A CRISPR way for accelerating improvement of food crops (original) (raw)

• Hickey, L. T. et al. Breeding crops to feed 10 billion. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 744–754 (2019).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Ray, D. K., Mueller, N. D., West, P. C. & Foley, J. A. Yield trends are insufficient to double global crop production by 2050. PLoS ONE 8, e66428 (2013).
  Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Chen, K., Wang, Y., Zhang, R., Zhang, H. & Gao, C. CRISPR/Cas genome editing and precision plant breeding in agriculture. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 70, 667–697 (2019).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Jinek, M. et al. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science 337, 816–821 (2012).
  ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Zetsche, B. et al. Cpf1 is a single RNA-guided endonuclease of a class 2 CRISPR-Cas system. Cell 163, 759–771 (2015).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Symington, L. S. & Gautier, J. Double-strand break end resection and repair pathway choice. Annu. Rev. Genet. 45, 247–271 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Komor, A. C., Kim, Y. B., Packer, M. S., Zuris, J. A. & Liu, D. R. Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage. Nature 533, 420–424 (2016).
  Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Gaudelli, N. M. et al. Programmable base editing of A•T to G•C in genomic DNA without DNA cleavage. Nature 551, 464–471 (2017).
  Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., Massel, K., Godwin, I. D. & Gao, C. Applications and potential of genome editing in crop improvement. Genome Biol. 19, 210 (2018).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Li, M. et al. Reassessment of the four yield-related genes Gn1a, DEP1, GS3, and IPA1 in rice using a CRISPR/Cas9 system. Front. Plant Sci. 7, 377 (2016).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Waltz, E. CRISPR-edited crops free to enter market, skip regulation. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 582 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Wang, Y. et al. Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid bread wheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 947–951 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Nekrasov, V. et al. Rapid generation of a transgene-free powdery mildew resistant tomato by genome deletion. Sci. Rep. 7, 482 (2017).
  Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
• Khanday, I., Skinner, D., Yang, B., Mercier, R. & Sundaresan, V. A male-expressed rice embryogenic trigger redirected for asexual propagation through seeds. Nature 565, 91–95 (2019).
  Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Wang, C. et al. Clonal seeds from hybrid rice by simultaneous genome engineering of meiosis and fertilization genes. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 283–286 (2019).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Henikoff, S. & Comai, L. Single-nucleotide mutations for plant functional genomics. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 54, 375–401 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Zong, Y. et al. Efficient C-to-T base editing in plants using a fusion of nCas9 and human APOBEC3A. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 950–953 (2018).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Zhang, R. et al. Generation of herbicide tolerance traits and a new selectable marker in wheat using base editing. Nat. Plants 5, 480–485 (2019).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Tian, S. et al. Engineering herbicide resistant watermelon variety through CRISPR/Cas9-mediated base-editing. Plant Cell Rep. 37, 1353–1356 (2018).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Li, C. et al. Expanded base editing in rice and wheat using a Cas9-adenosine deaminase fusion. Genome Biol. 19, 59 (2018).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
• Long, S. P., Marshall-Colon, A. & Zhu, X. Meeting the global food demand of the future by engineering crop photosynthesis and yield potential. Cell 161, 56–66 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Leal, D., Lemmon, Z. H., Man, J., Bartlett, M. E. & Lippman, Z. B. Engineering quantitative trait variation for crop improvement by genome editing. Cell 171, 470–480 (2017).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Zhang, H. et al. Genome editing of upstream open reading frames enables translational control in plants. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 894–898 (2018).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Lowe, K. et al. Morphogenic regulators Baby boom and Wuschel improve monocot transformation. Plant Cell 28, 1998–2015 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Kelliher, T. et al. One-step genome editing of elite crop germplasm during haploid induction. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 287–292 (2019).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Wang, B. et al. Development of a haploid-inducer mediated genome editing system for accelerating maize breeding. Mol. Plant 12, 597–602 (2019).
  Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Maher, M. F. et al. Plant gene editing through de novo induction of meristems. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 84–89 (2020).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Anzalone, A. V. et al. Search-and-replace genome editing without double-strand breaks or donor DNA. Nature 576, 149–157 (2019).
  Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Wurtzel, E. T. et al. Revolutionizing agriculture with synthetic biology. Nat. Plants 5, 1207–1210 (2019).
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Salesse-Smith, C. E. et al. Overexpression of Rubisco subunits with RAF1 increases Rubisco content in maize. Nat. Plants 4, 802–810 (2018).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Wersch, S. & Li, X. Stronger when together: clustering of plant NLR disease resistance genes. Trends Plant Sci. 24, 688–699 (2019).
  Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Engqvist, M. K. M. & Rabe, K. S. Applications of protein engineering and directed evolution in plant research. Plant Physiol. 179, 907–917 (2019).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Butt, H. et al. CRISPR directed evolution of the spliceosome for resistance to splicing inhibitors. Genome Biol. 20, 73 (2019).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Li, C. et al. Targeted, random mutagenesis of plant genes with dual cytosine and adenine base editors. Nat. Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-019-0393-7 (2020).
• Zsögön, A. et al. De novo domestication of wild tomato using genome editing. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 1211–1216 (2018).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Li, T. et al. Domestication of wild tomato is accelerated by genome editing. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 1160–1163 (2018).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Lemmon, Z. H. et al. Rapid improvement of domestication traits in an orphan crop by genome editing. Nat. Plants 4, 766–770 (2018).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Cui, L. et al. Development of perennial wheat through hybridization between wheat and wheatgrasses: a review. Engineering 4, 507–513 (2018).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• DeHaan, L., Christians, M., Crain, J. & Poland, J. Development and evolution of an intermediate wheatgrass domestication program. Sustainability 10, 1499 (2018).
  Article Google Scholar
• Venske, E. et al. Bread wheat: a role model for plant domestication and breeding. Hereditas 156, 16 (2019).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Pérez, R. et al. Mutation of a bHLH transcription factor allowed almond domestication. Science 364, 1095–1098 (2019).
  Article ADS PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Nour-Eldin, H. H. et al. Reduction of antinutritional glucosinolates in Brassica oilseeds by mutation of genes encoding transporters. Nat. Biotechnol. 35, 377–382 (2017).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Podevin, N., Davies, H. V., Hartung, F., Nogue, F. & Casacuberta, J. M. Site-directed nucleases: a paradigm shift in predictable, knowledge-based plant breeding. Trends Biotechnol. 31, 375–383 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Importation, Interstate Movement, and Environmental Release of Certain Genetically Engineered Organisms (US Department of Agriculture Animal and Health Inspection Service, 2017); https://go.nature.com/2VBr64V
• Whelan, A. I. & Lema, M. A. Regulatory framework for gene editing and other new breeding techniques in Argentina. GM Crops Food 6, 253–265 (2015).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Lema, M. A. Regulatory aspects of gene editing in Argentina. Transgenic Res. 28, 147–150 (2019).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Normile, D. Gene-edited foods are safe, Japanese panel concludes. Science (19 March 2019); https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax3903
• Thygesen, P. Clarifying the regulation of genome editing in Australia: situation for genetically modified organisms. Transgenic Res. 28, 151–159 (2019).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Callaway, E. CRISPR plants now subject to tough GM laws in European Union. Nature 560, 16 (2018).
  Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Huang, S., Weigel, D., Beachy, R. N. & Li, J. A proposed regulatory framework for genome-edited crops. Nat. Genet. 48, 109–111 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar