PocketFlow is a data-and-knowledge-driven structure-based molecular generative model (original) (raw)

• Li, Y. et al. Generative deep learning enables the discovery of a potent and selective RIPK1 inhibitor. Nat. Commun. 13, 6891 (2022).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Isert, C., Atz, K. & Schneider, G. Structure-based drug design with geometric deep learning. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 79, 102548 (2023).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Moret, M. et al. Leveraging molecular structure and bioactivity with chemical language models for de novo drug design. Nat. Commun. 14, 114 (2023).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Ramesh, A. et al. Hierarchical text-conditional image generation with clip latents. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2204.06125 (2022).
• Tong, X. et al. Generative models for de novo drug design. J. Med. Chem. 64, 14011–14027 (2021).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Wang, J. et al. Multi-constraint molecular generation based on conditional transformer, knowledge distillation and reinforcement learning. Nat. Mach. Intell. 3, 914–922 (2021).
  Article Google Scholar
• Li, Y., Pei, J. & Lai, L. Structure-based de novo drug design using 3D deep generative models. Chem. Sci. 12, 13664–13675 (2021).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Zheng, S. et al. Accelerated rational PROTAC design via deep learning and molecular simulations. Nat. Mach. Intell. 4, 739–748 (2022).
  Article Google Scholar
• Zhang, J. & Chen, H. De novo molecule design using molecular generative models constrained by ligand–protein interactions. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 62, 3291–3306 (2022).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Godinez, W. J. et al. Design of potent antimalarials with generative chemistry. Nat. Mach. Intell. 4, 180–186 (2022).
  Article Google Scholar
• Bagal, V. et al. MolGPT: molecular generation using a transformer-decoder model. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 62, 2064–2076 (2022).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Blaschke, T. et al. REINVENT 2.0: An AI tool for de novo drug design. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 60, 5918–5922 (2020).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Schwaller, P. et al. Molecular transformer: a model for uncertainty-calibrated chemical reaction prediction. ACS Cent. Sci. 5, 1572–1583 (2019).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Moret, M. et al. Beam search for automated design and scoring of novel ROR ligands with machine intelligence. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 19477–19482 (2021).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Liu, M. et al. Generating 3d molecules for target protein binding. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2204.09410 (2022).
• Peng, X., et al. Pocket2mol: efficient molecular sampling based on 3d protein pockets. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning 162, 17644–17655 (2022).
• Ragoza, M., Masuda, T. & Koes, D. R. Generating 3D molecules conditional on receptor binding sites with deep generative models. Chem. Sci. 13, 2701–2713 (2022).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Pearl, J. Radical empiricism and machine learning research. J. Causal Inference 9, 78–82 (2021).
  Article MathSciNet Google Scholar
• Pan, Y. Heading toward artificial intelligence 2.0. Engineering 2, 409–413 (2016).
  Article Google Scholar
• Cheng, G., Gong, X.-G. & Yin, W.-J. Crystal structure prediction by combining graph network and optimization algorithm. Nat. Commun. 13, 1492 (2022).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Jiang, Y. et al. Coupling complementary strategy to flexible graph neural network for quick discovery of coformer in diverse co-crystal materials. Nat. Commun. 12, 5950 (2021).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• O’Boyle, N. M. et al. Open Babel: an open chemical toolbox. J. Cheminform. 3, 33 (2011).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Bickerton, G. R. et al. Quantifying the chemical beauty of drugs. Nat. Chem. 4, 90–98 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Ertl, P. & Schuffenhauer, A. Estimation of synthetic accessibility score of drug-like molecules based on molecular complexity and fragment contributions. J. Cheminform. 1, 8 (2009).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Polykovskiy, D. et al. Molecular sets (MOSES): a benchmarking platform for molecular generation models. Front. Pharmacol. 11, 565644 (2020).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Francoeur, P. G. et al. Three-dimensional convolutional neural networks and a cross-docked data set for structure-based drug design. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 60, 4200–4215 (2020).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Eldridge, M. D. et al. Empirical scoring functions: I. The development of a fast empirical scoring function to estimate the binding affinity of ligands in receptor complexes. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 11, 425–445 (1997).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Hartshorn, M. J. et al. Diverse, high-quality test set for the validation of protein-ligand docking performance. J. Med. Chem. 50, 726–741 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Hopkins, A. L., Groom, C. R. & Alex, A. Ligand efficiency: a useful metric for lead selection. Drug Discov. Today 9, 430–431 (2004).
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Kenny, P. W. The nature of ligand efficiency. J. Cheminform. 11, 8 (2019).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Chen, H. et al. in Comprehensive Medicinal Chemistry III (eds Chackalamannil, S. et al.) Ch. 2.08 (Elsevier, 2017).
• Verdonk, M. L. et al. Docking performance of fragments and druglike compounds. J. Med. Chem. 54, 5422–5431 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Wu, H. et al. Structural basis for substrate specificity and catalysis of human histone acetyltransferase 1. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 8925–8930 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Fan, P. et al. Overexpressed histone acetyltransferase 1 regulates cancer immunity by increasing programmed death-ligand 1 expression in pancreatic cancer. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 38, 47 (2019).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Xue, L. et al. RNAi screening identifies HAT1 as a potential drug target in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 7, 3898–3907 (2014).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Xia, P. et al. MicroRNA-377 exerts a potent suppressive role in osteosarcoma through the involvement of the histone acetyltransferase 1-mediated Wnt axis. J. Cell. Physiol. 234, 22787–22798 (2019).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Kumar, N. et al. Histone acetyltransferase 1 (HAT1) acetylates hypoxia-inducible factor 2 alpha (HIF2A) to execute hypoxia response. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gene Regul. Mech. 194900, 2023 (1866).
  Google Scholar
• Lahue, B. R. et al. Diversity & tractability revisited in collaborative small molecule phenotypic screening library design. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 28, 115192 (2020).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Roundtree, I. A. et al. YTHDC1 mediates nuclear export of N6-methyladenosine methylated mRNAs. eLife 6, e31311 (2017).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Xiao, W. et al. Nuclear m6A reader YTHDC1 regulates mRNA splicing. Mol. Cell 61, 507–519 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Sheng, Y. et al. A critical role of nuclear m6A reader YTHDC1 in leukemogenesis by regulating MCM complex–mediated DNA replication. Blood 138, 2838–2852 (2021).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Bubeck, S. & Sellke, M. A universal law of robustness via isoperimetry. J. ACM 70, 1–18 (2023).
  Article MathSciNet Google Scholar
• Nakkiran, P. et al. Deep double descent: where bigger models and more data hurt. J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp. 2021, 124003 (2021).
  Article MathSciNet Google Scholar
• Schulman, J. et al. Proximal policy optimization algorithms. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1707.06347 (2017).
• Mnih, V. et al. Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning. Nature 518, 529–533 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Sutton, R. S. et al. Policy gradient methods for reinforcement learning with function approximation. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2018/hash/d60678e8f2ba9c540798ebbde31177e8-Abstract.html (1999).
• Haarnoja, T. et al. Soft actor-critic: off-policy maximum entropy deep reinforcement learning with a stochastic actor. In Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Machine Learning 80, 1861–1870 (2018).
• Jing, B. et al. Learning from protein structure with geometric vector perceptrons. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2009.01411 (2020).
• Aykent S. and T. Xia. Gbpnet: Universal geometric representation learning on protein structures. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining https://doi.org/10.1145/3534678.3539441 (2022).
• Deng, C. et al. Vector neurons: a general framework for so (3)-equivariant networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision https://openaccess.thecvf.com/content/ICCV2021/html/Deng_Vector_Neurons_A_General_Framework_for_SO3-Equivariant_Networks_ICCV_2021_paper.html (2021).
• He, K. et al. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition https://openaccess.thecvf.com/content_cvpr_2016/html/He_Deep_Residual_Learning_CVPR_2016_paper.html (2016).
• Gasteiger, J. et al. Fast and uncertainty-aware directional message passing for non-equilibrium molecules. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2011.14115 (2020).
• Yu, D. & Seltzer, M. L. Improved bottleneck features using pretrained deep neural networks. In Twelfth Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association https://jackyguo624.github.io/img/2020-02-12-bottle-feature-for-asr/Bottleneck-Interspeech2011-pub.pdf (2011).
• Ranzato, M. A. et al. Sequence level training with recurrent neural networks. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1511.06732 (2015).
• Schmidt, F. J. Generalization in generation: a closer look at exposure bias. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1910.00292 (2019).
• Bishop, C. M. Mixture density networks. Technical Report. https://publications.aston.ac.uk/id/eprint/373/ (Aston University, 1994).
• Jumper, J. et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596, 583–589 (2021).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Luo, Y., Yan, K. & Ji, S. Graphdf: a discrete flow model for molecular graph generation. In Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learning 139, 7192–7203 (2021).
• Shi, C. et al. Graphaf: a flow-based autoregressive model for molecular graph generation. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2001.09382 (2020).
• You, J. et al. Graph convolutional policy network for goal-directed molecular graph generation. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2018/hash/d60678e8f2ba9c540798ebbde31177e8-Abstract.html (2018).
• Popova, M. et al. MolecularRNN: generating realistic molecular graphs with optimized properties. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1905.13372 (2019).
• Irwin, J. J. et al. ZINC20—a free ultralarge-scale chemical database for ligand discovery. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 60, 6065–6073 (2020).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Kingma, D. P. & Ba, J. Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1412.6980 (2014).
• Jiang, Y. et al. PocketFlow is a data-and-knowledge driven structure-based molecular generative model. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10460455 (2024).