An investigation into the use of bitewing radiography in children in Greater Glasgow (original) (raw)

Verifiable CPD paper

British Dental Journal volume 196, pages 563–568 (2004)Cite this article

Key Points

Abstract

Aim In recent years there have been a number of reviews and guidelines published with respect to the diagnosis and management of caries in children. Bitewing radiography remains the recommended method of choice for caries diagnosis in most circumstances. The aims of the study were to investigate the usage of bitewing radiography by general dental practitioners (GDPs) in Greater Glasgow, for the diagnosis of caries in children and to assess the usefulness of the technique as perceived by these dental practitioners.

Design A questionnaire for self completion was sent to all GDPs with an NHS list number in the Greater Glasgow area.

Results An 80% response rate was obtained with 303 GDPs responding. Less than half the dentists (44%) indicated that they always carried out caries risk assessments for all children, but 71% reported doing this for 6 and 7-year-old children. Approximately 60% of dentists stated they had read the recent radiation and caries management guidelines. Only 72% stated that they used radiography as a caries diagnostic tool in children, with 12 GDPs (4%) indicating they would never consider using bitewing radiography in children. Only 17% would consider taking bitewing radiographs in children under 6 years, and the majority of dentists (61%) reported that they would first consider taking radiographs in the 6–11-year-old age group. However, only a low proportion of children in this age band had dental x-rays taken. Bitewing radiography was considered to be more important for 12-year-olds than for 6-year-olds. Recommended methods for decreasing radiation exposure such as rectangular collimation and film holders were not being used universally, with 41% and 58% respectively using these devices.

Conclusions A significant proportion of dentists in Greater Glasgow are not complying with recent guidelines and recommendations and it would appear that the value of bitewing radiography as a diagnostic tool in children is not being fully exploited.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Faculty of General Dental Practitioners (UK) Working Party. Selection criteria for dental radiography. Faculty of General Dental Practitioners (UK) The Royal College of Surgeons of England, 1998.
  2. Nunn J, Crawford P, Page J, Winter G . British Society of Paediatric Dentistry: A policy document on the dental needs of children. Int J Paediat Dent 1997; 7: 203– 207.
    Google Scholar
  3. Scottish Intercollegiate Guideline Network 47. Preventing caries in children at high risk. Edinburgh, 2000.
  4. Kidd EAM, Pitts NB . A reappraisal of the value of the bitewing radiograph in the diagnosis of posterior approximal caries. Br Dent J 1990; 169: 195– 200.
    Article Google Scholar
  5. Creanor SL, Russell JI, Strang DM, Stephen KW, Burchell CK . The prevalence of clinically undetected occlusal dentine caries in Scottish adolescents. Br Dent J 1990; 169: 126– 129.
    Article Google Scholar
  6. Council on Dental Materials, Instruments and Equipment. Recommendations in radiographic practices: an update, 1988. J Am Dent Assoc 1989; 118: 115– 117.
  7. The Ionising Radiations Regulations 1999. SI 1999 No 3232. London: The Stationery Office.
  8. The Ionising Radiation (Medical Exposure) Regulations 2000. SI 2000 No 1059. London: The Stationery Office.
  9. National Radiological Protection Board. Guidance notes for dental practitioners on the safe use of x-ray equipment. Department of Health, 2001.
  10. Pitts NB, Fyffe HE . Scottish dentists' use of and opinions regarding bitewing radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1991; 20: 214– 218.
    Article Google Scholar
  11. Memorandum to NHS: 1998 PCA(D)9. Edinburgh: Scottish Office, 1998.
  12. Scottish Dental Practice Division. Amendment 81 to Statement of Dental Remuneration. November 2001.
  13. Brown JE . Advances in dental imaging. Prim Dent Care 2001; 8: 59– 62.
    Article Google Scholar
  14. Berkhout WER, Sanderink GCH, Van der Stelt PF . A comparison of digital and film radiography in Dutch dental practices assessed by questionnaire. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2002; 31: 93– 99.
    Article Google Scholar
  15. Berkhout WER, Sanderink GCH, Van der Stelt PF . Does digital radiography increase the number of intraoral radiographs? A questionnaire study of Dutch dental practices. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2003; 32: 124– 127.
    Article Google Scholar
  16. Horner K, Hirschmann PN . Dose reduction in dental radiography. J Dent 1990; 18: 171– 184.
    Article Google Scholar
  17. Pitts NB, Hamood SS, Longbottom C, Rimmer PA . The use of bitewing positioning devices in children's dentistry. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1991; 20: 121– 126.
    Article Google Scholar
  18. Curzon MEJ, Pollard MA . Do we still care about children's teeth? Br Dent J 1997; 182: 242– 244.
    Article Google Scholar
  19. Rushton VE, Horner K, Worthington HV . A two-centre study to determine dentists' agreement with current guidelines on the frequency of bitewing radiography. Commun Dent Oral Epidemiol 1996; 24: 175– 181.
    Article Google Scholar
  20. Scottish Health Boards' Dental Epidemiological Programme. The dental health of 5 year olds in Greater Glasgow 2001/2002. University of Dundee, 2002.
  21. Milsom KM, Tickle M, Blinkhorn AS . Dental pain and dental treatment of young children attending the general dental service. Br Dent J 2002; 192: 280– 284.
    Article Google Scholar
  22. Levine RS, Pitts NB, Nugent ZJ . The fate of 1,587 unrestored carious deciduous teeth: a retrospective general dental practice based study from northern England. Br Dent J 2002; 193: 99– 103.
    Article Google Scholar
  23. Rushton VE, Horner K, Worthington HV . Factors influencing the frequency of bitewing radiography in general dental practice. Commun Dent Oral Epidemiol 1996; 24: 272– 276.
    Article Google Scholar
  24. Dental practice inspection checklist. Greater Glasgow Primary Care Trust, 2001.
  25. Scottish Dental Practice Division. Statement of Dental Remuneration. April 2002.
  26. Pitts NB, Kidd EAM . Some of the factors to be considered in the prescription and timing of bitewing radiography in the diagnosis and management of dental caries. J Dent 1992; 20: 74– 84.
    Article Google Scholar
  27. McComb D, Tam LE . Diagnosis of occlusal caries: Part I. Conventional methods. J Can Dent Assoc 2001; 67: 454– 457.
    PubMed Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the general dental practitioners who participated in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. GDP, Clinical Governance Adviser Greater Glasgow Primary Care NHS Trust and Lead Dental Audit Facilitator Argyll and Clyde NHS Board,
    G K Taylor
  2. Senior Lecturer and Honorary Consultant in Dental Public Health, University of Glasgow Dental School, 378 Sauchiehall Street, Glasgow, G2 3JZ
    L M D Macpherson

Authors

  1. G K Taylor
  2. L M D Macpherson

Corresponding author

Correspondence toL M D Macpherson.

Additional information

Refereed paper

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Taylor, G., Macpherson, L. An investigation into the use of bitewing radiography in children in Greater Glasgow.Br Dent J 196, 563–568 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4811228

Download citation

This article is cited by