Glaucoma phenotype in a large Swiss pedigree with the myocilin Gly367Arg mutation (original) (raw)

Introduction

Primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) is a major cause of visual impairment and blindness worldwide with a prevalence of approximately 2% in individuals over 40 years of age.1, 2, 3 Most glaucoma cases seem to follow complex inheritance and are likely caused by multiple interacting genes, of which some may display incomplete penetrance or variable expressivity.4 Monogenic genotypes exhibiting classic Mendelian inheritance are relatively rare and may be associated with POAG, juvenile open-angle glaucoma (JOAG), congenital glaucoma, and the anterior segment dysgenesis syndromes. Linkage studies of such pedigrees have led to the identification of several genes harbouring various disease-causing mutations, the most prominent members being myocilin (MYOC/TIGR OMIM=*601652), cytochrome P450 1B1 (CYP1B1, OMIM=*601771), optineurin (OPTN OMIM=*602432), and the recently linked WD repeat-containing gene (WDR36, OMIM=*609669), coding for a protein which is involved in T-cell activation.5

Mutations in the MYOC gene are responsible for approximately 3% of POAG with a prevalence ranging from 2.8 to 4.3% in different population groups.6, 7 MYOC is localized on chromosome 1q21–31, which was mapped 1993 by linkage analysis in families with JOAG.8 Stone et al9 identified the gene in 1997 as the TIGR gene (trabecular meshwork-induced glucocorticoid response protein). Some of these mutations have been found to descend from a single common ancestor, for example, GLN368STOP,7, 8, 9, 10 others have arisen independently in multiple individuals. Regarding the phenotype, some MYOC mutations cause an early onset, severe glaucoma, others account for a less typical, late-onset disease,11 and some are associated with a quite variable phenotype (eg, Lys423Glu).12, 13

In this study, we present a four-generation pedigree with autosomal-dominant JOAG living in the area of Bern, Switzerland. The primary aims were to identify the mutation and all mutation carriers, and to characterize disease phenotype and age-related penetrance. A secondary aim was to define an adequate plan to manage the mutation carriers and to counsel the other family members.

Patients and methods

Patients

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. An attempt was made to contact all living family members and their relatives by marriage and invite them to participate. If available, clinical data were completed with the records of private ophthalmologists. This study was approved by the ethical committee of the Kanton Bern (KEK, No. 238/03), and informed consent regarding both the clinical and the molecular analysis was obtained from all participants.

Clinical work up

This study was conducted between March and November 2004. All participants underwent the following examination protocol: best-corrected visual acuity, goldmann applanation tonometry, gonioscopy, standard automated perimetry (Octopus perimeter), colour optic disc photography, optic nerve head analysis with Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy (HRT II), retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) analysis with Scanning Laser Polarimetry (GDx VCC), and ultrasound pachymetry. A person was classified as having glaucoma if at least two of the following criteria were met: untreated IOP >21 mm Hg, glaucomatous optic disc damage and/or RNFL loss, and glaucomatous changes in the visual field (VF). A patient was designated a glaucoma suspect in this study when having normal IOP but glaucomatous looking optic disc and normal or borderline VF.

Mutational screening analysis

Mutation analysis was performed using a single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis approach.14 The first 25 blood samples were screened for the entire coding sequences of MYOC (1q23–25). After the unequivocal identification of the mutation, the remainder were analysed for exon 3 only.

Calculation of penetrance

The age-related penetrance of the mutation was calculated as the ratio of the number of mutation carriers with the disease to the total number of mutation carriers at age of 30 and 40 years, respectively.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics was performed using GraphPad Prism, Version 4.03 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). All data are expressed as median±SD. Clinical parameters were compared between the groups using the unpaired _t_-test.

Results

The pedigree consisted of 82 living members over four generations (Figure 1). The family is of caucasian origin and all members remained in Switzerland. The first known affected ancestor (1873–1949) was reported to be blind and had 11 children, six of whom had glaucoma. All but one member of this first generation were already deceased. Sixty-six family members (29 female, 37 male) gave blood for molecular analysis; of whom 52 (21 female, 31 male) participated also in the clinical investigation.

Figure 1

figure 1

Pedigree.

Full size image

Molecular analysis (genotype)

A glycin–arginin exchange at the first position of codon 367 in exon 3 (Gly367Arg=G367R) of the MYOC gene was found in 13 family members (eight males, five females); mean age 48.9±24.5 years (range, 15–93 years). One 50-year-old family member (ID 90), showed a base change at position 398 (→ K398R). This sequence variant is known to represent a benign SNP.15 Accordingly, the ocular phenotype in this subject was completely normal.

Clinical examination (phenotype)

Mutation carriers

Among the 13 mutation carriers, eight had known open-angle glaucoma (ID 1, 2, 47, 50, 51, 71, 97, and 101) with two of them (ID 51 and 101) only diagnosed in 2003. One member was previously known to be a glaucoma suspect (ID 55). Of the three other members who had their first glaucoma screening during this study, one had already a moderately advanced glaucoma (ID 100 and age 40), one was a strong glaucoma suspect (ID 67 and age 19), and one was not affected yet (ID 68 and age 15). A 16-year-old mutation carrier (ID 135) was not available for the clinical examination. The age-related penetrance (age at diagnosis) of the Gly367Arg mutation was 50% at 30 years (5/10) and 78% at 40 years (7/9). All mutation carriers had open, unremarkable anterior chamber angles. The mean age at diagnosis was 34.9±8.3 years (range, 28–51 years). Maximum IOP at diagnosis was 34.7±9.6 mm Hg (24–50 mm Hg). Seven of the nine glaucoma-affected mutation carriers (12 eyes) had a history of filtration surgery, with a mean age at first surgery of 37.9±6.6 years (30–47 years) corresponding to a mean latency of 5.75±7.04 years (0.5–19 years) after diagnosis. Although some of the eyes needed several operations, IOP was, in general, well-controlled long term. The glaucoma relevant characteristics of all the mutation carriers are outlined in Table 1.

Table 1 Identified living Gly367Arg mutation carriers, _n_=13

Full size table

The story of the index patient's children (ID 50 and 51) is very illustrative with regard to the course of the Arg367Gly-associated disease. Being aware of the family glaucoma history, they both started regular ophthalmic check-ups early—the brother at 27, his sister at 17. At first examination, the brother was classified as glaucoma suspect (IOP 20/21 mm Hg and C/D 0.6/0.7) and was closely monitored without treatment. At 30, his IOP rose to 24 mm Hg, treatment was initiated, 8 years later trabeculectomy was performed on both eyes, and at 47, during this study, he still showed full VA and normal VF (MD 0.4/1.4 dB2) (Figure 2). His sister had normal findings at 17 (IOP 15/17 mm Hg and C/D 0.2/0.3). Until the age of 36 years, her IOP increased slightly (19/21 mm Hg), but optic discs and VF remained unremarkable. Then, during a personal crisis, which ended in divorce, the patient stopped seeing her ophthalmologist for 6 years, until she noticed a VF constriction in her right eye. At examination at 42, an IOP of 30 mm Hg, C/D ratio of 0.9, and advanced VF damage (MD 18.2/14.2 dB2) were recorded in both eyes (Figure 3). These two cases allow us to deduce a disease onset at 30 and 36–40 years, respectively, with a rapid and aggressive course afterwards, if left untreated.

Figure 2

figure 2figure 2

(a–c) Patient 50, mutation-carrier, now 47 years old; diagnosed and treated at the age of 30 in an early stage of the disease. (a) Optic nerve head photographs showing cupping asymmetry but a well-preserved neuroretinal rim. (b) Standard automated perimetry (Octopus 101): normal VFs. (c) GDx VCC: nerve fibre thickness is in the normal range.

Full size image

Figure 3

figure 3figure 3

(a–c) Patient 51, mutation-carrier, now 43 years old; diagnosed at the age of 42 in an advanced stage of the disease. (a) Fundus photographs showing prominent glaucomatous disk cupping with a C/D ratio of 0.9. (b) Standard automated perimetry (Octopus 101): severe VF damage. (c) GDx VCC: diffuse atrophy of the RNFL.

Full size image

Wild-type family members

Of the 53 genetically screened wild-type family members, 40 (age range 13–82 years) could be examined clinically. None had elevated IOP or glaucomatous VF defects. All had open angles. One person had pseudoexfoliation syndrome without glaucoma. Three (age 35, 59, and 81 years) were suspects of normal-tension glaucoma, based on glaucomatous looking optic nerve heads, abnormal results in the GDx, and normal-to-borderline VF. One 48-year-old female had been treated for glaucoma with a beta-blocker for 19 years, because of her positive family history, initial IOP of 19 mm Hg, and suspicious optic disc. Based on our clinical and molecular findings, we recommended cessation of treatment.

Comparison between the groups

Comparing mutation-positive and the wild-type family members, IOP, MD, neuroretinal rim area, and RNFL parameters differed significantly, whereas central corneal thickness and disc area did not (Table 2).

Table 2 Clinical features of mutation carriers and wild-type family members

Full size table

Discussion

The Gly367Arg mutation in the MYOC gene has been described previously in four families of different origin (Table 3),16, 17, 18, 19, 20 and in one Indian glaucoma patient.21 There may be a single common ancestor (founder effect) in the Caucasian pedigrees, as found in the Canadian Gly367Arg family20 and other MYOC mutations.7, 22, 23 The family presented here is the largest with confirmed Gly367Arg mutation and allowed us to study the phenotype in more detail, especially with regard to disease onset and responsiveness to therapy. Furthermore, the large pedigree enabled us to exclude a pleiotropic effect of the mutated protein influencing disease-defining parameters, such as central corneal thickness and disc area, affecting IOP measurement or C/D ratio, respectively.

Table 3 Reported pedigrees with the Gly367Arg mutation

Full size table

The glaucoma phenotype can be summarized as follows: it is a late-onset, high-pressure JOAG with an aggressive course without treatment, poor responsiveness to topical medication, and, in general, good responsiveness to filtration surgery. Wild-type family members do not differ from the general population with respect to glaucoma prevalence. The age-related penetrance of 50% at 30 and nearly 80% at 40 is comparable to other MYOC mutations, for example, Cys433Arg and Asn480Lys.24, 25 So far, all reported MYOC mutations have incomplete penetrance at 30, with Thr377Met resulting in the highest26 and Gln368STOP in the lowest22, 27 age of onset.

In vitro experiments15 have supported a widely accepted pathogenic concept, that aggregation of mutant and wild-type MYOC (heteromultimerization) in the trabecular meshwork may lead to intra- and extracellular accumulation of protein complexes, which might affect outflow structures. However, MYOC has also been shown to be expressed in other tissues such as the retrolaminar region of the optic nerve, the perivascular connective tissue, and in the meningeal sheath surrounding the optic nerve.28 Therefore, retinal ganglion cells or optic nerve fibers could be directly affected by the mutant protein in terms of an IOP-independent neuropathy. In our family, however, we could not find any evidence of IOP-independent glaucomatous features. All our glaucoma patients had high IOP levels, and IOP control could reliably slow down disease progression.

Based on the study results, we suggest the following ophthalmic-care approach for descendants of this family: Molecular analysis at the age of 16–18; wild-type members can be released from further screening; mutation carriers should undergo a baseline ophthalmic examination with tonometry, automated perimetry, and optic disc photography. After the age of 20, mutation carriers should undergo yearly examinations and treatment should be strongly recommended if IOP exceeds 21 mm Hg. Filtration surgery should be considered an early option.

In conclusion, this study exemplifies that genetic screening should be offered to all glaucoma families to identify members at risk and to initiate treatment at an early stage of the disorder, before irreversible loss of vision has occurred. The story of the two siblings (ID 50 and 51) underlines the importance of psychosocial factors. Not irrelevant in a socio-economic aspect, wild-type family members can be released from frequent ophthalmologic examinations and be instructed that their risk of glaucoma does not differ from that of the general population.

References

  1. Leske MC . The epidemiology of open-angle glaucoma: a review. Am J Epidemiol 1983; 118: 166–191.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  2. Quigley HA . Number of people with glaucoma worldwide. Br J Ophthalmol 1996; 80: 389–393.
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  3. Resnikoff S, Pascolini D, Etya'ale D, Kocur I, Pararajasegaram R, Pokharel GP et al. Global data on visual impairment in the year 2002. Bull World Health Organ 2004; 82: 844–851.
    PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  4. Hewitt AW, Craig JE, Mackey DA . Complex genetics of complex traits: the case of primary open-angle glaucoma. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2006; 34: 472–484.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  5. Monemi S, Spaeth G, DaSilva A, Popinchalk S, Ilitchev E, Liebmann J et al. Identification of a novel adult-onset primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) gene on 5q22.1. Hum Mol Genet 2005; 14: 725–733.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  6. Alward WL, Fingert JH, Coote MA, Johnson AT, Lerner SF, Junqua D et al. Clinical features associated with mutations in the chromosome 1 open-angle glaucoma gene (GLC1A). N Engl J Med 1998; 338: 1022–1027.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  7. Fingert JH, Heon E, Liebmann JM, Yamamoto T, Craig JE, Rait J et al. Analysis of myocilin mutations in 1703 glaucoma patients from five different populations. Hum Mol Genet 1999; 8: 899–905.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  8. Sheffield VC, Stone EM, Alward WL, Drack AV, Johnson AT, Streb LM et al. Genetic linkage of familial open angle glaucoma to chromosome 1q21–q31. Nat Genet 1993; 4: 47–50.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  9. Stone EM, Fingert JH, Alward WL, Nguyen TD, Polansky JR, Sunden SL et al. Identification of a gene that causes primary open angle glaucoma. Science 1997; 275: 668–670.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  10. Baird PN, Richardson AJ, Mackey DA, Craig JE, Faucher M, Raymond V . A common disease haplotype for the Q368STOP mutation of the myocilin gene in Australian and Canadian glaucoma families. Am J Ophthalmol 2005; 140: 760–762.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  11. Mabuchi F, Yamagata Z, Kashiwagi K, Tang S, Iijima H, Tsukahara S . Analysis of myocilin gene mutations in Japanese patients with normal tension glaucoma and primary open-angle glaucoma. Clin Genet 2001; 59: 263–268.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  12. Morissette J, Cote G, Anctil JL, Plante M, Amyot M, Heon E et al. A common gene for juvenile and adult-onset primary open-angle glaucomas confined on chromosome 1q. Am J Hum Genet 1995; 56: 1431–1442.
    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  13. Morissette J, Clepet C, Moisan S, Dubois S, Winstall E, Vermeeren D et al. Homozygotes carrying an autosomal dominant TIGR mutation do not manifest glaucoma. Nat Genet 1998; 19: 319–321.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  14. Liechti-Gallati S, Schneider V, Neeser D, Kraemer R . Two buffer PAGE system-based SSCP/HD analysis: a general protocol for rapid and sensitive mutation screening in cystic fibrosis and any other human genetic disease. Eur J Hum Genet 1999; 7: 590–598.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  15. Jacobson N, Andrews M, Shepard AR, Nishimura D, Searby C, Fingert JH et al. Non-secretion of mutant proteins of the glaucoma gene myocilin in cultured trabecular meshwork cells and in aqueous humor. Hum Mol Genet 2001; 10: 117–125.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  16. Suzuki Y, Shirato S, Taniguchi F, Ohara K, Nishimaki K, Ohta S . Mutations in the TIGR gene in familial primary open-angle glaucoma in Japan. Am J Hum Genet 1997; 61: 1202–1204.
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  17. Taniguchi F, Suzuki Y, Shirato S, Araie M . The Gly367Arg mutation in the myocilin gene causes adult-onset primary open-angle glaucoma. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2000; 44: 445–448.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  18. Michels-Rautenstrauss KG, Mardin CY, Budde WM, Liehr T, Polansky J, Nguyen T et al. Juvenile open angle glaucoma: fine mapping of the TIGR gene to 1q24.3–q25.2 and mutation analysis. Hum Genet 1998; 102: 103–106.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  19. Mansergh FC, Kenna PF, Ayuso C, Kiang AS, Humphries P, Farrar GJ . Novel mutations in the TIGR gene in early and late onset open angle glaucoma. Hum Mutat 1998; 11: 244–251.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  20. Faucher M, Anctil JL, Rodrigue MA, Duchesne A, Bergeron D, Blondeau P et al. Founder TIGR/myocilin mutations for glaucoma in the Quebec population. Hum Mol Genet 2002; 11: 2077–2090.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  21. Kanagavalli J, Krishnadas SR, Pandaranayaka E, Krishnaswamy S, Sundaresan P . Evaluation and understanding of myocilin mutations in Indian primary open angle glaucoma patients. Mol Vis 2003; 9: 606–614.
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  22. Angius A, De Gioia E, Loi A, Fossarello M, Sole G, Orzalesi N et al. A novel mutation in the GLC1A gene causes juvenile open-angle glaucoma in 4 families from the Italian region of Puglia. Arch Ophthalmol 1998; 116: 793–797.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  23. Adam MF, Belmouden A, Binisti P, Brezin AP, Valtot F, Bechetoille A et al. Recurrent mutations in a single exon encoding the evolutionarily conserved olfactomedin-homology domain of TIGR in familial open-angle glaucoma. Hum Mol Genet 1997; 6: 2091–2097.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  24. Brezin AP, Adam MF, Belmouden A, Lureau MA, Chaventre A, Copin B et al. Founder effect in GLC1A-linked familial open-angle glaucoma in Northern France. Am J Med Genet 1998; 76: 438–445.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  25. Lam DS, Leung YF, Chua JK, Baum L, Fan DS, Choy KW et al. Truncations in the TIGR gene in individuals with and without primary open-angle glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000; 41: 1386–1391.
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  26. Mackey DA, Healey DL, Fingert JH, Coote MA, Wong TL, Wilkinson CH et al. Glaucoma phenotype in pedigrees with the myocilin Thr377Met mutation. Arch Ophthalmol 2003; 121: 1172–1180.
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  27. Craig JE, Baird PN, Healey DL, McNaught AI, McCartney PJ, Rait JL et al. Evidence for genetic heterogeneity within eight glaucoma families, with the GLC1A Gln368STOP mutation being an important phenotypic modifier. Ophthalmology 2001; 108: 1607–1620.
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  28. Swiderski RE, Ross JL, Fingert JH, Clark AF, Alward WL, Stone EM et al. Localization of MYOC transcripts in human eye and optic nerve by in situ hybridization. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000; 41: 3420–3428.
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all the participants in this study for their commitment.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ophthalmology, University of Bern, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
    M E Iliev, S Bodmer, K Katsoulis, S Wolf, P Trittibach & G M Sarra
  2. Department of Pediatrics, Division of Human Genetics, University of Bern, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
    S Gallati
  3. Department of Chemistry and Applied Bioscience, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
    R Lanz
  4. Department of Ophthalmology, Cantonal Hospital, Winterthur, Switzerland
    J Sturmer

Authors

  1. M E Iliev
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  2. S Bodmer
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  3. S Gallati
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  4. R Lanz
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  5. J Sturmer
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  6. K Katsoulis
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  7. S Wolf
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  8. P Trittibach
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  9. G M Sarra
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence toG M Sarra.

Additional information

Proprietary interest: none Research funding: none

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Iliev, M., Bodmer, S., Gallati, S. et al. Glaucoma phenotype in a large Swiss pedigree with the myocilin Gly367Arg mutation.Eye 22, 880–888 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.eye.6702745

Download citation

Keywords