRNA in rat and human brain, [2] colocalization of INMT and AADC mRNA in the same cells in rat brain, and [3] predominately non-overlapping expression of INMT with AADC mRNA in rat peripheral organs including the adrenal, kidney, lung, and heart. We further show that DMT is present in rat visual cortex in pineal-intact and pinealectomized animals. Moreover, we show DMT levels are significantly elevated by experimentally-induced cardiac arrest. Collectively, these data support the notion that DMT is synthesized in rat brain and at concentrations consistent with that of other known monoamine neurotransmitters. Our demonstration of INMT mRNA expression in human cerebral cortex, choroid plexus, and pineal gland also suggest that DMT biosynthesis may similarly occur in the human brain.

This study demonstrates for the first time that INMT mRNA, the transcript for a key DMT synthetic enzyme, is widely expressed in the cerebral cortex in rats. Importantly, INMT and AADC transcripts are co-expressed in the same brain cells, providing a plausible mechanism for cellular synthesis of DMT in the mammalian neocortex. DMT is a monoamine produced from tryptophan. If endogenous DMT functions as a non-classical monoamine neurotransmitter in the brain, DMT would be the only monoamine whose biosynthesis takes place within the cerebral cortex where it may directly influence cognitive functions of the brain.

While AADC expression in the brain is well known26, INMT expression in the brain was unclear prior to our study. Earlier studies showed that INMT mRNA was only weakly present in rabbit brain tissues17, and undetectable in human brain tissues18. These prior reports are all based on Northern blot analysis, which provides no information on cellular distribution of INMT mRNA and is less sensitive compared to quantitative polymerase chain reaction or the in situ hybridization method used in our study. We were able to identify INMT mRNA in both rat and human brain tissues using the RNAscope in situ assay system, in part because of the high sensitivity afforded by this technique27, which allowed robust and unambiguous identification of INMT mRNA in both rat and human brain FFPE tissues for the first time (see Fig. 1).

AADC is best characterized as one of the enzymes necessary for the synthesis of all canonical monoamine neurotransmitters, including 5-HT [together with tryptophan hydroxylase (TPH)] and dopamine/norepinephrine [together with tyrosine hydroxylase (TH)]. In the pineal gland, AADC (together with TPH) is well known to mediate the synthesis of 5-HT, the precursor for melatonin production28. In the brain, AADC mRNA is present abundantly in the monoamine neurons in the brainstem26. However, AADC mRNA and protein have also been reported in neurons of the cerebral cortex and hippocampus26 that do not contain TH/TPH in mice, rats and humans29,30,31,32,33. To date, the function of these AADC-positive and TH/TPH-negative neurons is unknown.

Using the RNAscope in situ hybridization technique, we identified AADC mRNA in several regions of the rat brain (Fig. 2), including the cerebral cortex and hippocampus (Fig. 2), consistent with what has been reported in mouse brain26. Critically, we found in each of these rat structures that AADC mRNA is colocalized with an INMT transcript (Fig. 2), suggesting that these INMT-positive and AADC-positive neurons may function as DMT-producing neurons (or D-neurons) and that DMT, a non-canonical monoamine, may possibly be the principle neurotransmitter in these widely distributed brain D-neurons. A functional role of the D-neurons will need to be explored in future studies. For example, INMT-deficient animals are necessary to demonstrate unequivocally that INMT is responsible for the endogenous production of DMT.

INMT protein was also found in monkey pineal gland in a prior study34. Our study expanded this finding and demonstrated an abundant expression of INMT mRNA in the pineal gland in both rats and humans (Fig. 1). Co-expression of INMT and AADC mRNA in rat pinealocytes was confirmed by double in situ hybridization analysis (Fig. 2), suggesting that a potential mechanism for DMT biosynthesis, as in the rat visual cortex, exists in the pineal gland. Transcripts for DMT synthetic enzymes were detected additionally in the choroid plexus, a venous network lining the ventricles of the brain that produce CSF, a fluid in which DMT has been detected11. The choroid plexus contains a high density of 5-HT2C receptors whose stimulation by agonists leads to marked reduction of CSF production35. As DMT is an agonist at the 5-HT2C receptor4,5,36 and LSD binds to the 5-HT2C receptor in cultured choroid plexus epithelial cells to stimulate their activity37, the effect of endogenous DMT on CSF regulation deserves additional investigation.

The high levels of INMT mRNA previously found in peripheral tissues18 have led to speculation that DMT is released from peripheral stores and subsequently transported to the brain. Consistent with earlier Northern blot analysis of human tissues18, we found high levels of INMT mRNA expression in rat kidney, lung, heart, and adrenal (Fig. 3). However, INMT mRNA expression in rat peripheral tissues showed very limited overlap with AADC mRNA at the cellular level, suggesting that INMT may have functions independent of DMT synthesis in the periphery. Although our present data suggest that DMT in the brain does not originate from peripheral sources but, rather, is produced locally in specific brain tissues, future studies (using brain-specific INMT knockout animals, for example) could be conducted to conclusively demonstrate that DMT found in brain dialysates originates from the brain. Peripheral INMT may be responsible for established DMT-independent functions such as methylation of sulfur-containing compounds38, histamine17,19, and selenium metabolism[39](/articles/s41598-019-45812-w#ref-CR39 "Kuehnelt, D. et al. Selenium metabolism to the trimethylselenonium ion (TMSe) varies markedly because of polymorphisms in the indolethylamine N-methyltransferase gene. Am J Clin Nutr ajcn114157, https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.115.114157

               (2015).").

DMT is an endogenous monoamine whose physiological functions remain unknown. Furthermore, since exogenous DMT can bind with nanomolar affinities to various receptors including 5-HT receptors40,41,42,[43](/articles/s41598-019-45812-w#ref-CR43 "Blough, B. E. et al. Interaction of psychoactive tryptamines with biogenic amine transporters and serotonin receptor subtypes. Psychopharmacology 231, 4135–4144, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-014-3557-7

               (2014).") and trace-amine associated receptors (reviewed in ref.[44](/articles/s41598-019-45812-w#ref-CR44 "Gainetdinov, R. R., Hoener, M. C. & Berry, M. D. Trace Amines and Their Receptors. Pharmacol Rev 70, 549–620 (2018).")), endogenous DMT may influence brain functions via the same receptors. If DMT were indeed to function as a non-canonical monoamine neurotransmitter, however, it must be present in the brain at a physiologically relevant concentration. Presence of DMT has been reported in various species including rats[6](#ref-CR6 "Christian, S. T., Harrison, R., Quayle, E., Pagel, J. & Monti, J. The in vitro identification of dimethyltryptamine (DMT) in mammalian brain and its characterization as a possible endogenous neuroregulatory agent. Biochemical Medicine 18, 164–183 (1977)."),[7](#ref-CR7 "Beaton, J. M. & Morris, P. E. Ontogeny of N,N-dimethyltryptamine and related indolealkylamine levels in neonatal rats. Mech. Ageing Dev. 25, 343–347 (1984)."),[8](#ref-CR8 "Barker, S. A., Borjigin, J., Lomnicka, I. & Strassman, R. LC/MS/MS analysis of the endogenous dimethyltryptamine hallucinogens, their precursors, and major metabolites in rat pineal gland microdialysate. Biomed. Chromatogr. 27, 1690–1700 (2013)."),[9](#ref-CR9 "Franzen, F. & Gross, H. Tryptamine, N,N-Dimethyltryptamine, N,N-Dimethyl-5-hydroxytryptamine and 5-Methoxytryptamine in Human Blood and Urine. Nature 206, 1052–1052 (1965)."),[10](#ref-CR10 "Kärkkäinen, J. et al. Potentially hallucinogenic 5‐hydroxytryptamine receptor ligands bufotenine and dimethyltryptamine in blood and tissues. Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation 65, 189–199 (2005)."),[11](/articles/s41598-019-45812-w#ref-CR11 "Barker, S. A., McIlhenny, E. H. & Strassman, R. A critical review of reports of endogenous psychedelic N, N-dimethyltryptamines in humans: 1955-2010. Drug Test Anal 4, 617–635 (2012)."), yet its _in vivo_ concentration in living brain has not been reported. This study represents the first quantification of DMT in the extracellular fluid of the brain in freely moving and normal behaving animals.

The baseline concentration of DMT in cortical microdialysates ranged between 0.05 to 1.8 nM (blue dots in Fig. 4Ab) in pineal-intact rats, and between 0.25 to 2.2 nM (blue dots in Fig. 4Bb) in pinealectomized rats. DMT levels showed no significant difference between rats with the pineal and without the pineal gland (Fig. 4Ca). Importantly, this cortical concentration of DMT (average 1.02 nM) is only slightly lower than that of 5-HT detected in the same dialysates, which averaged around 2 nM in rats without the pineal gland (Fig. 4Cc). This value of 5-HT in brain dialysates is consistent with what others have found in rats (average 0.87 nM; 0.12–3.4 nM range) [reviewed in ref.25]. In fact, the basal DMT concentrations (Fig. 4Ab; average 1.02 nM; 0.25–2.2 nM range) in the brain microdialysates are well within the known range of all three canonical monoamine neurotransmitters25: 5-HT (average 0.87 nM; 0.12–3.4 nM range), norepinephrine (average 1.77 nM; 0.19–4.4 nM range), and dopamine (average 1.5 nM; 0.07–4.9 nM range). We wish to emphasize that our microdialysates were collected and analyzed online in real time from rats without any pretreatment to block the activity of monoamine oxidase, an enzyme that rapidly degrades DMT in vivo15,45. The mechanism and function of cortical DMT production remain to be fully investigated.

DMT was previously detected in freely moving rats8. However, DMT was not quantified in that study. Furthermore, the microdialysates used for DMT analysis8 were collected from both the pineal gland and the surrounding visual cortex of rats and it was unclear whether the detected DMT was from the pineal alone, the cortex alone, or both. To address this latter issue, we surgically removed the pineal gland and monitored DMT levels in rats both under baseline and following cardiac arrest (Fig. 4B). We found that DMT concentrations in the brain are independent of the pineal gland, as cortical DMT levels show no significant difference with or without the pineal gland (Fig. 4Ca). These data suggest that the cortex may be one of the major sources of released DMT from the brain. At this point, it is uncertain to what extent, if any, the pineal contributes to DMT production8. It is also unclear whether DMT detected in the brain extracellular fluid is secreted from neurons and/or glial cells. Colocalization studies using both an INMT probe and cell-type specific markers should be used in future studies to clarify this.

The extensive colocalization of INMT and AADC transcripts in pinealocytes (Fig. 2C), and the apparent lack of the pineal’s contribution to the brain production of DMT (Fig. 4Ca) present a paradox. We reasoned that there may be two competing pathways for tryptophan in the pineal: (1) conversion of tryptophan to 5-HT via sequential actions of TPH and AADC, and (2) the potential conversion of tryptophan to DMT via sequential actions of AADC and INMT. It is plausible that in the pineal, the first pathway is overwhelmingly dominant, resulting in high production of 5-HT at the expense of DMT. The established properties of the enzymes support this: the affinity of tryptophan for TPH (_K_m = 41.3 uM)46 in the 5-HT/melatonin synthesis pathway is substantially higher compared to the reported affinity of tryptophan for AADC (_K_m = 3000 uM)47 in the DMT biosynthetic pathway. Thus, if the same cell expresses both TPH and AADC, tryptophan will be more likely to be converted to 5-hydroxytryptophyan (destined to 5-HT) than to tryptamine (destined to DMT). Additionally, 5-hydroxytryptophan binds to AADC with substantially higher affinity than tryptophan (_K_m = 160 uM48 versus _K_m = 3000 uM)47. As a result, high levels of 5-hydroxytryptophan found in the pineal are likely to competitively inhibit AADC conversion of tryptophan to tryptamine, further reducing this intermediate in DMT production. The relatively low affinity of AADC for tryptophan thus reduces the production of DMT in pineal cells that contain both TPH and AADC. These data may explain the possibility that the pineal gland contributes little to DMT production, despite the abundant co-expression of AADC and INMT in the pinealocytes. We could not, however, rule out the possibility that there may be compensatory increases in DMT’s biosynthesis in other brain areas following the loss of the pineal gland.

In our previous studies, we have observed a marked elevation of some, but not all, critical neurotransmitters in rat brain during asphyxic cardiac arrest21, which we posit may contribute to the elevated conscious information processing observed in dying rats21,49. These data also suggest that global ischemia (by cardiac arrest, as in the current study), similar to global hypoxia (by asphyxia, as in21), leads to a tightly regulated release of a select set of neurotransmitters21. To test whether DMT concentrations are regulated by physiological alterations, we monitored DMT levels in rat brain dialysates following experimentally-induced cardiac arrest, and identified a significant rise in DMT levels in animals with (Fig. 4A) and without the pineal (Fig. 4B).

The cardiac arrest-induced increase of endogenous DMT release may be related to near-death experiences (NDEs), as a recent study reports NDE-like mental states in human subjects given exogenous DMT50. Not all rats in our current study exhibited a surge of DMT following cardiac arrest (Fig. 4), an interesting observation in light of the fact that NDEs are reported by less than 20% of patients who survive cardiac arrests51. It is unknown whether the concentrations of DMT reported in our study at cardiac arrest can elicit the effects of an exogenous psychedelic dose of DMT, or whether this surge of endogenous DMT similarly occurs in humans. Moreover, the conscious states reported by NDE survivors may involve contributions from several of the other neurotransmitters found to surge at cardiac arrest in our prior rodent study21. Further investigation is clearly warranted to investigate whether DMT plays a role in generating neural correlates of near-death consciousness.

In conclusion, we present evidence for the brain expression of mRNA for INMT, the key DMT synthetic enzyme previously thought to exist only in the periphery, and demonstrate that, unlike in the periphery, transcripts for the DMT synthetic enzymes AADC and INMT are co-expressed in the same cells within the rat brain. The wide co-expression of transcripts for the DMT synthetic enzymes in the rat brain and basal concentrations of DMT comparable to that of other monoamine neurotransmitters indicate that endogenous DMT may influence brain function.

Materials and Methods

Animals

Adult (2–5 months of age) male Wistar rats (Harlan Laboratories, Indianapolis, IN) were divided into two groups for in vivo microdialysis: rats with intact pineal glands (n = 25; average weight = 334 g) and pinealectomized rats (n = 11; average weight = 335 g). All animals were housed in an 12:12 light:dark cycle in a controlled light environment (250 Lux at the cage level). The 12 hours of light began at 6 am and the 12 hours of dark began at 6 pm. The animals were given food and water ad libitum. The study was approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations laid down by the Committee.

Rat formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues

Following euthanasia, rat brains and peripheral organs were harvested immediately and perfused in 1:10 formalin for one week. Tissues were then placed into 70% ethanol, dissected, and sectioned to a thickness of 5 µm by the University of Michigan Cancer Histology Core.

Human FFPE tissues

FFPE human tissues used in Fig. 1 were archived from the University of Michigan. All samples were obtained from human autopsies and de-identified and, as such, were deemed exempt for regulation by the Institutional Review Boards at the University of Michigan.

INMT and AADC mRNA in situ hybridization

For single staining experiments, in situ probes for rat INMT (Catalog No. 418021) and human INMT (Catalog No. 459961) and the chromogenic RNAscope® 2.0 HD Detection Kit (RED) for FFPE tissues (an alkaline phosphatase system, Catalog No. 310036) were purchased from Advanced Cell Diagnostics (Hayward, CA, USA). Protocol was followed according to the RNAscope® Sample Preparation Pretreatment Guide for FFPE (Catalog No. 320511) and RNAscope® 2.0 HD Detection Kit (RED) User Manual Part 2 (Catalog No. 320487). INMT mRNA was stained red and counterstained with 50% hematoxylin. For double staining experiments, in situ positive control probes [ready to use (RTU) mixture of two probes targeting _PPIB_ and _POLR2A_ (Catalog No. 313921) and negative control probes (Catalog No. 310043 – _dapB_; RTU probe targeting a bacterial gene), as well as probes for rat INMT (Catalog No. 418021) and AADC (Catalog No. 428331-C2), and the RNAscope® 2.5 HD Duplex Detection Kit (Chromogenic) for FFPE (a mixed alkaline phosphatase and horseradish peroxidase system, Catalog No. 322430) were likewise purchased from Advanced Cell Diagnostics. Protocol was followed according to the FFPE Sample Preparation and Pretreatment User Manual for the RNAscope® 2.5 Assay Part 1 (Document No. 322452-USM) as well as the RNAscope® 2.5 HD Duplex Detection Kit (Chromogenic) User Manual Part 2 (Document No. 322500-USM). The only change in the protocol was to increase AMP 5 and AMP 9 incubation from 30 minutes to 1 hour per recommendation of Advanced Cell Diagnostics. INMT mRNA was stained green (horseradish peroxidase) while AADC mRNA was stained red (alkaline phosphatase). Single and double staining experiments were both completed in single day-long sessions. Slides were counterstained with 50% hematoxylin. Positive and negative control probes were run on samples in dual channels to assay for mRNA quality and background signal in samples, as well as to verify kit performance. Positive staining was defined by signal intensity stronger than that of the negative control. In general, small-punctate dots are taken to represent a single transcript whereas larger dark clusters represent multiple transcripts in close proximity, i.e., signal intensity is a qualitative measure of transcript level27. Semi-quantitative analysis of mRNA signal was conducted for duplex staining on rat brain experimental tissues for comparison to control images in all duplex images using ImageJ (Version 1.50i) as defined in the proceeding section. All images were captured on an Olympus BX-51 with a DP70 camera. Magnifications are specified in figure legends. Images were processed with Adobe Photoshop CC 2015.5 (Adobe Systems Inc.).

Semi-quantitative analysis of mRNA duplex staining in rat brain tissues using ImageJ

Experimental rat brain tissue sections subjected to duplex staining for INMT and AADC mRNA and positive and negative control probes on adjacent brain sections (images in Figs 2 and S1) were quantified using ImageJ to estimate the fraction of total area in pixels of mRNA signals by summating both colormetric channel pixels as per a prior publication analyzing this variable in brightfield images of rat FFPE brain tissues following RNAscope in situ52. Results of mRNA quantification are presented in Fig. S1 (summated INMT and AADC signals for comparison of experimental versus control tissue sections). Briefly, blue channel staining was quantified in all Figs 2 and S1 images with the following Color Threshold command adjustments (under the Adjust command). All default settings were used, except hue was set for 0–163, saturation was set for 0 to 90–255, depending on background, and brightness was set for 0–215 to 255, depending on background. Similarly for red channel staining, all default settings were used, except HSB color space was changed to YUV, and Y was set for 0–135 to 200, depending on background, U was set for 0–255, and V was set for 135–185 to 255, depending on background. Particles were then analyzed using the Analyze Particles command and default settings therein along with the Summarize box option checked. Outputs from the Summarize box for %Area for both colormetric channels were entered into GraphPad Prism Version 7.0a for Mac OS X to construct graphs in Fig. S1. All images were processed beforehand with the same microscope settings and Adobe Photoshop CC 2015.5 (Adobe Systems Inc.) filters.

Surgical implantation of microdialysis probes

Microdialysis probes were constructed as previously described24 and their surgical implantation was conducted on each rat (n = 36) for pineal and/or cortical dialysate collection using a method modified from a published protocol and under strictly aseptic conditions24. The rats were anesthetized lightly first using a combination of ketamine (10 mg//kg, i.m.) and xylazine (2 mg/kg, i.m.). The animal’s head was shaved and positioned in a stereotaxic instrument with the head flat. For the rest of the surgery, anesthesia was provided by 1.8% (1.5–2%) isoflurane. The skull was exposed by a 2 cm coronal incision between the two ears along the interaural line. Three stabilizing stainless steel screws 1 mm in diameter were placed to allow the positioning of the probes on the skull. Two small burr holes were created on both sides of the skull. The smaller hole on the right side was ~0.5 mm in diameter, which prevented the tip of the 25-gauge dialysis needle from penetrating the skull, whereas the larger hole on the left side was ~1 mm in diameter and allowed the probe to easily exit the skull during implantation. Next, the right probe was carefully pushed into the brain tissue through the pineal from the right side of the skull leaving the epoxy ball outside of the skull. Following the completion of probe insertion, the epoxy on the left side was removed using cautery and the tungsten rod was then carefully pulled out of the probe. The excess dialysis fiber was cut and the hollow fiber tip was then secured to the tip of the second part of the probe using epoxy resin. The probe setup was fixed to the anchor screws on top of the skull with dental cement. Finally, the skin was sutured, leaving two probes: one to introduce the perfusate, and the other end to collect dialysate. The entire procedure took less than two hours per animal. The animals were returned to their cages, housed individually, and allowed to recover from the surgery for 7 days before microdialysis recording proceeded. Target was verified via HPLC assessment of dialysate for melatonin, which emanates specifically from the pineal in the brain.

Pinealectomy

The pineal gland was first surgically removed from 11 rats. After the pineal gland was removed from the brain, a microdialysis probe was then inserted into the pinealectomized visual cortex using the same coordinates we used when the pineal gland was intact8. Animals were allowed 7 days to recover before baseline microdialysis sampling began. Pineal removal was further confirmed, via HPLC, by the absence of melatonin in the dialysate.

In vivo measurement of DMT secretion

An automated system combining microdialysis with real time HPLC analysis was utilized for measurement of DMT secretion in both normal (n = 25) and pinealectomized animals (n = 11) at baseline and following induction of cardiac arrest. The system is outlined with illustrations elsewhere24. DMT retention times were determined using reference standards, as in our previous publication8. The HPLC system consisted of one Shimadzu SCL-10A VP controller, two Shimadzu LC-20AD isocratic pumps, a CTO-20AC column oven containing 2 Supelco C18 reversed phase columns, two RF-10AXL detectors, two VICI Cheminert® sample injectors (2-position/10-port actuator), and a VICI digital sequence programmer.

Each HPLC system was designed to analyze data simultaneously from 4 rats, with 2 rats using each detector. Following one week of recovery, animals were placed within a light-controlled microdialysis chamber that held 2 cages. Rats were housed at 250 lux on an light:dark cycle with a dark period of 18:00–6:00 and were allowed to move freely throughout due to a swivel mounted on a counterbalance arm. The 21-gauge needle base was connected with PEEK tubing and a syringe to link two rats each to an Instech peristaltic pump. Microdialysis was performed at a continuous 2 μL/min flow rate with an artificial cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) solution consisting of NaCl (148 mM), KCl (3 mM), CaCl2·2H2O (1.4 mM), MgCl2·6H2O (0.8 mM), Na2HPO4·7H2O (0.8 mM), and NaH2PO4·H2O (0.2 mM). Pineal/cortical dialysates were collected from two rats in 15 or 30 minute intervals and delivered to a sample loop (Instech, Plymouth Meeting, PA, USA) during which time previously collected samples for two rats were injected by a VICI Cheminert® sample injector (2-position/10-port valve) into a reversed phase C18 column, 250 × 4.6 mmm with 5 μm packing (Sigma, St Louis, MO, USA) maintained at 45 °C. A Shimadzu LC-20AD isocratic pump (Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan) delivered the mobile phase, which consisted of 34% methanol with 10 mM sodium acetate, at 1.5 mL per minute. Since DMT is naturally fluorescent, as are all other compounds derived from tryptophan, samples were analyzed online by a Shimadzu fluorescence detector (excitation: 280 nm; emission: 345 nm) without any derivatization. The automated control was carried out with an external computer using Shimadzu chromatography software.

Dialysates were collected in 15 or 30 minute intervals for several hours or days to establish baseline levels, at which point rats were euthanized by injection of 10% KCl to the heart between approximately 11:00–12:00. Content of DMT, melatonin, and 5-HT in the dialysates were identified using internal controls and quantified as previously described8,24. Data collection and sequence processing were performed on CLASS-VP firmware from Shimadzu. Baseline values for DMT were calculated as the average of 3 stable time points 2 hours prior to induction of cardiac arrest and compared to the maximum peak DMT value following induction of cardiac arrest. The automated analysis of these compounds at baseline and maximum points following induction of cardiac arrest was confirmed manually if necessary.

Experimental design and statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was conducted using RStudio (Macintosh Version 0.99.903) for paired two-tailed t-tests and unpaired t-tests with Welch’s correction. Exact p-values and means, means of differences, standard deviations, 95% confidence intervals, t values, and degrees of freedom are reported throughout the manuscript and completely in Figure legends. All plots and graphs were created with GraphPad Prism Version 7.0a for Mac OS X (La Jolla, CA) and further edited in Adobe Photoshop CC 2015.5 and Illustrator CC 2015.3 (Adobe Systems Inc.).

Data Availability

Original data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author (J.B.).

References

1. The Hallucinogens by Hoffer, A. & Osmondm, H.: Academic Press Hardcover, 1st Edition - bookseller e.g. Wolfgang Risch. Available at, https://www.abebooks.com/first-edition/Hallucinogens-A-Hoffer-H-Osmond-Academic/10736817745/bd.
2. Strassman, R. J., Qualls, C. R., Uhlenhuth, E. H. & Kellner, R. Dose-response study of N,N-dimethyltryptamine in humans. II. Subjective effects and preliminary results of a new rating scale. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 51, 98–108 (1994).
   Article CAS Google Scholar
3. Geyer, M. A. & Vollenweider, F. X. Serotonin research: contributions to understanding psychoses. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 29, 445–453 (2008).
   Article CAS Google Scholar
4. Ray, T. S. Psychedelics and the Human Receptorome. Plos One 5, e9019 (2010).
   Article ADS Google Scholar
5. Nichols, D. E. Psychedelics. Pharmacol Rev 68, 264–355 (2016).
   Article CAS Google Scholar
6. Christian, S. T., Harrison, R., Quayle, E., Pagel, J. & Monti, J. The in vitro identification of dimethyltryptamine (DMT) in mammalian brain and its characterization as a possible endogenous neuroregulatory agent. Biochemical Medicine 18, 164–183 (1977).
   Article CAS Google Scholar
7. Beaton, J. M. & Morris, P. E. Ontogeny of N,N-dimethyltryptamine and related indolealkylamine levels in neonatal rats. Mech. Ageing Dev. 25, 343–347 (1984).
   Article CAS Google Scholar
8. Barker, S. A., Borjigin, J., Lomnicka, I. & Strassman, R. LC/MS/MS analysis of the endogenous dimethyltryptamine hallucinogens, their precursors, and major metabolites in rat pineal gland microdialysate. Biomed. Chromatogr. 27, 1690–1700 (2013).
   Article CAS Google Scholar
9. Franzen, F. & Gross, H. Tryptamine, N,N-Dimethyltryptamine, N,N-Dimethyl-5-hydroxytryptamine and 5-Methoxytryptamine in Human Blood and Urine. Nature 206, 1052–1052 (1965).
   Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
10. Kärkkäinen, J. et al. Potentially hallucinogenic 5‐hydroxytryptamine receptor ligands bufotenine and dimethyltryptamine in blood and tissues. Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation 65, 189–199 (2005).
    Article Google Scholar
11. Barker, S. A., McIlhenny, E. H. & Strassman, R. A critical review of reports of endogenous psychedelic N, N-dimethyltryptamines in humans: 1955-2010. Drug Test Anal 4, 617–635 (2012).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
12. Szabo, A. et al. The Endogenous Hallucinogen and Trace Amine N,N-Dimethyltryptamine (DMT) Displays Potent Protective Effects against Hypoxia via Sigma-1 Receptor Activation in Human Primary iPSC-Derived Cortical Neurons and Microglia-Like Immune Cells. Front. Neurosci. 423, https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2016.00423 (2016).
13. Cameron, L. P., Benson, C. J., Dunlap, L. E. & Olson, D. E. Effects of N, N-Dimethyltryptamine on Rat Behaviors Relevant to Anxiety and Depression. ACS Chem Neurosci 9, 1582–1590 (2018).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
14. Ly, C. et al. Psychedelics Promote Structural and Functional Neural Plasticity. Cell Reports 23, 3170–3182 (2018).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
15. Barker, S. A., Monti, J. A. & Christian, S. T. N, N-dimethyltryptamine: an endogenous hallucinogen. Int. Rev. Neurobiol. 22, 83–110 (1981).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
16. Axelrod, J. Enzymatic formation of psychotomimetic metabolites from normally occurring compounds. Science 134, 343 (1961).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
17. Thompson, M. A. & Weinshilboum, R. M. Rabbit lung indolethylamine N-methyltransferase. cDNA and gene cloning and characterization. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 34502–34510 (1998).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
18. Thompson, M. A. et al. Human indolethylamine N-methyltransferase: cDNA cloning and expression, gene cloning, and chromosomal localization. Genomics 61, 285–297 (1999).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
19. Herman, K. S., Bowsher, R. R. & Henry, D. P. Synthesis of N pi-methylhistamine and N alpha-methylhistamine by purified rabbit lung indolethylamine N-methyltransferase. J. Biol. Chem. 260, 12336–12340 (1985).
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
20. Sullivan, J. P. et al. The oxidation of tryptamine by the two forms of monoamine oxidase in human tissues. Biochem. Pharmacol. 35, 3255–3260 (1986).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
21. Li, D. et al. Asphyxia-activated corticocardiac signaling accelerates onset of cardiac arrest. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112, E2073–2082 (2015).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
22. Jahng, J. W., Wessel, T. C., Houpt, T. A., Son, J. H. & Joh, T. H. Alternate promoters in the rat aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase gene for neuronal and nonneuronal expression: an in situ hybridization study. J. Neurochem. 66, 14–19 (1996).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
23. Kubovcakova, L., Krizanova, O. & Kvetnansky, R. Identification of the aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase gene expression in various mice tissues and its modulation by immobilization stress in stellate ganglia. Neuroscience 126, 375–380 (2004).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
24. Borjigin, J. & Liu, T. Application of long-term microdialysis in circadian rhythm research. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 90, 148–155 (2008).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
25. Fitzgerald, P. J. Neuromodulating mice and men: Are there functional species differences in neurotransmitter concentration? Neurosci Biobehav Rev 33, 1037–1041 (2009).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
26. Eaton, M. J. et al. Distribution of aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase mRNA in mouse brain by in situ hybridization histology. J. Comp. Neurol. 337, 640–654 (1993).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
27. Wang, F. et al. RNAscope: a novel in situ RNA analysis platform for formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues. J Mol Diagn 14, 22–29 (2012).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
28. Borjigin, J., Li, X. & Snyder, S. H. The pineal gland and melatonin: molecular and pharmacologic regulation. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 39, 53–65 (1999).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
29. Jaeger, C. B. et al. Some neurons of the rat central nervous system contain aromatic-L-amino-acid decarboxylase but not monoamines. Science 219, 1233–1235 (1983).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
30. Nagatsu, I., Sakai, M., Yoshida, M. & Nagatsu, T. Aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase-immunoreactive neurons in and around the cerebrospinal fluid-contacting neurons of the central canal do not contain dopamine or serotonin in the mouse and rat spinal cord. Brain Res. 475, 91–102 (1988).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
31. Komori, K., Fujii, T., Karasawa, N., Yamada, K. & Nagatsu, I. Some neurons of the mouse cortex and caudo-putamen contain aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase but not monoamines. Acta. Histochem. Cytochem 24, 571–577 (1991).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
32. Ikemoto, K. et al. Tyrosine hydroxylase and aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase do not coexist in neurons in the human anterior cingulate cortex. Neurosci. Lett. 269, 37–40 (1999).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
33. Kitahama, K. et al. Aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase-immunoreactive structures in human midbrain, pons, and medulla. J. Chem. Neuroanat. 38, 130–140 (2009).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
34. Cozzi, N. V., Mavlyutov, T. A., Thompson, M. A. & Ruoho, A. E. Indolethylamine N-methyltransferase expression in primate nervous tissue. Society for Neuroscience Meeting Abstract. Society for Neuroscience Meeting Abstract. Society for Neuroscience Meeting Abstract 840.19 (2011).
35. Boyson, S. J. & Alexander, A. Net production of cerebrospinal fluid is decreased by SCH-23390. Ann. Neurol. 27, 631–635 (1990).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
36. Halberstadt, A. L. & Geyer, M. A. Multiple receptors contribute to the behavioral effects of indoleamine hallucinogens. Neuropharmacology 61, 364–381 (2011).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
37. Burris, K. D., Breeding, M. & Sanders-Bush, E. (+)Lysergic acid diethylamide, but not its nonhallucinogenic congeners, is a potent serotonin 5HT1C receptor agonist. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 258, 891–896 (1991).
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
38. Chu, U. et al. Methylation of Thiols and Thioethers by Human Indolethylamine-N Methyl Transferase. FASEB J 29, 1022.7 (2015).
    Google Scholar
39. Kuehnelt, D. et al. Selenium metabolism to the trimethylselenonium ion (TMSe) varies markedly because of polymorphisms in the indolethylamine N-methyltransferase gene. Am J Clin Nutr ajcn114157, https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.115.114157 (2015).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
40. Smith, R. L., Canton, H., Barrett, R. J. & Sanders-Bush, E. Agonist properties of N,N-dimethyltryptamine at serotonin 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C receptors. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 61, 323–330 (1998).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
41. Blair, J. B. et al. Thieno[3,2-b]- and Thieno[2,3-b]pyrrole Bioisosteric Analogues of the Hallucinogen and Serotonin Agonist N,N-Dimethyltryptamine. J. Med. Chem. 42, 1106–1111 (1999).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
42. Keiser, M. J. et al. Predicting new molecular targets for known drugs. Nature 462, 175–181 (2009).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
43. Blough, B. E. et al. Interaction of psychoactive tryptamines with biogenic amine transporters and serotonin receptor subtypes. Psychopharmacology 231, 4135–4144, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-014-3557-7 (2014).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
44. Gainetdinov, R. R., Hoener, M. C. & Berry, M. D. Trace Amines and Their Receptors. Pharmacol Rev 70, 549–620 (2018).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
45. Barker, S. A. N,N-Dimethyltryptamine (DMT), an Endogenous Hallucinogen: Past, Present, and Future Research to Determine Its Role and Function. Front. Neurosci. 12 (2018).
46. Cichon, S. et al. Brain-specific tryptophan hydroxylase 2 (TPH2): a functional Pro206Ser substitution and variation in the 5′-region are associated with bipolar affective disorder. Hum Mol Genet 17, 87–97 (2008).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
47. Lovenberg, W., Weissbach, H. & Udenfriend, S. Aromatic l-Amino Acid Decarboxylase. J. Biol. Chem. 237, 89–93 (1962).
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
48. Sumi, C., Ichinose, H. & Nagatsu, T. Characterization of recombinant human aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase expressed in COS cells. J. Neurochem. 55, 1075–1078 (1990).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
49. Borjigin, J. et al. Surge of neurophysiological coherence and connectivity in the dying brain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 14432–14437 (2013).
    Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
50. Timmermann, C. et al. DMT models the near-death experience. Front. Psychol. 9 (2018).
51. van Lommel, P., van Wees, R., Meyers, V. & Elfferich, I. Near-death experience in survivors of cardiac arrest: a prospective study in the Netherlands. The Lancet 358, 2039–2045 (2001).
    Article Google Scholar
52. Grabinski, T. M., Kneynsberg, A., Manfredsson, F. P. & Kanaan, N. M. A Method for Combining RNAscope In Situ Hybridization with Immunohistochemistry in Thick Free-Floating Brain Sections and Primary Neuronal Cultures. Plos One 10, e0120120 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Startup Award (to J.B.) from the Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology at the University of Michigan. The authors wish to thank Kelly Young and Soo Jung Lee for assistance with in situ technique on FFPE tissues, Bruce Donohoe and Pennelope Blakely at the University of Michigan Microscopy and Imaging Analysis Laboratory for help with imaging, Chris Andrews of the University of Michigan Center for Statistical Consultation and Research unit for help with statistical analysis, Drs. Mark Womble and Gary Hammer, and Aaron Mrvelj for their helpful discussion on the use of human FFPE tissues, Kate Fleming for her comments on the manuscript, and Nick Barbush and Fangyun Tian for helping with Figures.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

1. Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
   Jon G. Dean, Tiecheng Liu, Sean Huff, Ben Sheler, Michael M. Wang & Jimo Borjigin
2. Department of Comparative Biomedical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA
   Steven A. Barker
3. Department of Psychiatry, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM, USA
   Rick J. Strassman
4. Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
   Michael M. Wang & Jimo Borjigin
5. Neuroscience Graduate Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
   Michael M. Wang & Jimo Borjigin
6. VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
   Michael M. Wang
7. Center for Consciousness Science, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
   Jon G. Dean & Jimo Borjigin

Authors

1. Jon G. Dean
   You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
2. Tiecheng Liu
   You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
3. Sean Huff
   You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
4. Ben Sheler
   You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
5. Steven A. Barker
   You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
6. Rick J. Strassman
   You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
7. Michael M. Wang
   You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
8. Jimo Borjigin
   You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

J.B. and M.M.W. conceived the project and planned experiments; J.G.D., T.L., S.H. and B.S. conducted the experiments with the help from S.A.B.; J.G.D. and J.B. wrote the paper with the help from S.A.B., R.J.S. and M.M.W.

Corresponding author

Correspondence toJimo Borjigin.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dean, J., Liu, T., Huff, S. et al. Biosynthesis and Extracellular Concentrations of N,N-dimethyltryptamine (DMT) in Mammalian Brain.Sci Rep 9, 9333 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-45812-w

Download citation

• Received: 18 December 2018
• Accepted: 10 June 2019
• Published: 27 June 2019
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-45812-w