Gastrointestinal tolerance of erythritol and xylitol ingested in a liquid (original) (raw)

• Original Article
• Published: 20 September 2006

European Journal of Clinical Nutrition volume 61, pages 349–354 (2007)Cite this article

• 11k Accesses
• 381 Altmetric
• Metrics details

Abstract

Objectives:

To determine and compare the gastrointestinal (GI) responses of young adults following consumption of 45 g sucrose, 20, 35 and 50 g xylitol or erythritol given as a single oral, bolus dose in a liquid.

Design:

The study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Subjects:

Seventy healthy adult volunteers aged 18–24 years were recruited from the student population of the University of Salford. Sixty-four subjects completed the study.

Interventions:

Subjects consumed at home without supervision and in random order, either 45 g sucrose or 20, 35 and 50 g erythritol or xylitol in water on individual test days, while maintaining their normal diet. Test days were separated by 7-day washout periods. Subjects reported the prevalence and magnitude of flatulence, borborygmi, bloating, colic, bowel movements and the passage of faeces of an abnormally watery consistency.

Results:

Compared with 45 g sucrose, consumption of a single oral, bolus dose of 50 g xylitol in water significantly increased the number of subjects reporting nausea (P<0.01), bloating (P<0.05), borborygmi (P<0.005), colic (P<0.05), watery faeces (P<0.05) and total bowel movement frequency (P<0.01). Also 35 g of xylitol increased significantly bowel movement frequency to pass watery faeces (P<0.05). In contrast, 50 g erythritol only significantly increased the number of subjects reporting nausea (P<0.01) and borborygmi (P<0.05). Lower doses of 20 and 35 g erythritol did not provoke a significant increase in GI symptoms. At all levels of intake, xylitol produced significantly more watery faeces than erythritol: resp. 50 g xylitol vs 35 g erythritol (P<0.001), 50 g xylitol vs 20 g erythritol (P<0.001) and 35 g xylitol vs 20 g erythritol (P<0.05).

Conclusions:

When consumed in water, 35 and 50 g xylitol was associated with significant intestinal symptom scores and watery faeces, compared to the sucrose control, whereas at all levels studied erythritol scored significantly less symptoms. Consumption of 20 and 35 g erythritol by healthy volunteers, in a liquid, is tolerated well, without any symptoms. At the highest level of erythritol intake (50 g), only a significant increase in borborygmi and nausea was observed, whereas xylitol intake at this level induced a significant increase in watery faeces.

Sponsorship:

Cerestar R&D Center, Vilvoorde, Belgium.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 12 print issues and online access

$259.00 per year

only $21.58 per issue

Buy this article

• Purchase on SpringerLink
• Instant access to full article PDF

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

• Log in
• Learn about institutional subscriptions
• Read our FAQs
• Contact customer support

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

• Arrigoni E, Brouns F, Amadò R (2005). Human gut microbiota does not ferment erythritol. Br J Nutr 94, 643–646.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Asano T, Levitt MD, Goeth FC (1973). Xylitol absorption in healthy men. Diabetes 22, 279–281.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Beaugerie L, Flourié B, Pellier P, Achour L, Franchisseur C, Rambaud JC (1991). Tolerance clinique, absorption intestinale et valeur energetique de quatre polyols pris a jeun. Gastroentérol Clin Biol 15, 929–932.
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Bornet FRJ, Blayo A, Dauchy F, Slama G (1996a). Plasma and urine kinetics of erythritol after oral ingestion by healthy humans. Regulat Toxicol Pharmacol 24, S280–S285.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Bornet FRJ, Blayo A, Dauchy F, Slama G (1996b). Gastrointestinal response and plasma urine determinations in human subjects given erythritol. Regulat Toxicol Pharmacol 24, S296–S302.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Bornet FRJ, Dauchy F, Chevalier A, Slama G (1992). Etude du devenir metabolique, après ingestion chez l’homme sain, d’un nouvel edulcorant de charge basse calorie: l’ erythritol. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 16, A169.
  Google Scholar
• Culbert SJ, Wang YM, Fritsche HA, Carr D, Lantin E, van Eys J (1986). Oral xylitol in American adults. Nutr Res 6, 913–922.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Cummings JH, Lee A, Storey D (2001). Workshop: physiology and tolerance of LDCs. Br J Nutr 85, S59–S60.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• De Cock P (1999). Erythritol: a novel noncaloric sweetener ingredient. World Rev Nutr Diet 85, 110–116.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• De Cock P, Bechert CL (2002). Erythritol. Functionality in noncaloric functional beverages. Pure Appl Chem 74, 1281–1289.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Dubach UC, Feiner E, Forgo I (1969). Orale verträglichkeit von xylit bei stoffwechselgesunden versuchspersonen. Schweiz Med Wochenschr 99, 190.
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Dwivedi BK (1978). Food products for special dietary needs. In: Dwivedi BK (ed). Low Calorie and Special Dietary Foods. CRC Press: West Palm Beach, FL, pp 1–22.
  Google Scholar
• Goosens J, Röper H (1994). Erythritol: a new sweetener. Food Sci Technol Today 8, 144–149.
  Google Scholar
• Hiele M, Ghoos Y, Rutgeerts P, Vantrappen G (1993). Metabolism of erythritol in humans: comparison with glucose and lactitol. Br J Nutr 69, 169–176.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Ishikawa M, Miyashita M, Kawashima Y, Nakamura T, Saitou N, Modderman J (1996). Effects of oral administration of erythritol on patients with diabetes. Regulat Toxicol Pharmacol 24, S303–S308.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Kanwanabe J, Hirasawa M, Takeuchi T, Oda T, Ikeda T (1992). Noncariogenicity of erythritol as a substrate. Caries Res 26, 358–362.
  Article Google Scholar
• Lanthier PL, Morgan MY (1985). Lactitol in the treatment of chronic hepatic encephalopathy: an open comparison with lactulose. Gut 26, 415–420.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Lederle FA, Busch DL, Mattox KM, West MJ, Aske DM (1990). Cost-effective treatment of constipation in the elderly: a randomized double-blind comparison of sorbitol and lactulose. Am J Med 89, 597–601.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Lee A, Storey DM (1999). Comparative gastrointestinal tolerance of sucrose, lactitol, or D-tagatose in chocolate. Regulat Toxicol Pharmacol 29, S78–S82.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Lee A, Storey DM, Zumbe A (1994). Breath hydrogen after ingestion of the bulk sweeteners sorbitol, isomalt and sucrose in chocolate. Br J Nutr 71, 731–737.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Livesey G (1992). Energy values of dietary fibre and sugar alcohols for man. Nutr Res Rev 5, 61–84.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Livesey G (2001). Tolerance of low-digestible carbohydrates: a general view. B J Nutr 85, S7–S16.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Maguire A, Rugg-Gunn J, Wright G (2000). Adaptation of dental plaque to metabolise maltitol compared with other sweeteners. J Dent 28, 51–59.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Marteau P, Flourie B (2001). Tolerance to low-digestible carbohydrates: symptomatology and methods. Br J Nutr 85, S17–S21.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• McNemar Q (1947). Note on the sampling error of the difference between correlated proportions or percentages. Psychometrica 12, 153–157.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Munro IC, Bernt WO, Borzelleca JF, Flamm G, Lynch BS, Kennepohl E et al. (1998). Erythritol: an interpretive summary of biochemical, metabolic, toxicological and clinical data. Food Chem Toxicol 36, 1139–1174.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Noda K, Nakayama K, Oku T (1994). Serum glucose and insulin levels and erythritol balance after oral-administration of erythritol in healthy-subjects. Eur J Clin Nutr 48, 286–292.
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Oku T, Okazaki M (1996). Laxative threshold of sugar alcohol erythritol in human subjects. Nutr Res 16, 577–589.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Paul AA, Southgate DAT (1978). McCance and Widdowson's The Composition of Foods, 4th edn. HM stationery Office: London.
  Google Scholar
• Pepper T, Ollinger M (1988). Xylitol in sugar-free confections. Food Technol 42, 98–105.
  Google Scholar
• Schiweck H, Ziesenitz SC (1996). Physiological properties of polyols in comparison with easily metabolisable saccharides. In: Grenby TH (ed). Advances in Sweeteners. Blackie Academic and Professional: Glasgow. pp 56–83.
  Chapter Google Scholar
• Storey DM, Lee A, Zumbe A (2002). The comparative gastrointestinal response of young children to the ingestion of 25 g sweets containing sucrose or isomalt. Br J Nutr 87, 291–297.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Tetzloff W, Dauchy F, Medimagh S, Carr D, Bar A (1996). Tolerance to subchronic, high dose ingestion of erythritol in human volunteers. Regulat Toxicol Pharmacol 24, S286–S295.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Zumbe A, Brinkworth R (1992). Comparative studies of gastrointestinal tolerance and acceptability of milk chocolate containing either sucrose, isomalt or sorbitol in healthy consumers and type II diabetics. Z Ernahrungswiss 31, 40–48.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Zumbe A, Lee A, Storey D (2001). Polyols in confectionery: the route to sugar-free, reduced sugar and reduced calorie confectionery. Br J Nutr 85, S31–S45.
  Article CAS Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge Dr P Scarf (Director, Centre for Operational Research and Applied Statistics at the University of Salford) for initial advice on statistical methodology.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

1. Biomedical Science Research Institute, School of Environment and Life Sciences, The University of Salford, Salford, Greater Manchester, UK
   D Storey & A Lee
2. Nutrihealth Consulting & Clinical research, F-92599 Rueil-Malmaison, F, Vilvoorde, Belgium
   F Bornet
3. TDC food, Cerestar Vilvoorde Research and Development Centre, Vilvoorde, Belgium
   F Brouns

Authors

1. D Storey
   You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
2. A Lee
   You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
3. F Bornet
   You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
4. F Brouns
   You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence toF Brouns.

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Storey, D., Lee, A., Bornet, F. et al. Gastrointestinal tolerance of erythritol and xylitol ingested in a liquid.Eur J Clin Nutr 61, 349–354 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602532

Download citation

• Received: 22 May 2006
• Accepted: 05 July 2006
• Published: 20 September 2006
• Issue Date: 01 March 2007
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602532

Keywords